
US–Israel bombed the nuclear sites, but not the nuclear threat: Iran still holds 400kg of enriched Uranium, enough to make 10 N-bombs
Live Events
Where did the Uranium go?
IAEA confirms last inspection was days before attack
Trump declares victory. But confusion follows
Is Iran still pursuing nuclear weapons?
Experts warn threat is not over
Washington admits uncertainty
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
The US says it destroyed Iran's key nuclear sites last week. But 400kg of enriched uranium—enough to build up to ten atomic bombs—is still unaccounted for.Vice President JD Vance confirmed the missing material during an interview with ABC News, saying the administration 'would work in the coming weeks to do something about the fuel and would have conversations with the Iranians.'That fuel is enriched to 60%. It only takes enrichment to 90% to make a weapon.At the heart of the operation were six bunker-busting bombs , dropped by US B-2 Spirit bombers on three nuclear sites: Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. The attack came after satellite images showed a line of 16 trucks outside Fordow—a site built deep inside a mountain and resistant to most conventional strikes.Israel requested Washington use its most advanced bombers and GBU-37 bunker-buster munitions.The strikes reportedly caused 'severe damage and destruction,' according to US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Joint Chiefs Chair Gen Dan Caine.Trump later said on Truth Social: 'We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran… A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow. All planes are safely on their way home… NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!'That's the question no one can answer. Post-strike satellite images showed the trucks were gone.Israeli officials believe Iran managed to move the stockpile, and possibly some centrifuges, just before the attack. They shared this view with The New York Times.Sima Shine, a former Iran expert at Mossad, told the Financial Times: 'They have enough enriched uranium somewhere, and they took some advanced centrifuges somewhere, in order to enable them to some day go to a nuclear device… The programme is not destroyed completely, no matter what the Americans say.'TS2 Space, a Polish defence firm, reviewed satellite images and said Iran appeared to be shifting critical materials. The Open Source Centre in London also confirmed visual evidence of frantic movement days before the bombing.The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said it last saw the stockpile a week before Israel's first strike.Its Director-General, Rafael Grossi, addressed the UN Security Council and called for inspections to resume immediately. 'It is essential,' he said. He warned military escalation 'delays this indispensable work' and harms chances of a diplomatic solution.Kelsey Davenport, of the Arms Control Association, told AFP: 'It will be difficult if not impossible to track down all of Iran's 60 per cent enriched uranium, stored in small canisters that are easily transportable by car.'Hours after the strike, Trump told ABC News: 'We're not involved in it (but) it's possible we could…' and urged both Iran and Israel to 'reach an accord before it is too late.'Afterwards, he announced a 'total and complete' ceasefire and declared the 12-day conflict over.But the US intelligence community has since shown signs of uncertainty.Tulsi Gabbard, Director of National Intelligence, had told Congress earlier that Iran was not building nuclear weapons. But on Saturday, she reversed her position, saying Iran could produce them 'within weeks.' Trump had called her previous assessment 'wrong.'Tehran insists its nuclear programme is peaceful. But Israel claims otherwise, saying Iran was nearing a 'point of no return.'After the strikes, Iran threatened to leave the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Deputy Foreign Minister Takht Ravanchi was defiant: 'No one can tell us what to do…'A CNN report noted that Israel's first strikes likely only delayed Iran's nuclear programme by a few months. The deeper parts of the programme, particularly those buried under mountains like at Fordow, were not seriously damaged.Still, a senior official told CNN that 'Tehran does have all the necessary ingredients.'Ronen Solomon, an Israeli intelligence analyst, told The Telegraph: 'They have the uranium, but they can't do a lot with it unless they have built something we don't know about on a small scale.'But many experts remain cautious. 'With 60 per cent enriched uranium and a few hundred advanced centrifuges, Iran still has the capability to weaponise,' said Kelsey Davenport.Richard Nephew, a former US official on Iran policy, told Financial Times: 'It comes down to the material and where it is. On the basis of what we've seen at this point, we don't know where the material is. We don't have any real confidence that we've got the ability to get it any time soon.'US Secretary of State Marco Rubio admitted to CBS News, 'No one will know for sure for days' whether Iran managed to move the uranium.He added, 'I doubt they moved it because you really can't move anything right now. The minute a truck starts driving somewhere, the Israelis have seen it, and they've targeted it and taken it out.'But this contradicts what satellite images and intelligence officials suggest.Vice President JD Vance told ABC News that 'if the Iranians decide to expand this, then that's ultimately their decision. And the president of the United States will respond in kind.' He also stressed that Trump does not want 'a drawn-out conflict in the Middle East.'But the fact remains: Iran's uranium stockpile is missing.And while bombs have fallen, and statements made, one uncomfortable truth lingers.The most dangerous material in this crisis may still be out there—just hidden from view.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
14 minutes ago
- India Today
Modi misread Trump: Now India pays the price
A war of words has erupted between New Delhi and Washington, exposing the fragility of what was once hailed as a geopolitical success story. India has hit back hard at US President Donald Trump's threat to hike tariffs on Indian goods over continued imports of Russian oil, calling the targeting "unjustified and unreasonable" whilst slamming what it perceives as Washington's double The so-called Modi-Trump bromance, once paraded as diplomatic triumph, is now cracking under the weight of harsh reality. What began with mutual praise and public spectacle, from the "Howdy Modi" event in Houston to the grand "Namaste Trump" reception in Ahmedabad, has devolved into accusations, tariffs, and transactional Fatal MiscalculationOne of New Delhi's fundamental missteps was assuming that warm handshakes and mega-rallies could override hard economic interests. Modi's outreach to Trump was personal, public, and passionate, but Trump doesn't separate business from bromance. The "great friend" narrative gave India false confidence that proved Modi threw his weight behind Trump, literally sharing the stage with him in Houston and Ahmedabad, it was a bet on personal chemistry over policy complexity. India saw Trump not as a volatile businessman-president, but as a dealmaker who'd favour "friends." The reality? Trump doesn't do friendships, he does leverage. And India misread that playbook temples in Varanasi to villages in Gujarat, people performed pujas praying for Trump's victory. Modi had pulled off spectacular diplomatic theatre, and India felt it had America in its corner. Yet Trump's loyalty lies only with the US balance sheet, viewing India as a trade surplus machine rather than a strategic Russian Oil WedgeIndia's dependence on Russian oil has become the new wedge in this deteriorating relationship. With crude prices volatile and energy security paramount, India turned to Moscow for discounted supply, with Russia now accounting for up to 40% of India's oil imports. Trump, who views foreign policy through a profit-loss lens, sees this as lashed out, accusing India of undermining the West's Ukraine strategy and "helping Putin," with tariffs becoming punishment. Worse still, he's framed it as India profiting from global chaos. Modi's government finds itself caught in a trilemma: oil security, global optics, and Trump's offensive 4th August 2025, India's Ministry of External Affairs dropped a diplomatic bombshell in response. Calling Trump's tariff threats "unjustified and unreasonable," the MEA emphasised that India's oil purchases are driven by survival, not sympathy for Moscow. With Middle Eastern oil redirected to Europe after the Ukraine war, India had little choice but to buy discounted Russian crude to shield its economy. India's anger wasn't merely economic, it was moral. The statement highlighted US and EU hypocrisy, pointing out how the West continues trading heavily with Russia in everything from uranium to fertilisers, yet singles out India for 25% Tariff HammerTrump's imposition of a 25% tariff on all Indian goods wasn't just economic muscle-flexing, it was a warning shot. The US goods trade deficit with India stood at $45.7 billion in 2024, which Trump views as theft, plain and simple. His administration has revived old complaints about high tariffs, restricted market access, regulatory red tape, and "unfair" practices in pharmaceuticals, agriculture, and most jarring for India was Trump's renewed outreach to Pakistan, military meetings, energy cooperation discussions, and vague proposals of "regional balance." For a country that expected Trump to be firmly in its anti-Pakistan corner, this felt like betrayal, exposing another blind spot in India's strategic Path ForwardIndia must now abandon illusions of personal diplomacy. Trump is a negotiator, not a friend, he respects leverage, not loyalty. New Delhi must shift from sentimentality to strategy, from ceremonial displays to pragmatic biggest lesson? Don't tie national strategy to individual leaders. American policy is shifting toward hard realism, and India must do the same. This means engaging not as a junior partner seeking approval, but as a sovereign power navigating a multipolar obsession with optics, handshakes, stagecraft, mega-events, must give way to tough negotiations, quiet diplomacy, and pragmatic positioning. Because Trump isn't here to dance at "Namaste Trump" events, he's here to deal. And if Modi wants to succeed, it's time to stop praying and start playing hardball politics.- Ends

Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘US Hegemony Cracking': Russia Blasts Trump For Blackmailing BRICS Nations
/ Aug 05, 2025, 11:40PM IST Russia has accused the Trump administration of pushing a "neocolonial" economic agenda against the Global South through politically motivated sanctions and tariffs. Moscow says the U.S. is trying to maintain its global dominance as a multipolar world emerges. Citing Trump's latest tariff wave, Russia vowed to strengthen ties with BRICS and other like-minded nations. India also hit back at U.S. threats over its Russian oil trade, exposing Western double standards.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
14 minutes ago
- Business Standard
US slams use of AI to personalise airline ticket prices, would investigate
US Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said Tuesday the department has concerns about the use of AI to set personalised airline ticket prices and will investigate if anyone does so. Last week, Delta Air Lines told lawmakers it will not and has not used AI to set prices for individual consumers. "To try to individualise pricing on seats based on how much you make or don't make or who you are, I can guarantee you that we will investigate if anyone does that," Duffy said. "We would engage very strongly if any company tries to use AI to individually price their seating." Duffy noted Delta clarified that it would not use AI for pricing individual tickets, "and I'll take them at face value." Late last month, Democratic Senators Ruben Gallego, Mark Warner and Richard Blumenthal said they believed the Atlanta-based airline would use AI to set individual prices, which would "likely mean fare price increases up to each individual consumer's personal 'pain point.'" Delta previously said it plans to deploy AI-based revenue management technology across 20 per cent of its domestic network by the end of 2025 in partnership with Fetcherr, an AI pricing company. Fetcherr on its website says its technology is "trusted by the world's leading airlines," and lists Delta, Westjet, Virgin Atlantic, Viva and Azul. American Airlines CEO Robert Isom said last month using AI to set ticket prices could hurt consumer trust. Democratic lawmakers Greg Casar and Rashida Tlaib have introduced legislation to bar companies from using AI to set prices or wages based on Americans' personal data and would specifically ban airlines raising individual prices after seeing a search for a family obituary. Delta said airlines have used dynamic pricing for more than three decades, in which pricing fluctuates based on a variety of factors like overall customer demand, fuel prices and competition, but not a specific consumer's personal information.