US Treasury asks Congress to scrap foreign revenge tax in Trump bill
The US treasury department has called on Congress to scrap a provision in
Donald Trump
's flagship budget bill that would allow Washington to raise
taxes
on foreign investments, reversing a plan that had spooked Wall Street.
Treasury secretary
Scott Bessent
said on Thursday that the measure was no longer needed because he had secured concessions for US companies to the new OECD global minimum tax regime.
He added that the agreement would prevent such groups from having to pay more than $100 billion to foreign governments over the next decade, according to treasury estimates.
Mr Bessent said on X that his agency had asked lawmakers to remove the so-called Section 899 provision in Mr Trump's 'big, beautiful' budget bill.
READ MORE
The legislation has already passed the House of Representatives and is under consideration in the Senate, with a vote potentially coming as soon as this weekend. The republican chairmen of the powerful Senate Finance and House Ways and Means committees said late on Thursday that they plan to drop the measure from the bill.
Section 899 would allow the US Government to impose retaliatory taxes on companies and investors from countries that it deemed to have punitive tax policies – such as those allowed under the OECD regime.
Some banks and investors had argued that Section 899 could trigger a retreat from US assets and sharply cool corporate investment.
Mr Bessent said the US had reached an 'understanding' with other members of the G7 group of leading nations, which dominate the OECD, that would make Section 899 unnecessary.
He said that, under the deal, which the
G7
would seek to implement in coming weeks and months, 'OECD Pillar 2 taxes will not apply to US companies'.
Pillar 2 of the new OECD regime, which started to take effect this year, introduces a global minimum 15 per cent corporate tax rate, and allows other states to collect the levies if companies' home countries do not.
An EU official hailed the provisional US-G7 deal while cautioning that it still needed to be formally adopted by the OECD next week.
Another official said that the principal idea would be for other jurisdictions to exempt US companies on the grounds that various US taxing schemes are 'broadly equivalent'.
'It sounds like the US is getting a lot of what they wanted,' said Alex Parker, tax legislative affairs director at Eide Bailly, though he noted some confusion as to which of the Pillar 2 measures would be removed.
UK chancellor Rachel Reeves also described the treasury secretary's call on Congress to scrap Section 899 as 'important', saying the progress provided 'certainty for business'.
Canadian finance minister François-Philippe Champagne also welcomed the move to scrap the measure. Mr Parker said that, while the removal of Section 899 was a big step for G7 governments, there were other aspects of the US tax code, such as Section 891, that retaliate against taxpayers from countries where the US alleges discriminatory taxation.
The global minimum tax was designed as one half of a groundbreaking deal agreed by more than 135 countries at the OECD in 2021 to prevent tax avoidance by multinationals and update the international tax system for a digital age.
The first 'pillar' of the deal, which aimed to close tax loopholes for Big Tech groups and multinationals, has not been enacted. The second pillar, the global minimum tax, was implemented by several countries in 2024.
The OECD deal had been supported by the US treasury under the Biden administration but had not been passed by Congress, due in part to resistance from republicans. When the Trump administration came to power it took a hostile stance to the agreement.
Republicans have been particularly unhappy about part of the OECD deal called the undertaxed profits rule, which would allow other countries to levy top-up taxes on US companies.
The rule, which they have branded as 'discriminatory', would permit governments to increase taxes on a local subsidiary of a multinational group if the multinational paid less than 15 per cent in corporate tax in any other jurisdiction. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
12 minutes ago
- Irish Times
US is again betting that installing ‘our sonuvabitch' will neutralise an adversary. It never does
In the surreal world of Donald Trump and Binyamin Netanyahu , war starts and ends on social media, with the flick of a post on Truth Social. Midnight Hammer, the name chosen by Washington for its June 22nd bombing raids on Iran , might have been better suited to a porn film. Everything in Sheriff Trump's wild west is oversized – the world's most expensive warplanes delivered the world's heaviest ordnance on the world's longest bombing raid constituting 'ONE OF THE MOST SUCCESSFUL MILITARY STRIKES IN HISTORY'. Except it wasn't. In his inaugural address last January, Trump gave the impression he had learned from past errors, promising to 'measure our success not only by the battles we win but also by the wars that we end – and perhaps most importantly, the wars we never get into'. If Trump were capable of contemplation, he might ask himself why, roughly every 20 years, Israel and the US attempt to remake the Middle East, with catastrophic consequences. A brief reminder of past misadventures: READ MORE June 1982 Israel invades Lebanon with the goal of stopping attacks by the Palestine Liberation Organisation. Hundreds of Israeli soldiers and tens of thousands of Lebanese and Palestinians are killed. Israeli occupation forces remain in much of the country for 18 years, until they are driven out in humiliation by Hizbullah, an Iranian-backed Shia Muslim militia. March 2003 The US invades Iraq with the goal of destroying Saddam Hussein's nonexistent weapons of mass destruction. Hundreds of thousands of Iraqis and more than 4,000 US troops are killed during the invasion, ensuing civil war and eight-year occupation, which costs more than $3 trillion. Iran becomes the main power in Iraq. June 13th, 2025 Binyamin Netanyahu begins bombing Iran, on the dubious pretext that Iran is about to make a nuclear weapon. Israel has never owned up to owning hundreds of nuclear warheads that it has never submitted for inspection. Trump, who doesn't follow through on his own ultimatums to Vladimir Putin , waits only three days of a two-week grace period before dropping 14 30,000-pound GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator bombs, or MOPs, on Iranian nuclear sites. Trump calls Iran 'the world's No 1 state sponsor of terror'. But these days, it is Trump's buddies, Putin and Netanyahu, who practise state terror against Ukraine and Gaza. If there really were no other way to spare the world from a hypothetical Iranian bomb, one might have concluded – as German chancellor Friedrich Merz did in an obscene remark – that Israel was 'doing our dirty work for us', or 'Drecksarbeit', as he put it. Nato secretary general Mark Rutte also praised the illegal attacks . Under Trump, the West has lost its moral compass. Painstaking negotiations, not brute force, are the only way to defuse a nuclear threat. Diplomacy achieved the 2015 accord known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action treaty (JCPOA) , which Iran abided by until Trump discarded the agreement at Netanyahu's urging. It was Netanyahu who commissioned the 1996 Clean Break report advocating the overthrow of Saddam Hussein, upon which US neocons based the 2003 invasion of Iraq. This month's war on Iran was reportedly inspired by Restoring Deterrence: Destabilising the Iranian Regime, a study by the British academic researcher Barak Seener, published by a rightwing think tank in London. The belief that we can neutralise an adversary by installing 'our sonuvabitch' is a dangerous, recurring delusion. In 1982 Israel and the US attempted to impose the soon-to-be slain Maronite militia leader Bachir Gemayel to lead Lebanon. In 2003 the US groomed Ahmad Chalabi , a corrupt banker who propagated the myth of Saddam's WMDs, for Baghdad. Now Israel dreams of restoring the Pahlavi dynasty, 46 years after the late Shah and his family were driven out by Islamic revolution. The Shah's son, Reza Pahlavi, now aged 64, visited Jerusalem with his mother Farah Diba at the invitation of the Israeli Likud cabinet minister Gila Gamliel in 2023. 'The Iranian people love Israel, and they want the Ayatollah regime to be replaced,' Gamaliel told the Jerusalem Post in March. Trump harbours the same fantasy: 'It's not politically correct to use the term 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime Change??? MIGA!!!' he posted on Truth Social. On June 23rd Reza Pahlavi predicted at a press conference in Paris that the Tehran regime would fall this year. Israel's heritage minister, Amihai Eliyahu of the far-right Otzma Yehudit party, said , 'The fact that we are co-operating with the opposition in Iran today is a blessing.' After an estimated 800 Iranians and 30 Israelis were killed, Trump blithely congratulated his Israeli allies and the country he had just bombed for their 'Stamina, Courage, and Intelligence'. Hours later he lashed out at both for apparent ceasefire violations, saying they 'don't know what the f*** they are doing.' Trump flew to The Hague, where he was feted by royalty and fawned over by Nato's secretary general. Thirty-one of Nato's 32 member states – only Spain's socialist prime minister, Pedro Sánchez, objected – caved in to Trump's long-time demand that they devote 5 per cent of GDP to defence. And those extra hundreds of billions had better be spent on US hardware. There was not a squeak of criticism for Russia's assault on Ukraine, because Trump hates it when you insult his buddies. He denounced corruption charges against Netanyahu as 'a witch hunt'. Trump directed his venom at 'FAKE NEWS CNN, TOGETHER WITH THE FAILING NEW YORK TIMES' for reporting preliminary findings by the US Defence Intelligence Agency that 12 days of sound and fury had delayed Iran's nuclear programme by at best a few months. CIA director John Ratcliffe flew to Trump's rescue, insisting that Operation Midnight Hammer set back Iran's nuclear programme by years. We segued from the verge of a third world war into farce, with Trump, Netanyahu and Iran's supreme leader all claiming victory. Trump and Netanyahu must learn there is no such thing as a quick fix in the Middle East. We've come full circle to the original dilemma: negotiations or a new forever war.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Where is the value in increasing the Help-to-Buy scheme threshold?
Pre-budget submissions are all about pleadings. Every special interest group in the State makes a pitch for more resources. They all consider their proposals to be in the wider public and economic interest. Some are worthy, many more are largely self-interested. This year the whole process appears to have kicked off earlier than usual, perhaps on the understanding that the largesse of recent years is unlikely to be repeated this time around. In the first place, there is no election. Worries for the medium-term health of Europe's most open economy in a climate where tariffs, trade wars and an absence of consistency on policy are increasingly the norm also will inevitably push Ministers towards a more cautious approach. And for what money is available, the need is to prioritise investment in infrastructure. Expensive upgrades to electricity, water and sewerage networks that are increasingly being cited by foreign direct investors among factors counting against Ireland Inc are needed. READ MORE An EY survey on Friday found that more than two-thirds of Irish businesses 'are worried about securing enough energy to meet future needs', which is an extraordinary number. Put together, it means more things are going to be a tough ask to get over the line. [ First-time buyers in Dublin now locked out of Help-to-Buy scheme, warns Savills Opens in new window ] It seems a strange time then for estate agent Savills to be picking CSO house price data to press for an increase in the upper threshold for the Help-to-Buy scheme. Savills says first-time buyers in Dublin are paying an average of €515,000 for a home, putting them beyond the €500,000 ceiling for Help-to-Buy. It wants that ceiling increased to at least €621,000 to take account of inflation, it says. First, averages are notoriously prone to manipulation by singular expensive property sales. Second, the more reliable median data from the same CSO note shows that prices exceed €460,000 only in Dún Laoghaire Rathdown among the four Dublin local authority areas. [ Developers are bluffing when they say lower prices would undermine viability of house building Opens in new window ] Then there is the maximum available tax refund under Help-to-Buy, which is €30,000. Ignoring that when calling for a higher ceiling is not making property more affordable for first-time buyers in general, only for the very wealthy. It is worth remembering that while the marketing speaks about providing a helping hand for first-time buyers – with even the scheme's name selected for the same reason – Help-to-Buy was from the start a scheme put together to help developers make the numbers stack up on building starter homes. That's not happening, as supply constraints (and prices rising at their fastest rate in 10 years) attest, so for the State – and those first-time buyers – what is the value of widening the incentive?
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Wall Street gets the chills in New York's ‘hot commie summer'
Wall Street is, to put it mildly, not keen on the prospect of a socialist mayor of New York. It's 'officially hot commie summer', said billionaire money manager Dan Loeb. 'Socialism has no place in the economic capital of our country,' said hedge fund manager Bill Ackman, warning an exodus of wealthy taxpayers could cost New York up to $10 billion. Young people will get a 'refresher on the outcome of Marxism', said Bitcoin billionaire Tyler Winklevoss. 'Suicide by mayor,' said investment strategist Jim Bianco. Their target? Zohran Mamdani , the democratic socialist now favoured to become New York's next mayor. READ MORE Mamdani's plans include rent freezes, free childcare, free buses and public grocery stores, funded by tax hikes on the wealthy. Much of his wish list requires state approval, and Governor Kathy Hochul has already rejected proposed tax hikes. Still, the symbolism alone has unnerved the moneyed classes. Billionaire doomsaying isn't new. Investors made similar threats about leaving New York when Bill de Blasio ran in 2001, only to stay put once he was elected. Mamdani is clearly further left, and his rhetoric is fierier. Nevertheless, for all the talk of leaving for Florida or Texas, New York still offers what they can't: density, talent, infrastructure and prestige. Wall Street may squirm in this ideologically hostile summer, but flight may be harder than fury.
