Appeal to create 'peaceful haven' for youngsters
MAIN, based in Middlesbrough, is seeking £25,000 to create a quiet room - a sensory-controlled space for youngsters to use when feeling overwhelmed.
The "calm, safe and low-stimulation environment" would allow them to manage emotions, reduce stress and "help prevent crisis situations", the charity said
Some businesses have offered their expertise for free, but funds are needed for materials to complete the project.
MAIN supports children and adults who are autistic, neurodivergent, have learning disabilities or complex needs.
Services include one-to-one support, opportunities to experience new activities, a parent forum group, along with advice and guidance.
MAIN CEO Heather Whyman, said: "Many of the children we support experience sensory overload that can lead to high levels of distress, sometimes resulting in aggression towards themselves or others.
"By having access to a dedicated space where they can de-escalate safely and in their own time, we can help prevent crisis situations and better support their continued participation."
The quiet room would be a "vital part" of creating a "stable, inclusive and therapeutic environment", she said.
"We have such great support from the local community and we know that times are hard for lots of people, but we are a very small charity which relies heavily on donations.
"Everyone who is helping us – from the architect to the building works, public relations to marketing support - is doing it for free simply because they strongly believe it is the right thing to do."
Follow BBC Tees on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Related internet links
MAIN
'Going to A&E is unbearable for my autistic son'
Councillor's autism 'benefits politics'
Second cafe staffed by disabled workers to open
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
The possible pension changes that workers need to know about
Ministers are set to resurrect a commission after nearly 20 years in a bid to reform the UK's pension system, amid fears that many of today's workers face poverty in retirement. Experts warn people looking to retire in 2050 are on course to receive £800 per year less than current pensioners, while 45% of working-age adults are putting nothing into their pensions, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) said. With this in mind, work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall is now turning to the Pensions Commission, which last met in 2006, to 'tackle the barriers that stop too many saving in the first place'. 'The original Pensions Commission helped get pension saving up and pensioner poverty down," said Pensions minister Torsten Bell. 'If we carry on as we are, tomorrow's retirees risk being poorer than today's." The commission's work marks the second phase of a wide-reaching government review into the pension's system, the first half of which looked at investment and how to ensure "greater returns" for savers. Phase two will focus on improving pension adequacy. Kendall also confirmed that the next statutory government review into when and how to raise the state pension age will start work now. Here, Yahoo News takes a look at what changes we could expect the Pensions Commission to consider. What is the Pensions Commission? The original Pensions Commission was set up in 2002 and is regarded as having huge influence over the UK's pension landscape. Among the most significant reforms resulting from its work are the automatic enrolment onto workplace pensions and the reduction of qualifying years for the full basic state pension to 30 years for men and women. The Resolution Foundation said the commission has "already transformed living standards for current and future pensioners for the better", but that "the job is not yet complete". In particular, the think tank calls on the new commission to boost "future generations' living standards in retirement" and tackle the "equally pressing 'rainy day' savings challenge people face today". Below are some changes we could expect the commission to consider. Changes to auto enrolment While we don't know exactly what the commission will recommend, it is expected to look at ways of widening the scope of automatic enrolment. The Resolution Foundation said the current "one-size fits all system" is in need of reform, adding: "Some low-earners may be saving more than they can afford, or need to, while others – particularly middle and higher earners – are still saving too little." Analysis by the think tank finds that under the current State Pension and auto enrolment policy with an 8% default contribution rate, the typical earner can expect to replace just 51% of their pre-retirement earnings. The commission will have to balance this challenge with the present-day needs of workers with families, one-in-three of whom have savings of less than £1,000, the foundation said, stressing the need for "greater flexibility". The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) proposes increases in default contributions be "targeted at middle and higher earners". "In addition, pension participation should be extended by providing employer contributions to almost all employees, even those who do not make an employee contribution," the think tank adds. No matter what age you are, it's a good idea to start thinking about a might feel confusing but don't worry, it's easier than you think!Here's what you need to know ⤵️ — CitizensAdvice (@CitizensAdvice) July 19, 2025 Suggesting that there is a balance to be struck, Helen Morrissey, head of retirement analysis at Hargreaves Lansdown told Yahoo News: "We don't want to be in a position where lower earners see their contributions hiked to the extent that they struggle in the here and now. "Similarly, we don't want higher earners to save at minimum levels and receive a nasty shock when they get to retirement and realise their pension will not sustain the lifestyle they have been used to." Under current workplace pension auto enrolment rules, 8% of an employee's eligible earnings go towards their pension – 5% from the employee, and the employer adding 3%. Encouraging self-employed to save for retirement Morrissey said the commission also needs to decide "how to get groups such as the self-employed to save more for retirement". Self-employed people aren't covered by auto enrolment, don't benefit from employer contribution, and may be hesitant to put money away until at least the age of 55 due to volatile earnings, she added. 📊#IFSSatStat: A significant minority of employees, and majority of self-employed workers, aren't on track for an adequate retirement income based on standard adequacy IFS Pensions Review sets out reforms to help many save more: — Institute for Fiscal Studies (@TheIFS) July 19, 2025 For this reason, economists have suggested that the commission could consider finding a way to bring the self-employed into the auto enrolment system. One solution made last year by David Sturrock, a senior research economist at the IFS, is for self-employed people to be given an active choice over whether to save into a pension or LISA (lifetime ISA) when filing their tax returns. Another option, he said, would be for the government to enrol them automatically into a long-term savings plan, from which they could opt out. Triple lock 'out of scope' Liz Kendall has confirmed the commission will not be looking at changes to the triple lock on state pensions. The triple lock is a mechanism that means state pensions will rise every year by 2.5%, CPI inflation, or the rise in average earnings, whichever is highest. 'The triple lock is out of scope of the commission. We've got a very clear commitment to that for the entirety of this Parliament," the work and pensions secretary said. 'And what we're asking the commission to do is genuinely look medium to longer term, the middle of this century, and how the state pension and second pensions work together.' Improving adequacy and equality With four in 10 working age adults not on track to meet the target retirement income (two-thirds of pre-retirement pay), the commission will be looking at ways to improve this figure. DWP analysis suggests 15 million people were under-saving for retirement – particularly the self-employed, lower earners and some ethnic minorities. Only a quarter of people on low pay in the private sector and the same proportion from Pakistani or Bangladeshi backgrounds are saving. Women face a significant gender pensions gap, with those approaching retirement in line to receive barely half the income that men can expect, the commission's terms of reference says, suggesting that bridging these gaps will also be on the commission's agenda. Morrisey said the Commission's work can "give the government the opportunity to take a long-term view and look at how the state pension and the triple lock's role within it need to evolve to ensure it remains sustainable and people can plan for their futures with confidence". One potential reform she suggests is the use of a Living Pension, similar to a Living Wage, as a "minimum income underpin" with targeted salary replacement rates over this to ensure people meet adequate saving targets. Tom Selby, director of public policy at AJ Bell, suggests the government could be limited, telling Yahoo News: "It is hard to imagine hiking minimum contributions – hitting employers and employees in the pocket in the short term – will be on the agenda during this Parliament." AJ Bell's head of public policy Rachel Vahey warned: "Raising employer contribution requirements would likely face a business backlash, with employers having recently shouldered huge rises in the minimum wage and an extra £25bn a year in national insurance costs." Read more Small pension pot rules and loopholes: what are they and how do they work? (The Telegraph) People need an annual income of £44,000 in retirement for comfortable lifestyle (Daily Record) 'I retired to Spain and live on the state pension. I could never afford it in Britain' (The Telegraph)
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Key questions answered on water reforms to protect consumers and environment
The Government has backed the recommendation by an independent commission to abolish water regulator Ofwat as part of a shake-up of the sector. Here are some key questions answered. – What is the problem? There has been growing anger about the state of the privatised water industry. Pollution in England's rivers, coasts and lakes, hikes to bills, shareholder dividends and bosses' bonuses, along with the well-publicised financial woes of the biggest water firm Thames Water, have led to calls for action to tackle what the Government and others have labelled a 'broken' sector. There is also the looming issue of future water supplies in the face of climate change which is bringing more extreme weather. That means a rising risk of drought like the one currently gripping swathes of England and leading to restrictions on supplies for millions of people, heatwaves which push up demand and intense downpours which overwhelm water and sewage systems. Climate change, along with a growing population and historic underinvestment in water infrastructure such as reservoirs, are putting pressure on future supplies and the natural environment. – How does the water system work in England and Wales? It is a 'regulated monopoly' in which a series of private water companies in England are responsible for supplying households in their area with drinking water and/or removing and treating sewage. Ofwat regulates the financial conduct and health of the water firms, while the Drinking Water Inspectorate ensures water supplies are safe for consumers, and the Environment Agency and to a lesser extent Natural England regulate environmental issues around water. Ofwat is also the economic regulator for water companies in Wales, which is mostly supplied by not-for-profit Welsh Water. Unlike with energy companies, you cannot change your water company, so there is no competition between the firms. Instead a five-yearly system known as the 'price review' involves water companies putting in proposals to economic regulator Ofwat on how much they can charge on bills and what they will deliver in return. The regulator determines a final settlement – which can then be contested by the firms and ruled on by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA). – What was the Independent Water Commission? With the new Government's postbag on environmental issues dominated by concerns over water, ministers launched an independent water commission led by Sir Jon Cunliffe, former deputy governor of the Bank of England, to conduct a wholesale review of the water sector. But the terms of reference excluded renationalising the industry. – Why not renationalise water services? Many countries have publicly-owned water services, and some campaigners see it as the only way to ensure that public interest is favoured over private profits. They complain that the owners of water companies have loaded them with debt and paid out large profits to shareholders over the years since privatisation, while putting insufficient investment into infrastructure and hiking bills. But ministers have insisted that renationalising the sector is not the answer, with Environment Secretary Steve Reed warning it would cost £100 billion and slow down efforts to curb pollution as efforts to return them to public ownership would be snarled up in legal wrangles. – What did the review say? It made 88 recommendations, with key ones including a recommendation to overhaul the sector's regulators and replace them with one body for England and one body for Wales. For England, this would see Ofwat and the Drinking Water Inspectorate abolished, and the removal of the environmental regulation functions for the Environment Agency and Natural England. It also recommends measures such as expanding the role of the voluntary Consumer Council for Water into an ombudsman to give stronger protection to customers and a clearer route to resolving complaints, and the introduction of a national social tariff. And on the environment, it calls for stronger regulation on abstraction, sludge, drinking water standards and water supply, improving the process where companies collect and analyse wastewater discharges and compulsory water metering and greater water reuse and rainwater harvesting schemes. Sir Jon has warned that all the issues outlined in the report need to be addressed to solve the fundamental problem with the sector. – What is the Government doing now? Environment Secretary Steve Reed has already announced abolishing Ofwat and rolling the four separate regulators into a 'single, powerful' body acting on behalf of customers, investors and the environment, in one of five recommendations the Government will fast-track. He has also pledged to halve pollution from the water sector by 2030, a higher target than previously, albeit from a higher baseline of 2024 compared to the previous start date of 2021. And he said the Government would be consulting on all 88 different recommendations in Sir Jon's report, as well as pointing to securing £104 billion in investment from water companies and more powers to the regulator. – Will it be enough? Mr Reed has said the reforms will protect customers from the kind of bill hikes seen this year, attract investment into the sector and clean up rivers, lakes and seas. Water UK, which represents water companies, welcomed the review's recommendations, saying they would 'establish the foundations to secure our water supplies, support economic growth and end sewage entering our rivers and seas'. But critics continue to call for more fundamental reform, including nationalising companies such as heavily-indebted Thames Water, battling to secure funding to shore up its creaking finances and responsible for major pollution incidents. River Action chief executive James Wallace accused the commission of falling short, leaving 'the current failed privatised water company model intact.' And Richard Benwell, a member of the Independent Water Commission's expert advisory group and chief executive of Wildlife and Countryside Link, said reforms would 'fall short' without proper funding and a clear steer from Government.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Cyber insurer CFC weighs potential UK listing with £5bn valuation
Cyber insurance company CFC is in the process of evaluating options including a potential UK listing at a valuation of more than £5bn ($6.74bn), reported the Financial Times. Owned by private equity firms EQT and Vitruvian Partners, CFC is in discussions with investment bankers over potential avenues such as a sale or an initial public offering (IPO). However, sources close to the matter have indicated that no definitive decisions have been made at this point. CFC, a London-based company specialising in cyber insurance, is also contemplating listing on alternative exchanges, including those in the US. These considerations are still in the preliminary stages, and any potential deal is not expected to materialise before the latter half of next year, the report said. The company, which was valued at just over £2.5bn following EQT and Vitruvian's investment in 2021, operates as a managing general agent (MGA). Originally established as CFC has diversified its offerings to include insurance products that protect companies against a wide array of risks such as medical malpractice and product recall. The group has recently completed a significant debt refinancing of $1.7bn and has developed an insurance service for small businesses involved in mergers and acquisitions. With an expansion into more than 20 specialist insurance classes, CFC now operates nine offices worldwide and employs more than 950 individuals. The company's customer base has grown to approximately 150,000, as stated on its website. Last month, CFC appointed Nick Line as its new chief underwriting officer (CUO). Line will join CFC in 2026 following a 28-year tenure at Markel, where he has served as CUO since 2018. Line began working in the insurance industry in 1997, serving in roles such as chief actuary and CUO. "Cyber insurer CFC weighs potential UK listing with £5bn valuation " was originally created and published by Life Insurance International, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio
