Kilmar Abrego Garcia Scores Major Legal Win
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran man at the center of a long-running legal and political controversy over U.S. immigration enforcement, must be released from custody and returned to Maryland, two federal judges ruled Wednesday in separate decisions.
The decisions come after months of legal battles following Abrego's controversial removal to El Salvador in March, a deportation that the U.S. Supreme Court later determined to be unlawful.
Late on Wednesday, in a third ruling, U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes delayed Abrego's release from custody for 30 days, following a request from his attorneys. They cited government advice that the Department of Homeland Security would begin removal proceedings if he were released.
Newsweek approached the Department of Homeland Security and Department of Justice for comment.
Why It Matters
The orders from U.S. District Judges Waverly Crenshaw Jr. and Paula Xinis mark a significant turning point in the case. The orders are the latest developments in a high-profile saga involving immigration, criminal proceedings, and alleged violations of constitutional rights. While the decisions represent a significant legal victory for Abrego, federal immigration authorities have signaled that efforts to deport him may soon resume.
Kilmar Abrego Garcia is seen in a courtroom sketch sitting in court during his detention hearing on Wednesday, June 25, 2025, in Nashville, Tenn
Kilmar Abrego Garcia is seen in a courtroom sketch sitting in court during his detention hearing on Wednesday, June 25, 2025, in Nashville, Tenn
Diego Fishburn via AP
What To Know
Abrego, who entered the U.S. without authorization over a decade ago, was living and working in Maryland under an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) supervision order when he was detained and deported to El Salvador on March 12, 2025.
The deportation directly violated a standing immigration court order from 2019 that prohibited his removal to El Salvador due to credible fears for his safety there.
After being expelled, Abrego was held at El Salvador's Terrorism Confinement Center, a prison known for violence and overcrowding.
His removal prompted legal challenges that reached the Supreme Court, which found the deportation violated both the Immigration and Nationality Act and Abrego's constitutional right to due process.
Following the ruling, the federal government delayed for nearly three months before returning Abrego to the U.S. in June.
Upon arrival, he was placed in U.S. Marshals custody to face unrelated criminal charges in Tennessee.
On Wednesday, Judge Crenshaw, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, ruled that Abrego should be released on bail while awaiting trial in the Middle District of Tennessee, finding that prosecutors had not demonstrated that he posed a flight risk or danger to the community.
Crenshaw noted that although the government accused Abrego of immigrant smuggling involving a minor, he had been cooperative when stopped by law enforcement in 2022 and had not attempted to flee.
Judge Xinis, acting in a civil case brought by Abrego and his family over his deportation, ruled to both restore Abrego to his pre-deportation immigration status and protect his due process rights if officials attempt to remove him from the U.S. again. Her ruling criticized government attorneys and ICE officials for failing to prepare adequately for court proceedings and for offering limited details about possible third-country removal options.
The court noted that although DHS has existing diplomatic agreements with countries like Mexico and South Sudan to accept deportees, no specific plans had been confirmed for Abrego. Nor had federal officials explained what process would be available to him in the event of a third-country removal.
The court's ruling underscores that any further attempts to remove Abrego must begin in Maryland, where jurisdiction over his original immigration case lies. Officials had previously indicated that any removal proceedings could be initiated wherever ICE found space to detain him, raising concerns about due process and judicial oversight.
Tennessee U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes has delayed the release of alleged MS-13 member Kilmar Abrego Garcia from custody for thirty days.
His attorneys requested the delay on Monday, citing advice from the government that the Department of Homeland Security would initiate removal proceedings if he were released.
What People Are Saying
U.S. District Judge Waverly Crenshaw Jr. in Tennessee, said in his ruling: "It is not difficult to see why one might seek to avoid ICE after experiencing what Abrego did in recent months," adding that is was "pure speculation" on the government's argument that Abrego would flee to avoid ICE highlighting that it was the government itself that had created the circumstances now cited as justification for detention.
While U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis in Maryland said: "The requested relief is necessary not only to fulfill this Court's prior order, but also to provide the kind of effective relief to which a wrongfully removed alien is entitled upon return," emphasizing that the action was necessary to restore the "status quo ante"—Abrego's legal standing before his unlawful deportation.
Tennessee U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes said: "Abrego shall therefore remain in the custody of the United States Marshal pending further order, as previously directed."
Despite these rulings, Tricia McLaughlin from the Department of Homeland Security said: ""He [Abrego] will never walk America's streets again."
What Happens Next
Despite the rulings, Abrego's legal battles may be far from over. While the courts have ordered his return to Maryland and implemented safeguards against sudden deportation, immigration authorities have maintained their intent to pursue removal.
As the case moves forward, it remains a focal point in the broader national conversation over immigration enforcement, executive power, and the limits of constitutional protections for noncitizens.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Thailand-Cambodia Clash Tests US Against Growing China Influence in Asia
Based on factual reporting, incorporates the expertise of the journalist and may offer interpretations and conclusions. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A deadly and dramatic escalation in a decades-long border dispute between Thailand and Cambodia is the latest challenge to U.S. President Donald Trump's vow to enforce a more peaceful international order. But the fiery bout in Southeast Asia also marks a test for Washington's waning influence in a region viewed as a crucial theater in a geopolitical competition between the United States and China. "This crisis represents a critical test of American and Chinese influence in Southeast Asia," Sophal Ear, a regional expert and associate professor at Arizona State University's Thunderbird School of Management, told Newsweek. "For the U.S., Thailand is a key strategic partner, essential to sustaining American military and diplomatic presence in the region," Ear said. "For China, Cambodia is a central player in its regional ambitions under the Belt and Road Initiative, serving as a strategic foothold." He argued that "both powers recognize significant stakes: instability could undermine their respective regional alliances and economic interests, while an overly aggressive stance risks deepening geopolitical competition." A Cambodian soldier stands on a truck carrying a Russian-made BM-21 rocket launcher traveling along a street in Oddar Meanchey province on July 25, 2025. A Cambodian soldier stands on a truck carrying a Russian-made BM-21 rocket launcher traveling along a street in Oddar Meanchey province on July 25, 2025. TANG CHHIN SOTHY/AFP/Getty Images Another U.S. Setback The latest Thailand-Cambodia border dispute dates back to 1907, when a map drawn during French colonial rule in Cambodia marked a boundary still cited by Cambodian officials today. Thai officials dispute this demarcation and claim territory beyond it, including ancient Khmer-era Hindu temples, such as Preah Vihear, despite two International Court of Justice rulings favoring Cambodia's claims. Their rivalry has played out against the backdrop of broader international conflicts among world powers, including World War II and the Cold War. A decade before the U.S. war in Vietnam, then divided between a communist north and a nationalist south, Thailand joined the U.S.-backed Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO), serving as a bulwark against the spread of communism in the region. North Vietnam would emerge victorious against the U.S., uniting the nation and quickly going to war with the rival China-backed Khmer Rouge communist leadership of Cambodia, leading to its downfall. Thailand, meanwhile, remained a staunch ally of the U.S. anti-communist posturing in Asia. However, its prominence in Washington's foreign policy has declined in recent decades, particularly as the U.S. has intensified its relations with its former foe, Vietnam. China, meanwhile, has invested heavily in ties with all countries in the region, including Cambodia, Thailand and Vietnam. However, as Beijing's growing global presence occupies a larger space in U.S. foreign policy, some argue that its attention to Thailand has been sidelined. "I think the U.S. already flunked the test and that should be a wakeup call," Evan Feigenbaum, vice president for studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and former deputy assistant secretary at the U.S. State Department, told Newsweek. "Because if the U.S. frame on Southeast Asia is that it's all about fighting the proxy fight with China for influence," he said, "the fact that the U.S. is now missing in action and really has no leverage to bring to bear on either party, should tell you everything." Royal Thai Army soldiers are pictured on U.S.-built M1126 armored vehicles on a road in Chachoengsao province on July 24, 2025. Royal Thai Army soldiers are pictured on U.S.-built M1126 armored vehicles on a road in Chachoengsao province on July 24, 2025. LILLIAN SUWANRUMPHA/AFP/Getty Images China's Balancing Act Both the U.S. and China have called for de-escalation since the fighting first erupted Thursday, with at least 15 killed and dozens wounded. The Thai military has since claimed that more than 100 Cambodian soldiers have been killed as fighting spread throughout their rugged border, spanning some 500 miles. "The United States is gravely concerned by reports of the escalating fighting along the Thailand-Cambodia border," the State Department said in a statement issued Thursday. "We are particularly alarmed by reports of harm to innocent civilians," the statement added. "We express our deepest condolences on the loss of life. We strongly urge the immediate cessation of attacks, protection of civilians, and peaceful settlement of disputes." Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi called the situation "deeply distressing and concerning" and urged a "calm and careful handling." At the same time, he argued that the "issue lies in the legacy left by Western colonial powers." "As a mutual neighbor and friend to both Cambodia and Thailand, China is committed to maintaining an objective and impartial stance, and will continue to play a constructive role in helping to de-escalate tensions and ease the situation," Wang said Friday during a meeting with Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) chair Kao Kim Hourn, who is seeking to mediate the conflict. While Cambodia is traditionally viewed as a close partner of China, Beijing's neutrality is also informed by its efforts to maintain and develop close relations with Thailand. "The more logical model for [China], where their interests are threatened is to just kind of bring the hammer down quietly," Feigenbaum said. "But I think their calculation would be that they would pay a cost with both they really don't want to take sides between these two, because they want good relations with both of them." "So, they'd either have to bring pressure to bear on both of them simultaneously, or choose a side," he added. "The latter is not an option for them." Further complicating any external role are the charged domestic politics that have helped fuel tensions to the point of open conflict. After frictions intensified in May when an exchange of cross-border fire led to the death of a Cambodian soldier, Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra was caught in a leaked phone call addressing Cambodian Senate President and former Prime Minister Hun Sen with terms of endearment and criticizing Thai military leadership. The incident led to her suspension from office and has threatened her already fragile ruling coalition. As for whether the U.S. could step in where China was hesitant, Feigenbaum was doubtful, seeing Beijing as now closer to Washington's oldest ally in Asia. "The U.S. really doesn't have the influence anymore on Thailand, so the idea that Thailand is some kind of U.S. proxy is nonsense," he said. "And meanwhile, China has a good relationship with the royal family in Thailand, they're the number one trading partner. They're the number one investment partner." "The U.S. is still important economically," he said," but in relative terms, China, in a lot of ways, has become much more important." Risk of Escalation Derek Grossman, a former U.S. intelligence official now serving as a professor at the University of Southern California, also believed that the Thailand-Cambodia conflict had yet to escalate to a Cold War-style proxy conflict, similar to the one the U.S. engaged in against China and the Soviet Union in Vietnam. At the same time, he warned that the situation had the potential to further drag in the world's top two powers should it continue to escalate. "While it is true that Thailand is a security ally of the U.S. and Cambodia is a close partner of China, both Washington and Beijing have called for an immediate ceasefire and de-escalation," Grossman told Newsweek, "and thus there isn't a proxy struggle playing out to achieve strategic advantage in Indochina—at least not yet." "That said, if the conflict worsens, it's likely that the U.S. and China would deepen their support for their respective friends," Grossman added. "Beijing has already said, for example, that the reason for the conflict was due to Western colonialism—a clear knock against powers external to the region." Grossman also noted how Thailand has thus far turned down international mediation efforts in favor of direct talks, a tactic he said could be attributed to the belief that it "has the upper hand militarily and that it has Washington in its corner if the crisis escalates." Meanwhile, Ear warned that, "if China hawks frame it as U.S.-ally Thailand v. China-backed Cambodia, this might be seen as a proxy war brewing even though this has nothing to do with China," while noting the most likely path for both Beijing and Washington was "to encourage diplomacy and de-escalation." "The career diplomats are busy writing their statements, I'm sure," Ear said. "I just hope the politicos aren't too preoccupied between Epstein files, to pay the attention to this regional conflict."
Epoch Times
2 hours ago
- Epoch Times
Trump Says SCOTUS Immunity Ruling Likely Helps Obama Following DNI Disclosures
President Donald Trump on Friday said that former President Barack Obama likely has immunity following a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in light of a report that was declassified by Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard earlier this month. Gabbard said the documents showed that Obama and his then-Cabinet members 'manufactured and politicized intelligence to lay the groundwork for what was essentially a years-long coup against President Trump,' which Obama denied in a statement earlier this week. Gabbard said in a Sunday interview that she referred some Obama-era officials for criminal prosecution to the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI.
Los Angeles Times
3 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Mailbag: O.C. student alarmed over proposed education funding cuts
I am a high school student and I am here this week in the ACLU National Advocacy Institute in Washington, D.C. to get a sense of how the law of the land extends throughout this country. That's why I became so alarmed to read that the U.S. Supreme Court has paved the way for mass layoffs at the Department of Education and the Trump administration has announced its intention to close it. In its functions, this department ensures just funding, the protection of civil rights and the support of special needs children. It would be the students in lower-resourced communities, many of whom are in my own community, Santa Ana, who would most bear the brunt of it being broken apart. Without federal action, there is a fear that educational justice will be left behind. This is not an abstract issue to me. It affects my peers, my educators and my future. I strongly encourage leaders and communities to give this plan the thumbs down and demand a public, regulated and equitable education system. Sahib GrewalSanta Ana I've been participating in Indivisible protests near my home here in Huntington Beach for several months. As a person in my 70s and a retired high school American government teacher, I've been greatly affected by America's drift toward authoritarianism since the reelection of Donald Trump as president. Thus, I need to be out there — for myself but also in defense of the lessons I taught in my classroom about the inviolability of Constitutional law and the Bill of Rights. Each week, I stand on the curb with my sign that reads 'This is not normal.' Horns are honked in support and fingers are thrust in the air in opposition. I even had one young man in a pickup pull over to the curb where I was standing and tell me to 'go back to the senior citizens' home.' That one hurt, but, thankfully, this is a free country where the 1st Amendment protects his free speech. Then, recently, the vituperative responses crossed a line for me. First, a young father drove by angrily throwing an obscene gesture towards the protesters as his small daughter seated in a child's seat looked on. Then, a little later, a car drove past with a little boy, maybe 10 years old, making an obscene gesture out of the back seat of the car toward the protest. I suspect he was emulating his dad (or his mom). Tragically, the breakdown of civility and civil discourse would appear to be destined to last for generations. Parents would do well to remember that the kids are watching how we handle this national crisis. Lorraine GayerHuntington Beach Since Donald Trump took the oath of office last January, I have read and reread the inscription at the Statue of Liberty several times. In part, it reads: '… A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name Mother of silent lips. 'Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore...' It's not surprising that many artists are now depicting the Mother of Exiles — the Statue of Liberty — kneeling, her face hidden in her hands. Today's America, which is marked by presidential attacks on judges, law firms, and the judicial system itself, stands sharply at odds with this nation's enduring symbol of freedom. Equally troubling are the White House-approved ICE raids targeting communities of color. Simply put, these raids are designed to inflict cruelty. If you believe these raids will end soon, you're mistaken. ICE agents, equipped with the names, addresses, and phone numbers of over 79 million Medicaid recipients, have unprecedented reach into private homes — day or night. It won't matter where you live in Orange County, if agents determine you should be deported, it's only a matter of time before they will start pounding on your door. The rule of law, freedom of speech, and the right to peaceful protest have been fundamental to American democracy since its inception. Anyone who has visited the Statue of Liberty knows it represents more than decency; it serves as a powerful reminder that freedom is always worth protecting, no matter which way the political winds blow. If you ask me, today this principle is more crucial than ever. Denny FreidenrichLaguna Beach Re: 'Mariachi Nationals Summer Institute plays on in Anaheim, despite loss of NEA funding,' July 20. I just read the piece to my dad; we are blown away. Thank you for covering our annual camp. Having support from local partners such as TimesOC and Los Angeles Times is so important to continuing first, the folk genre itself, and second, exposure to donors who can help bring our goals to life. José Hernandez Newport Beach
