When to expect Social Security benefits for July
For Social Security and Supplement Security Income recipients, July will be a normal month in terms of the payment schedule.
However, come August, some recipients might have to deal with an odd payment schedule, similar to that of May's.
If you need to know when you'll receive your Social Security benefits check in July, you can check the Social Security Administration's retirement benefit schedule online for this year and 2026. Your payments are based on your birth date, which has the following breakdown for July:
If you receive Supplemental Security Income (SSI), you will receive your regular payment on July 1. However, similar to May, in August, SSI recipients will receive two payments: one on August 1 and one on August 29. This means that there will technically be no SSI payments in September.
The remainder of 2025's SSI schedule is:
If you think you are missing a Social Security benefit or SSI payment, you should first contact your bank to make sure they can't see any delayed payments. If they can't, then you should contact the agency at 1-800-772-1213 or go to your local Social Security office.
NewsNation offers a Social Security calculator on our website to help you estimate what your monthly benefits should look like.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ahold Delhaize USA says cyberattack exposed personal data of 2M people
This story was originally published on Grocery Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Grocery Dive newsletter. The cyberattack that struck Ahold Delhaize USA in late 2024 potentially exposed sensitive information belonging to more than 2 million people, the grocery company disclosed last week. Data that might have been compromised includes birthdays, Social Security numbers, bank account details, health records and workers' compensation information, Ahold Delhaize USA said in an update posted on Thursday. The breach affected people including current and former employees as well as their dependents and beneficiaries, according to the company. Ahold Delhaize USA said in an FAQ about the breach that it does not believe that the attack impacted customer payment or pharmacy systems. According to a form Ahold Delhaize USA filed with the attorney general of Maine, where the company operates supermarkets under its Hannaford banner, the cyberattack impacted about 2.2 million people, including nearly 100,000 who reside in that state. Ahold Delhaize USA notified people whose information may have been exposed about the breach in a letter dated last Thursday, noting that intruders gained access to one of its databases on Nov. 5 and 6. The company did not propose a remedy to people who might have been affected by the attack beyond offering two years of credit monitoring and identity protection services. 'We take this issue extremely seriously and will continue to take actions to further protect our systems,' Ahold Delhaize USA said in the letter. Ahold Delhaize USA's parent company revealed on Nov. 8 that its systems had been compromised and said in April that the attackers had gained access to sensitive information connected with people in the Netherlands, where it is based. The attack also forced the grocer to temporarily take some of its systems offline, temporarily halting Hannaford's e-commerce services and causing outages on websites operated by the company's other U.S. banners, which include The Giant Company, Giant Food, Food Lion and Stop & Shop. A threat group known as Inc Ransom claimed responsibility for the cyberattack. Ahold Delhaize USA's disclosure that the attack resulted in the exposure of people's personal information follows a cyberattack earlier this month that forced grocer distributor United Natural Foods, Inc. to take down some of its online systems and disrupted its ability to make deliveries to retailers. UNFI said last week that it had contained the attack and restarted its electronic ordering and invoicing operations. Recommended Reading Ahold Delhaize USA names new CIO Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
CNBC
3 hours ago
- CNBC
'Big beautiful' Senate bill touts tax help for seniors on Social Security. How it would work
Some Americans ages 65 and over may be poised to see additional tax relief if Republicans' "big beautiful" bill becomes law. Now that the Senate and House have both passed their versions of the tax and spending bill, it is up to both chambers to decide how large that new temporary deduction — called a senior "bonus" in the legislative text — will be. Per the Senate bill, the deduction would amount to up to $6,000 per eligible taxpayer. Meanwhile, the House's One Big Beautiful Bill Act calls for $4,000 per eligible individual. The new additional temporary deduction would be in effect from 2025 through 2028, according to the proposals. More from Personal Finance:What the Senate Republican tax and spending bill means for your money'Big beautiful bill' mostly benefits the rich, while low earners would suffer, report finds Social Security cost-of-living adjustment may be 2.5% in 2026, estimates find Eligible taxpayers would get the full deduction if their modified adjusted gross income is up to $75,000 if single or $150,000 if married and filing taxes jointly. For incomes above those thresholds, the deduction would phase out at a 6% rate based on the Senate bill and a 4% rate based on the House bill. It would be available to taxpayers regardless of whether they claim the standard deduction or itemize their returns. Based on both bills, the deduction would fully phase out for single filers with $175,000 in income and joint filers with $250,000, according to the Tax Foundation. Notably, while the White House says the legislative package "slashes taxes on Social Security," it does not end the taxation of Social Security benefits. President Donald Trump touted plans to end the taxation of Social Security benefits on the campaign trail. However, Republicans are pursuing their tax bill through reconciliation, and a Senate rule prohibits changes to Social Security in that process. The two proposed changes — the senior "bonus" versus eliminating taxes on Social Security benefits — would have different effects based on beneficiaries' incomes. Social Security benefits are taxed based on a unique formula known as combined income — the sum of adjusted gross income, nontaxable interest income and half of Social Security benefits. Up to 50% of Social Security benefits are taxed for single filers with $25,000 to $34,000 in combined income, or joint filers with between $32,000 and $44,000. Up to 85% of benefits are taxed for individuals and couples above those respective thresholds. Eliminating taxes on Social Security benefits would benefit people with higher incomes. Individuals with combined income below $25,000 — or couples with combined income below $32,000 — do not pay taxes on their benefit income and therefore would not benefit. In contrast, the senior bonus in the "big beautiful" legislation targets taxpayers with modified adjusted gross incomes below $75,000 if they are single and $150,000 if married. "It's better because it helps the people who need the help more," Howard Gleckman, senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, recently told Lower-middle to middle-income taxpayers would benefit the most from the additional senior deduction, according to the Tax Foundation. Taxes on Social Security benefits started with legislation enacted in 1983. The purpose of the Social Security reforms passed then was to shore up a funding shortfall the program faced. Today, Social Security similarly faces imminent funding woes. The trust fund used to help pay benefits to retired workers and their families — the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance, OASI, trust fund — can pay scheduled benefits until 2033, according to the latest projections from Social Security's trustees. At that point, just 77% of those benefits will be payable, unless Congress enacts a fix sooner. The senior "bonus" in the Senate bill may reduce the number of seniors who pay taxes on their benefits, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. For those who still owe taxes on benefits, it could help reduce the marginal rate at which those benefits are taxed, according to the non-partisan organization. The expanded senior deduction, along with other changes in the "big beautiful" bill including the extension and expansion of the 2017 tax cuts, would cost approximately $30 billion per year, the CRFB estimates. That would accelerate the depletion date for Social Security's OASI trust fund to late 2032 from early 2033, according to the estimate. The insolvency date for Medicare's Hospital Insurance trust fund, which is used to fund Part A, would also be accelerated from 2036 to 2030, according to the CRFB.
CNBC
4 hours ago
- CNBC
Senate Republicans' spending bill boosts child tax credit. Who stands to benefit
Senate Republicans on Tuesday passed President Donald Trump's spending package, which includes a bigger child tax credit — but some families won't see a benefit, policy experts say. Under current law, the maximum child tax credit is $2,000, which will revert to $1,000 after 2025 without changes from Congress. Wider income eligibility limits will also sunset without an extension. If enacted, the Senate bill would permanently raise the top credit to $2,200 starting in 2025. The provision would also index this figure for inflation after 2025. By contrast, the House-approved One Big Beautiful Bill Act would increase the highest child tax credit to $2,500 from 2025 through 2028. After that, the credit's max value would fall to $2,000 and be indexed for inflation. More from Personal Finance:'Revenge saving' picks up as consumers brace for economic uncertaintyStudent loan borrowers face 'default cliff' as late payments climbHow the GOP budget bill targets immigrant finances With differences between the Senate and House provisions, it's unclear how the measure could change. The House still must approve the Senate's legislation before it arrives at Trump's desk for signature. For 2025, the child tax credit is worth up to $2,000 per qualifying child under age 17 with a valid Social Security number. After the first $2,500 of earnings, the child tax credit value is 15% of adjusted gross income, or AGI, until the tax break reaches that peak of $2,000 per child. The tax break starts to phase out once AGI exceeds $400,000 for married couples filing together or $200,000 for all other taxpayers. However, "if you have very low income, you can't access the full $2,000 credit," Elaine Maag, senior fellow in the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, previously told CNBC. The reason: The child tax credit is only partially "refundable," which provides a benefit after your balance reaches $0. This feature helps the lowest earners who typically don't owe taxes. The refundable portion, known as the additional child tax credit, is worth up to $1,700 for 2025. If the Senate bill is enacted, the bigger child tax credit would primarily go to middle- and upper-income families, according to Kris Cox, director of federal tax policy with the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities' federal fiscal policy division. Currently, 17 million children do not receive the full $2,000 credit because their families don't earn enough and owe enough taxes, the organization finds. "Both bills leave behind children in families with lower incomes," Cox told CNBC. In 2024, the House passed a bipartisan bill to address this issue by boosting the refundable portion of the credit, but the legislation later failed in the Senate. The proposed higher child tax credit comes as the U.S. fertility rate hovers near historic lows, which has troubled lawmakers, including the Trump research suggests financial incentives, like a bigger child tax credit, could boost U.S. fertility. But other experts say it won't resolve the issue long-term.
