
I had to cancel my £21k wedding but I don't know what to do with the dress
Inside, the dress hangs, ghostly and still, suspended in time, the opposite of Miss Havisham's. The beads, intricately sewn onto the delicate fabric, catch my eye as I reach inside to touch the gown I chose back in December 2018, freshly engaged and drunk on the prospect of the white wedding we'd planned for summer 2020.
The bag falls away, landing in a soft heap on the floor, and the dress, perfectly preserved, is revealed in all its glittering glory, for the first time in half a decade.
While most wedding dresses, five years on from their big days, divulge telltale signs of a party well partied – a rip, a stain, a train trampled with mud – mine has none of that. It appears to be as it always was: untouched, unseen, unworn.
The perfect dress for my dream wedding
Stuart and I met in 2016 at a housewarming party and, a year and half later, I moved from London to live with him in his house in Cambridge. We got engaged later that year.
Life – or, more accurately, a global pandemic – got in the way of our wedding. I last tried on my dress – a £1,300 gown bought from a small bridal shop in Cambridge the day after we got engaged (I was overexcited) – in February 2020.
I had planned to collect it from the dress shop that May to take it to a seamstress for alterations: it needed taking up, delicate work that the shop itself couldn't do. That never happened.
Instead, in March 2020, we were forced to postpone the wedding – a £21,000 DIY affair with a marquee in a field, a barbecue, and a band – until the following summer.
Then, nearly a year later, we cancelled it altogether when life really did get in the way and I fell pregnant with our first child: nothing sharpens the mind or the available budget quite like an impending baby.
But, while my life moved on – we bought a house together in a village just outside Cambridge; had a baby, Fabian, in November 2021; and then a second, Inigo, in May 2024 – my dress didn't.
It stayed secreted away in its bag like an unkissed bride behind a veil at the dress shop – scene of its giddy purchase – for two years and then in a wardrobe at my sister's house for a further three after the boutique owner begged me to collect it.
I felt unable to have it – this pretty, precious thing – in my house, a home now full of dirty nappies and smears of crusted Weetabix. The two chapters of my life – the wedding that wasn't and the motherhood that is now viscerally real – felt so profoundly at odds that it was hard to compute they both belonged to me.
Sometimes, deep in the trenches of mothering, I longed to be a bride again: carefree, romantic, naive. And then my son would slip his tiny, sticky hand into mine and I'd pity the girl who thought her wedding dress had to be perfect.
The woman I am, five years on
Inevitably, the half-decade in storage has imbued the dress with a weighty significance: it's a shimmering embodiment of the person I used to be; an almost mystical artefact from a life I no longer lead.
The person who bought this dress still lived in her partner's house; had left journalism behind – she thought forever – to pursue a teaching career; could go out dancing on a whim (and tolerate the hangover that followed); and had never, ever changed a nappy.
While I have largely ignored the dress for five years, the memory of it – almost ethereal – has burrowed its way into my subconscious mind, its beauty jarring with the chaos of my life five years on.
I don't know what made me want to look at it again; when curiosity finally trumped the fear I might burst into tears upon seeing it, the physical release of emotions that have been in storage for as long as the dress. Perhaps it was the birth of my second baby a year ago, a further stretching of the now taut line between my former and current selves. Perhaps it was the growing sense of guilt about the dress taking up space in my sister's wardrobe, a maid of honour duty she performed gladly but didn't sign up for. Perhaps it was simply because wedding season was coming down the aisle.
We choose a Monday, when the children are in childcare, and my sister treats the moment with the reverence it deserves, hanging the dress, cloaked in its covering, on the back of her wardrobe.
She speaks in hushed tones, like a doctor breaking bad news. I'm grateful she's taking it seriously, this slightly frivolous reopening of the past. Taking the dress out of its bag, I note, with surprise, the emotional paralysis I feel upon seeing it: not sad, not happy, just nothingness.
The dress feels both familiar and foreign, like an ex-partner I once loved but haven't seen for years. It is, objectively, beautiful; its intricate beading, the cut of its bodice, the buttons that snake sensuously down its back. As I trace a finger down these buttons, the numbness begins to dissipate and I observe the tangle of emotions – joy, anger, excitement, grief – now woven into the gown. It's both special and not; both my wedding dress and not.
My first dress – and my second
Because we did have a wedding, in the end: a simple ceremony 16 months after the birth of our first son with close friends only and a party at a pub. It cost us just £850 all in. And I chose another dress to wear for that day, deeming my original too bridal for the occasion.
My first dress was – still is, of course – traditional: the colour of champagne with a demure neckline, delicate embellishments and a train that puddled prettily on the floor. It was also a tiny size six.
My second dress, meanwhile, was crimson, low-cut and aggressively sequinned with a slit from floor to upper-thigh. It – a size 12, incidentally – was vibrant and bold and, I think, spoke of the life lived in the years since choosing the first gown.
If my first dress was virginal, my second screamed the opposite: it was the colour of life, of longing and of a mother newly blooded. It was also rented: with one dress already in storage, I chose an outfit I could send back. It cost me £85.
Back in the room, my sister – doing a job she's waited more than half a decade to do – helps me into the dress. Only half the buttons do up. As I gaze at my reflection in the mirror, I realise the dress is ill-fitting in more ways than one. It doesn't fit my body any more but nor, I see, does it fit me. The me that prefers secondhand to brand new, favours an oversized silhouette to a figure-hugging one, and is too time-poor, exhausted and overstimulated to faff around with that many tiny buttons. I have changed, forever altered by the last five years, while the dress, which never made it to its alterations, has not.
I take the dress off, place it back on its hanger. As I do so, I notice a seam at one shoulder has come apart, a small rip in the tulle that frays at the edges. Was it always like this? Is this one of the alterations I was hoping the seamstress might fix? I reach into the dark recesses of my brain but I can't remember: that information has been wiped and replaced with the correct Calpol dosage for a one-year-old. Maybe, I ponder, it's a new tear, evidence that, in fact, my dress was not frozen in time but aged with me inside the closet. Either way, I rather like this flaw. Marriage, after all, isn't about one perfect day in one perfect dress. Like delicate fabric, it can snag when put under pressure and be repaired with love and attention. And mending, of course, is how you make things stronger.
What to do: sell, donate or keep?
I take the dress home: it's time. What comes next, I don't know. Beautiful as it is, the frock rubs up awkwardly against my new life – my now life – a reality made flesh when, in order to get it home, I have to drape it across two children's car seats, both of them infested with toy cars, dried orange peel and breadstick crumbs. I have three options: sell, donate or keep. A scan of resale sites tells me wedding dresses, like cars, depreciate in value as soon as they're taken off the bridal forecourt: even ones that are only test driven, it seems, don't sell for anywhere near retail value. Meanwhile, the allure of donating the dress is appealing, in line as it is with the sustainable values that have sprouted in me over the last five years; a way of offsetting, perhaps, the fact I didn't choose a preloved dress in the first place.
Keeping it would be a ludicrous choice, of course. The dress is awkward to store and of little – nay, no – use to me: I have sons and, if I did have a daughter, I'd never expect her to wear a dress even I didn't don. But, when I finally get it home, I spot an inscription written in cursive on the garment bag: ' When I fall in love it will be forever... ' A cloying epigraph designed to woo brides-to-be, sure. But I did fall in love, in a bridal boutique days before Christmas 2018, and, well, till death do us part.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
33 minutes ago
- BBC News
Memories of Cirencester's Old Station sought for history festival
A history festival is calling for memories of a former railway station, which will be temporarily reopened during the History Festival takes place from 25 October to 1 November, offering talks and activities on local and global will be able to tour the town's Grade-II listed Old Station, which was designed by Isambard Kingdom Brunel and closed in free event on both Saturdays of the festival will celebrate the "golden age of rail," said festival producer Jess Yarrow. Ms Yarrow said most people know the Old Station as "a slightly sad, empty-looking building" but she hopes some will remember using it, on their commute, or even watching it welcome evacuees and soldiers during World War Two."We know that there are lots of people out there who can remember the station in its heyday," said Ms Yarrow. "We'd love to hear stories, we'd love to see photographs, we'd love to have any memorabilia that people have got tucked away because we'll be dressing the station as if it were a station with prams and benches and cases, so anything like that people have, we'd love to know about it." Architect Jonathan Rixon is refurbishing the station to use as his offices, and he will lead the will also be an audio listening project sharing stories of the station, and Cirencester College students have worked with Mr Rixon to create a virtual reality experience of the station during the Victoria Rixon said: "The building holds many hidden treasures, including a boardroom where Brunel sought a meeting space outside London. "It's important to protect our industrial heritage. I'm passionate about preserving this piece of history and sharing it with the town."Cirencester History Festival is returning for its second year, with This Country star Charlie Cooper as its ambassador.


Daily Mail
40 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Isla Fisher is absolutely glowing as she steps out at Wimbledon with handsome date on her arm after finalising her divorce from Sacha Baron Cohen
Isla Fisher is enjoying a new lease on life after finalising her divorce from ex-husband Sacha Baron Cohen. The Australian actress stepped out at Wimbledon in London on Sunday, where she had a mystery male friend on her arm at the Champagne Lanson event at Agapanthus Suite. The 49-year-old was glowing as she posed beside the man, who warmly rested his arm around her waist as the pair beamed for photos against the media wall. Isla opted for a cream ensemble which included a blouse worn under a blazer and a matching pleated midi-skirt. From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to the DailyMail's new showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop. The star added a pair of white leather high heels in a patent finish and sported a pair of designer sunglasses, while carrying a wicker purse. Her handsome guest coordinated with Isla, wearing a white shirt with a cream suit and a pair of trainers. He completed the look with a floral tie and like the actress, had on a pair of sunglasses. The duo stuck close together at the event, and were also seem arriving together with Isla walking a little in front of her pal. Isla was also the picture of happiness last week as she stepped out looking glamorous in a busty floral dress for day one of the Wimbledon Championships. The Australian actress couldn't wipe the smile off her face, looking radiant in a Monique Lhuillier lemon-printed corseted dress worth $4,703. Isla and her ex-husband Sacha, 53, announced they had finalised their £120 million (approx. AU$250 million) divorce on June 14. In a message posted simultaneously on both their Instagram sites, the pair said: 'Our divorce has now been finalised. The star added a pair of white leather high heels in a patent finish and sported a pair of designer sunglasses, while carrying a wicker purse 'We are proud of all we've achieved together and, continuing our great respect for each other, we remain friends and committed to co-parenting our wonderful children. 'We ask for the media to continue to respect our children's privacy.' Sacha and Isla first met in 2001 and married in 2010. They were believed to have one of the strongest marriages in showbusiness before quietly separating in 2023. They then publicly announced their break-up in April 2024, and it now appears they have amicably resolved any differences. A source said: 'It's all sorted. Now Sacha and Isla both just want to get on with the rest of their lives and focus on their family's well-being.' The couple - who have three children together - first met at a party in Sydney, Australia, in 2001. Speaking of their first encounter, Sacha recalled quickly noticing Isla was 'hilarious'. He remembered: 'We were at a very pretentious party, and me and her bonded over taking the mick out of the other people at the party.' 'I knew instantly. I don't know if she did,' he added. The pair announced their separation last year with a picture of themselves wearing tennis whites. They confirmed in an accompanying message: 'After a long tennis match lasting over 20 years, we are finally putting our racquets down.' Speaking earlier this year of their break-up, Isla said: 'It's the most difficult thing that I've been through and I've learnt so much about myself in the process. 'I never imagined my family being separated but we are committed and loving parents.'


Daily Mail
40 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Nicole Kidman and Anna Wintour get on famously in the Royal Box at Wimbledon and the actress even gets a smile out of former Vogue editor
Nicole Kidman and Anna Wintour were seen getting on famously on the final day of the Wimbledon 2025 Championships on Sunday. Australian actress Nicole, 58, and former Vogue editor-in-chief Anna, 75, were seated beside one another at the Royal Box in Centre Court. The pair brought the glamour as the beaming sun shone down on them at the All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club in London. Anna wore a white figure-hugging dress that featured long sleeves, oozing summer with petals stitched on to the frock. Meanwhile, Nicole opted for a cream double-breasted blazer layered over a smart collared shirt. As the games got underway, including the women's doubles final match, Nicole and Anna were engrossed in conversation. Snaps showed the duo even laughing together, as Anna cracked a smile to her Wimbledon pal. On Anna's left-hand side was actress Keira Knightley and her husband James Righton. They were also seen engaging in conversation with Anna and Nicole in the star-studded box. Meanwhile, Keira, 40, was pictured in fits of laughter as she spoke to Irish actors Paul Mescal and Andrew Scott. The duo were in good spirits as they brought the fun and laughter for the final day of this year's Wimbledon. It's unclear what was so funny but the trio appeared to be getting on like a house on fire. Elsewhere, the Princess of Wales beamed as she arrived at the All England Club for the men's Wimbledon final this afternoon - and she was accompanied by her tennis-mad children. Prince George, 11, and Princess Charlotte, 10, were dressed in their Sunday best as they greeted officials in SW19 ahead of the men's final between Carlos Alcaraz and Janick Sinner. Mother-of-three Kate Middleton has been patron of the All England Lawn and Tennis Club, also known as the AELTC (which organises the day-to-day running of the prestigious tournament), since 2016. While she has brought George and Charlotte to the sporting event, Prince Louis, who is known for his cheeky antics during spectator events, was absent. Louis, who turned seven in April, last delighted royal fans with his funny facial expressions and adorable beaming smile, showing off his new adult front teeth, at Trooping the Colour in June. The Princess looked radiant in a blue dress as she arrived at the All England Club for the second consecutive day this afternoon - after presenting the trophy at the women's final on Saturday.