Police can control bank accounts of scam victims in S'pore from July 1
Source: Straits Times
Article Date: 01 Jul 2025
Author: Nadine Chua
With the Protection from Scams Act coming into effect on July 1, the police will be allowed to issue restriction orders (ROs) to banks, which will then limit the banking transactions of an individual's accounts.
The police will now have powers to control the bank accounts of stubborn scam victims in Singapore who insist they are not being scammed despite evidence showing otherwise.
With the Protection from Scams Act coming into effect on July 1, the police will be allowed to issue restriction orders (ROs) to banks, which will then limit the banking transactions of an individual's accounts.
The Act, which was passed in Parliament on Jan 7, will enable the police to better protect scam victims by stopping them from transferring money into other accounts, using ATMs, and accessing credit services. In-person and over-the-counter transactions will also be restricted for them.
Those subjected to an RO will still have access to money for legitimate reasons, including paying bills and buying daily essentials like groceries.
On June 30, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) said ROs will be issued if it is believed these scam victims will transfer money to scammers.
The police said one of the biggest challenges they face is convincing people they are victims of a scam.
Without the Act, the police cannot stop victims from doing what they want with their money, even if they are suspected of being scammed.
MHA said ROs will be issued only as a last resort, after other options to convince victims have been exhausted.
The decision to issue an RO will be made by a police officer, based on an assessment of the facts and circumstances of each case, said the ministry.
Once the decision is made, ROs will be issued by default to the seven major retail banks here – OCBC Bank, DBS Bank, UOB, Maybank, Standard Chartered, Citibank and HSBC – but can also be issued to other banks.
ROs will take effect for up to 30 days at a time and can be extended up to five times, which means they can last for up to six months.
The police can cancel an RO ahead of the 30-day limit if the individual is assessed to be no longer at risk of being scammed. Appeals against the RO can be made to the Commissioner of Police, whose decision will be final.
MHA had said 10 or more ROs could be issued monthly, based on previous cases in which the police were unsuccessful in intervening.
In 2024, scam victims in Singapore lost $1.1 billion, a record high in a single year.
The police saw the highest number of scam reports in 2024, with 51,501 cases compared with 46,563 cases the previous year.
Overall, victims in Singapore have lost more than $3.4 billion to scams since 2019.
In more than three in four cases in 2024, victims had voluntarily transferred money without scammers gaining direct control of their bank accounts.
The police said these victims were manipulated into transferring money through deception and social engineering.
The most common ruse in 2024 was e-commerce scams, with 11,665 reported cases. Victims of investment scams saw the highest amount of losses, with $320.7 million lost to such scams.
Nadine Chua is a crime and court journalist at The Straits Times.
Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Singapore Law Watch
a day ago
- Singapore Law Watch
Granddaughter of Hin Leong founder O.K. Lim fails to keep 3 insurance policies from creditors' reach
Granddaughter of Hin Leong founder O.K. Lim fails to keep 3 insurance policies from creditors' reach Source: Straits Times Article Date: 04 Jul 2025 Author: Grace Leong Court finds lack of evidence that her father intended to create trust before bankruptcy. The daughter of bankrupt former Hin Leong Trading director Lim Chee Meng failed in a bid to shield three AIA Singapore insurance policies worth over half a million dollars from being part of Mr Lim's bankruptcy estate. Ms Michelle Lim Yan Yi, the granddaughter of Hin Leong founder Lim Oon Kuin, sought a High Court declaration that the three policies, worth over $521,000, should be ring-fenced from creditors' reach because they were held on trust for her benefit by her father, who was declared bankrupt in December 2024. The three policies are part of a set of eight insurance policies with AIA that Mr Lim Chee Meng had taken out when Ms Lim was a minor, under which he was the policy owner and she was the named insured. But High Court Judicial Commissioner Mohamed Faizal found there was a lack of evidence of an intention on Mr Lim's part, prior to his bankruptcy, to create a trust over the three policies for the sole benefit of his daughter. He found that the documentary evidence relied on by Ms Lim was 'either self-interested representations' or 'mere assertions'. One document she relied on was an October 2021 letter from Mr Lim to ring-fence the eight policies from other assets that were subjected to a freezing order in a US$3.5 billion (S$4.45 billion) civil suit. Another document adduced was an AIA letter dated October 2021 signed by a purported personal wealth manager, who asserted that 'the eight policies belong to (Ms Lim), and are being held by Mr Lim Chee Meng on trust for (Ms Lim)'. Ms Lim contended that the AIA letter would not have been issued unless her father had clearly conveyed his intention to create a trust. But the judicial commissioner found 'the letter was bare and bereft of details and merely asserted, without more, that the eight policies were held on trust'. Other documents Ms Lim relied on included an e-mail dated March 10, 2025, from Mr Lim to the trustees and part of his affidavit filed in 2024 for his bankruptcy proceedings, in which he asserted that he held the eight policies on trust for Ms Lim. But the judicial commissioner pointed out that most of the documents she relied on as evidence were written by or on behalf of her father after his bankruptcy proceedings started. 'By that time, it would have been apparent that Hin Leong's collapse could have extremely far-reaching financial consequences for all concerned, not least Mr Lim who was a director.' The judicial commissioner noted: 'It was at this point that Mr Lim started to insist that the eight policies were in fact not owned by him and should be deemed to be held on trust.' He pointed out: 'The courts should be wary of such belated attempts by bankrupts to shield assets from creditors by retrospectively asserting the existence of trust arrangements without contemporaneous evidence.' Mr Lim, along with his father and sister Lim Huey Ching, was declared bankrupt in December 2024, following a settlement of two lawsuits brought by Hin Leong's liquidators and HSBC against the Lim family. Their bankruptcy estates are being managed by trustees Leow Quek Shiong and Seah Roh Lin of BDO Singapore, who have taken the position that the three insurance policies vest in Mr Lim's bankruptcy estate. The trustees had asked Mr Lim and Ms Michelle Lim whether a third party would pay the bankruptcy estate the surrender value of the three policies, which was worth over $521,000 as at Jan 16. If no third party would pay for them, the trustees would then terminate the policies and use the proceeds to pay his creditors. But Mr Lim and his daughter did not agree to this arrangement. Ms Lim claimed that her father intended to hold these policies on trust for her until she turned 21 years old, after which he would transfer the policies to her name. But the trustees contend that while the policy documents do identify Ms Lim as the insured, they do not name her as a beneficiary. The trustees also pointed out that Mr Lim's actions were 'inconsistent with any intention to create a trust for Ms Lim since he did not take the necessary steps to vest the three policies in her name when she turned 21', despite having the opportunity to do so. The trustees noted that AIA had written to Mr Lim on June 13, 2024, to indicate that its records showed he wished to remain the policies' owner when Ms Lim turned 21, but they were writing to him just in case he wished to change the state of affairs. The judicial commissioner noted that Mr Lim 'chose to ignore the (AIA) letters altogether'. Further, he also did not file any affidavit to support his daughter's case. 'While I accept that the absence of direct evidence from Mr Lim is not determinative, such absence necessarily raises obvious and legitimate questions about the credibility and completeness of (Ms Lim's) claim,' the judicial commissioner noted. Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction. Print
Straits Times
2 days ago
- Straits Times
17-year-old youth who walked on MRT tracks to take video of train charged, remanded at IMH for assessment
The teen allegedly committed criminal trespass on March 27 at around 8.15pm by climbing a scaffolding along Upper Changi Road to access the train... PHOTOS: SCREENGRAB FROM FACEBOOK VIDEO/COMPLAINT SINGAPORE 17-year-old youth who walked on MRT tracks to take video of train charged, remanded at IMH for assessment Nadine Chua The Straits Times July 3, 2025 A 17-year-old youth who allegedly trespassed onto train tracks between Simei and Tanah Merah MRT stations was charged on July 3. The teen was handed one charge of wilfully endangering the safety of passengers and another charge of criminal trespass. He cannot be named as he was 16 years old when he allegedly committed the offences in March. Individuals below 18 are protected under the Children and Young Persons Act. The teen appeared in court via video-link, with the prosecution successfully applying for him to be remanded at the Institute of Mental Health for psychiatric assessment. District Judge Brenda Tan asked if his parents were in court. When this question was posed to those in the court gallery, no one responded. The judge asked if the teen's parents had been informed of the charges, and he replied he had called his parents. According to charge sheets, he allegedly committed criminal trespass on March 27 at around 8.15pm by climbing a scaffolding along Upper Changi Road to access the train tracks during operational hours. In early June, SMRT said it had filed a police report after footage that appeared to have been taken from an MRT track was posted on social media. The video was taken in dimly lit conditions and shows a train passing by on a nearby track. The person filming it later moves closer to the train, before crossing the tracks. The teen is also accused of wilfully endangering the safety of those travelling along the railway by trespassing onto the track while train service was in operation. His case was adjourned to July 17. Those convicted of committing criminal trespass can be jailed for up to three months, fined up to $1,500, or both. An offender who wilfully does something that endangers those travelling along the railway can be jailed for up to five years, fined up to $10,000, or both. Click here to contribute a story or submit it to our WhatsApp Get more of Stomp's latest updates by following us on:
Straits Times
2 days ago
- Straits Times
ByteDance food poisoning: Cockroaches found on premises of catering firm, 1 dish had unacceptable levels of pathogens
Yunhaiyao's chief executive Lu Zhi Tao appeared in court on July 2 on behalf of the company and pleaded guilty to two charges. PHOTO: THE STRAITS TIMES ByteDance food poisoning: Cockroaches found on premises of catering firm, 1 dish had unacceptable levels of pathogens Nadine Chua The Straits Times July 2, 2025 Catering company Yunhaiyao, which was involved in the ByteDance mass food poisoning case, has been convicted after cockroaches were found on its premises. The wok-fried diced chicken prepared by the company was also found to have contained more than 2,000 times the acceptable level of pathogens. Yunhaiyao's chief executive Lu Zhi Tao appeared in court on July 2 on behalf of the company and pleaded guilty to one charge under the Sale of Food Act and another under the Environmental Public Health (Food Hygiene) Regulations. Singapore Food Agency (SFA) prosecuting officer Mohd Rizal told the court that on July 30, 2024, the agency was alerted to an incident of gastroenteritis involving 60 victims, who were the staff of ByteDance. The victims had suffered abdominal pain, diarrhoea and vomiting after consuming catered lunches prepared by Yunhaiyao. Among the dishes from Yunhaiyao's menu sent for food analysis was the wok-fried diced chicken. The meat was found to contain over 200,000 colony-forming units (CFU) per gram of Staphylococcus aureus, a type of pathogen. This exceeded the specified levels of less than 100 CFU per gram. The prosecutor said pathogens exceeding this amount would make the food unsuitable for consumption and that eating such food may cause symptoms of gastroenteritis. During the inspection of Yunhaiyao's food preparation premises, SFA officers also discovered more than 10 live cockroaches beneath a folded grey plastic mat behind a rack. Yunhaiyao's staff immediately disposed of the infested material, said the prosecutor. Before a sentence was meted out, District Judge Janet Wang adjourned the case, seeking more information on how many victims needed medical intervention and how many were hospitalised, among other things. Lu, on behalf of Yunhaiyao, is expected to return to court on July 17 for mitigation and sentencing. Click here to contribute a story or submit it to our WhatsApp Get more of Stomp's latest updates by following us on:
