
US and EU avert trade war with 15% tariff deal
US President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced the deal at Trump's luxury golf course in western Scotland after an hour-long meeting that pushed the hard-fought deal over the line, following months of negotiations.
"I think this is the biggest deal ever made," Trump told reporters, lauding EU plans to invest some $600 billion in the United States and dramatically increase its purchases of U.S. energy and military equipment.
Trump said the deal, which tops a $550 billion deal signed with Japan last week, would expand ties between the trans-Atlantic powers after years of what he called unfair treatment of U.S. exporters.
Also Read | Explained: Donald Trump's landmark $1.35 trillion trade deal with EU before tariff deadline
Von der Leyen, describing Trump as a tough negotiator, said the 15% tariff applied "across the board", later telling reporters it was "the best we could get."
"We have a trade deal between the two largest economies in the world, and it's a big deal. It's a huge deal. It will bring stability. It will bring predictability," she said.
The agreement mirrors key parts of the framework accord reached by the U.S. with Japan, but like that deal, it leaves many questions open, including tariff rates on spirits, a highly charged topic for many on both sides of the Atlantic.
The deal, which Trump said calls for $750 billion of EU purchases of U.S. energy in coming years and "hundreds of billions of dollars" of arms purchases, likely spells good news for a host of EU companies, including Airbus, Mercedes-Benz and Novo Nordisk, if all the details hold.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz welcomed the deal, saying it averted a trade conflict that would have hit Germany's export-driven economy and its large auto sector hard. German carmakers, VW, Mercedes and BMW were some of the hardest hit by the 27.5% U.S. tariff on car and parts imports now in place.
The baseline 15% tariff will still be seen by many in Europe as too high, compared with Europe's initial hopes to secure a zero-for-zero tariff deal.
Bernd Lange, the German Social Democrat who heads the European Parliament's trade committee, said the tariffs were imbalanced and the hefty EU investment earmarked for the U.S. would likely come at the bloc's own expense.
Trump retains the ability to increase the tariffs in the future if European countries do not live up to their investment commitments, a senior U.S. administration official told reporters on Sunday evening.
The euro rose around 0.2% against the dollar, sterling and yen within an hour of the deal's being announced.
MIRROR OF JAPAN DEAL
Carsten Nickel, deputy director of research at Teneo, said Sunday's accord was "merely a high-level, political agreement" that could not replace a carefully hammered out trade deal: "This, in turn, creates the risk of different interpretations along the way, as seen immediately after the conclusion of the U.S.-Japan deal."
While the tariff applies to most goods, including semiconductors and pharmaceuticals, there are exceptions.
The U.S. will keep in place a 50% tariff on steel and aluminum. Von der Leyen suggested the tariff could be replaced with a quota system; a senior administration official said EU leaders had asked that the two sides continue to talk about the issue.
Von der Leyen said there would be no tariffs from either side on aircraft and aircraft parts, certain chemicals, certain generic drugs, semiconductor equipment, some agricultural products, natural resources and critical raw materials.
"We will keep working to add more products to this list," von der Leyen said, adding that spirits were still under discussion.
A U.S. official said the tariff rate on commercial aircraft would remain at zero for now, and the parties would decide together what to do after a U.S. review is completed, adding there is a "reasonably good chance" they could agree to a lower tariff than 15%. No timing was given for when that probe would be completed.
The deal will be sold as a triumph for Trump, who is seeking to reorder the global economy and reduce decades-old U.S. trade deficits, and has already reached similar framework accords with Britain, Japan, Indonesia and Vietnam, although his administration has not hit its goal of "90 deals in 90 days."
U.S. officials said the EU had agreed to lower non-tariff barriers for automobiles and some agricultural products, though EU officials suggested the details of those standards were still under discussion.
"Remember, their economy is $20 trillion ... they are five times bigger than Japan," a senior U.S. official told reporters during a briefing. "So the opportunity of opening their market is enormous for our farmers, our fishermen, our ranchers, all our industrial products, all our businesses."
Trump has periodically railed against the EU, saying it was "formed to screw the United States" on trade. He has fumed for years about the U.S. merchandise trade deficit with the EU, which in 2024 reached $235 billion, according to U.S. Census Bureau data.
The EU points to the U.S. surplus in services, which it says partially redresses the balance.
Trump has argued that his tariffs are bringing in "hundreds of billions of dollars" in revenues for the U.S. while dismissing warnings from economists about the risk of inflation.
On July 12, Trump threatened to apply a 30% tariff on imports from the EU starting on August 1, after weeks of negotiations failed to reach a comprehensive trade deal.
The EU had prepared countertariffs on 93 billion euros ($109 billion) of U.S. goods in the event a deal to avoid the tariffs could not be struck.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
12 minutes ago
- Mint
The week in charts: Trump's 25% India tariff, TCS's mass layoffs, oil on the boil
The US has imposed 25% tariffs on Indian exports and threatened penalties for buying oil from Russia. Meanwhile, Tata Consultancy Services has announced plans to lay off staff worldwide, and a new report highlights the struggles of women in India's blue- and grey-collar workforce. What's a little tariff between friends? US President Donald Trump imposed a 25% tariff on "friend" India and additional penalties for buying Russian oil from 1 August even as the two countries negotiate a trade deal. While there is little clarity on the impact of the new tariffs and penalties, the move has for now put India at a disadvantage to other countries that have struck trade deals with the US, with their tariffs ranging from 10-20%. India has so far refused to concede to the US's demand for greater access to its agriculture and dairy sectors. Crude awakening The US's latest threats of secondary sanctions on Russia, or more precisely its energy trade, has led to a sharp rise in oil prices. After hovering around $70 per barrel since the Israel-Iran ceasefire, Brent crude oil prices jumped to nearly $73 per barrel on Wednesday, following Trump's threats. The US also sanctioned 20 entities, including six from India, for petroleum, petroleum products and petrochemical trade with Iran. Even as the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (Opec) is expected to increase output, policy uncertainties will keep oil prices volatile. TCS's payroll purge 12,000: That's the the number of employees TCS plans to lay off worldwide, as Mint reported. The layoffs, comprising around 2% of its workforce, will mostly affect mid- and senior-level staff. India's largest IT firm said the move was part of its strategy to become a 'future-ready organisation', focusing on AI, tech investment, and workforce realignment. This has sparked worries of similar moves by other IT giants also facing uncertainty in their biggest market, the US. Global economy shows grit Lower-than-expected trade disruptions led to a more optimistic global growth forecast from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) earlier this week. The agency raised its 2025 global growth projection to 3% from 2.8% in April, along with a broader upgrade from the US, EU, China to India. While the IMF cited stronger front-loading of trade, lower effective US tariffs, and improved financial conditions as key drivers in the first half of the year, it also said the risks to projections remained tilted to the downside. We work, we list India's coworking sector is in expansion mode, with Awfis, Smartworks, and IndiQube now listed, and WeWork India expected to go public in August. Riding a post-covid boom, the industry has scaled rapidly, with flexible office supply in top cities expected to rise to 121 million sq ft by FY2027 from 85 million sq ft in FY25, an analysis by showed. As their business models are maturing, they are seeing strong revenue. However, despite strong operational margins, high upfront capital costs and depreciation continue to weigh on their profitability. Tata Motors spends a truckload $4.36 billion: That's the amount for which Tata Motors Ltd will acquire Italian truck and bus maker Iveco, its largest acquisition ever, amid plans to demerge its commercial and passenger vehicle business. The auto company is looking to boost its commercial vehicle business with the acquisition, which is expected to conclude by April-June 2026. For Tata Motors, the commercial vehicles business is the second-largest revenue contributor, with a 17% share in FY25. The company had acquired Jaguar Land Rover in 2008 for $2.3 billion. Giants claw back profit share India's markets are dominated by large firms, with the top 10% by revenue accounting for more than 90% of net profits. This began changing after the pandemic as smaller firms gained ground during a broader recovery. But this comeback is now running out of steam. In FY25, companies outside the top 10% made up 7.3% of aggregate net profit, down from 10.4% in FY23, a Mint analysis of 5,096 BSE-listed firms showed. Still, their performance was better than in pre-covid era, underlining their resilience. Chart of the week: Women's barriers to work Low income, poor work culture and safety fears are among the top reasons why women have shorter tenures in India's blue- and grey-collar jobs, according to a new survey report by the Udaiti Foundation and Quess Corp. Despite the growing numbers of women workers, more than half of respondents said they planned to leave the workforce within a year. Follow our data stories on the In Charts and Plain Facts pages.


Mint
12 minutes ago
- Mint
Best of the Week: Power. Tariffs. Tensions. What's next for global trade?
Key export sectors such as textiles, auto parts, and food products were dealt a rude shock when US President Donald Trump slapped a 25% tariff—along with an additional 'penalty'—on Indian goods starting 7 August. But this isn't just about tariffs. It's about shifting alliances, rising economic nationalism, and a global order that's being reimagined in real time. That's why Mint is bringing together sharp global minds for a timely webinar: Because geoeconomics now drives geopolitics. And understanding this shift could help you make sense of everything from de-risking strategies to India's evolving equation with both the US and China. Can India and the US still find common ground on agriculture, tech, and digital rules? Or has this move reset the clock on 25 years of strategic engagement? Amb. Arun K. Singh, former Indian envoy to the US, with decades of high-stakes diplomatic experience. Ajay Srivastava, trade policy expert and founder of the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI). Moderated by Elizabeth Roche, former foreign affairs editor at Mint and now a professor at Jindal School of International Affairs. Register now if you want to decode the new rules of power, trade, and global influence. India's $87 billion export engine to the US just hit a speed bump. US President Donald Trump's call for a 25% tariff on Indian goods has raised eyebrows—and concerns. Textiles, electronics, pharma, even auto parts—everything's in the crosshairs. Is this the return of a full-blown trade war or just political posturing? With over 75% of Indian exports at risk, and key sectors bracing for impact, the stakes are high. Can India negotiate its way out, or will exporters feel the heat? The 25 August trade talks may hold the answers. India's early trade deals? Not exactly blockbuster hits. With partners like ASEAN, Japan, and South Korea, exports stagnated while imports surged. But India has learnt its lessons—and it shows. Recent pacts with the UAE and Australia are already yielding real returns. Now, the India-UK free trade agreement seems to be the boldest step yet. With smart tariff cuts, stronger services play, and mobility provisions, could this be the new blueprint? Is India finally turning the trade tide in its favour? Women are showing up—but not staying on. A new report by Udaiti Foundation and Quess Corp reveals that 52% of women in India's blue- and grey-collar workforce plan to exit within a year. Why? Low pay, poor work culture, safety concerns, and long, unsafe commutes top the list. Even as their numbers double, retention remains weak. What's pushing women out? And more importantly, what will bring them back in—and keep them there? With India's economy leaning on this workforce, creating jobs isn't enough. We need to make them worth staying for. TCS is letting go of 12,000 employees—mainly seniors—this year, citing AI disruption and slower growth. The message? India's IT giants are rebalancing. As clients demand cheaper deals and smarter tech, the people-heavy model is under stress. And TCS isn't alone—Wipro is testing language skills, HCL is trimming freshers. So, is AI really taking over—or is this just a reset for an evolving industry? Either way, tech talent will need more than just code to stay future-ready. Is the great Indian consumption story picking up pace again? Hindustan Unilever thinks so—and the numbers agree. After quarters of sluggish growth, HUL posted a strong 3% volume rise and an 8% jump in profit, riding on tax sops, easing inflation, and a monsoon boost. Urban and rural demand is inching up, new product bets are paying off, and optimism is back at the FMCG bellwether. But can this momentum last? If you've been waiting for signs of revival in India's consumer economy—this might just be it. Indian companies' profit pie is still heavily skewed towards its biggest firms, even though smaller listed firms made strong post-pandemic gains. A Mint analysis of 5,096 firms shows that the top 10% by revenue cornered over 90% of profits in 2024-25—unchanged for two years. While some sectors like textiles and hospitality saw smaller firms thrive, dominance by giants remains strong across others. The revival in mergers and acquisitions suggests the playing field could tilt further. This data-packed story, with rich charts and sector-level insights, examines whether India's small firms are losing ground again in a David vs Goliath battle. In Tiptur, Karnataka, a hen named Kaveri is laying the foundation for a new kind of egg economy. She's part of Akshayakalpa's cage-free, antibiotic-free farm, where eggs are premium, traceable, and sold with a promise of purity. Startups like Eggoz, Henfruit, and Farm Made are trying to turn eggs into branded health products, not just cheap protein. But with fragile supply chains and price-sensitive consumers, can this sunny-side-up revolution scale? Or will it remain a niche, yolk-tinted dream? Nayara Energy, one of India's top fuel retailers, recently had its Microsoft services suspended. Why? Microsoft interpreted EU sanctions against Nayara's Russian shareholder as reason enough to halt emails, team communications, and operations. Though services were restored in two days, the episode exposed a deeper fault line: how dependent critical businesses are on foreign tech firms. As firms increasingly run on cloud tools, this incident shows how easily geopolitics can trigger service cuts, even without clear legal mandates in India. This year's generous monsoon—8% above normal so far—has boosted kharif sowing across India, especially of rice and maize. Nearly 84% of the country has seen normal or excess rainfall, with major gains in states like Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh. This has led to a 13% jump in rice planting and 9% in maize, offering hope for stable food prices and a push toward ethanol production. However, farmers are steering away from oilseeds due to poor returns, raising questions about long-term crop diversity. Could the shift towards water-intensive crops and biofuel-linked grains come at the cost of sustainable farming and future food security? This monsoon, cities across India—from Patna and Delhi to Mumbai and Bengaluru—have been brought to their knees by flooding. The reasons are well known: clogged drains, haphazard construction, poor waste management, and chronic underfunding of city infrastructure. The deeper problem? India's municipalities are broke, dependent on state grants, with little ability to raise their own funds or fix core services. Waste-to-energy plants, revamped drainage, and better accounting exist, but require serious investment and planning. Municipal bonds were meant to help, but few cities can even qualify. As flooding becomes an annual urban ritual, the question is no longer why this happens but how long can India's cities survive this cycle of neglect? That's all for this week. I hope you have a pleasant weekend! If you have feedback, want to discuss food, movies and shows or have anything else to say about our journalism, write to me at or reply to this email. You can also write to feedback@
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
12 minutes ago
- First Post
US Army helicopter crash that killed 67 people in Washington was facing technical issues, NTSB finds
The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), the US agency tasked with examining major accidents, held hearings from Wednesday to Friday, with rigorous questioning of experts and various other parties including regulators and air traffic controllers read more Jennifer Homendy, chair of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), looks on as US President Donald Trump speaks during a briefing about the mid-air crash between American Airlines flight 5342 and a military helicopter in Washington, in the Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House on January 30, 2025 in Washington, DC. File Image / AFP An investigative hearing into a deadly mid-air collision of a US Army helicopter and a passenger plane that killed 67 people in Washington has revealed a discrepancy in the chopper's altitude displays. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), the US agency tasked with examining major accidents, held hearings from Wednesday to Friday, with rigorous questioning of experts and various other parties including regulators and air traffic controllers. There were no survivors in the January 29 mid-air collision involving the Sikorsky Black Hawk military helicopter and a Bombardier CRJ700 operated by a subsidiary of American Airlines. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The passenger plane from Wichita, Kansas was coming in to land at Reagan National Airport – just a few miles from the White House – when the Army helicopter on a training flight collided with it. After examining flight recorder data, the NTSB first reported a discrepancy in the helicopter's altitude readings on February 14. As part of the investigation, tests were conducted with three of the same helicopter models – Sikorsky Black Hawk Lima – belonging to the same battalion. The findings revealed this week showed differences between the altitude indicated by the radar altimeter and the barometric altimeter on the aircraft. Investigator Marie Moler noted that the altimeters 'showed an 80- to 130-foot (24- to 40-meter) difference in flight' although the differences were within 20 to 55 feet in a controlled test environment. 'Once the helicopter rotors were turning and producing lift and thrust, the altimeter readings lowered significantly and stayed lower throughout the flights,' Moler said. NTSB chair Jennifer Homendy called the discrepancy significant, calling for more investigation. 'I am concerned. There is a possibility that what the crew saw was very different than what the true altitude was,' Homendy said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'A 100-foot difference is significant' in this case, she added. In the Potomac River area where the collision occurred, helicopters are required to stay below 200 feet, officials said during the hearings. President Donald Trump was quick to blame diversity hiring policies for the accident although no evidence has emerged that they were responsible. Federal Aviation Agency air traffic control specialist Clark Allen told the hearing there was sufficient supervisory staff present in the control tower that night. The collision was the first major plane crash in the United States since 2009 when 49 people were killed near Buffalo, New York.