Toxic Thailand rivers pinned on Myanmar mines
The complex is one of around a dozen extraction operations that have sprung up in Shan state since around 2022, in territory controlled by the United Wa State Army (UWSA), one of conflict-wracked Myanmar's largest and best-equipped ethnic armed groups.
A few kilometres away across the border, locals and officials in Thailand believe toxic waste is washing downstream from the mines into the Kok River, which flows through the kingdom's far north on its way to join the mighty Mekong.
Thai authorities say they have detected abnormally high arsenic levels in their waterways, which could pose a risk to aquatic life and the people further up the food chain.
The price fisherman Sawat Kaewdam gets for his catch has fallen by almost half, he says, because locals fear contamination.
"They say, 'There's arsenic. I don't want to eat that fish'," he told AFP.
Tests in Chiang Mai and Chiang Rai by a government pollution agency found levels of the toxic element as high as 49 microgrammes per litre (mcg/l) of river water -- nearly five times international drinking water standards.
Experts say that while the effects on human health would not be visible immediately, the fish-heavy local diet risks a cumulative impact over several years.
"We already know where the contamination is coming from," says fisherman Sawat.
"They should go fix it at the source."
- Fivefold rise -
Pianporn Deetes, campaign director of the International Rivers NGO, blames the arsenic levels on Shan state's unlicensed mines, which operate outside any regulation or control by the central government.
It was Thailand's "largest-ever case of transboundary pollution", she added.
The mines are believed to be run by Chinese companies with close links to the UWSA, whose members themselves have longstanding ties to China, speak Mandarin and use China's yuan currency.
It is unclear whether the mines are digging for gold, rare earths or a variety of minerals, and it is also difficult to gauge the size of an industry operating in a secretive grey zone.
But videos on Chinese social media suggest much of what is produced in Myanmar ends up being sold to Chinese buyers.
In a report Tuesday citing Chinese customs data, think tank ISP-Myanmar said the country was the source of around two-thirds of China's rare earth imports by value.
The Asian giant had imported five times as much rare earths from Myanmar in the four years since the 2021 military coup than in the equivalent preceding period, it added.
Many modern mines use a system of tailing ponds to reuse leftover waste and water and stop it being released into rivers, said Tanapon Phenrat of Naresuan University's civil engineering department.
But "in Myanmar, they reportedly discharge it directly into natural waterways", he added, increasing the risk of contamination spreading into the food chain.
"What we need is for mines to treat their waste properly and stop discharging toxic substances into shared waterways."
AFP was unable to reach UWSA officials for comment.
- 'Legal and orderly' -
From its Myanmar headwaters, the 285-kilometre (177-mile) Kok River is a vital resource for thousands of people as it wends through Chiang Rai province on its way to feed the Mekong.
In Chiang Rai City, a tranquil place popular with tourists, environmentalists dressed as wart-afflicted fish dance in protest.
The Thai government has proposed building a dam to prevent contaminated water from entering the country, but campaigners say physical barriers alone cannot stop pollution.
Bangkok acknowledges that Myanmar's junta may be unable to stop Chinese companies operating mines in militia-controlled areas.
And Chonthicha Jangrew of Thailand's parliamentary foreign affairs committee met senior Beijing officials last month, urging them to supervise Chinese mining firms "in order to stop the impact on people downstream", she said.
The Chinese embassy in Bangkok posted on Facebook Sunday that it had instructed Chinese companies "to comply with the laws of the host country and to conduct their business in a legal and orderly fashion at all times".
The Myanmar junta did not respond to questions from AFP.
"But this is a clear signal," he added. "We need to act now."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
a day ago
- ABC News
US drops sanctions on Myanmar junta's allies after military chief praises Donald Trump
The United States has lifted sanctions on several allies of Myanmar's ruling generals and their military-linked companies in a move that has prompted concern from politicians and rights groups. Junta chief Min Aung Hlaing seized power in a 2021 coup, deposing the civilian government and sparking a civil war that has killed thousands, displaced 3.5 million left and half the nation in poverty. The US Treasury announcement it would lift the sanctions came two weeks after Min Aung Hlaing sent a glowing letter of praise to US President Donald Trump, in response to his threat of tariffs, and commended him for shutting down US-funded media outlets covering the conflict. Rights groups say the decision risks undermining efforts to hold the country's military regime accountable. The US Treasury said it had dropped sanctions against KT Services & Logistics and its founder, Jonathan Myo Kyaw Thaung, who were sanctioned in 2022 for leasing Yangon's port from a military-owned firm. Others delisted include the Myanmar Chemical and Machinery Company and Suntac Technologies, which were previously sanctioned for producing arms, including tanks and mortars. A US Treasury spokesperson said the removals were conducted "in the ordinary course of business" and declined to explain why the individuals were removed from the list. A senior Trump administration official said the decision was unrelated to the general's letter. John Sifton, Asia advocacy director at Human Rights Watch, described the decision as "extremely worrying" and said it suggested a weakening of the US sanctions regime. "The individuals involved are not marginal players; they have facilitated the junta's arms imports from countries such as China and Russia," analyst Sean Turnell told the ABC. "These are people who are closely tied to Myanmar's war economy. "Lifting sanctions on them sends the wrong message." The sanctions decision comes as Myanmar's military continues deadly air strikes against civilians. In May, a junta air strike on a school in Sagaing region killed 20 students and two teachers, according to local witnesses. The strike was carried out despite a purported humanitarian ceasefire called to help the nation recover from a devastating earthquake. In July, more than 20 civilians, including children, were reportedly killed in another air strike on a monastery sheltering displaced people. Amnesty International data has shown that the military has continued importing aviation fuel despite sanctions, enabling lethal air strikes across the country. This year, the junta's China and Russia-backed forces have clawed back ground on the northern front. State media also said its soldiers managed "to fully retake" the gold mining town of Thabeikkyin this week. Early this month, as part of a slate of import tariffs Mr Trump ordered, Myanmar was notified of a 40 per cent tariff to take effect on August 1. On July 11, Min Aung Hlaing responded by proposing a reduced rate of 10 per cent to 20 per cent. US Democratic Representative Ami Bera, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Asia, said the decision to lift the sanctions "goes against our values of freedom and democracy". However, White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said that sanctions delistings "were collected over the last year in accordance with standard Treasury course of business". The US maintains sanctions against Min Aung Hlaing and two state-owned banks, the Myanma Foreign Trade Bank (MFTB) and Myanma Investment and Commercial Bank (MICB). Mr Turnell said it was important to keep individuals and banks involved in the military's procurement network on the sanctions list as it could complicate efforts to restrict the regime's access to foreign currency, which remains critical for weapons purchases. "Even Myanmar's allies, such as Russia and China, insist on payment in dollars or euros," Mr Turnell said. "That makes financial sanctions one of the most effective levers the US still holds." ABC/wires
SBS Australia
20-07-2025
- SBS Australia
In a $29 billion race for influence, Australia trails China as our allies turn away
China is leading the development race in Southeast Asia as traditional donors like the United States and United Kingdom step away from the region, according to a new Lowy Institute report. The third edition of the Southeast Asia Aid Map shows China increased its regional development spend in 2023 for the first time in three years. "The lack of Western and European money going into Southeast Asia is a real problem," says Grace Stanhope, a research associate at the Lowy Institute. "We're projecting a 20 per cent drop in bilateral foreign aid to the region by 2026." Writing shortly after the 2025 federal election, the Lowy Institute's Grace Stanhope said the re-elected Albanese government would "have to move fast" if it wanted to increase Australia's influence in Southeast Asia. Source: Supplied China favours infrastructure, loans After reducing its annual Southeast Asian development spend by 68 per cent over five years, China boosted its financing in 2023. The regional superpower is still favouring market-rate loans for infrastructure projects, with rail ventures in Indonesia and Malaysia accounting for most of the annual increase. China is on track to overtake traditional partners in infrastructure spending, quadrupling its commitments from 2022 to 2023 through the revival of the Kyaukphyu Deep Sea Port Project in Myanmar. Development spending committed by both China and Australia's traditional partner nations to Southeast Asia has decreased since 2015. Source: SBS News It's the loans to the region's poorest countries — like Myanmar, Laos, and Cambodia — that have some concerned. "These countries have far less options in terms of other development providers, and also far higher development needs," says Stanhope. "Increasingly, these countries have little room to manoeuvre in their negotiations." Stanhope warns reduced competition could reduce domestic scrutiny on China's funding. "I think we can expect to see less pressure for reform in terms of China's development finance offering if there are no viable alternatives." Most countries in the Indo-Pacific region have avoided high debt burdens taken on by other developing countries. Globally, a third of developing nations spend more on interest repayments than health each year. "We don't want countries in the Indo Pacific to be heavily indebted," says Melissa Conley Tyler, executive director at the Asia Pacific Development Diplomacy and Defence Dialogue. "That's a huge problem if countries can't provide the services that they need to their citizens because they're paying back debt." Further cuts expected The full impact of aid cuts is yet to be seen in the region. The Lowy Institute says that will result in the "centre of gravity" shifting in Southeast Asian development financing. Source: SBS News Australia's response Australia increased its aid to Southeast Asia in 2023, with Labor committed to raising its international assistance budget annually in line with inflation. Speaking after the ASEAN Leaders Summit earlier this month, Foreign Minister Penny Wong said Australia had "sought to pivot our aid to the [Indo-Pacific] region" in response to recent cuts. "Some 75 cents in every dollar that Australia provides in development assistance is directed to our broader region;" said Wong. "We will continue to prioritise that." Source: SBS News Conley-Tyler says it's critical for Australia to maintain that focus. "If you have a pandemic or animal diseases, if you have climate migration, all of those things are going to matter greatly to Australia," she says. "We would, of course, prefer to live in a region that is secure and stable and prosperous. And so the money we put into things like our development assistance is helping on our national interest in that."
ABC News
19-07-2025
- ABC News
East Perth residents rally against planned conversion of Fraser Suites building into public housing
Neighbours of a short-stay hotel earmarked for public housing in Perth's CBD are calling on the WA government to hold open forums to hear their concerns, which they say range from noise pollution to lack of parking. Nearby residents will gather outside Fraser Suites in East Perth on Saturday morning to protest against the plan to covert the 19-storey tower into 236 social and affordable units. Four other apartment blocks in the strata group will remain owners, including resident Ben Stephenson, fear the hotel suites are not designed for long-term living and that common areas will come under strain. "The more people you get in an area it can become a bit rowdy and become unpleasant for people who don't like that volume of people in one particular area," he said. Mr Stephenson said they had been denied proper consultation after the state government purchased the serviced apartment building for $105 million. Mr Stephenson said the Department of Communities had been meeting with people in groups of eight in 20 minute said the process was not working and called for bigger Q+A forums to be held so residents' concerns can be Minister John Carey has previously told the ABC the complex would consist of mostly affordable rentals that would house people on lower incomes like retail, hospitality and aged care workers. The minister said East Perth needed to lift its weight when it came to social housing, having only 3.2 per cent, compared to 11 per cent in nearby Highgate. The public housing waitlist was 22,315 applications long at the end of May, with many representing multiple people. Of those, 7,291 urgently need a home.
