I've tried many clock apps on Android, but none have this one excellent Samsung Clock feature
While I have my favorite apps, including what I consider the best video editing app and best to-do list app, I never thought I'd be very particular about which clock app I used. For as long as I can remember, I used whatever clock came with my phone.
But over the past few years, I've become accustomed to Samsung Clock's features. Since it's only available on Samsung phones, I've tried to switch to another clock app that isn't bound to a particular OEM. Despite trying plenty, I haven't been able to find one that suits my needs in the same way.
Do you have a preferred clock app on Android?
0 votes
No, I use whatever my phone comes with.
NaN %
Yes, I have a preferred app that I install on every phone (let us know in the comments!).
NaN %
Samsung's Clock app has become an essential part of my routine
Megan Ellis / Android Authority
So what is it about Samsung's clock app that has me in a chokehold? It comes down to the customizability of its snooze feature. Because of my chronic fatigue, I often need to adjust when I wake up based on how I'm feeling that day. This means that I place a lot of importance on an adjustable, repeatable snooze feature.
I place a lot of importance on an adjustable, repeatable snooze feature.
Most apps require you to choose a preset snooze time, with many maxing out at 30 minutes. But Samsung's app lets me set the snooze timer up to 60 minutes. Furthermore, when the alarm sounds, I can adjust the snooze time with simple plus and minus icons — which comes in handy when I just need an extra 10 minutes to come to grips with being awake.
My first alarm essentially acts as a nudge to break me out of deep sleep. I then snooze it with the aim of waking up in an hour. On a day where I'm recovering from a migraine or a particularly draining few days, I may snooze my alarm again. But on days where I have an appointment or need to travel, I may only give myself an additional 15 minutes to rouse myself.
My dependence on this extremely customizable snooze has gotten to the point that even though I haven't used a Samsung phone as my daily driver since 2023, I always sleep with a Samsung device near me in bed.
The alternatives just don't measure up
Stephen Schenck / Android Authority
I realized my strong preference for Samsung's clock app when I switched from an S22 Ultra to an Oppo Reno 10 Pro+ in 2023. My S22 Ultra display was severely cracked from a fall onto concrete, so I was relieved to finally switch over to a new device. But I struggled to adjust to the different clock app that came with Oppo's phone. That's when I first tried to find an OEM-agnostic clock app to take Samsung's place, but Google's app maxed out at a 30-minute snooze.
As a result, my S22 Ultra retained its position on my bedside table even though I had moved on from using the device. I eventually got a S23 Ultra as a secondary device during a sale, mainly to use to take photos when I was traveling or needed to take photos for work. But besides being my go-to camera smartphone, it also became my primary alarm clock. Even as I moved onto another camera smartphone, the S23 Ultra retained its place as my alarm clock — the only time I let it rest from this job was when I had a S25 Ultra in for review.
Now, there isn't a shortage of clock apps available. I've spent hours trawling the Google Play Store for an app to replace Samsung's. In fact, I like that the Google Clock app would allow me to incorporate it into a Google Assistant Routine. But it lacks that sweet spot of snooze customizability.
I've spent hours trawling the Google Play Store for an app to replace Samsung's.
When I switched my daily driver to the Honor 400 Pro, I hoped that I could finally end my search for a new clock app. But again I was greeted my a limited snooze duration. I renewed my efforts to find a clock app that wouldn't keep me bound to a specific brand, but the search was not a success.
Most of the apps I tried limited their snooze to 30 minutes maximum and as much as I would love to be a person who only needs a 30-minute break to wake up, my reality is that I need longer. Don't get me started on the number of rise-and-grind clock apps that don't include a snooze feature at all. My problem isn't that I'm a heavy sleeper or lazy, but that I experience non-restorative, fitful sleep that makes it a literal pain to get out of bed before I'm ready.
I extended my search to include apps that I had initially dismissed due to their inclusion of ads. I was either greeted by that same 30-minute limit, or the apps requested permissions that I was not comfortable giving. For example, two of the freemium clock apps I tried wouldn't work unless I granted the permission to display over other apps, despite none of my other clock apps requiring this permission.
I found other clock apps that seemed promising at first, only to check their data collection policies and decide they weren't worth the privacy trade-off. After all, why would I be comfortable with a simple clock app sharing my personal info with third parties when it's a general rule for me to give these kinds of apps a skip unless absolutely necessary?
For now, I'm stuck using two phones in bed
Megan Ellis / Android Authority
After my most recent search for alternative clock apps yielded no viable results, I've accepted that my current setup of two phones in bed is set to continue. It's not the worst problem to have, but it is annoying when I'm traveling and have to take multiple devices with me just for one to act as an alarm.
I've considered switching to my S23 Ultra as my daily driver, but it doesn't support my current dual physical SIM setup. There are also benefits to using a physical SIM, while switching to an eSIM in my country comes with its own barriers that deter me from the change.
Some people may also suggest just pulling myself together and getting on board with 30-minute snooze limits, but I've developed my habit due to specific needs. There are many times I've forced myself up before I'm ready to get out of bed, and this has often triggered a migraine, prolonged an ongoing migraine attack, or made my chronic fatigue worse during the day. I don't see my sleep habits changing anytime soon even if I wanted them to.
I'm hoping that a few other alternative clock apps with more customization (that also respect my privacy) will emerge that will enable me to pack away my Samsung phone. I'd even pay for a reasonably priced clock app that offers the functionality I need. But in the meantime, my awkward setup will live on.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNET
40 minutes ago
- CNET
The iPhone 17 Pro 'Feature' I Want Most? More Colors Beyond Monochrome and Metal
While we can all agree that what's inside an iPhone is far more important than the outside, I still care a ton about how my smartphone looks. So with all the rumors swirling about the upcoming iPhone 17, one that caught my eye had nothing to do with specs or features. It simply said the iPhone 17 Pro could adopt color inspired by iOS 26's Liquid Glass redesign -- which, based on descriptions, may resemble some older Samsung phone hues. And I started dreaming about a world where Apple's best phones look as fun as their lower-tier siblings. For years, Apple has split its phones into two tiers: the "regular" iPhones and the Pro models. The former offer lower specs and prices with bolder colors, while the latter are pricier premium models with more subdued tones. The iPhone Pro and Pro Max typically come in black, white and a silver-gray -- along with one trendier color that changes each year. For being the best that Apple offers, their colorways leave a lot to be desired, in my opinion. But the iPhone 16 Pro comes in desert titanium, which is gold in all but name. The year before, the iPhone 15 Pro was available in a gray-blue (which I remember well, if not fondly, for not matching my vintage Bondi blue case). In 2022, the iPhone 14 Pro left white behind for gold and added a pastel purple alongside its black and silver hues -- and so on. Some people dropping $1,000-plus on a souped-up iPhone Pro want their device to look svelte, not superlative -- elite over effervescent, cultured instead of colorful. I'm not that person. When I saw the iPhone 5C, I didn't mind the cheaper-looking plastic case -- the vibrant colors popped. I don't think buying a premium phone should sentence you to a purgatory of dimmer hues. And yes, there are those of you out there who don't care what your phone looks like, since its colors will only briefly see the light of day before the handset is stuffed in its case to survive life's inevitable bounces and falls. That's completely valid, too. So hearing that there's a potential Liquid Glass color coming to the iPhone 17 Pro that we expect to launch (as we do every year) in September, I got tentatively excited. But there's a big caveat: The rumor, sourced to Weibo-based leaker Instant Digital, didn't include a photo or any imagery of this potential debut. Instead, the leaker suggested that (as translated by Google Translate) the iPhone 17 Pro color is expected to be white, but with a finish that shifts or changes subtly under different lighting conditions. The baseline iPhone 16's rainbow of colors. Apple/CNET Where are my prismatic phone colors? Apple introduced its Liquid Glass update during WWDC 2025 in June, unveiling a new design strategy for the iPhone 17 Pro line that emphasizes translucence and rounded icons to give iOS 26 a fresh UI facelift. App makers responded to the initial developer betas with disdain, criticizing the design's distracting and disorienting lack of visual separation -- icons in the Control Center overlay were hard to see. Thankfully, subsequent tweaks improved the redesign ahead of the recently launched iOS 26 public beta. But how Liquid Glass's design looks as an iPhone color is a bit harder to fathom. Instant Digital's claim that it'll be white but will shift with the light offers clues -- and it could end up looking like some beloved colors from smartphones of yore. For instance, the 2018 Samsung Galaxy S10 came in a rather fetching prism white color that shimmered when you rotated it in the light, giving off a pearlescence of subtle pinks, purples and blues. Watch how it compares to the standard cream-colored ceramic white hue in this video from Sakitech. Contrast that with the more wildly prismatic "aura glow" color in the Samsung Galaxy Note 10 from the same year, which reflected every color of the rainbow. This bombastic choice sure was eye-catching, but I'd guess it's too flamboyant for Apple. (And the beautiful glass back sure couldn't stand up to a fall.) True, Apple has dabbled in subtly shimmering colors -- the iPhone 13 and 13 Mini came in midnight, a black so deep it was almost blue, reflecting hints of hidden hues underneath. That same year's iPhones had another color, starlight, that was essentially the same effect in white. But looking more closely at iPhone Pro designs from past years, I doubt we'll see anything as vivacious as those Samsung hues -- not only because Apple has avoided vibrant colors, but also because in recent years it's used a frosted rear glass that blurs and mutes the color beneath. Just what we end up getting from a Liquid Glass color, if anything at all, is very uncertain given Apple's design priorities. But I'm hoping, just this once, the Pro phones get to show off a bit more of their stuff. And who knows -- maybe that'll be what finally sells us on the upcoming Liquid Glass redesign that's set to change the look and feel of iOS, like it or not.
Android Authority
40 minutes ago
- Android Authority
This is the Google Maps feature I really want to see
Andy Walker / Android Authority Thanks to my extremely poor sense of direction, Google Maps is an essential travel app for me — for both short trips to different parts of the city, as well as longer routes that I have no chance of memorizing. I've come to love the traffic estimates, alternate route options, and the ability to avoid tolls. But there's a feature that I think Google Maps sorely needs: warning users of dangerous routes with high crime, with alternative routes suggested. Do you trust Google Maps to navigate you through safe routes? 0 votes Yes NaN % No NaN % Google Maps has steered me wrong multiple times Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority While I depend on Google Maps for my navigation needs, the app has taken me through dangerous routes on multiple occasions. I live in a country with high crime rates (South Africa), where you have to be on your guard more often than not. But in its efforts to give me the shortest route available, the app will often recommend that I go through areas with a lot of crime. Google Maps has taken me through dangerous areas on multiple occasions, usually to avoid busier routes. This happens the most on longer routes that involve highways. But I've also had it happen on 15-minute trips that take me into neighboring areas. The most memorable instance was when Google Maps diverted me off a main highway to take a road through an informal settlement that is considered one of the most dangerous places in my province. After I moved to my current suburb in Cape Town, my first trip to the airport went through another dangerous area — with road signs warning drivers about crime hotspots along the route. I've adapted to this to some degree. I try to remember when to ignore Google Maps' suggestion to turn at certain intersections or off-ramps. I tailored my route to my parents' house to avoid a certain highway. But this doesn't help when I'm on a route I've never traveled before. It also relies on my pre-existing knowledge of which routes are dangerous, which doesn't help in areas I'm completely unfamiliar with. I'm not the only one that has experienced this issue Andy Walker / Android Authority Google Maps directing me through ill-advised routes is not a niche issue, which is why I think that it's time Google started adding crime advisories and allowing users to skip dangerous routes. This would be particularly useful for tourists using the app in a foreign country, since they're arguably more vulnerable. Google Maps came under scrutiny due to several high-profile incidents after navigating tourists to a crime hotspot in Cape Town. In fact, in 2024, a couple sued Google after the Maps app sent them through a notoriously dangerous area. The couple were attacked while travelling from the Cape Town airport to their Airbnb. There were also other attacks on tourists that eventually led to Google removing the suggested route from Maps. But blocking a route after multiple attacks only fixes the issue after the fact. By adding a feature that notes high crime areas, Google Maps could pre-emptively warn users that an area they're traveling to or through could be dangerous. This would help tourists, but also residents of cities and countries with high crime. How a crime hotspot feature could work in Google Maps Megan Ellis / Android Authority Google Maps can recommend you the most fuel-efficient route based on your car engine type. When you navigate to an area, you can also choose to avoid tolls. The app also lets users share reviews for certain locations. So I don't see why it couldn't incorporate ways for you to avoid routes with high crime. The changes Google Maps made to its route recommendations from Cape Town International Airport show that collaboration with local authorities is possible. But the move was also reflexive, removing a route that had been long-known for its danger. It also doesn't seem to include the other crime hotspots around the route, just the most publicized one. Google could use publicly available data, collaborations with authorities and companies, and user feedback to incorporate safety advisories. But there's a ton of publicly available data that Google could use to tailor its route recommendations. It could even collaborate with companies to highlight any areas of concern. It could also allow feedback from local users to report intersections and routes that pose a risk to travelers. You can currently submit road information such as whether a road is one-way, private, or closed in the app. So allowing users to note areas of concern is totally possible. Extending custom route support in Google Maps' mobile app could also help, along with recognizing your preferred route like Apple Maps. After all, if Google Maps can identify products nearby that are in stock, I'm sure it has the power to figure out a solution to avoiding well-known crime hotspots in the name of safety. Google Maps has plenty of great features, which is why I use it as my preferred navigation app. In fact, it saved me from getting lost in the Irish countryside last year when the rental car's built-in GPS couldn't locate where I was staying. But crime is a pervasive problem for many people, especially in many tourist hotspots around the world. It's about time that Google Maps adapted to this reality and made it a priority feature. Follow
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I measured the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs. Honor Magic V5 to see which is the world's thinnest foldable
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. When the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 launched, there were plenty of changes to admire in the company's vastly upgraded device and one of the best foldable phones. But it's arrival also changed something else — people's perception of a rival foldable that had been claiming to be the thinnest of the two. Earlier in July, the Honor Magic V5 launched, proclaiming that it was the world's thinnest foldable phone. The Galaxy Z Fold 7 then launched later in the month, officially measuring slightly thicker and thus allowing Honor to keep the title. But then, users like tech leaker Ice Universe got their hands on both phones and started measuring. And they found different numbers to the published ones, numbers that seemed to prove the Galaxy Z Fold 7 is actually the thinner phone. With Honor trying to reassert its claim, and Samsung happily accepting that it's accidentally made the world's thinnest foldable phone, it's hard to know what to believe. So in the interest of trying to settle the matter, I've spoken to both Honor and Samsung, and taken my own measurements with my own samples of the two phones in question. A measured response As a baseline, let's look at the official claims for the thickness of these two phones when folded. The unfolded measurements are not under dispute here, and are arguably less important anyway since you won't be carrying a foldable around while unfolded the vast majority of the time. Also note that these measurements revolve around specifically the Ivory White Magic V5. The other colors of the Magic V5 are thicker due to slightly different back panel designs. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Honor Magic V5 (White) Official thickness when folded 8.9mm 8.8mm Ice Universe's measurements 8.79mm 8.95mm Compare those to Ice Universe's measurements in the same table: the Magic V5 is 0.15mm thicker according to his calipers, while the Galaxy Z Fold 7 is 0.11mm thinner than claimed. Obviously, something is amiss here, and Honor was quick to respond with possible explanations. As part of its statement to me and other tech outlets, Honor noted that even mass-produced products like smartphones can have small manufacturing variances. But this isn't a unique problem to Honor, and could even work in its favor as well as against it. So let's instead focus on the two other reasons why the official numbers and Ice Universe's may not match. The first is that Honor's official measurements come from a Magic V5 device with no screen protector. The Magic V5, like all of Honor's phones, ships with a pre-applied plastic film on its outer screen. This courtesy puts Honor at a thickness disadvantage compared to the Galaxy Z Fold 7, which has no pre-applied protector. It's hard to see in IU's images if the Magic V5 has a screen protector on or not, but I made sure to take the film off of my device before measuring. The second issue is the precise way in which Honor took its measurement. In documentation I've seen, the recommended measurement method involves placing the calipers over the phone from the hinged side to cover the Honor logo, and with 'appropriate thumb pressure' on the bottom jaw. I don't know if there's some secret advantage gained by measuring at this point, but having a nice flat canvas for the calipers to grip is certainly helpful. What's more confusing is how the images Honor has published of its lab testing do not show this method being used. So with those facts in mind, I got measuring. I'll state up front that my calipers, while from the reputable brand iFixit, are perhaps not as accurate as more expensive models, such as the ones phone companies like Honor use for their official specs measurements. Nonetheless, from other measurements I've made with these calipers, I am confident that they are at least 99% accurate, and are at the very least capable of showing a size difference between our two foldables. In the thick of it I measured the two phones with the method given by Honor — it's only fair, after all. The Galaxy Z Fold 7 doesn't have a logo on the back to help judge its midpoint, but I made the best approximation I could, given its similar height and width to the Magic V5. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Honor Magic V5 TG's measurement of thickness when folded 8.88mm 9.3mm My numbers are 0.08mm off the official figures for Samsung, and 0.5mm off for the Honor, making the Galaxy Z Fold 7 the thinner phone. I don't know what "appropriate thumb pressure" means precisely in Honor's statement, but it's an important detail. Putting pressure on the calipers allows you to get a smaller measurement as the object you're measuring flexes slightly, which applies all the more with foldable phones as there are two halves of the phone, plus the hinge, that can be squeezed tighter. Honor's official images of its size test don't appear to show the calipers under strain, with them only being held by one hand from the bottom of the ruler section. But given that calipers can be locked into place with the small screw on top of the display, we can't know for certain if there was any squeezing or not pre-photo. Annoyingly, I don't have any method of measuring or double-checking how much force I placed on the calipers to get the following measurements. The best I can do is describe the amount of force I applied, which I would call a press firm enough to leave a clean fingerprint in a thin piece of putty, or push open a door with just one thumb. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Honor Magic V5 TG's measurement of thickness when folded (with pressure) 8.6mm 8.78mm Here, we finally hit Honor's promised 8.8mm figure, with a final last-minute measurement in fact going past the promised figure (though sadly off-camera). But any celebrations that Honor may now be planning will be cut short, as doing the same on the Samsung makes it sleeker yet again, a whole 0.3mm thinner than the official specs and 0.18mm thinner than the Magic V5. As we discussed before, these results could be due purely to the construction of the Magic V5 unit I had, but I suspect if it's happened to both my and Ice Universe's devices, it'll happen to many others. Before putting the phones away, I contacted Samsung, both to ask for its stance on the situation and for its official measuring standards for its devices, so we might compare the two foldables' size on its terms too. The company declined to comment. Splitting hairs Despite the apparently conclusive evidence that the Magic V5 is not actually the thinnest book-style folding phone around, Honor seems to be sticking to its guns, and its official measurements. But now that I've seen the proof for myself that this claim is either inaccurate or comes with big caveats, I don't know why Honor's trying to power through like this. A device's thinness is an impressive and easy-to-grasp number, so I get why companies of all kinds like to talk about it in their marketing. But we are talking about the difference of about 40 micrometers - literally a couple hairs' thickness. There is so much more that Honor could sell the Magic V5 to people with beyond thinness. For instance, the V5's higher-res 50MP main and ultrawide cameras, its 64MP 3x telephoto camera, its huge 5,580 mAh battery or the faster 66W wired and 50W wireless charging standards. And if we're talking about deal breakers, the fact Honor doesn't sell in countries like the U.S. is going to be much more of a problem than its possibly imprecise measurements. As the global launch of the Magic V5 approaches, and we get closer to being able to fully review the phone, my anticipation isn't diminished by seeing it's slightly larger than the equivalent Samsung. As long as Honor doesn't make any other uncertain claims about the Magic V5's capabilities, it still stands a chance of making one of the best foldable phones around, and in ways that a rival phone maker can't just replicate or better immediately after. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button. More from Tom's Guide I tested Call Screening on iOS 26 vs Android 16 — and there's a clear winner Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold — what we know so far I recently got hacked — here's 5 hidden Apple security features I wish I'd known about
