
Clashes in Istanbul over alleged 'Prophet Mohammed' cartoon
"The chief public prosecutor's office has launched an investigation into the publication of a cartoon in the June 26, 2025 issue of LeMan magazine that publicly insults religious values, and arrest warrants have been issued for those involved," the prosectors office said.
A copy of the black-and-white image posted on social media showed two characters hovering in the skies over a city under bombardment.
"Salam aleikum, I'm Mohammed," says one shaking hands with the other who replies, "Aleikum salam, I'm Musa."
But the magazine's editor-in-chief Tuncay Akgun told AFP by phone from Paris that the image had been misinterpreted and was "not a caricature of Prophet Mohammed".
"In this work, the name of a Muslim who was killed in the bombardments of Israel is fictionalised as Mohammed. More than 200 million people in the Islamic world are named Mohammed," he said, saying it had "nothing to do with Prophet Mohammed.
"We would never take such a risk."
As the news broke, several dozen angry protesters attacked a bar often frequented by LeMan staffers in downtown Istanbul, provoking angry scuffles with police, an AFP correspondent said.
The scuffles quickly degenerated into clashes involving between 250 to 300 people, the correspondent said.
- Cartoonist, two others held -
In several posts on X, Interior Minister Ali Yerlikaya said police had arrested the cartoonist responsible for "this vile drawing", the magazine's editor-in-chief and its graphic designer.
Police had also taken over the magazine's offices on Istiklal Avenue and arrest warrants had been issued for several other of the magazine's executives, presidential press aide Fahrettin Altin wrote on X.
In a string of posts on X, LeMan defended the cartoon and said it had been deliberately misinterpreted to cause a provocation.
"The cartoonist wanted to portray the righteousness of the oppressed Muslim people by depicting a Muslim killed by Israel, he never intended to belittle religious values," it said.
Akgun said the legal attack on the magazine, a satirical bastion of opposition which was founded in 1991, was "incredibly shocking but not very surprising".
"This is an act of annihilation. Ministers are involved in the whole business, a cartoon is distorted," he said.
"Drawing similarities with Charlie Hebdo is very intentional and very worrying," he said of the French satirical magazine whose offices were stormed by Islamist gunmen in 2015.
The attack, which killed 12 people, occurred after it published caricatures lampooning the Prophet Mohammed.
'A very systematic provocation'
"There is a game here, as if we were repeating something similar. This is a very systematic provocation and attack," Akgun said.
Justice Minister Yilmaz Tunc an investigation had been opened on grounds of "publicly insulting religious values".
"Disrespect towards our beliefs is never acceptable," he wrote on X.
"No freedom grants the right to make the sacred values of a belief the subject of ugly humour. The caricature or any form of visual representation of our Prophet not only harms our religious values but also damages societal peace."
Istanbul governor Davut Gul also lashed out at "this mentality that seeks to provoke society by attacking our sacred values.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
29 minutes ago
- Euronews
Poll suggest Europeans want tougher Big Tech EU enforcement
The majority of French, Spanish, and German citizens want stricter EU enforcement of Big Tech, according to a new YouGov survey. Almost two-thirds in France (63%), 59% in Germany, and 49% in Spain said EU enforcement of laws addressing Big Tech's influence and power is too relaxed, when asked to choose between too relaxed, too strict, or about right. Only 7% of respondents in France, 8% in Germany, and 9% in Spain felt the enforcement was too strict. The survey, commissioned by two NGOs—People vs Big Tech and WeMove Europe—follows the EU's 2022 adoption of the Digital Services Act (DSA) and Digital Markets Act (DMA), aimed at regulating tech giants' impact on users and the marketplace. Both regulations are caught up in the trade dispute between the EU and the US, in which the US has described the DSA and DMA as unjustified non-tariff barriers. EU Competition Commissioner Teresa Ribera told Euronews last week that the EU would not give in to US pressure on the issue. 'We are going to defend our sovereignty,' Ribera said, adding: 'We will defend the way we implement our rules, we will defend a well functioning market and we will not allow anyone to tell us what to do.' Surprisingly, the survey results also show that the survey participants believed Big Tech holds more power than the EU itself. Half of French respondents (50%), 48% in Germany, and a majority in Spain (55%) believe that Big Tech companies are 'more powerful' or 'slightly more powerful' than the EU. In contrast, only 9% in France, 12% in Germany, and 15% in Spain think tech giants are 'slightly less powerful' or 'much less powerful.' The survey was conducted on a sample of 2,070 respondents in France, 2,323 in Germany, and 2,077 in Spain.


France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
US pause some weapons deliveries to Ukraine over depleting military stockpiles
01:16 03/07/2025 Iran charges two French detainees with 'spying' for Israel 02/07/2025 Thailand-Cambodia border conflict 'instrumentalised, weaponised' for internal political purposes Asia / Pacific 02/07/2025 United States : P. Diddy acquitted of most serious charges Americas 02/07/2025 France: Parliamentary report criticizes state and PM Bayrou on school abuse 02/07/2025 France's Macron hosts summit on New Caledonia's future 02/07/2025 Brittany, France's heatwave refuge 02/07/2025 Tibetan leader Dalai Lama sets clear succession plan, urges China to stay out 02/07/2025 In Italy, a new museum lab studies how people see and experience art 02/07/2025 Potential 60-day Gaza ceasefire: Trump pushes, Hamas and Israel consider


France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
Indonesia free meal plan stunted by delays, protests, poisonings
"My daughter had a stomachache, diarrhoea, and a headache," the woman told AFP on condition of anonymity about the incident in the Javan city of Bandung. "She also couldn't stop vomiting until three in the morning." Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto touted the populist scheme as a solution to the high rates of stunted growth among children, as he carved his way to a landslide election victory last year. But its rollout since January has stumbled from crisis to crisis, including accusations of nepotism, funding delays, protests and a spate of food poisonings. It was slated to reach as many as 17.5 million children this year to the tune of $4.3 billion. But so far it has only served five million students nationwide from January to mid-June, according to the finance ministry. The poisoning issues were not isolated to that girl's school -- five others reported similar incidents. But Prabowo has lauded the number of illnesses as a positive. "Indeed there was a poisoning today, around 200 people out of three million," he said in May. "Over five were hospitalised, so that means the success rate is 99.99 percent. A 99.99 percent success rate in any field is a good thing." Rushed policy Large-scale aid programmes in Indonesia have a history of allegations of graft at both the regional and national levels. Experts say this programme is particularly vulnerable, with little in the way of accountability. "A big budget means the possibility of corruption is wide open, and with lax monitoring, corruption can happen," said Egi Primayogha, a researcher at Indonesia Corruption Watch. "Since the beginning, the programme was rushed, without any good planning. There is no transparency." The programme was rolled out soon after Prabowo took office in October and local investigative magazine Tempo reported that "several partners appointed" were Prabowo supporters in the election. Agus Pambagio, a Jakarta-based public policy expert, said Prabowo rushed the plan, with critics saying there was little public consultation. "Japan and India have been doing it for decades. If we want to do it just like them within a few months, it's suicide," he said. "We can't let fatalities happen." The plan's stated aim is to combat stunting, which affects more than 20 percent of the country's children, and reduce that rate to five percent by 2045. Prabowo's administration has allocated $0.62 per meal and initially set a budget of 71 trillion rupiah ($4.3 billion) for this year. But authorities have been accused of delays and under-funding the programme. A catering business in capital Jakarta had to temporarily shut down in March because the government had not paid the $60,000 it was owed. The case went viral and it eventually got its money back. Poses risks The government announced a $6.2 billion budget boost recently but revised it by half as problems mounted in its ambitious quest to deliver meals to almost 83 million people by 2029. Widespread cuts to fund the programme's large budget also sparked protests across Indonesian cities in February. Yet some say the programme has benefited their child. "It's quite helpful. I still give my son pocket money, but since he got free lunch, he could save that money," Reni Parlina, 46, told AFP. However a May survey by research institute Populix found more than 83 percent of 4,000 respondents think the policy should be reviewed. "If necessary, the programme should be suspended until a thorough evaluation is carried out," said Egi. The National Nutrition Agency, tasked with overseeing free meal distribution, did not respond to an AFP request for comment. The agency has said it will evaluate the scheme and has trained thousands of kitchen staff. Kitchen partners say they are taking extra precautions too. "We keep reminding our members to follow food safety protocols," said Sam Hartoto of the Indonesian Catering Entrepreneurs Association, which has 100 members working with the government. While they seek to provide assurances, the debacles have spooked parents who doubt Prabowo's government can deliver. "I don't find this programme useful. It poses more risks than benefits," said the mother of the sick girl. "I don't think this programme is running well." © 2025 AFP