
Fascinating history of 178 wooden huts just outside Glasgow
The Carbeth huts have variously been the scene of family holidays and of experiments in lifestyle.
They provided emergency dwellings for those displaced by war, have fostered an outdoors culture of physical health, nurtured community, and, in their sometimes turbulent history, witnessed revolutionary organising and outbreaks of class warfare. This article can only introduce some of their earlier history.
Early Years
In the early 20th century, Allan Barns Graham was the owner of Carbeth Estate. He was a progressively minded laird, who led a modest life as a farmer and had artistic interests.
Much of his estate was wooded and largely unsuitable for agriculture. Before the First World War, it had permitted groups to camp there, including the Clarion Scouts, who combined cycling with socialism.
After the war, William Ferris, a military veteran, was, according to Lesley Riddoch in her book Huts: A Place Beyond – How To End Our Exile From Nature, a 'remarkable man who effectively started the Carbeth hutting site'. He had prior experience of the estate and wrote to Barns Graham requesting permission to construct a clubhouse for his camping club.
The landowner initially resisted the construction of huts, but eventually relented – perhaps influenced by the possibility of collecting rents.
Huts developed from tent platforms, which had been much used during the conflict in Europe. Ferris administered the site, and it grew rapidly. The huts, which were originally tightly regimented, catered to a demand for low-cost recreation and rural escape for urban and industrial workers, particularly from nearby Clydebank.
In 1922, an outside swimming pool was opened which had been constructed by damming a stream.
It became the scene of swimming galas, including in 1932, when Barns Graham presented awards to the winners. Ferris, meanwhile, was involved in a wide succession of outdoor associations and initiatives, supported by his lucrative activities as an antiquarian book dealer in Glasgow.
Outdoors Movement
The origins of the community have also, explains Riddoch, been ascribed to the outdoors movement and the economic depression of the 1920s and 30s. Certainly, these loom large in the popular memory of Carbeth.
Ian R Mitchell, writing in 2001, recorded how the site 'played a role in getting the working-class adventurer further out into the Highland hills'.
Many of the early Clydeside mountaineers were victims of the Depression, and there was overlap between them and the hutters.
The climbers met at Craigallion Loch, south of the huts, where a fire was reputedly never allowed to go out.'
Cultures of political resistance were fostered, and numbers volunteered for the International Brigades during the Spanish Civil War.
Perhaps more typical than these toughest of adventurers, however, are the people shown in a collection of photographs preserved by the Carbeth Hutters Company, the Carson Archive. These depict outdoor recreation at Carbeth in the 1920s and 30s, including camping, cycling, swimming and rambling.
One photograph shows a group of women, perhaps members of feminist groups associated with Red Clydeside, enjoying a rain-soaked rural ramble.
Family and War
Tom McKendrick springs from a family of long-established hutters. His family, who experienced pollution in Clydebank, first became involved with the site in the 1930s, when his grandmother gained a hut. Thanks to an expanding family, that number multiplied into five.
McKendrick's memories of growing up in the 1950s are filled with those of Carbeth, underlining its importance as a place of childhood. 'It was the natural thing,' he explained to me. 'You were born into the clan – it was very much your childhood.
'Families came to Carbeth in the summer, and you ran free. Animals, trees, making huts! So, when you came up here there would be 30, 40 weans around, and lifelong friendships were formed.'
More broadly, the link to Clydebank was reinforced in the aftermath of the Clydebank Blitz in 1941, when the local authority constructed 47 additional huts
which provided temporary accommodation for families displaced by the bombing.
McKendrick, an artist, believes the huts are connected to conflict by their history as a place of sanctuary from war.
THE 1960s ONWARDS
Carbeth's subsequent history features a decline in the popularity of hutting as working-class affluence and access to overseas travel increased in the 1960s.
There was a long and well-documented struggle between hutters and landowner over rents, living conditions and the future of the site.
The latter was eventually secured in 2009, followed by purchase of the land by the Hutters Community Company in 2013.
The story is well told by Riddoch in her book. 'Carbeth survived,' she wrote, 'because of the organisational abilities of its residents to effectively lobby the authorities, when elsewhere in Scotland, most other large hutting sites experienced mass evictions, demolition or conversion into caravan sites.'
(Image: YouTube)
Carbeth endures today as the legacy of the optimistic social experimentation of a century ago and encourages a more ecological approach to living, with self-sufficiency encouraged, including the building of wind turbines and use of solar panels to generate electricity.
The Carbeth community continues to provide working people with access to a precious resource in a country dominated by unequal land ownership – access to places of their own in the countryside.
Charlie Lynch thanks Tom McKendrick and the Carbeth Hutting Company, and Dr Lesley Riddoch for their help compiling this article. He recommends Riddoch's book, and her 2019 PhD thesis.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scotsman
15 hours ago
- Scotsman
Historic agreement ensures continuity of support for women across Scotland
Hundreds of women across Scotland will continue to receive critical financial and emotional support thanks to a landmark merger between two long-established benevolent funds. Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The Royal Society for the Support of Women of Scotland (the Society) and the E Mclaren Fund for Indigent Ladies (the Fund) have united in a move that secures the legacy of both institutions while expanding the scope of aid available to women in later life. The merger ensures that all beneficiaries of the Fund will continue to receive grants under their existing terms, while also gaining access to the enhanced services and broader support available through the Society, including higher levels of grants for some and access to a caseworker. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad As a result of the merger, combined assets as of July 2025 total just under £56 million, representing Scotland's largest sources of charitable financial support specifically for older women. The Royal Society for the Support of Women of Scotland HQ in Rutland Square pictured in 1912 Andrew Tweedy, Chief Executive of the Society, said: 'This merger represents the best of both worlds. We are preserving the values and intent of the Fund while broadening the safety net for women who need it most. 'The Society's caseworker team brings deep expertise and resources that will be of immediate benefit to the Fund's beneficiaries.' The Society, founded in 1847, last year distributed more than £1.23 million in grants to 831 women across Scotland. It traces its roots to the plight of unmarried daughters of gentlemen left destitute in later life – a cause immortalised in the novels of Jane Austen and the Brontë sisters. Though times have changed and the Society has evolved in response, the social vulnerability of older women remains starkly relevant. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad By comparison, the Fund, established during the First World War in 1917, has been supporting around 100 women annually – and initially had a focus on supporting the widows or daughters of officers who served in Scottish regiments – with grants totalling more than £90,000 last year. Graeme Kidd, Chair of the Fund, said: 'We recognised the importance of finding a partner that would not only honour the intent behind the Fund but also offer a stronger, modernised support model. 'The Society has proven itself a natural fit and a willing and proactive partner, and this move protects the dignity and future of the women we serve.' The merger is underpinned by a shared ethos. Both organisations have long adopted a 'cash first' approach to aid – a method now increasingly mirrored by statutory bodies. By providing direct financial support rather than goods or vouchers, recipients retain autonomy and dignity in managing their needs. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Beyond the vital financial payments, the Society has developed a more holistic support system, working closely with partner agencies and tailoring its assistance to the evolving circumstances of each beneficiary. The merger also allows for significant efficiencies. Combining operations reduces administrative costs and ensures that a larger share of assets goes directly to those who need it. The historic move not only guarantees continuity for current beneficiaries, but also ensures that future generations of vulnerable women will continue to be supported through a sustainable and robust framework. Andrew Tweedy added: 'This is a win for everyone. Beneficiaries of the Fund receive more comprehensive support, our combined operations become more efficient, and we can now help more women across Scotland. At a time of rising hardship for older women, this consolidation is both timely and transformative.'

The National
3 days ago
- The National
Fascinating history of 178 wooden huts just outside Glasgow
When I visited, the huts were surrounded by the lush vegetation of midsummer, adding to the organic quality of the settlement, which seems to emerge mushroom-like from the forested hillside. The Carbeth huts have variously been the scene of family holidays and of experiments in lifestyle. They provided emergency dwellings for those displaced by war, have fostered an outdoors culture of physical health, nurtured community, and, in their sometimes turbulent history, witnessed revolutionary organising and outbreaks of class warfare. This article can only introduce some of their earlier history. Early Years In the early 20th century, Allan Barns Graham was the owner of Carbeth Estate. He was a progressively minded laird, who led a modest life as a farmer and had artistic interests. Much of his estate was wooded and largely unsuitable for agriculture. Before the First World War, it had permitted groups to camp there, including the Clarion Scouts, who combined cycling with socialism. After the war, William Ferris, a military veteran, was, according to Lesley Riddoch in her book Huts: A Place Beyond – How To End Our Exile From Nature, a 'remarkable man who effectively started the Carbeth hutting site'. He had prior experience of the estate and wrote to Barns Graham requesting permission to construct a clubhouse for his camping club. The landowner initially resisted the construction of huts, but eventually relented – perhaps influenced by the possibility of collecting rents. Huts developed from tent platforms, which had been much used during the conflict in Europe. Ferris administered the site, and it grew rapidly. The huts, which were originally tightly regimented, catered to a demand for low-cost recreation and rural escape for urban and industrial workers, particularly from nearby Clydebank. In 1922, an outside swimming pool was opened which had been constructed by damming a stream. It became the scene of swimming galas, including in 1932, when Barns Graham presented awards to the winners. Ferris, meanwhile, was involved in a wide succession of outdoor associations and initiatives, supported by his lucrative activities as an antiquarian book dealer in Glasgow. Outdoors Movement The origins of the community have also, explains Riddoch, been ascribed to the outdoors movement and the economic depression of the 1920s and 30s. Certainly, these loom large in the popular memory of Carbeth. Ian R Mitchell, writing in 2001, recorded how the site 'played a role in getting the working-class adventurer further out into the Highland hills'. Many of the early Clydeside mountaineers were victims of the Depression, and there was overlap between them and the hutters. The climbers met at Craigallion Loch, south of the huts, where a fire was reputedly never allowed to go out.' Cultures of political resistance were fostered, and numbers volunteered for the International Brigades during the Spanish Civil War. Perhaps more typical than these toughest of adventurers, however, are the people shown in a collection of photographs preserved by the Carbeth Hutters Company, the Carson Archive. These depict outdoor recreation at Carbeth in the 1920s and 30s, including camping, cycling, swimming and rambling. One photograph shows a group of women, perhaps members of feminist groups associated with Red Clydeside, enjoying a rain-soaked rural ramble. Family and War Tom McKendrick springs from a family of long-established hutters. His family, who experienced pollution in Clydebank, first became involved with the site in the 1930s, when his grandmother gained a hut. Thanks to an expanding family, that number multiplied into five. McKendrick's memories of growing up in the 1950s are filled with those of Carbeth, underlining its importance as a place of childhood. 'It was the natural thing,' he explained to me. 'You were born into the clan – it was very much your childhood. 'Families came to Carbeth in the summer, and you ran free. Animals, trees, making huts! So, when you came up here there would be 30, 40 weans around, and lifelong friendships were formed.' More broadly, the link to Clydebank was reinforced in the aftermath of the Clydebank Blitz in 1941, when the local authority constructed 47 additional huts which provided temporary accommodation for families displaced by the bombing. McKendrick, an artist, believes the huts are connected to conflict by their history as a place of sanctuary from war. THE 1960s ONWARDS Carbeth's subsequent history features a decline in the popularity of hutting as working-class affluence and access to overseas travel increased in the 1960s. There was a long and well-documented struggle between hutters and landowner over rents, living conditions and the future of the site. The latter was eventually secured in 2009, followed by purchase of the land by the Hutters Community Company in 2013. The story is well told by Riddoch in her book. 'Carbeth survived,' she wrote, 'because of the organisational abilities of its residents to effectively lobby the authorities, when elsewhere in Scotland, most other large hutting sites experienced mass evictions, demolition or conversion into caravan sites.' (Image: YouTube) Carbeth endures today as the legacy of the optimistic social experimentation of a century ago and encourages a more ecological approach to living, with self-sufficiency encouraged, including the building of wind turbines and use of solar panels to generate electricity. The Carbeth community continues to provide working people with access to a precious resource in a country dominated by unequal land ownership – access to places of their own in the countryside. Charlie Lynch thanks Tom McKendrick and the Carbeth Hutting Company, and Dr Lesley Riddoch for their help compiling this article. He recommends Riddoch's book, and her 2019 PhD thesis.


The Guardian
6 days ago
- The Guardian
My partner misled me about wanting a family, but I'm desperate to have kids
I was very clear about wanting a family early in our relationship, but after two and a half years together my partner has admitted he doesn't want kids. This is the best relationship I've had – he's kind, patient, supportive, and we have the best sex. We're both anxious people with avoidance issues, but I felt safe and cherished until last year, when I discovered he had cheated. He said it was an attempt to 'escape'. I was deeply shocked. I ended the relationship, but he begged for another chance and accepted an ultimatum: commit to living together, getting a dog and starting a family (things I told him I wanted early on). He agreed to the first two, but said he needed more time for the last. I am 38 and asked repeatedly for honesty about children, fearing the same heartbreak I felt with my ex‑husband. Yet he kept it ambiguous, only to finally admit that he doesn't want children but is afraid to lose me. I respect that it's his decision, but I'm hurt and angry about being misled. I am a touring artist, which makes starting a family challenging, and it feels impossible to do it alone. I fear that if I can't make music – vital for my emotional and financial wellbeing – I may succumb to the depression and repeat the grim fate of my parents. After years of dating, I can't seem to find anyone I have much in common with who wants a family. The thought of ending up alone and childless terrifies me. I am trying to think of an alternative solution but, if I'm being honest, anything other than having a family with the person you love and who loves you back feels like a compromise. I'm so sorry you've been lied to. I feel that your inner voice has been screaming at you, but somewhere along the line you've learned to reason away your feelings. This man doesn't sound like he's the one for you. He has lied and he has cheated and you deserve better than to be scrambling around the 'good bits' to somehow convince yourself that you need to make this work. You don't. When you are in a situation that feels stuck, it's impossible to imagine solutions, or a life better lived. I consulted relationship therapist Joanna Harrison, who said: 'I can see that wherever you look it feels like there's mourning to do [for your parents' depression, your ex-marriage, your current situation]. You sound like someone who battles on alone, and perhaps this was essential with parents who were depressed.' I wonder whether you could seek some therapy to tease out the threads of your past life with someone who is 'on your side', and to explore the loops that keep repeating. Both Harrison and I also wondered if your current relationship only seemed 'kind and supportive' compared with past ones. If so, there are other kinder, more supportive relationships you may yet strive for. Harrison added: 'One longitudinal study of parents showed that in a sample of couples who had a baby when there had been a strong difference of views about having a baby, in all cases the couples had separated by the time their first child went to primary school. It's very painful for couples to be faced with a situation where there is no compromise, and it is very upsetting to lose the relationship and have to make this decision.' But I'd add that it would be easier in the long run than an unsatisfactory compromise. Also, why should you alone compromise? That would eat away at you in a different way. As your inner voice is saying: you need to try. Sign up to Inside Saturday The only way to get a look behind the scenes of the Saturday magazine. Sign up to get the inside story from our top writers as well as all the must-read articles and columns, delivered to your inbox every weekend. after newsletter promotion You may well meet the right person for you. In the meantime, you said in your longer letter that you were open to alternatives, such as co-parenting, or a less nuclear-family option. 'It feels that it would be unkind to yourself to not at least explore these options,' says Harrison. 'It may not be what you choose, but it may be helpful to explore what these different ways of doing things would mean to you.' You may also find this Guardian article of interest, as well as my podcasts on Should I Have a Baby? and Hope and Loss. Every week, Annalisa Barbieri addresses a personal problem sent in by a reader. If you would like advice from Annalisa, please send your problem to Annalisa regrets she cannot enter into personal correspondence. Submissions are subject to our terms and conditions. The latest series of Annalisa's podcast is available here. Comments on this piece are pre-moderated to ensure the discussion remains on the topics raised by the article. Please be aware that there may be a short delay in comments appearing on the site.