GOP attempt to derail abortion-funding bill falls short after emotional debate
Lawmakers on both sides of the abortion debate shared personal and emotional stories Thursday, with one holding back tears at one point, in a failed Republican attempt to derail a bill that would make millions available to help pay for the procedure.
The House ultimately voted 98-37 along party lines Thursday night to approve House Bill 930, but not before 40 minutes of debate during a House session earlier in the day when Republicans tried to put up a variety of amendments. The debate, at times, got personal.
Del. Tiffany T. Alston, (D-Prince George's County), said the state should stay out of decisions about an abortion, which 'should be made between a doctor and a patient.'
'As someone who has had a transvaginal ultrasound and had an ectopic pregnancy, you do not get those sounds out of your head,' Alston said. 'It was a medical emergency – and it is not the government's business about what happens with my body, when I am meeting with my doctor. We should not be legislating this stuff.'
On the other side, Del. April Rose (R-Frederick and Carroll) told the story of a niece who was encouraged to end her pregnancy due to presumed medical issues of the fetus.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
'My niece had a transvaginal ultrasound. Her baby was the size, actually smaller, than this bottle,' she said, holding up a standard-sized disposable water bottle.
'She was told that she should abort the baby because of all of the potential health implications. He is 4 – and he is fantastic,' Rose said, her voice starting to shake as she held back tears. 'I am standing for him, and for the women who should have the opportunity to make the choice of life.'
Many of the amendments debated Thursday were recycled versions of measures that have been tried and killed in recent committee hearings or in previous years by the heavily Democratic and pro-abortion legislature. Anti-abortion arguments can be a tough sell in Maryland, where voters in November voted 3-1 for a constitutional amendment protecting reproductive rights, but that didn't keep Republican lawmakers from trying.
They were challenging Del. Lesley J. Lopez's (D-Montgomery) HB930, which would give the state Department of Health access to about $25 million in funds that were collected as part of the federal Affordable Care Act, but have not been spent down. The money comes from $1-a-month fee that insurers in the ACA marketplace are required to collect on every policy to fund abortion services for their policyholders.
The fund has been growing by about $3 million a year for the past 15 years, as collections have outpaced need. If the bill is passed and signed into law, those funds would be distributed to providers to help cover abortion costs for uninsured and underinsured individuals, along with other situations.
Del. William J. Wivell (R-Washington and Frederick) offered an amendment that would require data collection on abortions done in the state, including the method of abortion, age of the fetus and reason for the abortion.
Lopez reminded him that he submitted similar language in a bill back in 2020, when it 'died a dignified and peaceful death in a drawer,' she said, meaning the bill was never brought to a vote because it was not likely to pass out of the Health and Government Operations Committee.
'The reason why the committee did not move on it, was because it was out of alignment with the will of the committee and the will of the body,' Lopez said. 'We have been actively working to try to protect data on reproductive care for years.'
When that amendment failed on party lines, Wivell offered an amendment that would have required a 24-hour wait time after a transabdominal ultrasound before a pregnant patient could receive an abortion. It would also have the physician offer to let the patient hear the 'fetal heartbeat.'
The amendment resembled legislation that was scheduled for a hearing in February but withdrawn by the sponsor, said Lopez, who called for its defeat.
'I think it's important to note that just last November, our voters, in almost every single legislative district, voted to enshrine reproductive rights without conditions into our constitution — and what this amendment does, is introduce a condition for care,' Lopez said.
Del. Susan K. McComas (R-Harford), didn't see it that way, and argued that Wivell's amendment was a matter of 'informed consent.'
'I have been corresponding with a lady out in Western Maryland who has had two abortions,' McComas said 'She is very, very sorry that she was not allowed to know that she could have a sonogram, and she might not have had those two abortions if she knew she could hear a heartbeat.'
Marathon of abortion-related bills in House Health committee shows fight is not over in the state
That amendment failed, as did three other GOP proposals, including one to require the collection of data on how many, if any, taxpayer dollars go to abortion services for out-of-state patients. Another would have restricted use of the ACA grants to abortions provided to Maryland residents, excluding patients who come in from out of town.
The last amendment would have required that abortion providers receive training to spot signs of sex trafficking victims. Lopez said that was unnecessary, since medical providers already get similar training.
Lopez urged passage of her bill, saying the ACA dollars would otherwise go to waste.
'These funds have been collected for the past 15 years, and they have no other purpose than going to provide abortion services,' Lopez said. 'If we do not use those funds, if we do not have a grant program, they will continue to get dusty, they will go unused.'
Full House approval of the bill comes just days before Monday's 'cross-over' deadline, the date by which a bill must be approved by one chamber of the legislature to be guaranteed a hearing in the other.
The Senate version of the bill, Senate Bill 848, was approved 8-3 in a party-line vote in the Finance Committee earlier this week. It is likely to come up for a vote by the full Senate soon.
In committee, Republicans unsuccessfully offered two familiar amendments to SB848, which was sponsored by Sen. Guy Guzzone (D-Howard).
Sen. Johnny Mautz (R-Middle Shore) on Wednesday offered an amendment to require reporting on the use of taxpayer funds toward abortion, specifically looking at how many residents are benefiting from the fund compared to the number of out-of-state patients, similar to an amendment that would be offered on HB 390 the following day.
Same goes for an amendment that Minority Whip Justin Ready (R-Frederick and Carroll) offered, to require that ACA-funded grants for abortion services be restricted to Maryland residents.
Both Republican-backed amendments failed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
26 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump to sign legislation cracking down on illicit fentanyl
President Donald Trump will host congressional leaders and families affected by the fentanyl epidemic on Wednesday for a signing ceremony on bipartisan legislation that would strengthen prison sentences for fentanyl traffickers, White House officials tell CNN. The Halt All Lethal Trafficking of Fentanyl Act, which recently passed both the Senate and the House with bipartisan support, represents a key priority for the president who has claimed the illicit flow of fentanyl is one of the underlying reasons for his tariff threats against Canada, Mexico and China. The bill will place all fentanyl-related substances, specifically, copycat versions of the drug, on the US Drug Enforcement Administration's list of most dangerous drugs, classifying them as Schedule I under the Controlled Substances Act. The Trump administration argues the move will limit the incentive for cartels to create new synthetic, fentanyl-like drugs to evade the reach of the Controlled Substances Act. 'Under the HALT Fentanyl Act, anyone who possesses, imports, distributes, or manufactures any illicit FRS (fentanyl-related substances) will be subject to criminal prosecution in the same manner as any other Schedule I controlled substance,' a White House document on the legislation obtained by CNN reads. 'First, we close the loopholes criminals use to skirt around the law. Second, we make it easier for law enforcement to prosecute those criminals,' the document says. While the legislation has received strong bipartisan support, some critics argue the bill could lead to harsh penalties for millions of people struggling with drug addiction, especially Black Americans. The White House event, scheduled for 3 p.m. on Wednesday, will prominently feature families who have lost loved ones due to fentanyl use, including activist Anne Funder, who lost her eldest son — 15-year-old Weston — to fentanyl poisoning. Funder was also a speaker at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee last year, where she called on the government to do more to deal with the fentanyl crisis in the US. Gregory Swan, whose son Drew died of fentanyl poisoning, will also speak. In the years following his son's death, Swan started a group known as Fentanyl Fathers, in which parents tell their story to high schools across America. Jacqueline Siegel, the founder of Victoria's Voice, an organization born from the loss of her 18-year-old daughter Victoria to a drug overdose in 2015, is also expected to speak. House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune will attend the ceremony, the officials said. GOP Sens. Chuck Grassley, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Bill Cassidy — who introduced the legislation with Democratic Sen. Martin Heinrich — will also be in attendance. Several organizations that have backed the legislation will also join the president for the ceremony, the officials said, including the Fraternal Order of Police and anti-immigration groups the Center for Immigration Studies and Federation for American Immigration Reform, among other drug, immigration and law enforcement groups.
The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
Mamdani says he wouldn't use ‘globalize the intifada' term: Reports
New York City Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani said he wouldn't use the phrase 'globalize the intifada' and would discourage others from using it as he faces scrutiny over his unwillingness to fully denounce the expression, multiple outlets reported. Mamdani, a state Assembly member who pulled off an upset victory to win the Democratic primary for mayor, has received significant criticism over the past month for comments he made during an interview in which he avoided condemning the phrase that has been a lightning rod throughout much of the Israel-Hamas war. In June, he said the phrase can have different meanings to different people, and he hears from the phrase a 'desperate desire for equality and equal rights in standing up for Palestinian human rights.' He has also said he wouldn't use the term itself, and no instances have come to light of Mamdani using it. But three people familiar with Mamdani's comments in front of a group of business leaders on Tuesday told The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal that he said he wouldn't use it and doesn't believe others should use it either. The outlet reported that the meeting included 150 executives at a closed-door event hosted by the Partnership for New York, a group of members representing banks, law firms and corporations. The phrase has received widespread attention since Hamas's Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel that claimed 1,200 lives. Pro-Palestinian activists have maintained the phrase only refers to liberation for Palestinians to have the right to their own state and doesn't endorse calls for violence. Meanwhile, pro-Israel supporters and many Jews recall the first and second intifadas that took place in Israel in the 1980s and 2000s in which Palestinians engaged in protests against Israeli occupation. Some were peaceful while others weren't, and many people died on both sides. Mamdani told those in attendance on Tuesday that some see the term as expressing solidarity with Palestinians, but others view it as calling for violence against Israel, the Times reported. The Hill has reached out to Mamdani's campaign for comment. Mamdani's comments come as he tries to coalesce support as the Democratic nominee. He hasn't yet received endorsements from top New York Democrats like House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand. All of them have been critical of Mamdani's defense of the term and called for him to reassure Jewish New Yorkers that he will represent them too. Mamdani is taking part in a breakfast on Wednesday in Washington with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and is expected to meet with Jeffries this week. The Democratic nominee is facing a multi-candidate field in the general election, including former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, whom he defeated in the primary. Cuomo announced Monday that he is running as an independent, alongside Mayor Eric Adams who's also running as an independent, Republican Curtis Sliwa and independent Jim Walden.
The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
Bondi suggests she has no plans to step down, dodges Epstein questions
Attorney General Pam Bondi sidestepped questions and calls for her to resign over the Justice Department's (DOJ) handling of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein's files on Tuesday, instead focusing on the Trump administration's goals to fight the fentanyl drug crisis. 'I'm going to be here for as long as the president wants me here,' Bondi told reporters during an event Tuesday evening. 'And I believe he's made that crystal clear.' One reporter asked the attorney general to explain discrepancies between the joint DOJ-FBI memo issued last week — which concluded that Epstein died by suicide and that a 'client list' did not exist — and comments she made in February suggesting such a list was on her desk waiting for review. Bondi brushed off the question, seeking to turn the conversation back to the war on drugs. 'This today is about fentanyl overdoses throughout our country and people who have lost loved ones to fentanyl,' she said. 'That's the message that we're here to send today. I'm not going to talk about Epstein.' In recent days some Republicans and Democrats alike have pressured the Trump administration to release the Epstein files in full or offer more of an explanation. Some conservative commentators have gone as far as to ask Bondi to resign over the controversy. The White House and Trump have stuck behind Bondi amid the turmoil, seeking to clarify her previous comments. 'She was saying the entirety of all of the paperwork, all of the paper in relation to Jeffrey Epstein's crimes,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said earlier this week. 'That's what the attorney general was referring to, and I'll let her speak for that.' Amid pushback over word choice, Trump too has vehemently defended his attorney general's work ethic — especially as fissures emerge among his ' Make America Great Again ' base over the controversy. 'They're all going after Attorney General Pam Bondi, who is doing a FANTASTIC JOB!' Trump wrote over the weekend. 'We're on one Team, MAGA, and I don't like what's happening.' On Tuesday, the president said Bondi should release 'whatever she thinks is credible.' He also pressed his supporters to move on, calling the Epstein drama 'boring.' 'I don't understand why the Jeffrey Epstein case would be of interest to anybody. It's pretty boring stuff. It's sordid, but it's boring,' Trump told reporters. 'And I don't understand why it keeps going. I think really only pretty bad people, including fake news, want to keep something like that going.' Bondi lauded the president for his support throughout public criticism and reaffirmed her commitment to the administration. 'We're going to fight to keep America safe again and we're fighting together as a team,' she said Tuesday.
