logo
What to expect, and what not to, at the UN meeting on an Israel-Palestinian two-state solution

What to expect, and what not to, at the UN meeting on an Israel-Palestinian two-state solution

UNITED NATIONS (AP) — The U.N. General Assembly is bringing high-level officials together this week to promote a two-state solution to the decades-old Israel-Palestinian conflict that would place their peoples side by side, living in peace in independent nations.
Israel and its close ally the United States are boycotting the two-day meeting, which starts Monday and will be co-chaired by the foreign ministers of France and Saudi Arabia. Israel's right-wing government opposes a two-state solution, and the United States has called the meeting 'counterproductive' to its efforts to end the war in Gaza. France and Saudi Arabia want the meeting to put a spotlight on the two-state solution, which they view as the only viable road map to peace, and to start addressing the steps to get there.
The meeting was postponed from late June and downgraded from a four-day meeting of world leaders amid surging tensions in the Middle East, including Israel's 12-day war against Iran and the war in Gaza.
'It was absolutely necessary to restart a political process, the two-state solution process, that is today threatened, more threatened than it has ever been,' French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot said Sunday on CBS News' 'Face the Nation.'
Here's what's useful to know about the upcoming gathering.
Why a two-state solution?
The idea of dividing the Holy Land goes back decades.
When the British mandate over Palestine ended, the U.N. partition plan in 1947 envisioned dividing the territory into Jewish and Arab states. Israel accepted the plan, but upon Israel's declaration of independence the following year, its Arab neighbors declared war and the plan was never implemented. Under a 1949 armistice, Jordan held control over the West Bank and east Jerusalem and Egypt over Gaza.
Israel captured the West Bank, east Jerusalem and Gaza in the 1967 Mideast war. The Palestinians seek those lands for a future independent state alongside Israel, and this idea of a two-state solution based on Israel's pre-1967 boundaries has been the basis of peace talks dating back to the 1990s.
The two-state solution has wide international support. The logic behind it is that the population of Israel — along with east Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza — is divided equally between Jews and Palestinians.
The establishment of an independent Palestine would leave Israel as a democratic country with a solid Jewish majority and grant the Palestinians their dream of self-determination.
Why hold a conference now?
France and Saudi Arabia have said they want to put a spotlight on the two-state solution as the only viable path to peace in the Middle East — and they want to see a road map with specific steps, first ending the war in Gaza.
The co-chairs said in a document sent to U.N. members in May that the primary goal of the meeting is to identify actions by 'all relevant actors' to implement the two-state solution — and 'to urgently mobilize the necessary efforts and resources to achieve this aim, through concrete and time-bound commitments.'
Saudi diplomat Manal Radwan, who led the country's delegation to the preparatory conference, said the meeting must 'chart a course for action, not reflection.' It must be 'anchored in a credible and irreversible political plan that addresses the root cause of the conflict and offers a real path to peace, dignity and mutual security,' she said.
French President Emmanuel Macron has pushed for a broader movement toward a two-state solution in parallel with a recognition of Israel's right to defend itself. He announced late Thursday that France will recognize the state of Palestine officially at the annual gathering of world leaders at the U.N. General Assembly in late September.
About 145 countries have recognized the state of Palestine. But Macron's announcement, ahead of Monday's meeting and amid increasing global anger over desperately hungry people in Gaza starting to die from starvation, makes France the most important Western power to do so.
What is Israel's view?
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rejects the two-state solution on both nationalistic and security grounds.
Netanyahu's religious and nationalist base views the West Bank as the biblical and historical homeland of the Jewish people, while Israeli Jews overwhelmingly consider Jerusalem their eternal capital. The city's eastern side is home to Judaism's holiest site, along with major Christian and Muslim holy places.
Hard-line Israelis like Netanyahu believe the Palestinians don't want peace, citing the second Palestinian uprising of the early 2000s, and more recently the Hamas takeover of Gaza two years after Israel withdrew from the territory in 2005. The Hamas takeover led to five wars, including the current and ongoing 21-month conflict.
At the same time, Israel also opposes a one-state solution in which Jews could lose their majority. Netanyahu's preference seems to be the status quo, where Israel maintains overall control and Israelis have fuller rights than Palestinians, Israel deepens its control by expanding settlements, and the Palestinian Authority has limited autonomy in pockets of the West Bank.
Netanyahu condemned Macron's announcement of Palestinian recognition, saying it 'rewards terror and risks creating another Iranian proxy, just as Gaza became.'
What is the Palestinian view?
The Palestinians, who label the current arrangement 'apartheid,' accuse Israel of undermining repeated peace initiatives by deepening settlement construction in the West Bank and threatening annexation. That would harm the prospect of a contiguous Palestinian state and their prospects for independence.
Ahmed Majdalani, a member of the PLO Executive Committee and close associate of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, said the meeting will serve as preparation for a presidential summit expected in September. It will take place either in France or at the U.N. on the sidelines of the high-level meeting, U.N. diplomats said.
Majdalani said the Palestinians have several goals, first a 'serious international political process leading to the establishment of a Palestinian state.'
The Palestinians also want additional international recognition of their state by major countries including Britain. But expect that to happen in September, not at Monday's meeting, Majdalani said. And he said they want economic and financial support for the Palestinian Authority and international support for the reconstruction and recovery of the Gaza Strip.
What will happen — and won't happen — at the meeting?
All 193 U.N. member nations have been invited to attend the meeting and a French diplomat said about 40 ministers are expected. The United States and Israel are the only countries who are boycotting.
The co-chairs have circulated an outcome document which could be adopted, and there could be some announcements of intentions to recognize a Palestinian state. But with Israel and the United States boycotting, there is no prospect of a breakthrough and the resumption of long-stalled negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians on an end to their conflict.
Secretary-General António Guterres urged participants after the meeting was announced 'to keep the two-state solution alive.' And he said the international community must not only support a solution where independent states of Palestine and Israel live side-by-side in peace but 'materialize the conditions to make it happen.'
___
Federman reported from Jerusalem. Associated Press writer Angela Charlton in Paris contributed to this report.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mike Johnson reportedly makes provocative visit to contested Israeli settlement
Mike Johnson reportedly makes provocative visit to contested Israeli settlement

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Mike Johnson reportedly makes provocative visit to contested Israeli settlement

On Monday, House Speaker Mike Johnson reportedly made a provocative visit to an Israeli-held area that has been deemed an illegal settlement by the United Nations. Axios reported that the Louisiana Republican and several other GOP lawmakers made an unannounced trip to Israel over the weekend amid growing criticism of the country's government as it continues its deadly occupation of Gaza. On Monday, Johnson was photographed in the Ariel region of the occupied West Bank, and a pro-Israel GOP activist on the trip cited him as saying the territory is the 'rightful property' of the Jewish people. The Palestinian Foreign Ministry reportedly condemned Johnson's visit as 'provocative incitement that encourages settler crimes and land confiscation.' The trip's timing certainly reveals a contrast between the speaker, who is a staunch backer of the Israeli government, and the increasingly outspoken number of Israel critics in Congress — a group that includes MAGA loyalists. (Johnson had planned a trip to address the Israeli parliament in June, but it was postponed because of the conflict between Israel and Iran.) As I recently wrote, more than two dozen Democratic senators denounced the raft of settler violence in the West Bank against people of Palestinian descent that has also killed Americans. So while some members of Congress seem disturbed by settler expansion and the deadly violence it has involved, the House speaker's propagandistic appearance at the Ariel settlement seemingly emboldens the purveyors of that violence to continue. This article was originally published on Solve the daily Crossword

House Democrats sign on to letter urging Trump to recognise Palestinian statehood
House Democrats sign on to letter urging Trump to recognise Palestinian statehood

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

House Democrats sign on to letter urging Trump to recognise Palestinian statehood

More than a dozen Democratic members of Congress have signed on to a letter that urges the Trump administration to recognise Palestinian statehood, in a draft copy shared with the Guardian. Congressman Ro Khanna of California is leading the letter addressed to the president and secretary of state Marco Rubio, and is joined by several House progressives, including Greg Casar of Texas, Pramila Jayapal of Washington, and Maxwell Frost of Florida. 'This tragic moment has highlighted for the world the long overdue need to recognize Palestinian self-determination,' the letter reads. 'Just as the lives of Palestinians must be immediately protected, so too must their rights as a people and nation urgently be acknowledged and upheld.' The letter comes as human rights experts sound the alarm over the unfolding famine in Gaza, and as some of Israel's key western allies, including France and Canada, have recently pledged to recognise a Palestinian state at the UN general assembly. The UK also made a similar pledge if Israel could not agree to a ceasefire by September. The Democrats' letter adds that a viable Palestinian state 'will need to fully recognize Israel and adopt a framework to guarantee Israel's security, including the disarmament of and relinquishing of power by Hamas in order to be broadly embraced by the community of nations'. A similar framework was proposed by French president Emmanuel Macron last month. Khanna's office said the letter would be sent out after 16 September, which coincides with the UN general assembly that runs from 8-23 September this year. 'This is the moment for the United States to officially recognise a Palestinian state,' Khanna told the Guardian. He added that he only began outreach 'this past week' but characterised the response as 'overwhelming'. The Trump administration, however, has made it clear that it does not agree with the growing list of countries agreeing to recognise a Palestinian state. In a White House briefing last week, press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the president views statehood as ultimately 'rewarding Hamas'. The administration's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff travelled to Gaza last week to assess aid conditions on the ground, and Trump told reporters on Sunday that the US is 'putting up money to get the people fed'. But in recent weeks, there have been several cracks in the unconditional support for Israel in Congress, including from Republicans. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, a Maga stalwart, characterised the humanitarian crisis in Gaza as a 'genocide' in a post on X last week, breaking from the GOP's fervent backing of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's military campaign. While a vote to bar US arms sales to Israel ultimately fell short last week, a record number of Democratic senators voted in favour of the two resolutions to stop the sale of offensive weapons to Israel.

Palestinians' unrealistic two-state solution: Letters to the Editor — Aug. 5, 2025
Palestinians' unrealistic two-state solution: Letters to the Editor — Aug. 5, 2025

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Palestinians' unrealistic two-state solution: Letters to the Editor — Aug. 5, 2025

The Issue: A two-state solution to the Israel-Hamas war which would establish Palestinian statehood. As Michael Goodwin points out so well, the true and only goal of Palestinians is the destruction of Israel ('Time to abandon '2-state delusion,' ' Aug. 3). The creation of what would be a jihadist state alongside Israel would pose an existential threat. Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas' vision of a two-state solution, including a Judenrein Palestinian state, would end Israel's existence as a Jewish state; this doesn't promise a peaceful Palestinian state that can coexist peacefully with Israel. Advertisement It is time, as Goodwin observed correctly, to bury the two-state delusion. Daniel Trigoboff Williamsville Advertisement It looks like Hamas is the one setting the terms for the end of hostilities. Propaganda pictures, plus media complicity, have the world crying for statehood for Palestinians. Hamas murdered over 1,200 innocents, took over 250 people hostage and people think statehood will make them peaceful. Sylvia Kane Advertisement Brooklyn Is the push by the current leaders of France, Britain and Canada for the establishment of a Palestinian state simply delusional, or is it born out of antisemitism? Gazans elected Hamas to lead them, which has been a total failure. The idea of a Palestinian state is utterly ignorant of history. Advertisement Jack Weinberg Manhattan There are dangers in a two-state solution, especially if there are no adequate military restrictions placed on the Palestinian state. However, opponents of the two-state solution have an obligation to propose an alternative which protects the rights and interests of both Jews and Arabs. In principle, everyone living in the current occupied territories should have equal political and civil rights to Israelis, although they may be expressed through different regional legislatures. Bruce Couchman Toronto, Ontario If I were the leader of a country, and I were asked whether I favor a two-state solution, my response would be: Yes, but don't ask me that question again until you show me proof that both states are willing to recognize the other. Currently, one side has solidified its position that the other state must be wiped off the face of the earth. So, until that has changed, we cannot consider the two-state solution. Advertisement Joseph Carbonaro Saratoga Springs Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! The Issue: Ghislaine Maxwell's move to the minimum-security 'Club Fed' prison in Texas. Ghislaine Maxwell's life of privilege continues with a transfer to a minimum security prison in Texas (' 'Max' to minimum,' Aug. 2). Advertisement No reason has been made public, and more importantly, the victims of her crimes were not notified. I hope someone is using the Freedom of Information Act to get more details. Her transfer coincided with a two-day deposition by the Department of Justice, making it even more important to know why it occurred. Is there a quid pro quo? If yes, it had better be a good one. Otherwise, there is no reason to make her life easier than those she damaged forever. Phil Serpico Advertisement Queens Why are President Trump and Justice Department officials doing everything possible to prevent the Epstein files from being released? Why don't they want Ghislaine Maxwell to provide the names of the powerful, very wealthy and influential pedophiles who paid Jeffrey Epstein to arrange for them to have sex with young girls? Advertisement And why was Maxwell quietly moved to the cushy 'Club Fed' prison as she pushed for a deal to tell all about Epstein and his well-known clients? Daniel Robinowitz Dallas, Texas Want to weigh in on today's stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@ Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store