logo
The Embarrassing Reason Xi Talks about ‘Great Changes Unseen in a Century'

The Embarrassing Reason Xi Talks about ‘Great Changes Unseen in a Century'

The Diplomat2 days ago
Haven't you heard? The world is undergoing great changes unseen in a century. And Chinese leader Xi Jinping is doing his level best to make sure everyone knows.
In front of the cameras – and microphones – of the Western media in 2023, he told his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin: 'Now is the moment of change unseen in a century. We are jointly driving it forward.' Of course, Putin could only agree. But agree with what, exactly?
The formulation clearly means something important. Xi enshrined it at the 19th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party in October 2017, and has used it many times in other key speeches and documents. The phrase is even used to describe Xi's approach since taking charge at the 18th National Party Congress in 2012.
But what does it mean?
Maybe Wikipedia can help. The dedicated page on the topic relies on a 2024 European Council on Foreign Relations e-book. The authors trace the origin to Yuan Peng and his 2009 article 'The Financial Crisis and U.S. Economic Hegemony' in the Chinese academic journal Contemporary International Relations.
Wikipedia and the ECFR authors also cite the dedicated entry in the Center for Strategic Translation's glossary, which tells us the phrase was:
… first used by Chinese academics following the Great Recession. The phrase is associated with the dangers and opportunities posed by American decline, and has been adopted by THE CENTER as a programmatic assessment of the trajectory of the current world order. The trends which can be feasibly linked to this trajectory are diverse.
The source for this is Rush Doshi's 2021 book, 'The Long Game.'
Doshi writes, in turn:
The concept first emerged from conversations about Western decline after the Global Financial Crisis. One of its first usages was in a 2009 essay titled 'The Financial Crisis and American Economic Hegemony' written by Yuan Peng… Yuan Peng observed that the United States 'for the first time in the history of its hegemony' was suffering from a series of grave challenges, that these were producing 'great changes unseen in a century'
Yuan's article has an original Chinese version and a translation. Doshi's quotes are his own translation.
As it turns out, both versions mistranslate Yuan. The original Chinese refers to: 'The 'eastward shift of global power' and the rise of emerging powers have brought about changes not seen in centuries.' (emphasis mine)
Earlier in the article, Yuan referred to Henry Kissinger's 'theory' of 'great changes unseen in 400 years' and how Kissinger saw the ''eastward shift of power'' as 'an inevitable trend.'
So is Xi's catchy phrase just one more thing Kissinger gave China, along with decades of what the Chinese call 'strategic opportunity'? Maybe. But why 'centuries' not 'a century'? Why did Yuan write about '400 years' not '100 years'?
In trying to glean the origins of the phrase, we shouldn't be too influenced by the specific Chinese character formulation. Yes, Yuan's quote is exactly the same as Beijing's official phrase with the addition of a shu to specify several centuries and the subtraction of the da that indicates the changes are great. But both follow the famous line (at least in Chinese histro-literary culture) from late Qing Dynasty statesman Li Hongzhang, about 'great changes unseen in thousands of years.' And others have used the same formulation before it became an official slogan, such as a literature professor in 1993.
To establish descent, we want both the focus on great hegemonic changes and a single century. Funnily enough, this brings us back to Kissinger. The first line of the first chapter of his 1994 book 'Diplomacy' stated: 'Almost as if according to some natural law, in every century there seems to emerge a country with the power, the will, and the intellectual and moral impetus to shape the entire international system in accordance with its own values.'
One Chinese paying attention was Liu Mingfu, author of the bestselling book 'China Dream' published in January 2010.
With that quote from Kissinger and references to some other Western scholars as support, Liu asserted something much like an actual natural law. According to Liu, there is a hundred-year cycle of new 'champion countries' rising up to transform the world as they transform themselves, driving historical progress forward for the benefit of humankind. China's dream is its destiny, Liu proclaimed, and it will replace the U.S. as the champion country. Unlike hegemonic Uncle Sam, the People's Republic of China will be a leader, drawing on the Chinese distinction between a bullying hegemon and those who lead the 'Kingly Way.' But military strength is key – the only way to righteously push a selfish U.S. into doing what's best for itself and humanity as whole, starting with stepping aside as Taiwan gets 'unified.'
Strong circumstantial evidence points to Liu as the source of the phrase about 'great changes unseen in a century.' Xi's signature 'China Dream' is the very title of Liu's book. As Xi ascended to power he ordered the creation of a website to educate cadres, which recommended Liu's book in 2013. In his first 2012 meeting with the new military leadership, he pointed to 'great changes unseen before.' Most if not all of the ideas in the book have prominent analogues in Xi's policies. The 2019 'China and the World in the New Era' white paper contained thinly disguised Liu Mingfu. Explainers for internal consumption on 'great changes unseen in a century' and the 'Great Rejuvenation of the Chinese Nation' recapitulate the themes of Liu's book. And in a dog-that-didn't-bark way, they do so without mentioning Liu.
Liu, no fool, understands that it's embarrassing that Xi Jinping Thought is derivative of a popular nonfiction book. Interviewed by the foreign media when Xi unveiled the 'China Dream' slogan, Liu was triumphant (As the BBC put it: 'Colonel Liu Mingfu seems to think that he has more capital than most to tell Xi Jinping his dreams') but careful not to stick his neck out too far:
The world today is undergoing a major change unseen in a century, but this also means we have the opportunity to make major changes. China's national goal is nothing less than to realize the 'Chinese Dream', the great rejuvenation of the Chinese people. Its core strategy is the 'Belt and Road' initiative to connect the world and bring happiness through cooperation. The ultimate goal will be to build a community with a shared future for mankind.
And he needs to be careful. The better connected and more powerful Liu Yazhou, who provided the foreword to Liu Mingfu's book, is reportedly in prison on a commuted death sentence. No wonder Liu wanted a photo showing him smiling as he holds up books on Xi Jinping Thought next to a plate with Xi on it.
But still, he must be satisfied with how his decision to read Kissinger's book turned out. While Xi is driving great changes unseen in a century with Putin and others, Liu knows that he was the first mover in driving great changes in Xi's head.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

American bombs in Iran also reverberate in China and North Korea
American bombs in Iran also reverberate in China and North Korea

The Mainichi

timean hour ago

  • The Mainichi

American bombs in Iran also reverberate in China and North Korea

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) -- President Donald Trump campaigned on keeping the United States out of foreign wars, but it didn't take long to convince him to come to the direct aid of Israel, hitting Iranian nuclear targets with bunker-buster bombs dropped by B-2 stealth bombers and Tomahawk cruise missiles fired from a submarine. Beyond the attack's immediate impact on helping bring the 12-day war to a close, experts say Trump's decision to use force against another country also will certainly be reverberating in the Asia-Pacific, Washington's priority theater. "Trump's strikes on Iran show that he's not afraid to use military force -- this would send a clear message to North Korea, and even to China and Russia, about Trump's style," said Duyeon Kim, a senior analyst at the Center for a New American Security based in Seoul, South Korea. "Before the strikes, Pyongyang and Beijing might have assumed that Trump is risk averse, particularly based on his behavior his first presidency despite some tough talk," Kim said. China, North Korea and Russia all condemn US strike Ten days into the war between Israel and Iran, Trump made the risky decision to step in, hitting three nuclear sites with American firepower on June 22 in a bid to destroy the country's nuclear program at a time while negotiations between Washington and Tehran were still ongoing. The attacks prompted a pro forma Iranian retaliatory strike the following day on a U.S. base in nearby Qatar, which caused no casualties, and both Iran and Israel then agreed to a ceasefire on June 24. North Korea, China and Russia all were quick to condemn the American attack, with Russian President Vladimir Putin calling it "unprovoked aggression," China's Foreign Ministry saying it violated international law and "exacerbated tensions in the Middle East," and North Korea's Foreign Ministry maintaining it "trampled down the territorial integrity and security interests of a sovereign state." While the strikes were a clear tactical success, the jury is still out on whether they will have a more broad strategic benefit to Washington's goals in the Middle East or convince Iran it needs to work harder than ever to develop a nuclear deterrent, possibly pulling the U.S. back into a longer-term conflict. US allies could see attack as positive sign for deterrence If the attack remains a one-off strike, U.S. allies in the Asia-Pacific region likely will see the decision to become involved as a positive sign from Trump's administration, said Euan Graham, a senior defense analyst with the Australian Strategic Policy Institute. "The U.S. strike on Iran will be regarded as net plus by Pacific allies if it is seen to reinforce red lines, restore deterrence and is of limited duration, so as not to pull the administration off-course from its stated priorities in the Indo-Pacific," he said. "China will take note that Trump is prepared to use force, at least opportunistically." In China, many who have seen Trump as having a "no-war mentality" will reassess that in the wake of the attacks, which were partially aimed at forcing Iran's hand in nuclear program negotiations, said Zhao Minghao, an international relations professor at China's Fudan University in Shanghai. "The way the U.S. used power with its air attacks against Iran is something China needs to pay attention to," he said. "How Trump used power to force negotiations has a significance for how China and the U.S. will interact in the future." But, he said, Washington should not think it can employ the same strategy with Beijing. "If a conflict breaks out between China and the U.S., it may be difficult for the U.S. to withdraw as soon as possible, let alone withdraw unscathed," he said. China and North Korea present different challenges Indeed, China and North Korea present very different challenges than Iran. First and foremost, both already have nuclear weapons, raising the stakes of possible retaliation considerably in the event of any attack. There also is no Asian equivalent of Israel, whose relentless attacks on Iranian missile defenses in the opening days of the war paved the way for the B-2 bombers to fly in and out without a shot being fired at them. Still, the possibility of the U.S. becoming involved in a conflict involving either China or North Korea is a very real one, and Beijing and Pyongyang will almost certainly try to assess what the notoriously unpredictable Trump would do. North Korea will likely be "quite alarmed" at what Israel, with a relatively small but high-quality force, has been able to achieve over Iran, said Joseph Dempsey, a defense expert with the International Institute for Strategic Studies. At the same time, it likely will be seen internally as justification for its own nuclear weapons program, "If Iran did have deployable nuclear weapons would this have occurred?" Dempsey said. "Probably not." The U.S. decision to attack while still in talks with Iran will also not go unnoticed, said Hong Min, a senior analyst at South Korea's Institute for National Unification. "North Korea may conclude that dialogue, if done carelessly, could backfire by giving the United States a pretext for possible aggression," he said. "Instead of provoking the Trump administration, North Korea is more likely to take an even more passive stance toward negotiations with Washington, instead focusing on strengthening its internal military buildup and pursuing closer ties with Russia, narrowing the prospects for future talks," he said. China and Taiwan will draw lessons China will look at the attacks through the visor of Taiwan, the self-governing democratic island off its coast that China claims as its own territory and President Xi Jinping has not ruled out taking by force. The U.S. supplies Taiwan with weapons and is one of its most important allies, though Washington's official policy on whether it would come to Taiwan's aid in the case of a conflict with China is known as "strategic ambiguity," meaning not committing to how it would respond. Militarily, the strike on Iran raises the question of whether the U.S. might show less restraint than has been expected by China in its response and hit targets on the Chinese mainland in the event of an invasion of Taiwan, said Drew Thompson, senior fellow with the Singapore-based think tank RSIS Rajaratnam School of International Studies. It will also certainly underscore for Beijing the "difficulty of predicting Trump's actions," he said. "The U.S. airstrike on Iran's nuclear facilities caught many by surprise," Thompson said. "I think it demonstrated a tolerance and acceptance of risk in the Trump administration that is perhaps surprising." It also gives rise to a concern that Taiwan's President Lai Ching-te, who in recent speeches has increased warnings about the threat from China, may be further emboldened in his rhetoric, said Lyle Goldstein, director of the Asia Program at the Washington-based foreign policy think tank Defense Priorities. Already, Lai's words have prompted China to accuse him of pursuing Taiwanese independence, which is a red line for Beijing. Goldstein said he worried Taiwan may try to take advantage of the American "use of force against Iran to increase its deterrent situation versus the mainland." "President Lai's series of recent speeches appear almost designed to set up a new cross-strait crisis, perhaps in the hopes of building more support in Washington and elsewhere around the Pacific," said Goldstein, who also is director of the China Initiative at Brown University's Watson Institute. "I think that is an exceedingly risky gambit, to put it mildly," he said.

Dalai Lama set to reveal succession plan as China watches
Dalai Lama set to reveal succession plan as China watches

Asahi Shimbun

timean hour ago

  • Asahi Shimbun

Dalai Lama set to reveal succession plan as China watches

DHARAMSHALA, India--The Dalai Lama will address a major three-day gathering of Buddhist religious figures this week ahead of his 90th birthday, as his followers wait for the Tibetan spiritual leader to share details about his succession in a move that could irk China. Beijing views the Dalai Lama, who fled Tibet in 1959 after a failed uprising against Chinese rule, as a separatist and says it will choose his successor. The Dalai Lama has said his successor will be born outside China and urged his followers to reject anyone chosen by Beijing. [Read More]

Indian Minister Backs Dalai Lama's Position on Successor, Contradicting China
Indian Minister Backs Dalai Lama's Position on Successor, Contradicting China

Yomiuri Shimbun

time5 hours ago

  • Yomiuri Shimbun

Indian Minister Backs Dalai Lama's Position on Successor, Contradicting China

DHARAMSHALA, India, July 4 (Reuters) – A senior Indian minister has said that only the Dalai Lama and the organization he has set up have the authority to identify his successor as the spiritual head of Tibetan Buddhism, in a rare comment contradicting rival China's long-held position. The Dalai Lama, who fled to India in 1959 after a failed uprising against Chinese rule, said on Wednesday that upon his death he would be reincarnated as the next spiritual leader and that only the Gaden Phodrang Trust would be able to identify his successor. He previously said the person would be born outside China. Beijing says it has the right to approve the Dalai Lama's successor as a legacy from imperial times. Kiren Rijiju, India's minister of parliamentary and minority affairs, made a rare statement on the matter on Thursday, ahead of visiting the Dalai Lama's base in the northern Indian town of Dharamshala for the religious leader's 90th birthday on Sunday. 'No one has the right to interfere or decide who the successor of His Holiness the Dalai Lama will be,' Indian media quoted Rijiju as telling reporters. 'Only he or his institution has the authority to make that decision. His followers believe that deeply. It's important for disciples across the world that he decides his succession.' Rijiju, a practicing Buddhist, will be joined by other Indian officials at the birthday celebrations. In response to the remarks, China's foreign ministry warned India on Friday against interfering in its domestic affairs at the expense of bilateral relations, urging it to be prudent in its words and actions. 'We hope the Indian side will fully understand the highly sensitive nature of Tibet-related issues, recognize the anti-China separatist nature of the 14th Dalai Lama,' spokesperson Mao Ning told a regular press conference. In a statement issued late on Friday afternoon, India's foreign ministry said the country does not take any position or speak on matters concerning beliefs and practices of faith and religion. 'Government has always upheld freedom of religion for all in India and will continue to do so,' foreign ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said in the statement. India is estimated to be home to tens of thousands of Tibetan Buddhists who are free to study and work there. Many Indians revere the Dalai Lama, and international relations experts say his presence in India gives New Delhi a measure of leverage with China. Relations between India and China nosedived after a deadly border clash in 2020 but are slowly improving now.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store