Gaza civil defence says Israeli forces kill 69 people
Israel has recently expanded its military operations in the Gaza Strip, where its war on Hamas militants has created dire humanitarian conditions and displaced nearly all of the territory's population of more than two million.
Many have sought shelter in school buildings, but these have repeatedly come under Israeli attacks that the military often says target Hamas militants hiding among civilians.
In an updated toll on Thursday afternoon, civil defence spokesman Mahmud Bassal told AFP that 69 people were killed by Israeli strikes, artillery or gunfire across the territory.
They included 38 people waiting for humanitarian aid at three separate locations in central and southern Gaza and a child killed by a drone in Jabalia in the north.
Bassal said 15 people, "the majority of them children and women", were killed and several others wounded in an Israeli air strike on a school-turned-shelter in Gaza City.
- Ceasefire pressure -
Contacted by AFP, the Israeli military (IDF) said regarding that incident that it "struck a key Hamas terrorist who was operating in a Hamas command and control center in Gaza City".
"Prior to the strike, numerous steps were taken to mitigate the risk of harming civilians, including the use of precise munitions, aerial surveillance, and additional intelligence," it added.
Regarding numerous other strikes across the territory on Thursday, it said it could not comment in detail without precise coordinates and times.
"In response to Hamas' barbaric attacks, the IDF is operating to dismantle Hamas military capabilities," it told AFP.
It said it "follows international law and takes feasible precautions to mitigate civilian harm".
Pressure has risen for a ceasefire to allow sorely needed humanitarian aid into Gaza at scale and permit the release of hostages seized by Palestinian militants during Hamas's October 2023 attack that sparked the war.
US President Donald Trump earlier this week declared a new ceasefire push, aiming for an initial 60-day truce, which he said had Israel's backing.
But Israel's leaders held firm to their aim of crushing Hamas, even as the group said Tuesday it was discussing new proposals for a ceasefire from mediators.
- Strike hits school -
At the Gaza City school compound hit on Thursday, AFP footage showed young children wandering through the charred, bombed out building, as piles of burnt debris smouldered.
Groups of Palestinians picked through the rubble and damaged furniture that littered the floor.
Umm Yassin Abu Awda, who was among mourners who gathered at the city's Al-Shifa hospital after the strike, said: "This isn't a life. We've suffered enough."
"For two years, we've been fighting just to get a piece of bread," she told AFP.
"Either you (Israel) strike us with a nuclear bomb and end it all, or people's conscience needs to finally wake up."
AFP | Omar AL-QATTAA
Bassal of the civil defence agency reported 25 people killed while seeking aid near the Netzarim area in central Gaza, six others at another location nearby and seven in Rafah, southern Gaza, with scores of people injured.
They were the latest in a string of deadly incidents that have hit people trying to receive scarce supplies.
Across Gaza on Thursday, Bassal said artillery shelling in the northern town of Beit Lahia killed three people.
Further south, he said three people were killed in a strike that hit tents housing displaced people in the coastal Al-Mawasi area.
Media restrictions in Gaza and difficulties in accessing many areas mean AFP is unable to independently verify the tolls and details provided by the civil defence agency.
- 'Finish the job' -
Despite mounting calls at home and globally for a ceasefire, Israel's hardline National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir called on Wednesday to push the offensive harder.
"Let's finish the job in Gaza. We must bring down Hamas, occupy the Gaza Strip, encourage the transfer" of Palestinians out of the territory, Ben Gvir said in a television interview.
To the minister, Israel was now "in a position to achieve" victory over Hamas, which he said would help free the remaining hostages still held in Gaza from the 2023 attacks.
"We must bring them back, but the way to bring them back is to bring down Hamas," he said.
Hamas's October 7, 2023 attack that prompted the Israeli offensive resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on Israeli official figures.
Israel's retaliatory military campaign has killed at least 57,130 people in Gaza, also mostly civilians, according to the Hamas-run territory's health ministry. The United Nations considers its figures reliable.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eyewitness News
2 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Rio to host BRICS summit wary of Trump
RIO DE JANEIRO - A summit of BRICS nations will convene in Rio de Janeiro on Sunday and Monday, with members hoping to weigh in on global crises while tiptoeing around US President Donald Trump's policies. The city, with beefed-up security, will play host to leaders and diplomats from 11 emerging economies, including China, India, Russia and South Africa, which represent nearly half of the world's population and 40% of its GDP. Brazil's left-wing President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva will have to navigate the absence of Chinese President Xi Jinping, who will miss the summit for the first time. Beijing will instead be represented by its Prime Minister Li Qiang. Russian leader Vladimir Putin, who is facing a pending International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant, will not travel to Brazil, but is set to participate via video link, according to the Kremlin. Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian, fresh from a 12-day conflict with Israel and a skirmish with the United States, will also be absent, as will his Egyptian counterpart Abdel Fattah al-Sissi, a Brazilian government source told AFP. Tensions in the Middle East, including Israel's ongoing war in Gaza, will weigh on the summit, as well as the grim anticipation of tariffs threatened by Trump due next week. 'CAUTIOUS' "We're anticipating a summit with a cautious tone: it will be difficult to mention the United States by name in the final declaration," Marta Fernandez, director of the BRICS Policy Center at Rio's Pontifical Catholic University, told AFP. China, for example, "is trying to adopt a restrained position on the Middle East", Fernandez said, pointing out that Beijing was also in tricky tariff negotiations with Washington. "This doesn't seem to be the right time to provoke further friction" between the world's two leading economies, the researcher said. BRICS members did not issue a strong statement on the Iran-Israel conflict and subsequent US military strikes due to their "diverging" interests, according to Oliver Stuenkel, an international relations professor at the Getulio Vargas Foundation. Brazil, nevertheless, hopes that countries can take a common stand at the summit, including on the most sensitive issues. "BRICS (countries), throughout their history, have managed to speak with one voice on major international issues, and there's no reason why that shouldn't be the case this time on the subject of the Middle East," Brazil's Foreign Minister Mauro Vieira told AFP. 'MULTILATERALISM' However, talks on finding an alternative to the dollar for trade between BRICS members are likely dead in the water. For Fernandez, it is almost "forbidden" to mention the idea within the group since Trump threatened to impose 100% tariffs on countries that challenge the dollar's international dominance. Brazil, which in 2030 will host the COP30 UN climate conference, also hopes to find unity on the fight against climate change. Artificial intelligence and global governance reform will also be on the menu. "The escalation of the Middle East conflict reinforces the urgency of the debate on the need to reform global governance and strengthen multilateralism," said Foreign Minister Vieira. Since 2023, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, Ethiopia, Iran and Indonesia have joined the BRICS, formed in 2009 as a counter-balance to leading Western economies. But, as Fernandez points out, this expansion "makes it all the more difficult to build a strong consensus."
eNCA
2 hours ago
- eNCA
Rio to host BRICS summit wary of Trump
RIO DEO JANEIRO - The BRICS nations will convene for a summit in Rio de Janeiro on Sunday and Monday, with members hoping to weigh in on global crises while tiptoeing around US President Donald Trump's policies. The city, with beefed-up security, will play host to leaders and diplomats from 11 emerging economies including China, India, Russia, South Africa and host Brazil, which represent nearly half of the world's population and 40 percent of its GDP. Brazil's left-wing President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva will have to navigate the absence of Chinese President Xi Jinping, who will miss the summit for the first time. Beijing will instead be represented by Premier Li Qiang. Russian President Vladimir Putin, who is facing a pending International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant, will not travel to Brazil, but is set to participate via video link, according to the Kremlin. Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian, fresh from a 12-day conflict with Israel and a skirmish with the United States, will also be absent, as will his Egyptian counterpart Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, a Brazilian government source told AFP. Tensions in the Middle East, including Israel's ongoing war in Gaza, will weigh on the summit, as well as the grim anticipation of tariffs threatened by Trump and due next week. Trump said that starting Friday, his administration would send countries letters stating their tariff levels, as negotiations to avoid higher US levies enter the final stretch. - 'Cautious' - "We're anticipating a summit with a cautious tone: it will be difficult to mention the United States by name in the final declaration," Marta Fernandez, director of the BRICS Policy Center at Rio's Pontifical Catholic University, told AFP. China, for example, "is trying to adopt a restrained position on the Middle East," Fernandez said, pointing out that Beijing was also in tricky tariff negotiations with Washington. "This doesn't seem to be the right time to provoke further friction" between the world's two leading economies, the researcher said. BRICS members did not issue a strong statement on the Iran-Israel conflict and subsequent US military strikes due to their "diverging" interests, according to Oliver Stuenkel, a professor of international relations at the Getulio Vargas Foundation. Brazil nevertheless hopes that countries can take a common stand at the summit, including on the most sensitive issues. "BRICS (countries), throughout their history, have managed to speak with one voice on major international issues, and there's no reason why that shouldn't be the case this time on the subject of the Middle East," Brazil's Foreign Minister Mauro Vieira told AFP. Lula on Friday again defended the idea of finding an alternative to the dollar for trade among BRICS nations. "I know it is complicated. There are political problems," Lula said at a BRICS banking event. "But if we do not find a new formula, we are going to finish the 21st century the way we started the 20th." - 'Multilateralism' - However, talks on this idea are likely dead in the water. For Fernandez, it is almost "forbidden" to mention the idea within the group since Trump threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on countries that challenge the dollar's international dominance. Brazil, which later this year will host the COP30 UN climate conference, also hopes to find unity on the fight against climate change. Artificial intelligence and global governance reform will also be on the menu. "The escalation of the Middle East conflict reinforces the urgency of the debate on the need to reform global governance and strengthen multilateralism," said foreign minister Vieira. Since 2023, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, Ethiopia, Iran and Indonesia have joined BRICS, formed in 2009 as a counter-balance to leading Western economies. But, as Fernandez points out, this expansion "makes it all the more difficult to build a strong consensus." By Facundo Fernández Barrio
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
War, lies, and amapiano
President Bill Clinton must have been a lucky man. In his first term of office, he met with the Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, following the latter's election as his country's head of government. Image: Bebeto Matthews/File/AP IT could have been Aeschylus, the Greek tragedian or Phillip Gibbs, the journalist who covered the First World War, who probably coined the all-time enduring aphorism. During war, the first casualty is the truth. Whoever it was is purely academic. It is the prophetic accuracy of the quote attributed to both which is the hallmark of the US empire. The energy that fuels the current global order is wholly predicated on layers and layers of quasi-truths, catechismic recitations and just pure unadulterated lies. After all, with so much military power, lies rank least in the hierarchy of the empire's problems. These opaque reams of deception have compacted for so long, they have ossified into concrete like plinths that support the unipolar facade. Yarn upon yarn, they have been spun at such dizzying frequencies and complexity of detail that time has hardened their surface. And in the absence of contradicting counter narratives, especially with the dominance of the legacy media, so many generations of men and women post the two world wars have come to depend on the refined glib of their manufactured consent and the rhetoric of the captured academic institutions that shape societal consciousness. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ And for lack of alternatives, it has become intractably difficult to view the world from any other vantage. The are two alternating sides, the one far less likely than its mendacious counterpart. The more absurd and aggressive the lie is, the greater the opportunity for its acceptability. Any timid yet truthful variety cannot conceivably compete. Mark Twain was right. A lie gets halfway round the world before the truth gets the chance to put its pants on. There are little lies, ostensibly told without fear of consequence. And there are big lies, reserved no doubt, to start wars or casually justify them. However, there are many other frequent deceptive quips randomly churned out by the system's inbred algorithms designed to embellish the insidiousness of the US hegemony. President Bill Clinton must have been a lucky man. In his first term of office, he met with the Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, following the latter's election as his country's head of government. In that much-reported encounter, Clinton is said to have famously retorted, 'who the hell is the superpower here?', a rebuke which must have incensed his visitor. So soon thereafter, he literally survived two Epstein-esque operations. Every so often, when Monica Lewinsky returned from Tel Aviv, she would meet her 'friend', a deep state Pentagon operative named Linda Tripp. After a dress with a sputtering of what was vaunted as Presidential spermatozoids got paraded before the media, and many tape recordings between Monica and Linda nestled in the hands of Bibi Netanyahu, President Clinton narrowly survived an impeachment attempt. Whether or not the beret-wearing intern was consciously party to an intel operation or was a mole herself is both unclear and possibly irrelevant. Nor can it be said with prescience that it was an operation at all, notwithstanding the causality and sequentiality of events. For the damsel in distress, however, she casually sauntered out of the scene and landed herself a job in Tel-a-Viv. Epstein 1.0. Check! With the mission unaccomplished, the real Epstein showed up on a 2.0 version on steroids, replete with private jets, verdant islands and many more exotic offerings besides. The problem is, this Epstein fellow is said to have relinquished his task without honours and exited the stage in a huff. And Patel, not of the Glengarry leads, is sternly corroborated by Bongino, his deputy at the FBI, that Jeffrey, the scion of the Epsteins, egressed unassisted. The American blend of hegemony has a distinguishably strong flavour, as deceitful as it is violent. When Great Britain's empire was underway, as equally deceitful as it was similarly violent, it had other competing powers in other hemispheres. France and Spain come to mind. For its coverage and influence, the British imperialist footprint lent depth to the definition of hegemony, an attribution which could not be enjoyed by Portugal, Spain or France, for that matter. Their collective reach on other hemispheres marked the tolerance and strategic restraint of British dominance in trade and warfare. The US hegemony has other plans, however. Unlike the British experiment, it has no margin of tolerance for competition at all. If the Monroe doctrine defined the need for an American near abroad and spheres of influence, Wolfowitz for his part, redefined the concept in his own image, and turned the entire globe into an American near abroad. For that redefinition to hold, the United States of America, the only country called 'America' among 35 countries dotting the two eponymously named hemispheres, needs acres and acres of lies to sustain it. Donald J Trump has a name for it, whose prosaic brilliance betrays the hubris of the empire's adventurism. 'Obliterated!' The essence of the furore that ensues from 'obliterated', or its meaning, is playing out in the United States with ferocity. And it has united all the warring parties instead of dividing them. With the exception of a few, it confirms the US hatred for Iran and the US administration's commitment to its military project called Israel. Joe Biden, even in his much publicised fog of senility, was convinced that if there was no Israel, America would create one. On the one side of the obliteration divide are Trump's acolytes, who claim that Iran's nuclear sites and capabilities are gone forever. And perhaps that would eschew Trump from going back to Iran for other targeted strikes. And on the same side, too, are the more rational intellectual voices which can appreciate the dilemma of the tyranny of deception. For them, the obliteration lie must go on so that no war must be contemplated against the people of Iran. The other side of that divide is inhabited by neocons and war mongers. They don't believe the three nuclear sites were obliterated, nor that the resolve of the mullahs was definitively attenuated. Dead scientists or not, they are convinced that Iran is getting ready to restart the fissile centrifuges in a quick turnaround. After all, they point out with conviction that the Highly Enriched Uranium is nowhere to be found. Therefore, the US must return to Iran and finish the job. A lie that holds an entire nation together is both fragile and dangerous. It renders the entire adhesive fabric of that society fragile and their politicians dangerous. But as they say, in America, whoever you vote for, you get John McCain! Yet the opportunity to fan the flames can never be missed. Rafael Grossi, the Director General of the IAEA has a brash, aggressive and fiercely pro-Zionist President, Javier Milei. Grossi, the Argentinian diplomat, found himself in a maelstrom of accusations that he has been secretly providing intelligence on the Iranian nuclear sites, technical progression, and other sensitive geolocation information to Israeli intelligence. After the obliteration declaration by Trump, the Iranians have banned the IAEA from monitoring their sites.
