
UK MPs to vote on Palestine Action ban
If MPs vote in favour, the order will go before the House of Lords on Thursday, with the ban due to come into force as soon as Saturday.
If passed, the move will designate Palestine Action a terrorist organisation, making membership and support for them a criminal offence, and punishable by up to 14 years in prison.
It will mark the first time that a direct action group has faced proscription, placing it alongside groups like the Islamic State and al-Qaeda under British law.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's order, which was laid before parliament on 23 June, has proposed two other organisations, neo-Nazi groups the Maniacs Murder Cult (MMC) and the Russian Imperial Movement (RIM) for proscription along with Palestine Action.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
In a statement, Cooper said that each of the groups had 'passed the threshold for proscription based on clear national security evidence and assessments'.
All three proscription orders will be debated and voted on together under the statutory instrument, with MPs unable to vote to ban some organisations and not others.
Palestine Action said the move to group the organisations together in the same vote is a deliberate attempt to ensure the order passes and forms part of Cooper's efforts to proscribe the group 'via the backdoor without proper Parliamentary consideration'.
Clare Hinchliffe, the mother of one of 18 Palestine Action activists who were arrested on terrorism charges in August 2024 and have been held on remand since, told MEE that the ban could criminalise her support for her daughter.
"It's scary, because we will continue to advocate for our loved ones and we don't know if that will be interpreted as support for Palestine Action," she said.
"I cannot afford to go to prison. I am needed to support my daughter. I'm a single parent, the only one paying the mortgage. I have a younger daughter to care for. I can't go to prison, but I'm outraged that I should be put in that position for advocating for my daughter."
'A terrifying escalation'
On Monday, the High Court granted Palestine Action an urgent hearing on Friday to consider a judicial review of the decision. If successful, the group's co-founder, Huda Ammori, would be given the opportunity to apply for "interim relief", which could stay the ban until after the review.
Speaking to Middle East Eye on Tuesday, Ammori said that she thought it was likely the ban will be voted through.
"Palestine Action was formed because we didn't rely on appealing to the politicians and the government to create changes for the people of Palestine," Ammori said.
UK High Court grants Palestine Action urgent hearing to challenge ban Read More »
"I understand how the system works and it's not a democracy by any means," she said, adding that she thought it would be likely MPs will be whipped to supporting the ban.
"I don't think that's an excuse for us to be complacent in not holding them to account. Every single person who votes for us to be proscribed should be held to account for this huge attack on civil liberties."
Meanwhile, pressure is mounting on Cooper to abandon the ban, with several UN special rapporteurs warning the decision could have a "chilling effect' on protest and advocacy in relation to Palestine.
On Tuesday, hundreds of lawyers signed two letters to Cooper from the Network for Police Monitoring (Netpol) lawyers' group and the Haldane Society of Socialist Lawyers, warning that the group's ban could set a dangerous precedent.
Also on Tuesday, Amnesty International's UK CEO wrote to parliamentarians, warning that the group's proscription would be a 'grave misuse of anti-terrorism powers'.
'The proscription of Palestine Action would be wholly unnecessary, disproportionate, and in violation of the right to freedom of association and expression amongst other human rights at risk should this harmful and dangerous motion proceed,' the NGO's UK chief, Sacha Deshmukh, said.
Yasmine Ahmed, UK director of Human Rights Watch, described the proposed ban as 'a terrifying escalation in this government's crusade to curtail protest rights'.
'Politicians should not be wielding the power of the state to protect corporate interests and silence legitimate non-violent protest. We expect this of authoritarian regimes like Russia or China, not a country like the UK that professes to believe in democratic freedoms.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UAE Moments
2 hours ago
- UAE Moments
UK High Court Refuses Bid to Halt Palestine Action Ban
The UK High Court has declined an urgent request to pause the government's designation of Palestine Action as a proscribed terrorist organisation under the Terrorism Act 2000. The decision paves the way for the ban to take effect as scheduled, with Home Secretary Yvette Cooper expected to finalise the order imminently and the ban to take effect at midnight. Co-founder Huda Ammori challenged the ban, arguing that Palestine Action's non-violent direct action—such as spraying red paint on military aircraft and disrupting arms companies—should not be criminalised under terrorism legislation. Her legal team said that they will seek an "urgent appeal" to prevent a "dystopian nightmare".


Middle East Eye
6 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
US Democrat Ro Khanna faces backlash for TV appearance with anti-Muslim legislator
US Congressman Ro Khanna is facing a deluge of criticism from activists for appearing on a news segment with an anti-Muslim and anti-Palestinian lawmaker. Khanna appeared alongside Republican Congressman Randy Fine in an interview on NewsNation on Thursday, where the politicians discussed the impact of US President Donald Trump's sprawling budget bill, which he and many of his supporters have referred to as the "big, beautiful bill". The interview primarily centred around Medicaid cuts that will result in over 17 million Americans losing access to healthcare. During the interview, Fine repeatedly claimed that "illegal migrants" were benefitting from Medicaid, whilst Khanna emphasised the false nature of those claims and his opposition to the bill. At the end of the interview, Khanna said, "One of the reasons I'm proud is you can have a Democrat of Hindu faith standing side by side with a Republican of Jewish faith having a civil conversation on your show. And we need more of that in this country to bring this country together." New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters For several years, Fine has faced criticism for his incendiary comments against Palestinians, his support for Israel's war on Gaza, as well as his advocacy for the withholding of humanitarian aid from Palestinians. More than 56,000 Palestinians have been killed as a result of the war, which several countries, as well as many international rights groups and experts, now qualify as an act of genocide. This was nauseating to watch. How disgraceful for @RoKhanna to lend credibility to this deplorable Islamophobe who regularly spews some of the most disgusting racist bile against Arabs and Muslims. You're talking about it like he's some tolerant religious man. 🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮 — B L A K E L E Y™℠©® LLC (@_iamblakeley) July 4, 2025 The Florida representative has called for called for Gaza to be destroyed, and in May, during an appearance on Fox News, advocated for the use of nuclear weapons on Gaza. In November 2023, while serving as a Florida state representative, Fine voted against a resolution calling for a ceasefire in Gaza, claiming that those supporting it were "putting every Jewish child in the state at risk". On 10 October 2023, Fine had the Israeli military mark an artillery shell with 'regards from Randy Fine'. The shell was set to be fired at Gaza. In a statement issued on X on Friday, Khanna said that he didn't know about Fine's views and stopped short of apologising for sharing the screen with the Republican lawmaker. Khanna later tweeted: "I reject categorically his views about Palestinians." "I try to always be civil and did not know about his comments. [Chris] Cuomo booked us both. But I exposed the deep betrayal the cuts in Medicaid are for working-class Americans. We need to get the facts out in new mediums, where people who may not be for us will still hear," Khanna said. In June, the Council on American Islamic Relations (Cair) designated Fine as an anti-Muslim extremist for his views on Islam and Palestinians. In its statement issued at the time, Cair called on 'congressional leadership to condemn his actions, initiate formal censure, and remove him from all committee assignments'. No congressional action has been taken to censure him. Khanna, meanwhile, has previously faced sharp criticism for meeting with the anti-Muslim commentator Abhijeet Iyer-Mitra during his visit to India in 2023. At the time, the Indian American Muslim Council said it was "deeply disappointed to see Khanna engaging with a far-right Islamophobe" and condemned him for embracing those who "enable [this] cycle of hate and violence against Muslims".

Middle East Eye
7 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Why is Trump hosting Netanyahu for a third time in six months?
No other world leader has visited this White House as often as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. On Monday, US President Donald Trump will host Netanyahu in Washington for the third time in six months, cementing and showcasing a personal relationship that has, in certain ways, not always translated into policy. Trump's unpredictable decision-making under the "America First" banner has largely meant standing by Israel as the core US strategic asset in the region, and cracking down on domestic pro-Palestine sentiment. But he has also been unusually transparent for an American president about his frustrations with Netanyahu's behaviour, most recently and in particular when Trump brought Israel and Iran into a ceasefire agreement after what he coined the "12-day war" last month. "ISRAEL. DO NOT DROP THOSE BOMBS," Trump wrote on his TruthSocial account after he declared the truce would go into effect. "BRING YOUR PILOTS HOME, NOW!" New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters He later told reporters, on camera, that Israel and Iran "don't know what the fuck they're doing". "The bromance has been restored with the full knowledge - I think Netanyahu understands this - that if, in fact, he imposes himself between the president and something the president really, really wants, that pressure will be forthcoming," Aaron David Miller, a former US State Department advisor on Middle East policy, told Middle East Eye. Miller is now a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Despite the moodiness with which Trump can sometimes conduct foreign policy, he's allowed Netanyahu "to produce what no Israeli prime minister has ever produced, and that is an American strike against Iran's nuclear sites," Miller said. This is despite the president's sidelining of Israel as he pursued negotiations with three of its major foes in the region: Hamas, the Houthis and Iran, all of whom this administration has engaged in unprecedented direct diplomacy. 'At what point does Hamas get guarantees that at the end of the road, the war will come to an end' - Aaron David Miller, former US State Department advisor Trump's first official foreign trip in May was to the Middle East, and it did not involve a stop in Israel - also unusual given the country is at war on multiple fronts, and some 70 percent of all its weaponry comes from the US. The president "has essentially blown through one of the two major political laws of gravity that have governed the US-Israeli relationship," Miller told MEE. "In this case, he's blown through 'no daylight' and 'we need to coordinate everything with Israelis'. The second is 'sustained and serious pressure' on an Israeli government. We've never really seen this." While the Biden administration publicly maintained it was keeping up some level of sustained pressure on the Israelis throughout the first year of the war on Gaza, the former US ambassador to Israel told The Times of Israel, "fundamentally, nothing that we ever said was, 'Just stop the war'". Trump's special envoy to the region, Steve Witkoff, demanded that Netanyahu agree to a ceasefire with Hamas beginning on 19 January 2025 - one day before Trump's inauguration. It earned the president strong praise in the anti-war contingent of conservatives and among Arab Americans who supported his anti-war campaign platform. In what seemed to be a one-time gesture to a personal friend, Netanyahu complied with Witkoff's demands. But by 1 March, Israel resumed its air strikes on Gaza and has since been killing some 100 Palestinians a day in the enclave - a figure similar to the earliest and most devastating days of the war. In addition to Iran, an emboldened Netanyahu has also carried out strikes in Syria, Lebanon and Yemen - all since Trump came into office. Gaza announcement? On Tuesday, Trump told reporters there may be "a deal next week" for a ceasefire in Gaza, prompting speculation about a joint announcement from the White House upon Netanyahu's arrival. But "Hamas is another party to this. So this is not something that can just be announced," Omar Rahman, a fellow at the Middle East Council on Global Affairs, told MEE. "It's not even Trump's style... He's going to announce via TruthSocial the minute he has the opportunity to." Trump said that Qatar and Egypt "have worked very hard to help bring peace" and "will deliver this final proposal", which would last 60 days. But Israeli media reports suggest the talks remain fraught. Serious challenges persist behind the scenes, especially over what will happen after the truce. Israel is reportedly seeking written assurances from Trump that it will be allowed to resume military operations in Gaza if its demands are not met. Citing a "member of the political echelon" - a phrase often used to signal deliberate leaks by Netanyahu - Israel's Channel 14 reported on Wednesday that the current proposal includes a side letter from Trump. The document would give Israel the green light to "renew the fire if our demands with regards to the disarmament of Hamas and the exile of its leaders are not met". Israel would be able to interpret, define and make a judgment call on these terms. Secret Trump letter would let Israel resume war despite ceasefire: Report Read More » There are major issues that are outstanding for Hamas, and the negotiations are not likely to wrap up by the time Netanyahu comes to Washington, Miller explained. "One is the number of Palestinian prisoners that are going to be [released as] the asymmetrical number" in exchange for potentially 10 of 20 living Israeli captives in Gaza. Another is guarantees on unimpeded and safe inflows of humanitarian aid. "The main conceptual issue is, at what point does Hamas get guarantees that at the end of the road, the war will come to an end, and the Israeli forces will either redeploy to a buffer zone - which I think is what Hamas expects - but from strategic points that the Israelis now occupy, which they may or may not want to do," Miller told MEE. That issue was never even resolved as part of the January ceasefire that Israel broke after six weeks. For Netanyahu, the "total victory" is to oust senior Hamas leadership from the Strip, "presumably to three, four different Arab countries willing to take them", Miller said. He is also insistent on the disarmament of Hamas, which Hamas has made clear it will not agree to as long as the Israeli occupation persists and there is no Palestinian state. Ultimately, any ceasefire comes down to American political will to force Israel's hand, Rahman explained. The January ceasefire "wasn't sustainable because the Israelis were unwilling [to stop the war], and then the Americans were unwilling to force the Israelis to abide by it," he said. "Could Trump get there? I think it's well within his power to do that." Normalisation Last month, Netanyahu floated the opening of new diplomatic channels with Arab neighbours as part of a larger Gaza ceasefire deal but did not specify which ones. Both he and Trump still have their eyes on the main prize: bringing Saudi Arabia on board the Abraham Accords. But the kingdom may not be as keen on the notion as Trump thinks, the Financial Times reported on Friday, citing Israel's attacks on Iran and its "destablising" effect on the region. There's also the matter of Syria and its new government under Ahmed al-Sharaa, which has been cosying up to Gulf states as well as western powers in order to rebuild a devastated country after 14 years of civil war. "There may be an announcement on further contacts between the Israelis [and Syrians] on coordination, diffusing tension, some sort of security understanding," Miller said. And having spent 20 years advising both Republican and Democrat presidents, "it is stunning to me that the issue of direct contact... is already underway with a government in Syria, which was formerly [linked to] al-Qaeda. It's terrific. It's extraordinary." But normalisation itself at this stage is unrealistic, Rahman argued. "I don't find even the prospect... credible at all," he told MEE. "I think they're going to try to - and understandably - come up with some kind of military agreement or detente situation", as former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad maintained for decades with Israel. And while there was momentum for an Israeli-Saudi diplomatic pathway prior to 7 October 2023 - something the Hamas-led attacks were intended to derail - "I was one of the few voices out there pushing back on the whole narrative that this was an imminent normalisation agreement," Rahman said. "I was in a lot of those rooms in DC discussing this kind of thing, and it was a jigsaw puzzle, and it didn't look like it was going to align." Trump's weightiest bilateral meetings in the Oval Office thus far have almost always come with surprises, especially as the president enjoys bringing the press into the room for a lengthy, spontaneous press conference. Monday's White House photo-op, however, "isn't going to change anybody's mind" in the US or in Israel, Miller told MEE. "It does figure prominently in Netanyahu's mind, and should he mismanage the relationship, it would have a cost."