Spectacular new £460m road now connecting two major UK motorways
Gloucestershire is set to see a major transformation in its travel infrastructure with the A417 Missing Link project, which promises to be one of the county's most pivotal road upgrades in recent times. The initiative aims to enhance safety, alleviate traffic jams, and bolster connectivity between the Midlands and the South.
A new dual carriageway is being constructed to link two crucial motorways, aiming to eradicate notorious traffic snarls and prevent drivers from using local roads as detours. The "Missing Link" itself is a notorious three-mile single-lane section on the A417, stretching from the Brockworth bypass to the Cowley Roundabout in Gloucestershire.
In November 2022, the Government greenlit a £460 million investment to transform the current single carriageway into a state-of-the-art dual carriageway.
National Highways has highlighted the importance of the A417/A419 route as it provides an alternative link between Gloucester and Swindon, circumventing the M5 and M4 near Bristol.
The planned route will partly trace the existing A417 corridor west of the Air Balloon roundabout, while a new segment will forge a fresh path south and east, skirting around the current road, reports the Express.
Additionally, the project includes constructing a new Shab Hill junction to facilitate connections between the A417, A436 towards Oxford, and Birdlip, as well as a new junction close to Cowley to take over from the existing Cowley Roundabout.
Moreover, the current A417 stretch between the Air Balloon and Cowley roundabouts is set for a revamp: sections will be transformed into exclusive routes for pedestrians, cyclists, and equestrians, while other parts will remain accessible to local residents.
Yet, motorists in Gloucester should brace for disruptions as the A417 will be shut between the Air Balloon roundabout and the A429 Burford roundabout across three weekends.
The A417 is slated for temporary closure from the Air Balloon Roundabout to the A429 Burford Road junction over three weekend intervals this summer. The planned shutdowns are scheduled from 11pm on Friday 25 July until 6am on Monday 28 July, from 11pm on Friday 1 August to 6am on Monday 4 August, and once more from 11pm on Friday 29 August to 6am on Monday 1 September.
These closures form part of the ongoing enhancement works and are likely to impact travel within Gloucestershire during these periods.
National Highways Senior Project Manager Celine Acard commented: "We're making good progress on the scheme but to maintain the programme we need to employ the full closures on this section to facilitate essential work on the utilities chambers.
"We fully appreciate that road closures can be frustrating, but we're unable to carry out the work while the road is open to traffic.
"We've planned the diversions to minimise disruption, we're anticipating an additional 25 minutes to drivers' travel time and in the meantime we thank people for their co-operation and patience, and advise people to plan ahead and allow a little extra time for their journeys."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
11 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Inside abandoned European airport left to rot with chairs covered in faeces
Eerie images show what Nicosia International Airport, located in Cyprus, looks like after being completely empty for over 50 years. The facility closed down after an unsuccessful Greek-inspired coup attempt in 1974 Europe bustles with busy airports, transporting billions of passengers to countless destinations each year. Last year's statistics reveal that more than 2.5 billion travellers took flight across the continent, exceeding pre-pandemic figures. Among Europe's most hectic hubs are London Heathrow, Frankfurt and Charles de Gaulle in Paris. However, one international airport hasn't welcomed a single passenger for an extraordinarily long period, remaining deserted and shuttered for 51 years. At Nicosia International Airport, the clock stopped ticking in 1974, after a failed Greek-backed coup attempt. Greek military leaders orchestrated the coup, which prompted Turkish forces to launch an invasion in retaliation. It comes after a warning to Brit tourists planning all-inclusive holidays to Spain. Since then, the island has remained divided between Greek Cypriots inhabiting the southern region and Turkish Cypriots occupying the north, reports the Express. A UN-monitored ceasefire boundary runs east to west, keeping the two communities apart. The former international airport at Nicosia now sits within the United Nations buffer zone, forbidden to both residents and visitors. Photographs expose the eerie remnants of this formerly bustling aviation centre, offering a glimpse into the past. The reception area serves as a preserved snapshot of the style at the time - deteriorating promotional displays advertise footwear and getaways pledging to whisk holidaymakers to "the ends of the earth". Above, an abandoned departure terminal stretches out, featuring rows of chairs blanketed in grime and bird mess. "It is actually frozen in time," Aleem Siddique, spokesperson for the United Nations peacekeeping force in Cyprus, UNFICYP, told Reuters. "Although there were several attempts over the years by the sides to reach an agreement, to see the airport being re-opened, restored, rehabilitated, the sides were unable to reach an agreement so gradually the condition of the airport had deteriorated." Now, Cyprus' principal airport sits in the southern coastal town of Larnaca, roughly 50 km (31 miles) distant. Located in the Greek section of the island, it functions as the main gateway to Cyprus, handling the bulk of international flights from across the globe. Elsewhere, a tiny UK airport that has been left to rot for almost two decades has finally been given a new lease of life. Back in its heyday, Sheffield City Airport handled a whopping 75,000 passengers in one single year - whizzing Brits over to the likes of Belfast, Amsterdam, Brussels, Dublin, and London. However, just years after its grand opening in 1997, the hub's popularity plummeted. According to The Sheffield Star, passenger numbers fell to 60,000 in 2000 and to just 13,000 by 2002. Struggling to keep up with the boom in low-cost travel, and unable to expand its short runway needed to accommodate larger planes used by budget airlines - it eventually closed its doors in 2008. The site - which is owned by the University of Sheffield - has now become part of the 100-acre Runway Park development. Featuring the UK's 'first reconfigurable digital factory', a materials lab, and large-scale testing facilities, Runway Park consists of distinct zones for innovation, manufacturing, and leisure - while a central hub links the community together.
BBC News
12 hours ago
- BBC News
New bus service to Birmingham Airport from Birmingham
A new bus service between Birmingham city centre and Birmingham Airport should improve transport links for people in parts of Birmingham and cut congestion, a bus operator 17A service starts on Sunday and will run up to every 30 minutes via Small Heath, Yardley and Tile Cross, National Express West Midlands move comes after the firm extended the 97A route to the airport in July changes would mean a better link to the airport for residents in central and east Birmingham, Mat Hidson, from National Express, said. He added the new service would also help "to reduce traffic and drive down harmful emissions on our region's roads".Bosses at Birmingham Airport said they have been working with the firm as part of their moves to cut carbon emissions on journeys to and from the the new service, some journeys will also be extended on the existing 17 service between Birmingham and Tile Cross, to serve Chelmsley Wood every 30 minutes, a National Express spokesperson said. Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
The Independent
13 hours ago
- The Independent
Heathrow's third runway plan is wrong – and not just because of noise and pollution
Here we go again. To say there is a deja vu aspect to the latest proposal to build Heathrow's third runway is an understatement. For reasons that are not clear, Sir Keir Starmer has determined the airport's expansion to be a key plank in the government's economic growth strategy. Seemingly, he did not take into account the issues that grounded the plans in the past, as far back as 1968 – namely, Heathrow's unfortunate and unavoidable proximity to the M25, the rivers and their valleys that cross that part of west London, the additional noise pollution, and the need for improved and costly transport links to and from the centre of the capital that will result from the vast uplift in passengers. On the constant sound from the increased number of planes landing and taking off, the prime minister will insist that great technological strides have been made in curbing the din. It is true that new aircraft are less noisy. However, they are still extremely audible, there will be more of them, and they will be flying over a heavily residential area. As for the rest, nothing has altered fundamentally, environmentally and logistically, since Heathrow last submitted a scheme, pre-Covid. Inflation means the bill is now an eye-watering £49bn. The bill, ultimately, will be borne by the air passenger, and Heathrow is already the most expensive airport in the world. Will the airlines and their customers stomach at least a doubling in charges? There is the thorny problem, too, of public transport to and from London. The London mayor will be expected to find a way to enable an extra 60 million people a year to use Heathrow. Transport for London is strapped for cash, struggling to upgrade the Tube network. How the additional demand will be met is not clear. What has shifted as well is the nature of air travel. Post-pandemic, business travel is down and looks unlikely to recover – that, certainly, is what the industry is saying. During the outbreak, holding meetings remotely came into its own and employers took a hard look at their budgets – Zoom or Teams often represent a better alternative in executive time and expense. That therefore raises a major doubt about one of the main claims made for Heathrow's extension. It is said to be necessary to enhance London and the UK's standing in the business world, but how, if the commercial users are not there? There has been movement too, and not of the positive kind, in attitude towards Heathrow the operator. The power outage that shut down the plum in Starmer's vision for resurgence and global acclaim was a shocking episode; it not only highlighted a neglected infrastructure but also a failure of management. Thomas Woldbye, who is seeking permission to build this national project, is the same boss who slept through the night as Britain's busiest airport ceased to function. Heathrow's reputation in the sector was already poor, but this took it to a new low. Woldbye has an idea that is different from the one previously suggested, which is to build the third runway over the M25, taking the motorway underneath – and all without any disruption to road users. This is fanciful even without a track record that hardly inspires confidence. Which raises another question. Why? Why should Heathrow as a company get to preside over the airport's improvement and reap the benefits? If we're all agreed that it is a vital national asset, holding a pivotal place in the economy, then why should the incumbent be in charge, not to mention entrusted, with its development? Those who wax lyrical about Heathrow's importance like to reminisce about how Britain led the transformation of international aviation. Boosting the airport is seen as completing that journey. It is the case that we once did. That was in the Margaret Thatcher era, when British Airways was freed from the shackles of state ownership. Thatcher did more than that, though. She enabled and encouraged competition, giving a steer to the challengers and disruptors, notably to Richard Branson at Virgin and Michael Bishop at British Midland. The newly privatised BA was forced to raise its game, and together, these three set new standards. There appears to be an assumption that Woldbye's company must be given the job. But there is another option. Surinder Arora, the self-made billionaire who has masterminded the building of leading hotels at Heathrow and other airports and is a substantial Heathrow landowner, has his own remedy. His is much cheaper, envisaging a shorter runway that does not affect the M25. It is easy to dismiss Arora. But he is popular with the airlines, he rails rightly against Heathrow's pricing, and he knows a thing or two about customer service. He also possesses heavyweight advisers in the shape of Bechtel, the US engineering, construction and project management giant. He deserves to be taken seriously. Heathrow needs a competitor. Likewise, if neither the airport operator nor Arora is selected and the third runway is again kiboshed, then surely serious thought must be given to expanding rival airports. Heathrow has been resting on its laurels for too long. As for Starmer, he perhaps should ask himself how it is that someone who professes to be forensic legally is so capable of displaying rushes of blood to the head politically. Giving Heathrow such prominence smacks of impetuousness. He's done it and has been left with an almighty headache.
