North Korea fires short-range missiles off coast
The missiles were launched from Wonsan, North Korea's eastern coastal city, on Thursday morning and flew up to 800km before splashing down in the sea, the military said in a statement.
South Korea was closely communicating with the US and Japan to share information about the launch, it said.
The foreign ministry said the three countries' nuclear envoys consulted by telephone and condemned it as a violation of UN sanctions.
South Korean Joint chiefs of Staff spokesman Lee Sung-jun declined to comment on the exact number of missiles detected or their characteristics, but told reporters the launch might have been to test the performance of missiles intended for export.
A North Korea analyst at the Korea Institute for National Unification, Hong Min, said they were likely two types of short-range ballistic missiles that had been supplied to Russia which used them to strike Ukraine.
"There is considerable amount of field data of these two missiles collected, and it's possible additional testing was needed to improve issues reported from the battlefield such as durability and precision," Hong said.
The Japanese government also said it detected a launch of a ballistic missile by North Korea, which might have flown on a irregular trajectory.
The nuclear-armed North's ballistic missile program is banned by United Nations Security Council resolutions, but in recent years Pyongyang has forged ahead with developing missiles of all ranges.
In March, North Korea fired multiple ballistic missiles, while blaming the South Korean and US militaries for conducting drills it calls dangerous and provocative.
North Korea has exported short-range ballistic missiles, among other weapons, to Russia for use in the war in Ukraine, according to US and allied intelligence agencies as well as independent researchers.
Pyongyang and Moscow have denied the weapons trade, although North Korean troops have been deployed to fight on the front lines in Russia's Kursk region.
North Korea has fired what appeared to be multiple short-range ballistic missiles off its east coast, South Korea's military says, possibly to test the performance and stability of various projectiles intended for export.
The missiles were launched from Wonsan, North Korea's eastern coastal city, on Thursday morning and flew up to 800km before splashing down in the sea, the military said in a statement.
South Korea was closely communicating with the US and Japan to share information about the launch, it said.
The foreign ministry said the three countries' nuclear envoys consulted by telephone and condemned it as a violation of UN sanctions.
South Korean Joint chiefs of Staff spokesman Lee Sung-jun declined to comment on the exact number of missiles detected or their characteristics, but told reporters the launch might have been to test the performance of missiles intended for export.
A North Korea analyst at the Korea Institute for National Unification, Hong Min, said they were likely two types of short-range ballistic missiles that had been supplied to Russia which used them to strike Ukraine.
"There is considerable amount of field data of these two missiles collected, and it's possible additional testing was needed to improve issues reported from the battlefield such as durability and precision," Hong said.
The Japanese government also said it detected a launch of a ballistic missile by North Korea, which might have flown on a irregular trajectory.
The nuclear-armed North's ballistic missile program is banned by United Nations Security Council resolutions, but in recent years Pyongyang has forged ahead with developing missiles of all ranges.
In March, North Korea fired multiple ballistic missiles, while blaming the South Korean and US militaries for conducting drills it calls dangerous and provocative.
North Korea has exported short-range ballistic missiles, among other weapons, to Russia for use in the war in Ukraine, according to US and allied intelligence agencies as well as independent researchers.
Pyongyang and Moscow have denied the weapons trade, although North Korean troops have been deployed to fight on the front lines in Russia's Kursk region.
North Korea has fired what appeared to be multiple short-range ballistic missiles off its east coast, South Korea's military says, possibly to test the performance and stability of various projectiles intended for export.
The missiles were launched from Wonsan, North Korea's eastern coastal city, on Thursday morning and flew up to 800km before splashing down in the sea, the military said in a statement.
South Korea was closely communicating with the US and Japan to share information about the launch, it said.
The foreign ministry said the three countries' nuclear envoys consulted by telephone and condemned it as a violation of UN sanctions.
South Korean Joint chiefs of Staff spokesman Lee Sung-jun declined to comment on the exact number of missiles detected or their characteristics, but told reporters the launch might have been to test the performance of missiles intended for export.
A North Korea analyst at the Korea Institute for National Unification, Hong Min, said they were likely two types of short-range ballistic missiles that had been supplied to Russia which used them to strike Ukraine.
"There is considerable amount of field data of these two missiles collected, and it's possible additional testing was needed to improve issues reported from the battlefield such as durability and precision," Hong said.
The Japanese government also said it detected a launch of a ballistic missile by North Korea, which might have flown on a irregular trajectory.
The nuclear-armed North's ballistic missile program is banned by United Nations Security Council resolutions, but in recent years Pyongyang has forged ahead with developing missiles of all ranges.
In March, North Korea fired multiple ballistic missiles, while blaming the South Korean and US militaries for conducting drills it calls dangerous and provocative.
North Korea has exported short-range ballistic missiles, among other weapons, to Russia for use in the war in Ukraine, according to US and allied intelligence agencies as well as independent researchers.
Pyongyang and Moscow have denied the weapons trade, although North Korean troops have been deployed to fight on the front lines in Russia's Kursk region.
North Korea has fired what appeared to be multiple short-range ballistic missiles off its east coast, South Korea's military says, possibly to test the performance and stability of various projectiles intended for export.
The missiles were launched from Wonsan, North Korea's eastern coastal city, on Thursday morning and flew up to 800km before splashing down in the sea, the military said in a statement.
South Korea was closely communicating with the US and Japan to share information about the launch, it said.
The foreign ministry said the three countries' nuclear envoys consulted by telephone and condemned it as a violation of UN sanctions.
South Korean Joint chiefs of Staff spokesman Lee Sung-jun declined to comment on the exact number of missiles detected or their characteristics, but told reporters the launch might have been to test the performance of missiles intended for export.
A North Korea analyst at the Korea Institute for National Unification, Hong Min, said they were likely two types of short-range ballistic missiles that had been supplied to Russia which used them to strike Ukraine.
"There is considerable amount of field data of these two missiles collected, and it's possible additional testing was needed to improve issues reported from the battlefield such as durability and precision," Hong said.
The Japanese government also said it detected a launch of a ballistic missile by North Korea, which might have flown on a irregular trajectory.
The nuclear-armed North's ballistic missile program is banned by United Nations Security Council resolutions, but in recent years Pyongyang has forged ahead with developing missiles of all ranges.
In March, North Korea fired multiple ballistic missiles, while blaming the South Korean and US militaries for conducting drills it calls dangerous and provocative.
North Korea has exported short-range ballistic missiles, among other weapons, to Russia for use in the war in Ukraine, according to US and allied intelligence agencies as well as independent researchers.
Pyongyang and Moscow have denied the weapons trade, although North Korean troops have been deployed to fight on the front lines in Russia's Kursk region.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
13 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Australia should recognise Palestine. To not do so only rewards Israel's crimes
Australia was among the first countries to recognise the state of Israel, but regrettably looks set to be among the last to recognise the state of Palestine. Three-quarters of the world – more than 140 countries – already recognise Palestine is a state, as does the United Nations. Australia's close allies may soon follow, including France, the United Kingdom and Canada. The momentum is driven by horror at Israel's relentless destruction in Gaza, the failure of more than 30 years of negotiations for a two-state solution since the Oslo Accords in 1993, Israel's persistent denial of Palestinian self-determination, de facto annexation of Palestinian land in the West Bank by illegal Israeli settlements and the extremism of the Netanyahu government. Also, no-one believes that the United States is an honest broker for peace, having fuelled Israeli war crimes with an endless supply of weapons and even threatening to seize Gaza. Current moves are a long-overdue circuit-breaker in a century of conflict when everything else has failed. The Palestinians were first promised a state over a century ago. A 1947 United Nations proposal to divide the British Mandate of Palestine into two states did not go to plan. Israel unilaterally declared statehood in 1948 after an insurgency against the British, terrorism against civilians and even assassination of UN officials. It established effective control and independence after a war with invading Arab countries. Australia recognised Israel within six months. The Palestine Liberation Organisation declared Palestine a state in 1988. International law does not prohibit unilateral declarations, as by Kosovo in 2008, but they do not create a state unless legal criteria are met. According to classical international law, statehood is a test of power. A state exists if it has a defined territory, a permanent population, an effective government, an ability to enter into foreign relations and relative independence from other states. Palestine largely meets these. There is international consensus that its territory is presumptively defined by the pre-1967 war borders, encompassing the West Bank, including East Jerusalem and Gaza. The precise borders remain to be agreed, but this has never been fatal to the existence of states, many of whom disagree with neighbours about borders. There is a core national population of Palestinian residents, potentially supplemented by Palestinian refugees returning from abroad, and excluding almost 700,000 Israeli settlers. There is a clear capacity to enter into foreign relations. Palestine engages diplomatically with other states, is an observer state in the United Nations, and makes treaties with other states.
The Age
13 hours ago
- The Age
Australia should recognise Palestine. To not do so only rewards Israel's crimes
Australia was among the first countries to recognise the state of Israel, but regrettably looks set to be among the last to recognise the state of Palestine. Three-quarters of the world – more than 140 countries – already recognise Palestine is a state, as does the United Nations. Australia's close allies may soon follow, including France, the United Kingdom and Canada. The momentum is driven by horror at Israel's relentless destruction in Gaza, the failure of more than 30 years of negotiations for a two-state solution since the Oslo Accords in 1993, Israel's persistent denial of Palestinian self-determination, de facto annexation of Palestinian land in the West Bank by illegal Israeli settlements and the extremism of the Netanyahu government. Also, no-one believes that the United States is an honest broker for peace, having fuelled Israeli war crimes with an endless supply of weapons and even threatening to seize Gaza. Current moves are a long-overdue circuit-breaker in a century of conflict when everything else has failed. The Palestinians were first promised a state over a century ago. A 1947 United Nations proposal to divide the British Mandate of Palestine into two states did not go to plan. Israel unilaterally declared statehood in 1948 after an insurgency against the British, terrorism against civilians and even assassination of UN officials. It established effective control and independence after a war with invading Arab countries. Australia recognised Israel within six months. The Palestine Liberation Organisation declared Palestine a state in 1988. International law does not prohibit unilateral declarations, as by Kosovo in 2008, but they do not create a state unless legal criteria are met. According to classical international law, statehood is a test of power. A state exists if it has a defined territory, a permanent population, an effective government, an ability to enter into foreign relations and relative independence from other states. Palestine largely meets these. There is international consensus that its territory is presumptively defined by the pre-1967 war borders, encompassing the West Bank, including East Jerusalem and Gaza. The precise borders remain to be agreed, but this has never been fatal to the existence of states, many of whom disagree with neighbours about borders. There is a core national population of Palestinian residents, potentially supplemented by Palestinian refugees returning from abroad, and excluding almost 700,000 Israeli settlers. There is a clear capacity to enter into foreign relations. Palestine engages diplomatically with other states, is an observer state in the United Nations, and makes treaties with other states.
News.com.au
17 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Lunatic policy of Net Zero': Barnaby Joyce puts UN on blast in New England snow rant
Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce has used a snow event in his electorate of New England to push his campaign against Australia's 'lunatic policy of net zero'. Mr Joyce, on Saturday, published a video on social media as thick snow fell on the town of Bendemeer. 'A day like today, I don't know which one is more ridiculous: [UN Secretary-General] Antonio Guterres talking about global boiling, or [Tim Flannery] – the river's in flood – saying, it's not gonna rain anymore,' he said in a video on his Facebook page. 'What's sad about this really is there's people in this little village I'm in, Bendemeer, who can't afford to keep warm because we've got this lunatic policy of net zero where apparently we're going to make it snow even more.' 'We're not doing anything, all we're doing is being completely cruel and hurting people.' Mr Joyce introduced a private member's bill in parliament's opening days hoping to repeal Australia's net zero commitment. Australia's current pledge is to cut emissions by 43 per cent from 2005 levels by 2030. The Climate Change Authority (CCA) is reportedly weighing up whether to recommend a more aggressive target of 65 to 75 per cent by 2035. Mr Joyce's chief gripe with the policy in recent weeks lies with what he sees as an unfair burden on regional Australia. His 'Repeal Net Zero' bill, backed by several Coalition rebels, proposes scrapping Australia's carbon-neutral target by 2050, a goal in line with most other developed nations. 'There's absolutely no reason that Mascot Airport can't work 24/7,' he previously told reporters. 'But we understand that people don't want planes flying over themselves in the middle of the night … but we don't want transmission lines over our head either. We don't want wind towers either, so there's got to be a form of quid pro quo.' His argument suggests city-dwellers are demanding action on climate change without shouldering its costs, leaving regional communities to deal with some sort of flow-on infrastructure burden. 'You don't feel virtuous if you're hurting people,' Mr Joyce said. While the bill is unlikely to pass without support from Liberal moderates, Mr Joyce's position is influential within the Nationals and perhaps reflects a growing pushback on climate policy from prominent sections of the Coalition. Joining him outside Parliament House were fellow Nationals MP Michael McCormack and Liberal MP Garth Hamilton, the only member of the senior Coalition partner to back the bill publicly. Mr Joyce's foray on the Bendemeer snow is in stark contrast to warnings by the UN's top climate executive, who said fruit and vegetables may become a 'once-a-year treat' if the country fails to drastically lift its clean energy ambitions. UN Climate Change Executive Secretary Simon Stiell said Australia faced a future of 'mega-droughts', plummeting living standards and eye-watering economic losses if it does not go much further on emissions cuts. 'Mega-droughts [will make] fresh fruit and veg a once-a-year treat. In total, the country could face a $6.8 trillion GDP loss by 2050,' Mr Stiell said during an address hosted by the Smart Energy Council, per The Australian. Mr Stiell, who met with Climate Change and Energy Minister Chris Bowen in Canberra this week, said setting an ambitious target wasn't just about the environment, but rather economic survival. 'Australia has a strong economy and among the highest living standards in the world. If you want to keep them, doubling down on clean energy is an economic no-brainer,' he warned. 'Living standards could drop by over $7000 per person per year. And rising seas, resource pressures, and extreme weather would destabilise Australia's neighbourhood – from Pacific Island nations to Southeast Asia – threatening your security.' New England residents are warned this weekend of some of the biggest snowfalls across the region in 20 years. Emergency services say unusual snow levels were reported at Armidale and Guyra, where falls of up to 50cm were forecast. The SES said on Saturday snowfall in the Northern Tablelands had never been seen at these depths before, which left up to 200 vehicles stuck in heavy snowfall. Snow in Bendemeer, located at around 800m elevation, is extremely rare and is usually very light when it does occur.
