
Microsoft's H-1B Visa Applications Questioned Amid Mass Layoffs
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Microsoft is under growing pressure to account for its H-1B visa requests after announced another round of layoffs this week, affecting around 9,000 employees across its global headcount.
The latest round of layoffs, hitting roughly 4 percent of the tech giant's workforce, comes after two other waves in May and June, affecting another 8,000 in total. The company has laid off nearly 16,000 people in total this year, out of a 228,000-strong global employee base.
In the weeks that followed those layoff announcements, claims began circulated on X that the company had also applied for upwards of 6,000 high-skilled work visas, or H-1Bs, since October, the start of the current fiscal year. While that number could not be independently confirmed, during the last fiscal year, Microsoft applied for 9,491 H-1B visas. All were approved.
"In some sense, there's nothing strange here," Steven Camarota, director of research at the Center for Immigration Studies, told Newsweek. "You have a situation where the advocacy or use of guest worker programs is entirely always disconnected from the actual behavior of businesses.
"The actual data we have never supports the idea that we are terribly short of workers in the way that the business community says."
People walk by the Microsoft Office building on 41st street and 8th avenue on May 13, 2025 in New York City.
People walk by the Microsoft Office building on 41st street and 8th avenue on May 13, 2025 in New York City.
CraigWhile not the largest recipient of H-1B visas — Amazon takes that title with over 9,200 in 2024 — Microsoft still placed seventh out of the top ten U.S. corporations with around 4,700 approvals, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) data released earlier this year.
Newsweek repeatedly reached out to Microsoft for comment on this story, specifically asking about the number of H-1Bs the company is presently requesting and how many of them are for positions being eliminated through layoffs.
When announcing its layoffs this year, the Redmond, Wash.-based company insisted that it was flattening its management layers, as opposed to targeting software engineers and developers at lower levels. However, the Seattle Times reported that only around 17 percent of those laid off at the Redmond campus were designated as managers.
Microsoft's cuts also come after one of its best quarters ever, with the company announcing $26 billion in profit from January through March. Its stock is up nearly 20 percent year-to-date, at a time when tech companies across the board are looking to replace certain jobs, particularly in coding and engineering, with AI.
With H-1B workers are typically seen as cheaper than Americans to employ, outrage has been spreading across social media from those who oppose the visa. There is no confirmed link between Microsoft's layoffs and its H-1B applications.
"This is economic treason. Approving a single H1B right now is a grave betrayal of your fellow citizens," the influential right-wing X user Pine Baron wrote in response to the latest round of Microsoft layoffs, while the account U.S. Tech Workers, linked to the Institute for Sound Public Policy, asked if the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) would investigate.
Newsweek reached out to the DOL about Microsoft's layoffs and whether it monitors companies hiring practices in relation to H-1B issuances.
Many tech companies benefit from the H-1B program, which involves them sponsoring individuals to come to the U.S. and work. Typically, the visa is tied to a particular role and company, meaning workers cannot easily change jobs and often have to leave the U.S. once their role is terminated. This makes them easier to employ at cheaper costs, and less likely to quit.
The re-election of Donald Trump has sparked a heated debate within the Republican Party over high-skilled immigration, specifically H1-B visas.
The re-election of Donald Trump has sparked a heated debate within the Republican Party over high-skilled immigration, specifically H1-B visas.
Getty Images
The program has become a flashpoint on the right, largely between the MAGA movement that believes H-1Bs take away jobs from American-born workers and the Big Tech executives who support Donald Trump but also do not want to see H-1Bs eliminated.
"The reality is that the business community is convinced they need the workers and there is tremendous skepticism in the part of the public, and the end result is political stalemate in terms of reforms," Camarota said.
At the end of 2024, debate around the H-1B blew up on social media, as Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy – set at the time to co-lead the DOGE initiative – came out in favor of the program and called for even more work visas, while the president's base made it clear it was not in the spirit of MAGA.
President Trump, as a businessman, has long been in favor of H-1Bs and has not given much indication he will look to modify the program.
"The problem here is, for the most part, the system works well for business, and if it works pretty well for business, well the incentive to change it in ways that would protect American workers is hard," Camarota said, referring to that debate.
"If they reformed H-1B, probably anything that would make it through Congress given the skepticism about it, would be more regulations and they don't want it."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump order calls for national park fee hikes for some: What to know
(NEXSTAR) — Just weeks after the Department of the Interior's budget proposal for fiscal year 2026 suggested a surcharge for some national park visitors, President Donald Trump has signed an executive order calling for just that. The order, signed Thursday, directs Interior Secretary Doug Burgum to develop a 'strategy' to boost revenue and improve recreational experiences at national parks, The Hill reported last week. As part of that, entrance fees and the cost for a recreation pass are intended to rise for 'nonresidents.' International visitors do not currently pay more to visit the national parks than U.S. residents. The White House said the price hikes will make national parks more affordable for American families. Here's what we know about Trump's order and the Interior Department's budget proposal. The Department of the Interior's budget proposal for fiscal year 2026 said a surcharge will help bring in more than $90 million, but didn't outline how. 'There could be a billion-dollar revenue opportunity without discouraging visitors,' Burgum said during a House Committee on Natural Resources oversight hearing in June. He didn't expand on how the extra fee could bring in more than $90 million, and the Department did not respond to Nexstar's request for additional information last month. An analysis by SFGate, using an estimate that 14.6 million international visitors went to U.S. national parks last year, determined that if the parks saw the same number of visitors in 2026, the necessary surcharge to reach the aforementioned budget goal would be about $6 a person. 'I think we're way undercharging, as a nation, for international visitors,' Burgum said during June's oversight hearing. Burgum pointed to other international venues where Americans and other non-resident tourists are charged more than locals, like the Galapagos Islands. There, non-Ecuadorian adults must pay a $200 entrance fee, in cash, to the Galapagos National Park. The entrance fee for children is $100. Meanwhile, Ecuadorian citizens over the age of 12 pay $30 while the fee for younger citizens is $12. Citizens also have discounted or free admission to popular tourist attractions around the world. College-aged residents of the European Union have free access to several museums within member countries, including the Louvre and The Orsay Museum in Paris. Tourists pay over 20 times more to visit the Taj Mahal than local residents do. Hawaii will begin charging a 'Green Fee' tourist tax next year in order to generate funds for mitigating future environmental challenges the state expects to face. Chicago's Field Museum offers discounted admission to city residents. Residents of the state of New York are able to pay whatever they prefer to visit The Metropolitan Museum of Art, though they are required to pay at least one penny per ticket. Even Disney World and Disneyland offer deals for those who live near their parks. Regarding international visitors at national parks, Trump's order calls for increased fees for foreign visitors, as well as a price hike for the America the Beautiful Pass and 'any site-specific agency or regional multi-entity passes' that are sold to foreign visitors. The America the Beautiful Pass is currently available at various price points and provides free entrance into national parks and federal recreational lands. An annual pass, available to 'everyone,' is $80. A senior annual pass is $20, while a senior lifetime pass is $80. Others may qualify for a free annual or lifetime pass. The price hikes, according to Trump's order, apply only to those parks that charge entrance or recreation pass fees. Currently, only 106 of the 475 sites that are managed by the National Park Service charge an entrance fee. Neither Trump's executive order nor the Interior Department's budget outlined how much entrance and pass fees could rise. Increased revenue from nonresident visitors would then be used to 'improve the infrastructure of, or otherwise enhance enjoyment of or access to, America's Federal recreational areas.' While the foreign visitor fees could bring in more revenue for the parks, the Trump administration has also proposed cutting the National Park Service's staffing budgets and service operations by 30 percent, The Hill reports. Meanwhile, the Interior Department's budget proposal is requesting $2 billion for the national parks, down more than $1 billion from the current budget. It would be the largest cut in NPS history, according to the National Parks Conservation Association (NPCA). Nonetheless, Trump's order calls for efforts to increase visitor capacity at America's national parks, invest in infrastructure at the sites, and improve park access to American families by ensuring they 'receive priority access in any permitting or reservation systems.' The National Park Service had its biggest year of attendance in 2024, with more than two dozen sites seeing record visitation.


CNBC
3 hours ago
- CNBC
Getting to Europe is cheaper this summer — but everything costs more when you're there
A last-minute summer flight to London or Rome costs less than it did a year ago, but the good news ends at the customs checkpoint. U.S. travelers to the U.K. and Europe are finding their dollars don't go as far as they did just months ago. Exchange rates haven't been kind to Americans abroad this year. The dollar index — which tracks the greenback against a handful of other major currencies — has plunged 10.3% so far this year, its worst half-year performance since 1973, largely due to President Donald Trump's ongoing global trade war. While some analysts expect a partial rebound later this month, €1 now buys only about $0.85 today, versus $0.93 a year ago. In Britain, £1 fetches some $0.73, about 6 cents less than in early July 2024. Some of the currency swings have been quite recent. A ticket to a London play that cost £100, or about $135, at the beginning of June would cost $137 now. A three-night Barcelona hotel bill of €850, about $965 a month ago, will set you back $1,002 today. Fortunately, cheaper airfares are cushioning the blow. Tickets to Europe and Asia are down 10% and 13%, respectively, since last year at this time and have returned to pre-pandemic pricing, according to the booking platform Hopper. And travel experts at recently found some of the lowest-ever deals for certain flights to Sydney, Rio de Janeiro and Dublin this fall. Many consumers appear to be taking advantage of bargain tickets. Even as international travelers pull back on visiting the U.S., Americans are venturing abroad. Travel volumes among U.S. citizens returning home at major airports' passport control were up about 2% over the 28 days through June 21 since the same period a year ago, according to Tourism Economics, a market research firm. While budget considerations are affecting who's deciding to vacation abroad and how to spend when they do, consumer finance experts and travel industry analysts say broader economic uncertainty is playing a bigger role. "If you're going to cancel an international trip, it's not going to be because of the dollar," said Greg McBride, chief financial analyst at Bankrate. "It's going to be because you're worried about getting laid off, you're worried about geopolitical issues, or don't have the money saved up and the only way to pay for it is to put it on the credit card and finance it at 20% interest." For any travelers with heartburn over the weaker dollar, McBride noted that it "still compares pretty favorably to levels we saw in 2021, and it's still better than pretty much anytime between 2003 and 2014." Indeed, Tourism Economics found travel spending by U.S. residents abroad rose 8.6% in the first four months of the year from the same period a year earlier. "This indicates continued U.S. outbound demand," the firm said. While the economy and household finances always influence travel demand, "today those factors are looking to have more of a negative impact than positive one," said Nicki Zink, deputy head of industry analysis at the market research firm Morning Consult. In the group's recent survey, 31% of consumers said both the state of the U.S. economy and personal financial pressures are reducing their interest in leisure travel in the next three months, "higher than any other factor we survey about," said Zink. For its own part, the tourism market research firm Future Partners found 47% of American travelers are likely to venture abroad in the next 12 months, but 35% said uncertainty around U.S. policy changes had already caused them to reconsider or delay those plans. And in a NerdWallet survey last month, 11% of consumers said they'd scrapped international travel plans this year over global relations or economic uncertainty. Plenty of Americans are still packing their passports, though. Millennials, for example, "are increasingly considering international destinations, despite the higher cost compared with domestic trips," said Zink, adding that interest in destinations across South and Central America, the Caribbean and northern Europe have risen this year. Wealthy travelers are also still traveling with gusto, extending a trend that has intensified since the recovery from the pandemic. "Our affluent clients are still going after those bucket-list adventures and once-in-a-lifetime experiences," said Mandee Migliaccio, CEO of the New Jersey-based agency Stepping Out Travel Services. "While they're definitely keeping an eye on the headlines, they typically won't change plans unless a destination really becomes unstable." Migliaccio acknowledged she has seen some subtle shifts lately, with some clients asking to trim flight costs or deciding to skip a stop to keep things more efficient. "It's not so much 'I can't go' as it is, 'How can I make this work for me?'" she said. "People are being strategic, spending where it matters most, and opting for curated experiences over excess."
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Amazon vs. Microsoft: Which Cloud Computing Giant Is the Better Buy?
Amazon and Microsoft are the two largest cloud computing companies. Microsoft Azure has been growing more quickly, but a strained relationship with OpenAI leaves some questions. Amazon's AWS, meanwhile, has a vertical integration advantage. 10 stocks we like better than Amazon › When it comes to cloud computing, Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) and Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) are the clear leaders. Both are seeing strong growth, both are leaning heavily into artificial intelligence (AI), and both are investing billions to meet increasing demand. But if I had to pick just one stock to own right now, I'd go with Amazon. Let's break down why. While best known for its e-commerce operations, Amazon basically invented the cloud computing industry due to its own struggles trying to scale up its infrastructure. Today, Amazon Web Services (AWS) is the largest cloud computing provider in the world, with nearly 30% market share. AWS is also both Amazon's most profitable segment and fastest-growing, with revenue climbing 17% last quarter. AI has been a big reason for this. Customers are using AWS solutions like Bedrock and SageMaker to help them build and run their own AI models and apps. Bedrock gives companies access to foundation models they can customize, while SageMaker is more of an end-to-end solution. Once these models are built, they then run on AWS infrastructure, locking customers into a recurring, high-margin business. On top of that, Amazon has built its own custom AI chips through its Annapurna Labs unit. Trainium is designed to train large language models (LLMs), while Inferentia handles inference. These chips are optimized for performance and cost, consuming less power and delivering better results than general-purpose graphic processing units (GPUs) for specific AI tasks. This gives Amazon a cost advantage over rivals like Microsoft and should lead to better operating leverage as usage scales. Beyond the cloud, Amazon is also using AI to improve its e-commerce business, as well. The company is now using agentic AI to power autonomous warehouse robots. These robots continue to become more sophisticated and can perform multiple tasks. Some can even spot damaged goods before they're shipped, improving customer satisfaction and reducing costly returns. It recently just surpassed 1 million robots in its warehouses. It's also using AI to improve efficiency in its logistics operations. AI is helping map out better routes, while mapping tools like Wellspring can help delivery drivers better navigate complicated drop-offs at places like large apartment complexes. Amazon is also using AI tools to help third-party sellers better market products and target customers more effectively. It's worth noting that its sponsored ad business has become one of the largest digital ad platforms in the world and is growing quickly. There's no denying that Microsoft is a powerhouse. The company has long been the dominant player in worker productivity software with programs such as Word, Excel, and PowerPoint, and its Windows operating system powers most non-Apple computers. However, Microsoft's cloud computing unit Azure has been its big growth driver, with AI accelerating that momentum. Last quarter, Azure revenue jumped 33% year over year (35% in constant currency), with AI services making up nearly half of the growth. Azure is currently firing on all cylinders, but Microsoft has been running into capacity constraints. To address that, Microsoft plans to increase its capital spending in fiscal 2026. It will also shift more investment into shorter-lived assets like GPUs and servers, which it said are more directly tied to revenue. Microsoft made an early and aggressive investment in OpenAI, and the ability to give customers access to the start-up's leading LLM is one of the biggest reasons why Azure has been taking market share in the cloud computing space. Microsoft has also deeply integrated OpenAI's technology into its own products. For example, the technology is used to help power its AI assistant copilots in Word, Excel, and other productivity tools. At $30 per month per enterprise user, Microsoft's copilots have been a nice growth driver for the company. Microsoft has also expanded AI beyond Office 365. It's added new copilots focused on cybersecurity and even launched Muse, an AI model designed to help develop and preserve older video games. Meanwhile, its GitHub Copilot has been one of its best-performing, helping drive solid growth for its code-hosting and collaboration platform. However, the company's relationship with OpenAI has become strained. Microsoft is no longer the exclusive data center provider for the company, and the two have been fighting over the terms of Microsoft's investment, including whether it will get access to the intellectual property of OpenAI's pending acquisition of Windsurf. Microsoft's investment in OpenAI is one of the most attractive parts of its story. It's currently entitled to 49% of OpenAI Global LLC's profits, capped at roughly 10 times its nearly $10 billion investment. But OpenAI is looking to renegotiate the deal as it looks to restructure into a for-profit company. Both Amazon and Microsoft are great companies with strong cloud computing platforms and big AI opportunities. However, Amazon has the edge. Amazon's biggest advantage is that its cloud computing platform is vertically integrated. It can provide a wide range of services from custom chips to infrastructure to high-margin services. Its Inferentia and Trainium chips are helping lower its cloud computing costs, and AWS offers a wide array of foundation AI models, both from itself and other leading tech companies. Microsoft, meanwhile, is reliant on expensive chips from Nvidia and AI models from OpenAI, with whom tensions have been growing. Microsoft is looking to develop its own AI chips, but it was recently reported that its next-generation Maia AI chip has been delayed. Azure has been growing more quickly than AWS, but it faces a lot more unanswered questions at the moment. Microsoft is a solid stock to own long-term, but right now, Amazon is the better buy. Before you buy stock in Amazon, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Amazon wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $699,558!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $976,677!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 30, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Geoffrey Seiler has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Amazon vs. Microsoft: Which Cloud Computing Giant Is the Better Buy? was originally published by The Motley Fool