Oman oil price reaches $70.52 per barrelOman oil price reaches $70.52 per barrel
Meanwhile, international oil prices fell for the fourth consecutive session on Wednesday, as investors assessed trade developments including a US tariff deal with Japan ahead of a US stocks data announcement. Brent crude futures were down 50 cents, or 0.7%, at $68.05 a barrel as of 11:19 GMT. US West Texas Intermediate crude futures were down 47 cents, or 0.7%, at $64.78 per barrel.
Both benchmarks lost about 1% in the previous session after the EU said it was considering countermeasures against US tariffs. US President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that the US and Japan had struck a trade deal that included a 15% tariff on US imports from Japan.
'The slide (in prices) of the past three sessions appears to have abated but I don't expect much of an upward impetus from news of the US-Japan trade deal as the hurdles and delays being reported in talks with the EU and China will remain a drag on sentiment', said an analyst. — Agencies
MUSCAT: The official price of Oman oil for September delivery on Wednesday reached $70.52. The price of Oman oil decreased by 18 cents compared to Tuesday's price of $70.70. The monthly average price of Omani crude oil for July delivery reached $63.62 per barrel, a decrease of $4.25 compared to the price for June delivery.
Meanwhile, international oil prices fell for the fourth consecutive session on Wednesday, as investors assessed trade developments including a US tariff deal with Japan ahead of a US stocks data announcement. Brent crude futures were down 50 cents, or 0.7%, at $68.05 a barrel as of 11:19 GMT. US West Texas Intermediate crude futures were down 47 cents, or 0.7%, at $64.78 per barrel.
Both benchmarks lost about 1% in the previous session after the EU said it was considering countermeasures against US tariffs. US President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that the US and Japan had struck a trade deal that included a 15% tariff on US imports from Japan.
'The slide (in prices) of the past three sessions appears to have abated but I don't expect much of an upward impetus from news of the US-Japan trade deal as the hurdles and delays being reported in talks with the EU and China will remain a drag on sentiment', said an analyst. — Agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times of Oman
17 minutes ago
- Times of Oman
"Steady, time-tested": MEA says ties with Russia stand on "merit, should not be seen from prism of third country"
New Delhi: The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) on Friday defended India's long-standing relationship with Russia, calling it "steady and time-tested," amid growing criticism from the US. MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal, during the weekly media briefing, emphasised that India's relations with any country are based on their own merit and shouldn't be viewed through the lens of third countries "Our ties with any country stand on their merit and should not be seen from the prism of a third country. As far as India-Russia relations are concerned, we have a steady and time-tested partnership," he said. Jaiswal's comments came after a series of statements from the US, including from President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, criticising India for continuing to import discounted Russian oil despite Western sanctions over the Ukraine war. Trump, while announcing a 25% tariff on Indian goods starting August 8, had cited India's purchase of Russian oil and military equipment as one of the reasons for the punitive move. Rubio also called India's Russian oil imports a "point of irritation" in bilateral ties, suggesting that such purchases were helping fund the war in Ukraine. Jaiswal clarified that India's energy purchases are guided by market dynamics and national interests, adding that the government is unaware of any specific developments regarding Indian oil companies pausing Russian imports. "You are aware of our broad approach to energy sourcing requirements, that we look at what is available in the market and the prevailing global situation. We are not aware of any specifics," he said. MEA made it clear that India's partnership with the United States remains strong and resilient. Jaiswal stressed that the India-US relationship is rooted in shared values and interests and is capable of weathering external challenges. "India and the United States share a comprehensive global strategic partnership anchored in shared interests, democratic values, and robust people-to-people ties. This partnership has weathered several transitions and challenges. We remain focused on the substantive agenda that our two countries have committed to and are confident that the relationship will continue to move forward," he added. Earlier this week, Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal told Parliament that the government is assessing the impact of the new US tariffs and will take all necessary steps to protect the national interest.
Observer
an hour ago
- Observer
With new 40% Tariff, Trump tries to box in China
Ever since President Donald Trump began raising tariffs on goods from China during his first term, Chinese companies have raced to set up warehouses and factories in Southeast Asia, Mexico and elsewhere to bypass US tariffs with indirect shipments to the US market via other countries. But on Thursday, Trump took aim at all indirect American imports, which he blames for part of the $1.2 trillion US trade deficit. The president imposed 40 per cent tariffs on so-called transshipments, which will take effect in a week. And a senior administration official who briefed reporters said work was underway that could broaden considerably the definition of indirect shipments. The new rules cover indirect shipments from anywhere, not just China. But China, with its massive factory infrastructure and expansive manufacturing ambition, has been the main country to develop a global network for such shipments. Trade experts were quick to predict that China would be the most affected — and the most annoyed. 'The trade provisions are a thinly veiled attempt to box in China — China will view them as such, and this will inevitably spill over into trade discussions with the United States,' said Stephen Olson, a former US trade negotiator who is now a senior fellow at the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, a research group in Singapore. Trump's executive order Thursday created a new category of imports: goods that are transshipped through other countries instead of coming straight from the country of origin. The 40 per cent tariffs on these goods will be on top of whatever tariffs would have applied if the goods had come directly from the country where they were originally made. The legal definition of transshipment is quite narrow: a good that did not undergo a 'substantial transformation' in the country through which it was indirectly shipped. Countries in Southeast Asia like Vietnam have long denied that they allow a lot of transshipment, and they have been tightening inspections to prevent it. They contend that their soaring imports of Chinese components are being assembled into new and different products that can appropriately be labeled as made in their countries, and not labeled 'made in China.' In addition to the new 40 per cent tariffs on transshipment, the Trump administration plans to put in place so-called rules of origin for indirect shipments in 'a few weeks,' the senior administration official said. Rules of origin are meant to assure importers that goods really were manufactured where their sellers say they were. To be effective, rules of origin must be written strictly, as they are for goods to qualify for free trade agreements with the United States. For example, the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, which replaced the North American Free Trade Agreement, require that as much as 75 per cent of cars be manufactured in North America to qualify for duty-free treatment in crossing borders. Brad Setser, an official under the Obama and Biden administrations who is now a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, said that setting rules of origin could make a big difference. 'The most significant long-term change from the Trump tariff barrage may be creating rules of origin that define the Chinese content,' he said. But other experts were less convinced that the Trump administration would set stringent rules, particularly when discussions have been underway for a possible summit this autumn between Trump and Xi Jinping, China's top leader. The Chinese government has called for the removal of tariffs on its exports and further tightened its considerable restrictions on the purchase of American goods. Workers at a clothing factory in Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, where 60 percent of fabrics for manufacturing come from China. — NYT 'There is nothing in there about content from certain countries, and that is helpful because it means that they aren't risking the wrath of China at this point in time,' said Deborah Elms, the head of trade policy at the Hinrich Foundation in Singapore. The first country-specific trade deal reached by Trump to tackle transshipment head on was one on July 2 with Vietnam. It included a 40 per cent provision on goods indirectly shipped from China. The provision has turned out to be a blueprint for a sweeping new strategy to limit China's role in the world's supply chain. But a month later, Vietnam has not publicly confirmed the transshipment provision. With the exception of Indonesia, transshipment tariffs also have not been featured in announcements of subsequent deals with other countries in Southeast Asia. In recent weeks, Trump has also modulated his strident tone on China. He reversed a previously hard-line position on the export of artificial intelligence chips to China. Not long after, he told the president of the Philippines that he didn't mind if the country got along with China because the United States also had a good relationship with China. For countries in Southeast Asia that had raced to placate Trump over the months since he first announced his reciprocal tariffs, the flip-flopping has created both a sense of uncertainty and a dose of cynicism about the new agreements they have with the United States. At the same time, many countries in Southeast Asia have explored ways to crack down on Chinese companies that reroute exports through their countries without doing any further processing. Governments in the region have streamlined customs practices and promised to quash counterfeit and illegal trade. They have given serious thought to reducing the amount of Chinese content in the products they assemble and export. Multinationals like Walmart account for a sizable share of US imports and have fairly detailed information on how their products are made. But some analysts question whether US Customs and Border Enforcement is capable of identifying whether packages really come from China. 'Enforcement is likely to be challenging, and even if outright rerouting is reduced, trade diversion will continue to dampen the impact of US tariffs on China's aggregate export performance,' Capital Economics, an economic analysis consulting firm, said in a research note. — The New York Times
Times of Oman
5 hours ago
- Times of Oman
India may face annual export loss of $5-6.75 billion because of 25% tariffs imposed by US: Report
New Delhi: India may face an annual export loss of $5 to $6.75 billion if demand declines by 20 to 30 per cent because of 15 per cent tariff imposed by US, said a report by Ventura Securities. Given the country's FY25 GDP of around USD 3.3 trillion (Rs 287 lakh crore), this shortfall could reduce GDP growth by approximately 0.15 to 0.2 per cent, the report added. It further said that India's industry is expected to face short- to medium-term challenges due to US tariffs, however, during this period, the sector is likely to step up efforts to diversify its markets, with aim to maintain growth momentum. US President Donald Trump has imposed 25 per cent tariff on goods from India and an additional penalty if India imports crude from Russia. However, Ventura report highlighted that even with a 25 per cent US tariff, India is still competitive. "While export volumes are bound to be impacted, India can cushion much of the impact by leveraging the recently concluded FTAs with Australia, UAE, EFTA, ASEAN, and SAARC countries," the report added. While the sanctions are effective from today, higher tariffs will be imposed from August 7 onwards till a bilateral trade agreement is signed with the U.S. India continues to engage with the American counterparts to iron out the trade deal. "Negotiations are expected to resume mid-August and the deal is likely to be clinched by October. In this case, the pain would be relatively short-term with an improved trade trajectory," the report added. Over the past few months, India and the US have been negotiating for an interim trade deal, but there were some reservations from the Indian side on the US demand for opening up the agricultural and dairy sectors for the US. Agriculture and dairy are critical for India as these two sectors provide livelihood opportunities to a large section of its people. India reportedly faces US demands, including allowing remanufactured goods, opening up agriculture and dairy, accepting genetically modified (GM) feed, and adopting US rules on digital trade and product standards. Experts have stated that the decision will have a varied impact on different sectors.
