logo
Trump slammed by two Native American groups for supporting 'Redskins' name revival

Trump slammed by two Native American groups for supporting 'Redskins' name revival

Economic Times2 days ago
President Donald Trump's post on Truth Social, claimed there was 'a big clamoring' for the Commanders - who adopted their current name in 2022 - to revert to their previous moniker, adding that 'our great Indian people' want it restored. (AP/PTI)
Synopsis President Trump's call to reinstate the 'Redskins' name for Washington's NFL team has sparked strong condemnation from two Native American organisations. They denounce the name as a racist caricature, emphasizing the need for respect and self-determination. While the team aims for a new stadium in DC by 2030, Trump's stance could influence congressional approvals. Two Native American organisations strongly condemned President Donald Trump on Monday after he threatened to block a proposed new NFL stadium in Washington, DC, unless the local team reinstates its former 'Redskins' name.
ADVERTISEMENT Trump, posting Sunday on Truth Social, claimed there was 'a big clamoring' for the Commanders - who adopted their current name in 2022 - to revert to their previous moniker, adding that 'our great Indian people' want it restored. He also called on MLB's Cleveland Guardians, formerly the Indians, to change their name back.
In response, the Association on American Indian Affairs denounced Trump's push, saying such names and mascots 'do not honor Native Peoples - they reduce us to caricatures'. The organisation emphasised that Native nations are 'sovereign, contemporary cultures who deserve respect and self-determination, not misrepresentation'.
The National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) also rejected Trump's comments, labeling racist mascots as 'an affront to Tribal sovereignty'. NCAI President Mark Macarro stated that the organisation has opposed such imagery for 75 years, asserting that mascots mocking and dehumanising Native people have no place in modern society."We unequivocally oppose President Trump's call for the Washington Commanders and Cleveland Guardians to reinstate their former, racist names. Tribal Nations have been unambiguous on this issue for generations. We are not your mascot. We are not your distraction," NCAI said in a statement.
ADVERTISEMENT
The Washington NFL team retired the Redskins name and logo in 2020 after decades of criticism. Trump's comments come as the team prepares to return to DC with a new stadium expected in 2030. While Trump cannot directly block the project, Congress - which oversees DC governance - could influence funding and approvals.
ADVERTISEMENT The Commanders, a storied NFL franchise with three Super Bowl titles, were ranked by Forbes last year as the league's 10th most valuable team, with an estimated worth of $6.3 billion.Despite the criticism, the Native American Guardians Association voiced support for Trump's stance, accusing cancel culture of erasing tradition and identity.
ADVERTISEMENT Other major sports franchises with Native American-themed names - such as the Atlanta Braves, Chicago Blackhawks, and Kansas City Chiefs - have said they do not plan to change their names, keeping the debate over sports mascots alive.
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel)
(Catch all the US News, UK News, Canada News, International Breaking News Events, and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.)
Download The Economic Times News App to get Daily International News Updates.
NEXT STORY
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's DOJ Sidesteps Norms to Boost Ally Alina Habba as US Attorney
Trump's DOJ Sidesteps Norms to Boost Ally Alina Habba as US Attorney

Mint

time14 minutes ago

  • Mint

Trump's DOJ Sidesteps Norms to Boost Ally Alina Habba as US Attorney

President Donald Trump's administration sidestepped tradition this week and criticized judges who sought to bypass his ally as the top federal prosecutor in New Jersey — a pattern that may repeat itself in other Democratic-leaning states. The actions of the Justice Department to shield interim US Attorney Alina Habba, Trump's former personal attorney, could foreshadow other fights over chief federal prosecutors holding temporary posts in blue states like California, New York and Nevada. Federal judges in New Jersey said Tuesday they would not extend Habba's four-month tenure, the longest she could serve without US Senate confirmation. When the judges bypassed Habba to pick her deputy, Attorney General Pam Bondi then slammed 'politically minded judges' for overstepping their authority. She fired the judges' choice, Desiree Grace, hours later. Habba's term is set to expire at the end of the week, and what happens next is anyone's guess. But Trump and his appointees have routinely assailed judges who resist him in court cases, and they've shown a recent willingness to push the boundaries of statutes on appointment to protect their choices. 'It's a little unclear as to how this will all shake out,' said Jennifer Selin, an associate law professor at Arizona State University who researches US attorney appointments. The law on appointing interim US attorneys wouldn't prevent Trump from naming Habba as the interim again, but it's 'definitely on the fringes of law,' Selin said. Spokespersons for the Justice Department and the US Attorney's Office in New Jersey declined to comment. US attorneys typically serve four-year terms after they are approved by the US Senate, and they leave en masse with the change of a presidential administration. Under Senate custom, if a home-state senator opposes a president's US attorney nominee, the full body won't confirm their appointment. More than 20 states have two Democratic senators but disputes may arise soon in Nevada, Illinois and California, where interim appointments are set to expire soon. Trump has nominated Habba for a four-year term, but she's drawn strong opposition from New Jersey's two Democratic senators, Cory Booker and Andy Kim. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, has also vowed to hold up all Justice Department nominees over Trump receiving a gifted jet from the Qatari government. District judges can appoint a US attorney until a vacancy is filled, but that is prompting pushback from the Trump administration. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche accused New Jersey's judges of 'a left-wing agenda, not the rule of law' and acting like partisans and activists. Such a posture is not a long-term recipe for success, said Daniel Richman, a law professor at Columbia University. Every US attorney's office investigates and prosecutes criminal cases and represents the US in civil litigation. Its lawyers appear regularly in court before federal judges. 'An office that relies on the cooperation of judges to do its work usually doesn't get ahead by making war on them,' Richman said. In the Northern District of New York, the Trump administration tested the bounds of its appointment authority this month after federal judges declined to extend the 120-day term of John Sarcone, the chief prosecutor. Bondi appointed Sarcone as 'Special Attorney to the Attorney General' and 'First Assistant US Attorney,' making him the acting leader under the federal law governing vacancies. Sarcone is authorized to conduct the same legal proceedings as US attorneys may conduct, according to records that say his appointment is 'indefinite but may be terminated at any time.' He could serve more than 600 days as an acting official under the vacancy statute, effectively bypassing the Senate, said Selin. Acting officials may serve under the vacancy law for up to 210 days, followed by up to two more 210-day stints if nominations for the seat fail in the Senate. Trump's administration also named two successive interim leaders to serve as US attorney in Washington, DC, tapping Jeanine Pirro for a 120-day term after her predecessor, Ed Martin, lacked the Senate votes to advance. 'The Trump administration has been very strategic in using acting positions to navigate difficulties in the Senate,' Selin said. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

Trump was informed he was named in Epstein files? Here's what White House said
Trump was informed he was named in Epstein files? Here's what White House said

Hindustan Times

time14 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Trump was informed he was named in Epstein files? Here's what White House said

US President Donald Trump was informed in May that his name appeared in the Jeffrey Epstein filed, and the information was given to him by Attorney General Pam Bondi, a Wall Street Journal report said on Thursday. A message calling on President Donald Trump to release all files related to Jeffrey Epstein is projected onto the US Chamber of Commerce building.(AFP) However, the White House has denied the report as "fake news", blaming the Democrats and liberal media for fabricating it. "This is nothing more than a continuation of the fake news stories concocted by the Democrats and the liberal media," White House spokesman Steven Cheung was quoted as saying by news agency Reuters. What did the WSJ report say? The publication has claimed that Pam Bondi reviewed files related to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and found Trump's mention in it "multiple times". Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche then informed Trump of the development, the publication further reported. The WSJ report also claimed that besides Trump, the Epstein files named many other high-profile figures. However, WSJ also said that "being mentioned in the records isn't a sign of wrongdoing". While the White House was quick to dismiss the report, Bondi and her deputy also issued a statement, without directly addressing the WSJ report. "Nothing in the files warranted further investigation or prosecution, and we have filed a motion in court to unseal the underlying grand jury transcripts," the officials were quoted as saying by Reuters. "As part of our routine briefing, we made the President aware of the findings." The report also claimed that the officials told Trump in May itself that there were no plans to release documents related to the probe as "the material contained child pornography and victims' personal information." Trump-Epstein ties and the files Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein were once friends but their ties are now under scrutiny, amid a growing demand for the release of all government files on the sex offender's alleged crimes. The duo shared a good camaraderie in the 1990s but had a falling out in 2004 over eyeing the same property at Palm Beach. In 2019, Trump said that they had a "falling out" and hadn't spoken in 15 years. While there was a period when the two shared a friendship, there is no evidence linking Trump to the sex offender's crimes. The Jeffrey Epstein files contain important information, like flight logs, contact lists, clients list, court records etc., linked to the sex offender and his activities. While some parts of the files have been released, large portions of it still remain sealed and there are growing demands to release them.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store