Cambodia-Thailand conflict: Monks, dancers and volunteers offer respite as violence escalates
SURIN, Thailand (AP) — Long-festering tensions over border territory have escalated into armed conflict between Cambodia and Thailand, leading to dozens of deaths on both sides and displacing tens of thousands of people.
Neither side is prepared to claim responsibility for the first volley on Thursday, and they each blame the other for the continuing skirmishes. While regional and international allies and organizations have called for a ceasefire, scant attempts at mediation had resulted in no peace talks as of early Sunday.
It's a grim situation, but there is some light amid the darkness. On both sides of the border, some people are working around the destruction, intent on creating a safe space or finding normalcy.
A Buddhist temple with a homemade bomb shelter
A temple in Thailand 's northeastern province of Surin has something most of the country's 27,000 active Buddhist monasteries do not: a concrete bunker to shelter from bombs and shelling.
The temple, which asked not to be identified by name because of safety concerns, is about 10 kilometers (6 miles) from the border with Cambodia.
The temple's abbot, Phut Analayo, said the decision to build a bunker was made shortly after a brief armed clash between Thai and Cambodian soldiers in May inflamed cross-border relations, culminating in the current fighting.
Phut Analayo said donations paid for materials and equipment for the bunker, and the temple's monks and nearby villagers built it in four or five days. Construction was speedy because the bunker is made from large precast concrete drainage pipes a little over a meter (yard) in diameter, protected by mounds of earth, metal frames and sheeting.
It's divided into two tubular rooms, each about four meters (yards) long, and wired with electricity. There's a kitchen with a kettle, an electric rice cooker and basic cookware.
It's a tight fit, but because most of the nearby residents have fled to safer areas, there is enough space for the temple's six monks and the dozen or so villagers who sleep there every night.
'When we need to use the bathroom, we have to wait to make sure if things are quiet. If it's quiet out there, we will go out,' Phut Analayo said.
He said his temple has ceased religious activities for now but that the remaining monks stayed out of concern for the monastery and the people it serves.
'If I leave, the people who rely on us will lose their spirit," he said. 'I'm scared too, but I'll just stay here for now, when I can.'
Thai monasteries frequently serve as sanctuaries for stray dogs, and the more than 10 living at the temple are seemingly unbothered by the crisis.
"If I leave them behind, how will they live? What will they eat? So I have to stay to take care of them. Every life loves their lives all the same,' Phut Analayo said.
Ballroom dancers heed the call to help their countrymen
Learning ballroom dancing is how some senior citizens in northeastern Thailand usually spend their leisure hours, but the latest border conflict has motivated them to try to help some of the thousands of people displaced by the fighting.
About a dozen members of the Ballroom Dance for Health of the Elderly of Surin Province club went Saturday to a shelter housing about 1,000 evacuees, where they handed out clothes, toiletries, blankets and pillows.
Retired civil servant Chadaporn Duchanee, the ballroom teacher, initiated the project. On Friday, she gathered with friends at her home to fill small yellow plastic bowls with toiletries and other goods to give to the evacuees.
The 62-year-old posted on Facebook about the donation she made on Thursday, and her pupils proved happy to participate, too.
'We want to help, said Chadaporn. 'Everyone left in a hurry, without bringing their belongings, just trying to escape the line of fire, so they fled empty handed,'
Prapha Sanpote, a 75-year-old member of Chadaporn's donation team, said she hopes the conflict is resolved quickly.
'Our people couldn't go home. They have to leave home, and it's not just the home they had to leave,' he said. 'It's their belongings, their cattle, or their pet dogs, because they left without anything. How will those animals live? Everything is affected.'
A pop-up stall to feed those fleeing fighting and those headed into battle
It looks just like your typical roadside stall found commonly all over Southeast Asia, but this one seems exceptionally well-provisioned.
Also, it's not selling anything, even though there are boxes of bottled water, plastic bags filled with fruit and vegetables and the occasional packet of instant noodles. It is there to solicit donations of food and other essentials to give to evacuees escaping fighting along the border. It also gives handouts to members of the armed forces headed in the other direction, toward the front lines.
This pop-up operation is at the border of Siem Reap, home to Cambodia's Angkor Wat temple complex, and Oddar Meanchey province, which is an active combat zone. It's a one-stop shop on a key road that convoys of police and military vehicles roar along with sirens blaring.
Chhar Sin, a 28-year-old self-described youth volunteer, mans the stall, which is located in her home Srey Snam district.
'We're used to seeing people bustling around, we're not surprised by that,' she said, between handing out parcels to eager hands.
But even here, 100 kilometers (60 miles) from the border with Thailand, she senses people don't feel safe, as the streets seem emptier than usual.
She and other volunteers, are spending the weekend collecting supplies from ordinary Cambodians to dole out to the less fortunate. Families drive by on tractors to donate vegetables, while others swing by on motorbikes carrying bananas, dragon fruit and rambutans.
'For today and tomorrow, we are standing here waiting to give gifts to the people who are displaced from war zones and are seeking safety,' Chhar Sin said Saturday. 'We will provide them with food because they have nothing, and some of them come with only a few clothes and a hat.'
When she woke up Saturday morning, Kim Muny, made the decision not to open her convenience store, but instead cook rice for members of the Cambodian military and fleeing civilians.
'Cambodians have a kind heart. When we heard that soldiers and displaced people needed help, we decided to help with an open heart,' said the 45-year-old after donating parcels of rice wrapped in banana leaves at the stall. 'We know our soldiers don't have time to cook, so we will do it for them.'
The city empties but its temple's top monk isn't moving
Alone in a mostly evacuated pagoda, Tho Thoross began a Buddhist chant to express gratitude for all that is good in life.
The 38-year-old Tho Thoross is one of the last monks in the city of Samrong, the provincial capital of Cambodia's Oddar Meanchey province, which is on the front line of the cross-border fighting. Most civilians have fled the town, spooked by the sounds of artillery and what they suspect was a Thai military drone hovering above them.
All but seven of the 40 monks at the monastery have left. As chief monk of Wat Prasat Samrong Thom, Tho Thoross ordered more than a dozen of the temple's novices — young monks in training — to evacuate to displacement camps farther from the border with Thailand, which is 40 kilometers (25 miles) away.
The temple is the largest in the town of Samrong, as well as the oldest, dating back over a century.
Its distance from the border does not keep it protected from artillery and aerial attacks, but it nonetheless is considered a relatively safe place. Most Cambodians and Thais are Buddhists.
Nine monks from other temples that felt more insecure are also staying at Wat Prasat Samrong Thom.
In the Buddhist tradition, temples are community centers and almost always places of sanctuary, and on Thursday, several displaced villagers stopped by briefly on their way to a government-arranged safety zone. Tho Thoross provided them with food.
He said the latest fighting is '10 times bigger' than prolonged clashes over similar issues in 2008 and 2011, when the clashes were confined to certain areas.
'But today, the fighting is happening everywhere along the border.' said Tho Thoross, who has lived in Oddar Meanchey for nearly three decades.
'As a Buddhist monk living in a province bordering Thailand, I would like to call on both sides to work together to find a solution that is a win-win solution for all,' he declared Saturday.
_____
Sopheng Cheang and Delgado reported from Samrong, Cambodia; Peck reported from Bangkok. Associated Press video journalist Tian Macleod Ji in Surin, Thailand contributed to this report.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Bride Yelled at Her 2 Years Ago. Now She Refuses to Join Husband on Couples' Outings
One woman says she's done spending time with her husband's friend's wife after a series of tense encountersNEED TO KNOW A woman refuses to attend a boating trip with her husband's friend due to past tension with the friend's wife She says the bride once screamed at her in front of others before a wedding ceremony, with no warning or cause The woman now avoids all interaction with the couple and wonders if she's in the wrong for keeping her distanceA woman seeks support from the Reddit community after refusing to hang out with her husband's friend as a couple, following an uncomfortable history with the friend's wife. In a post shared to the AITAH subreddit, she details a series of upsetting experiences that have led her to draw a firm boundary. 'She once yelled at my husband to 'get out' when he walked inside of their house to use the restroom,' the woman recalls, explaining that her husband had the groom's permission and was visiting as a guest. The situation escalated to the point where the rest of the visit took place awkwardly in the garage. The tensions continued during the wedding itself, where her husband served as a groomsman less than two years ago. On the way to the venue, the bride called her and asked her to pick up a sign-in book that had been forgotten, a task she gladly accepted. But later, things took a turn when the bride began screaming at guests. 'Anyone NOT in the bridal party is NOT ALLOWED to be in this part of the venue until the wedding begins,' she recalls the bride shouting at the top of her lungs. Embarrassed and uncomfortable, she offered to leave and pick up her husband after the ceremony. 'There were no signs, no instruction, the valet never notified us, security never notified us of this rule,' she explains, adding that she ended up sitting in her car for over an hour with another guest. Her husband was upset by the way she was treated and offered to leave, but she encouraged him to stay and chalked it up to wedding stress. Still, she says she didn't feel 'fully comfortable for the rest of the night,' and the experience left a lasting impression. Following the wedding, the couple's interaction with the groom and his now-wife grew sparse. They missed the couple's gender reveal after her mother passed away just days prior and were met with backlash for not attending. 'They were pissed we didn't go and made it an opportunity to talk badly about us,' she shares. Since then, she's seen the bride only briefly at social events, making a point to 'keep my distance.' The groom, however, has been eager to rekindle the friendship and has repeatedly invited the couple on boating trips. But the woman refuses to go, explaining, 'I really don't want to be stuck on a boat with her for hours.' Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Despite her insistence that her husband go without her, he won't. 'I tell him to go by himself, but he refuses this option,' she says, noting that every week he brings it up and every week she shuts it down. Her husband seems disappointed but ultimately understanding. 'Husband seems bothered by having to turn down what should be a fun time but understands that it wouldn't actually be a fun time,' she writes. Still, the situation leaves her feeling conflicted. 'I feel like I may be the AH because husband and groom were very close,' she admits, 'and now that he's married to a woman I don't feel comfortable around, I am becoming the 'factor' that keeps them apart.' One commenter suggests a solution that resonates with the woman. 'Suggest to hubby that maybe they should just make it a man's trip for just them two,' the commenter offers. The woman agrees but shares that the groom's wife is unlikely to be okay with that plan. 'She has to be there or it doesn't happen,' she explains, indicating that the bride insists on being included in everything. Now, the woman remains firm in her decision, even as she grapples with guilt over the tension it's caused. Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
15 Phrases That Start Fights Every Single Time
We've all been there—those moments when words slip out, and suddenly, it's game on. It's not that you aim to start a fight; it just happens. Sometimes, it's about phrasing, and other times, it's about the timing. But wouldn't it be nice to avoid these verbal landmines? Let's take a look at 15 phrases that seem to spark arguments every single time. 1. "Calm Down." If you ever want to escalate a situation quickly, telling someone to "calm down" is a surefire way to do it. This phrase is often perceived as dismissive, implying that the person's feelings are invalid or exaggerated. According to Dr. John Gottman, a renowned relationship expert, dismissive phrases can lead to increased conflict because they fail to acknowledge the other person's emotions. Instead of calming the situation, it often pours fuel on the fire. When emotions run high, validation goes a lot further than commands to chill out. When you tell someone to calm down, you might as well be saying, "Your feelings are not important." It's not just the words but the tone that often accompanies this remark that makes it incendiary. Try replacing "calm down" with a simple acknowledgment of how the person feels. For example, "I see you're upset, let's talk about it" tends to work better. Recognizing emotions helps to de-escalate rather than inflame the situation. 2. "You Always..." Starting a sentence with "You always" is like throwing a verbal grenade. It often leads to defensiveness because it feels like an attack on their character. People rarely do something all the time, and this exaggeration invalidates the rest of what you're saying. It turns a conversation into a blame game rather than a constructive discussion. By using such absolutes, you leave little room for understanding or resolution. Instead, try to focus on the specific behavior that's bothering you, without making it sound like a character flaw. A statement like "I've noticed that you sometimes do this, and it bothers me" opens up for dialogue. It's less about being right and more about finding a solution that works for both parties. Remember, you're having a conversation, not a competition. Being specific and avoiding generalizations can help keep things civil. 3. "I Don't Care." Saying "I don't care" can be the emotional equivalent of slamming a door in someone's face. It signals a lack of interest or investment in what the other person is saying, shutting down any chance of a meaningful conversation. Research from psychologist Dr. Susan Krauss Whitbourne shows that emotional disengagement is a major predictor of conflict in relationships. It's like turning off the light in a room where someone is trying to find their way. The phrase may seem harmless, but it can be incredibly hurtful. A better approach is to express what you do care about, even if it's not the topic at hand. You might say, "This isn't something I know much about, but I'm interested in understanding your perspective." This way, you show that you value the other person's feelings even if you're not invested in the subject itself. It's about staying engaged, not necessarily sharing the same level of interest. Communication is about connection, not just exchanging words. 4. "You're Just Like Your (Insert Family Member)." Bringing family comparisons into an argument is almost never a good idea. It often triggers defensiveness and can open up old wounds or insecurities that have nothing to do with the current issue. It's usually meant to criticize or point out a flaw, which is unlikely to be received well. Instead of focusing on resolving the problem, it shifts the focus to family dynamics, which are far more complex. This phrase often leaves both parties feeling misunderstood and even more frustrated. A more effective approach is to describe the specific behavior you want to discuss without bringing in someone else's actions. Focus on how the behavior affects you directly, rather than dragging family baggage into it. For example, say, "When you do this, it makes me feel like this," which is more likely to lead to a productive conversation. It's hard to argue with someone's feelings, but easy to argue about family dynamics. By keeping the focus on the issue at hand, you're more likely to find a resolution. 5. "It's Fine." The phrase "it's fine" often acts as a conversation stopper, but not in a good way. It's usually said through clenched teeth and is rarely an accurate reflection of how someone feels. Dr. Deborah Tannen, a linguistics professor, notes that indirect communication like this can lead to misunderstandings and unresolved issues. When you say, "it's fine," you're essentially closing the door on the conversation, signaling that you're not open to discussing it further. Instead of resolving the issue, it can create lingering tension. If something isn't fine, it's better to say so. You don't have to dive into a deep conversation, but acknowledging that something's amiss can prevent further misunderstandings. Try saying something like, "I'm not okay with this right now, but I need some time to process it." This shows that you're not brushing it under the rug but are willing to address it when you're ready. Clarity is key to keeping communication lines open and functional. 6. "You Never Listen." Accusing someone of never listening is a conversation killer. It instantly puts them on the defensive and diminishes any previous attempts they may have made to understand you. This kind of sweeping statement can make the other person feel unappreciated and even frustrated. It turns a specific issue into a broader critique of their character, which is not what you want. The goal is to address the immediate concern, not to make someone feel inadequate. Instead of saying, "You never listen," try pointing out specific instances where you felt unheard. This can open up a more meaningful dialogue about why those moments happened and how to avoid them in the future. You might say, "In our last conversation, I felt like my points were overlooked, and I'd like us to work on that." This way, you're focusing on a solution rather than just pointing out a perceived flaw. The goal should be to listen to each other, not just be heard. 7. "Whatever." Uttering "whatever" is like waving the white flag, but with a side of sarcasm. It's a dismissive phrase that often signals the end of a conversation, not because there's resolution, but because someone has checked out. According to Dr. Preston Ni, a communication specialist, dismissive language can undermine relationships by blocking productive communication. It often leaves the other person feeling unimportant and frustrated, as if their opinions don't matter. The phrase might be short, but its impact can be long-lasting. Instead of resorting to "whatever," try to articulate what's really bothering you. Even if you're feeling overwhelmed, saying, "I need a moment to gather my thoughts," is more constructive. This invites future conversation rather than shutting it down completely. It acknowledges that the issue is important, even if you can't deal with it right then. Effective communication is about finding the right words, even when the going gets tough. 8. "You're Overreacting." Telling someone they're overreacting can feel like an attack on their emotional state. It often signals that you're not willing to understand or validate their feelings, which can be incredibly hurtful. This phrase is usually said with the intention to calm things down, but it rarely does. In fact, it can escalate the situation by making the other person feel belittled. It's better to approach the situation with empathy, acknowledging that everyone's emotional barometer is different. Instead of saying "you're overreacting," aim to understand where the other person is coming from. Ask questions like, "Can you help me understand why you feel this way?" This not only validates their feelings but also opens the door for a more meaningful conversation. It shifts the focus from judgment to understanding, which is always a more productive path. Remember, the goal is to understand and communicate, not to judge or dismiss. 9. "I Told You So." Few things are more infuriating than hearing "I told you so" when something goes wrong. It doesn't just add insult to injury; it also undermines trust and respect in a relationship. This phrase turns a learning moment into a power struggle, emphasizing who was right rather than what can be learned. It often leaves the other person feeling belittled and less likely to listen to you next time. Instead of fostering growth, it stunts it. A better approach is to focus on constructive feedback rather than rubbing salt in the wound. Offer support by asking how you can help fix the problem rather than dwelling on past mistakes. You could say, "Let's see what we can learn from this moving forward." This shows that you're a team, not adversaries. It's about building each other up, not tearing each other down. 10. "You're Too Sensitive." When you tell someone they're too sensitive, it can feel like you're dismissing their feelings entirely. It implies that the problem lies with them for having emotions, not with the situation that triggered them. This often leads to defensiveness and hurt, rather than resolving the issue at hand. Emotional sensitivity varies from person to person, and it's essential to respect that. Instead of dismissing their feelings, try to understand them. A more productive approach is to ask why the person feels the way they do. This not only validates their emotions but also provides an opportunity for a deeper understanding. You might ask, "What about this situation upset you?" This encourages open dialogue and helps you both get to the root of the issue. Remember, empathy goes a long way in diffusing tension and fostering connection. 11. "You're Making A Big Deal Out Of Nothing." Saying someone is making a big deal out of nothing is a classic way to invalidate their feelings. It downplays their emotions and makes them feel like they're overreacting, which can escalate the tension rather than diminish it. This phrase puts the other person on the defensive, making it harder to resolve the actual issue. It turns the conversation into a debate about who's right, rather than what's wrong. The goal should be to understand and support, not to minimize. Instead of saying this, try asking questions to get a better grasp of their perspective. Show genuine interest in understanding why the situation is significant to them. You might say, "Help me understand why this is important to you." This opens up a dialogue rather than shutting it down. Everyone wants to feel heard, and this approach makes it possible. 12. "Why Can't You Be More Like..." Comparisons are rarely helpful, especially in heated conversations. Saying "Why can't you be more like..." can feel like an attack on someone's self-worth. It can trigger insecurities and make the individual feel like they're falling short, which isn't conducive to effective communication. It shifts the focus from resolving the issue to competing with someone else's standards. This phrase often leaves the other person feeling inadequate and unappreciated. A more constructive approach is to focus on the specific behaviors you'd like to see, without comparing them to others. Highlight what you value and appreciate in them, and discuss how certain changes could enhance those qualities. For instance, "I love when you do this, and I think trying that could make it even better" emphasizes positive growth rather than comparison. It's about encouraging improvement, not creating rivalry. Supporting each other should always be the aim. 13. "It's Not That Big Of A Deal." When you say something isn't that big of a deal, you risk trivializing the other person's feelings. It's a way of saying their emotions are unwarranted, which can lead to increased frustration and hurt. This phrase often undermines the person's experience, making them feel like their concerns don't matter. It stops the conversation before it even begins, creating a wall instead of a bridge. The aim should be to understand, not to downplay. Instead, acknowledge the other person's feelings and the situation's significance to them. You might say, "I see this is important to you, and I'd like to understand why." This opens up a dialogue and shows that you're willing to engage, even if you don't fully agree. It's about validating their perspective and being open to understanding it. Communication is a two-way street, and both voices deserve to be heard. 14. "You Shouldn't Feel That Way." Telling someone they shouldn't feel a certain way is an attempt to invalidate their emotions. It implies that their feelings are wrong, which can lead to defensiveness and even resentment. This phrase often comes from a place of misunderstanding, as it's easier to dismiss emotions than to deal with them. However, feelings are subjective and personal, and telling someone they're incorrect won't help. Instead of ending the conversation, it merely fuels the fire. A more supportive approach is to ask why they feel the way they do, even if it doesn't make sense to you. Everyone's emotional landscape is different, and it's crucial to respect that. You might say, "I see you're feeling this way, and I'm here to listen and understand." This opens up a pathway for dialogue and mutual understanding. It's about being there for each other, not dictating what's right or wrong. 15. "You're Being Irrational." Labeling someone as irrational is a quick way to end a productive conversation. It's often seen as an insult, suggesting that the person's thoughts and feelings are without merit. This phrase is not only dismissive but also patronizing, creating a divide rather than a connection. It turns the focus from resolving the issue to defending one's rationality. The aim should be to find common ground, not to undermine the other person. Instead of calling someone irrational, try to understand why they see things the way they do. Ask questions that invite explanation and deeper understanding. You might say, "I'm having trouble seeing it from your perspective. Can you help me understand?" This shows a willingness to engage rather than dismiss, making it easier to find a resolution. Effective communication is about empathy and understanding, not judgment. Solve the daily Crossword
New York Times
a day ago
- New York Times
Russian Nuclear Submarine Base Was Damaged in Quake, Satellite Images Show
A nuclear submarine base in the remote Far East of Russia sustained minor damage last week after the region was rocked by one of the strongest earthquakes in decades, satellite imagery suggests. A floating pier at the Rybachiy submarine base, one of the key sites for Russia's Pacific Fleet on the Kamchatka peninsula, appeared to have been badly damaged, according to satellite images taken on Sunday by Planet Labs, a commercial satellite company. One section of the pier appeared to be detached from its mooring. No other major damage is visible, and several vessels, including five submarines, were seen moored at piers nearby. There has been no official announcement about damage at the base, and the Russian media has said nothing on the subject. International bodies monitoring nuclear sites have not reported heightened radiation levels in the area. Some of Rybachiy's floating piers are brand-new: At least two new piers have been commissioned and installed at the base since Russia's invasion of Ukraine began in 2022, according to the military. The base, built during Soviet times, was set up in a cove in order to protect the vessels from the high waves and storms of the open sea just a few miles away. Although several piers at Rybachiy appear to be intact, one showed signs of damage from tsunami waves caused by the earthquake. 'This is unlikely to affect the battle readiness of the base — and repairs for the pier are probably not going to be costly,' the Conflict Intelligence Team, a research group that uses open-source data to study the Russian military, told The New York Times in response to a request for an assessment. The 8.8-magnitude earthquake struck the Far East of Russia on Wednesday, rattling local residents, sending huge tsunami waves toward the Pacific Coast and setting off alerts across the world. The epicenter of the earthquake was about 80 miles away from Rybachiy. The base is situated on the same bay as the regional capital of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskiy, which suffered minor damage. Tsunami waves did not reach the city itself but were sighted in the open sea a few miles away. The submarine base and the town of Rybachiy are high-security sites where public access is restricted. Russia this summer moved some of its military assets farther east after a daring Ukrainian drone attack launched from within Russia hit several high-profile targets thousands of miles away from the frontline, including an airfield in eastern Siberia. Kamchatka was battered last week with a series of seismic events, including a major earthquake and its aftershocks as well as volcano eruptions.
