"Too expensive and too old" - Colin Cowherd predicts next season will be the last in the career of LeBron James
How strange is it that not too long ago, when LeBron James was keeping the Los Angeles Lakers afloat during the stretch where Anthony Davis was traded and Luka Doncic was finding his footing on a new team, the narrative around The King was that he still had what it takes to lead a franchise to a title. But fast forward just a few months and the conversation has changed drastically.
Now, speculations are swirling that LeBron's days in the league are numbered and Colin Cowherd has fueled that fire by boldly proclaiming the 2025-26 season will be the Akron native's final one.
Colin explains why the 2025-26 season is LeBron's "Last Dance"
What makes this shift even more puzzling is that James logged an average of 24.4 points and 8.2 assists per game, earning an All-NBA Second Team selection in the process and ranking sixth in the MVP voting at the age of 40 and in Year 22.
So, there's no disputing his production on the court, as he is evidently more impactful than the majority of players in the league. Not so surprisingly for Cowherd, production isn't an issue with LBJ.
The real issue lies in the economics. LeBron is set to earn over $52 million in the upcoming 2025-26 season, which is currently the highest on the Lakers roster. Addressing the same, Cowherd pointed out how in a league that is focusing more on building young cores that can chase championships for more years, LeBron hinders the long-term championship window with his inability to take a lesser paycheck.
"People around the NBA believe LeBron may announce this is his last season. And I do buy that for two reasons primarily. Number one: Clearly, the Lakers feel Luka is the future. Here's the other thing: LeBron's too expensive and too old. Everything with LeBron operates in the near term. Nobody operates like that now that they know what they're doing. So, LeBron's just the new casualty of the new CBA," Cowherd said. "It's not his play, he's a top 10, 12 player on any night, but he is now, hard to sign. He's an old expensive guy," Colin stated.For how long can LeBron continue?
Given that the notion of Father Time finally caught up, or James' presence hinders a team, isn't a new theme. While his athletic dominance may not be what it once was, his impact on and off the court remains elite.
The marketability, the ratings, the jersey sales, LeBron still draws attention like few others in sports. Thus, it is no surprise that the Lakers haven't distanced themselves from him; financially, he's still a major asset.
So, yes, while it is true that Luka should be the No. 1 player for the Purple and Gold going forward, LeBron has never been a superstar who has felt threatened in passing the baton.
Rather, the latter has wanted someone else to carry the team's heavy load for some time in L.A. now, while he works more without having so much ball in his hands.
While things could go haywire if the Lakers fail in the upcoming season, it remains to be seen if James' high-earning salary is the root cause of it.This story was originally reported by Basketball Network on Jul 19, 2025, where it first appeared.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Francisco Lindor's RBI groundout
Francisco Lindor drives in Francisco Alvarez after grounding out to Willy Adames, putting the Mets on the board first with a 1-0 lead in the 3rd inning
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ronny Mauricio's RBI double
Ronny Mauricio rips a double down the right-field line to bring home Francisco Alvarez and give the Mets a 2-1 lead in the 5th inning
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US, China to launch new talks on tariff truce extension, easing path for Trump-Xi meeting
By David Lawder STOCKHOLM (Reuters) -Top U.S. and Chinese economic officials will resume talks in Stockholm on Monday to try to tackle longstanding economic disputes at the centre of a trade war between the world's top two economies, aiming to extend a truce by three months and keeping sharply higher tariffs at bay. China is facing an August 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with President Donald Trump's administration, after Beijing and Washington reached preliminary deals in May and June to end weeks of escalating tit-for-tat tariffs and a cut-off of rare earth minerals. Without an agreement, global supply chains could face renewed turmoil from U.S. duties snapping back to triple-digit levels that would amount to a bilateral trade embargo. The Stockholm talks come hot on the heels of Trump's biggest trade deal yet with the European Union on Sunday for a 15% tariff on most EU goods exports to the U.S., including autos. The bloc will also buy $750 billion worth of American energy and make $600 billion worth of U.S. investments in coming years. No similar breakthrough is expected in the U.S.-China talks but trade analysts said that another 90-day extension of a tariff and export control truce struck in mid-May was likely. An extension of that length would prevent further escalation and facilitate planning for a potential meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in late October or early November. A U.S. Treasury spokesperson declined comment on a South China Morning Post report quoting unnamed sources as saying the two sides would refrain from introducing new tariffs or other steps that could escalate the trade war for another 90 days. Trump's administration is poised to impose new sectoral tariffs that will impact China within weeks, including on semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, ship-to-shore cranes and other products. "We're very close to a deal with China. We really sort of made a deal with China, but we'll see how that goes," Trump told reporters on Sunday before European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen struck their tariff deal. DEEPER ISSUES Previous U.S.-China trade talks in Geneva and London in May and June focused on bringing U.S. and Chinese retaliatory tariffs down from triple-digit levels and restoring the flow of rare earth minerals halted by China and Nvidia's H20 AI chips and other goods halted by the United States. So far, the talks have not delved into broader economic issues. They include U.S. complaints that China's state-led, export-driven model is flooding world markets with cheap goods, and Beijing's complaints that U.S. national security export controls on tech goods seek to stunt Chinese growth. "Geneva and London were really just about trying to get the relationship back on track so that they could, at some point, actually negotiate about the issues which animate the disagreement between the countries in the first place," said Scott Kennedy, a China economics expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. "I'd be surprised if there is an early harvest on some of these things but an extension of the ceasefire for another 90 days seems to be the most likely outcome," Kennedy said. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has already flagged a deadline extension and has said he wants China to rebalance its economy away from exports to more domestic consumption -- a decades-long goal for U.S. policymakers. Analysts say the U.S.-China negotiations are far more complex than those with other Asian countries and will require more time. China's grip on the global market for rare earth minerals and magnets, used in everything from military hardware to car windshield wiper motors, has proved to be an effective leverage point on U.S. industries. TRUMP-XI MEETING? In the background of the talks is speculation about a possible meeting between Trump and Xi in late October. Trump has said he will decide soon on a landmark trip to China, and a new flare-up of tariffs and export controls would likely derail planning. Sun Chenghao, a fellow at Tsinghua University's Center for International Security and Strategy in Beijing, said that a Trump-Xi summit would be an opportunity for the U.S. to lower the 20% tariffs on Chinese goods related to fentanyl. In exchange, he said the Chinese side could make good on its 2020 pledge to increase purchases of U.S. farm products and other goods. "The future prospect of the heads of state summit is very beneficial to the negotiations because everyone wants to reach an agreement or pave the way in advance," Sun said. Still, China will likely request a reduction of multi-layered U.S. tariffs totaling 55% on most goods and further easing of U.S. high-tech export controls, analysts said. Beijing has argued that such purchases would help reduce the U.S. trade deficit with China, which reached $295.5 billion in 2024.
