The teen 'Luddites' rethinking how they use tech ahead of Australia's under-16s social media ban
It was a smartphone with access to a plethora of distracting social media apps.
By 12, she was so "engrossed" in her small screen that it began to trouble her parents and, though she didn't admit it at the time, herself.
"My screen time [then] was around five to six hours, which is a pretty decent chunk of my day, especially considering the fact that I was in school for eight hours," she tells ABC Radio National's Science Friction.
So at 14, Ms Butler did something few others her age would even contemplate; she stopped scrolling, deleted her social media accounts, and gave up her smartphone.
What she discovered was that life had much more to offer her outside of a hand-held device; Ms Butler could finally pay attention to the world instead of living life vicariously through strangers on the internet.
To make sure she was still contactable in emergencies, Ms Butler bought a "dumbphone" without any apps.
"The flip phone just made so much sense," she adds.
She thought she was the only one who felt this way until she met Logan Lane, a high school student two years her senior with similar beliefs. Together they formed the Luddite Club, a group that promotes the "conscious consumption of technology" among teens and young adults.
The name is inspired by the original Luddites, textile workers in England who formed a rebellion during the Industrial Revolution, raiding factories at night to destroy the machines threatening their livelihoods.
But Ms Butler and her fellow Luddite Club members don't think of themselves as revolutionaries; their goal is simply to "empower young people and give them the tools they need to help themselves".
The idea of building safe offline spaces, especially for children, is catching on in other parts of the world.
A town in France introduced a ban on the public use of phones last year, and parents are forming community groups to prevent their children from accessing phones until they are older.
Here in Australia, a ban on under-16s accessing some social media platforms will become law in December 2025.
But who is best placed to impose these restrictions? Should it be up to governments, organisations or individuals?
Ms Butler is now 18 and isn't planning to get a smartphone for as long as possible, even if "having a flip phone in 2025 definitely make[s] … life harder in some aspects".
"Especially as we now see QR codes, links to websites everywhere. A lot of my schoolwork is online," she acknowledges.
Her dedication has surprised her parents, who didn't think her smartphone-free status was going to last.
"I definitely spend more quality time with my family. I'm more present at family dinners, I do my schoolwork faster, I have better grades, I'm more organised, I'm more on top of everything, I've become a lot less scatterbrained," she says.
The idea to unite like-minded New Yorkers in forming the Luddite Club was fuelled, in part, by Ms Butler's and Ms Lane's own experiences navigating a less tech-dependent lifestyle.
"We realised the hardest part about making that transition [is] the feelings of isolation that come with it and a lack of community," she says.
However, finding teens and young adults who share their views is difficult, with many not convinced that giving up their phones is the ticket to a better life.
Critics argue the Luddite Club is classist and that living without a phone is a privilege, given many people use it to be included in society.
"[The perception is that] … we have all these rules for Luddite Club and requirements to join, when in reality, that's not true," Ms Butler explains.
Those who do take part are only required to follow one rule at their regular Luddite Club meetings: put any devices away for the duration of the gathering.
"Other than that, the Luddite Club is very free-range and spontaneous," Ms Butler says.
"We like to keep the Luddite Club very loosely structured because we've noticed that when you take these devices and these distractions away from people, they don't need prompting, immediately meaningful conversations [are spawned]."
The Luddite Club has now expanded beyond New York to states like Florida and Philadelphia.
But the bigger issue may be spreading their message to adults.
"Now I'm the one at family dinner like, 'Mum, get off of Facebook'," the teenager says.
More than half of Australian children aged 10 to 13 own a mobile phone. And much of the debate about social media and devices recently has focused on those aged 16 and under.
High school teacher and mum Steph Challis lives in regional Victoria and is founder of The Phone Pledge program, a group of mums trying to keep their children off screens until at least 16 years of age.
She understands why some people see hypocrisy in parents and teachers telling kids not to use their phones when the adults around them are also using the devices.
But Ms Challis claims we should be setting an age limit on when to access phones because they pose a greater risk to a child's development.
"[Social media is] harming their brain; it's changing the way their brains develop, much more so than it would be for someone who's 25 and above," she says.
Part of what has prompted her to found the program is her own teaching experiences with tired students who "openly admit a lot of that [tiredness] is because of their electronic devices".
She was also inspired by Jonathan Haidt's hugely popular yet controversial book, The Anxious Generation, and a survey she did that found many parents in her district were similarly worried about their children's phone use.
"If we reach parents that were probably going to give their children a smartphone and a TikTok account in grade five [age 10], and they decide to wait until year seven and year eight, that's still progress and that's still something to be celebrated," she says.
Anna Lembke is a professor of psychiatry and addiction medicine at Stanford University School of Medicine and describes the compulsive overconsumption of digital media as a "collective problem" that requires "collective solutions".
"It's not enough to just moderate the content or try to limit our time, we need actual physical spaces and times when we all come together with no internet connection," she says.
She notes that it's amazing that in "this day and age you can have a spiritual experience just by not carrying your phone with you".
"Comedy clubs, music events, all kinds of people are really recognising that what makes for a meaningful gathering of humans is the extent to which they are psychologically investing in the moment."
A small French town 50 kilometres south of Paris is going one step further by imposing a local smartphone ban on everyone, regardless of age.
Seine Port is home to 2,000 people. Its mayor, Vincent Paul-Petit from the right-wing party Les Républicains, introduced the scheme, which passed a referendum with a slim margin of 54 per cent in favour last year.
Individuals are discouraged from scrolling outside the school gates, in shops, cafes, restaurants, parks and even footpaths.
"[The ban] was a form of provocation to help everyone wake up to this social issue, which is a huge issue, a huge social difficulty," the mayor says.
It has been welcomed by some.
"The shopkeepers are very happy with the progress we've felt in the town. They've all put a sticker inside their stores, a big sticker, saying 'screen-free spaces, smartphone-free spaces'," Mr Paul-Petit says.
"They appreciate being able to interact with their customers."
But not long after the success of the referendum, Mr Paul-Petit discovered he didn't have the power to prohibit smartphone use, so the "ban" has been replaced by a voluntary charter.
And he admits there are some who don't want to follow it.
"[People] say: 'Hide your phone, the mayor is coming.' … It's rather amusing," he says.
Time will tell whether other places follow Mr Paul-Petit's lead. But the debate remains as to whose role it is to limit smartphone and social media use.
For example, when legislation was passed in 2024 banning under-16s from accessing some social media, media reports claimed it set "Australia up as a test case for a growing number of governments which have legislated, or have said they plan to legislate, an age restriction on social media". The ban will not take effect until the end of the year.
But critics — including Elon Musk, who owns the social media platform X — claim the move is a "backdoor way to control access to the internet by all Australians".
Professor Lembke has praised the Australian government's approach and says when she talked about banning smartphones from schools 15 years ago, "people looked at me like it was absolutely crazy".
"Now it's happening, so I'm super hopeful. Humans are adaptable," she says.
Others are more sceptical about whether social media age restrictions will be followed by young people. A few teens impacted by the ban say they will find a "secret" way to continue to use social media platforms.
Jameson Butler says these decisions should be left to individuals.
The choice to consume less technology should be "consensual and empowering", she adds, and not the result of a ban.
"I remember honestly being very annoyed every time my parents would try to tell me how bad the smartphone was because it was just … so entertaining," she says.
"I didn't want to put it down … And despite all the times my parents tried to warn me and tried to limit my screen time, it wasn't until I reached the conclusion that my phone had been harming me … that I really decided to do something about it."
She says that's part of the reason why she and her friends formed the Luddite Club.
"What sets us apart from other, offline organisations and foundations … [is] a lot of them centre around parents and parenting," she says.
"[But] we see that kids are really not going to always listen to their parents."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
18 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Olivia Newton-John's widower John Easterling finds love with American businesswoman
Olivia Newton-John's widower has found love three years after her death. Daily Telegraph reports John Easterling, who married the late Australian singer in 2008, has moved on with US businesswoman Sarah Owen. Owen is the founder and owner of two companies: Striphair, which is a gentle grooming brush for pets, and Betty's Best, The outlet claims the pair met at a New Year's Eve event in December, 2022. Newton-John died at her ranch in California in August 2022. She was 73. The Grease star, who suffered a long battle with breast cancer, spent her final days at the sprawling Santa Ynez Valley estate with Easterling, where the couple had lived since purchasing the property in 2015. Easterling sold the home for $US7.95 million (AUD$12.16 million) in February this year after it was first listed in June 2024. 'Olivia and I made many wonderful memories at our home in Florida and the ranch in California. The message that keeps coming through so clearly is to love life, live life, and never forget about the good things that are going on,' Easterling told PEOPLE at the time. 'The 'Indian Way' Ranch in Santa Ynez is a spectacular property where I can see a new family having great nature adventures and relishing the life experience. I'll still maintain a presence in both Florida and California.' Easterling, who founded the Amazon Herb Company in 1990, first met Newton-John in 1993 when they were married to other people. After years of friendship, the pair began dating in 2007 before marrying in a spiritual ceremony in Peru in June 2008, followed by a legally-binding wedding on Jupiter Island in Florida. Newton-John's first marriage was with Matt Lattanzi, who she met on the set of the 1980 film Xanadu. They later married in 1984, welcoming their daughter Chloe Lattanzi in January 1986. The couple divorced in 1996. At the time of her death, Easterling paid heartfelt tribute to Newton-John, describing every day with his wife as 'supernatural.' 'Every day with Olivia was a bit of magic,' Easterling wrote. Lattanzi, for his part, shared a joint statement written by his current wife, Michelle. 'Today we lost one of the world's greats Olivia Newton-John. Matt and I are so overwhelmed with the love and gratitude shared with us by friends, family and a deeply loving community of fans who will all miss Olivia's presence in this world,' Michelle wrote in a post shared to Facebook. 'I have heard truly lovely stories and memories from people near and far, and honour in each of you where those feelings and memories come from. 'Nothing will replace the icon we lost, yet her legacy is alive and well in our hearts and memories, as well as her contributions to our global culture, her beloved daughter Chloe Lattanzi, and her cancer research and wellness centre in Melbourne, AU.'

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Bella Thorne claims Charlie Puth turned on her for refusing to sleep with him
Bella Thorne claims Charlie Puth publicly lied about their relationship because she refused to sleep with him. The former Disney star made the claim in the comment section of an Instagram post about Little Mix singer Jade Thirlwall 'never' wanting to collab with Puth again. 'Yeah I mean. he lied to the entire world about me and started a hate train. All because I wouldn't … Do the deed with him,' Thorne, 27, wrote. Page Six has reached out to Puth's reps for comment. Thorne and Puth, 33, were briefly linked together in December 2016, shortly after the actress broke up with her ex Tyler Posey. The duo were caught kissing in Miami and attended iHeartRadio's Jingle Ball together where he serenaded her during his performance. Things turned sour just a few weeks later when the singer accused the actress of cheating, claiming she had not ended her relationship with Posey before pursuing things with him. In a slew of since-deleted tweets, the record producer accused Thorne of putting him in a love triangle with the Teen Wolf actor. 'I can't believe what I'm reading,' he wrote at the time. 'No one should have their heart messed with like this, and I'm not going to be in the middle of it.' Puth did not call out Thorne by name, but directly apologised to Posey, 33, making it clear who the tweets were about. 'I don't know Tyler personally, but I know he shouldn't be treated this way,' he wrote, adding, 'She told me she was not with him anymore. This is all news to me.' The model denied the claims, tweeting back just hours later, 'Ty and I have been broken up for like over two weeks and charlie and I ARENT DATING we are friends. That article was written forever ago,' referencing a Paper magazine piece published earlier that week. 'Charlie and I were hanging out. he saw an old interview and got butthurt but instead of texting me and asking about it he put it on Twitter,' she further explained. Both Thorne and Puth moved on with other partners and have not brought up the messy situation until now. Thorne is engaged to Mark Emms. She went Instagram-official with the Emms Productions and Eastern Road Films CEO on Valentine's Day in 2023. 'Find someone u want to share ur candy with,' she captioned the loved-up carousel of PDA pictures. Puth, for his part, married Brooke Sansone in September 2024 after a decades-long friendship. 'There was always a spark and chemistry between us, but the timing never seemed to work out — until it did,' Sansone shared. 'It's like an invisible string was always there, showing us that timing is everything.'

ABC News
4 hours ago
- ABC News
Why queer artists Fletcher and JoJo Siwa are causing controversy in the LGBTQIA+ community
While Pride month is over for another year, queer music lovers are still talking about two of the community's most divisive stars. US singers Cari Fletcher and JoJo Siwa are known for their queer pop anthems and have a passionate lesbian fanbase. Both singers have identified as lesbian or queer, so their recent announcements that they are dating men have shocked and upset certain fans. It has sparked a broader conversation about the erasure of bisexual and pansexual identities and the pressure placed on celebrities to live up to fan expectations. And if you're thinking "who the heck are Fletcher and Siwa and why do people care?", let us fill you in. JoJo Siwa rose to fame on the hit TV show Dance Moms in 2014 for her extroverted personality. She began releasing music in 2016 aimed at children, before branching out to pop music for an older audience. Siwa came out in 2021 by posting a photo of herself in a T-shirt that said "Best Gay Cousin Ever." The 22-year-old has more than 11 million Instagram followers and more than 500,000 monthly Spotify listeners. In 2024, she proudly (and erroneously) declared that she "invented gay pop". She later conceded that while she didn't invent the genre, she would love to be its "chief marketing officer." Cari Fletcher, better known by her stage name Fletcher, became a queer icon after the release of her song Becky's So Hot in 2022. Fletcher also came out in 2021, after getting fans to ask her questions on her Instagram story. One fan asked if she was lesbian or bisexual. "I get this question so much. I just exist. If someone needed to put me in some sort of category, for themselves to better understand, I would say I identify as queer," Fletcher posted on her story in response to the question. The 31-year-old has more than one million Instagram followers and more than two million monthly Spotify listeners. Things started to blow up for Siwa earlier this year while she was a contestant on UK Celebrity Big Brother, a television show in which celebrities must live in a house together, completing tasks all while being cut off from the outside world. People started to ask questions as she became very close with her fellow co-star Chris Hughes, despite still being in a relationship with Australian content creator Kath Ebbs. On the show she said she didn't feel she identified with being a lesbian anymore. "I have always been afraid of feeling queer, like I have always said lesbian right, but I feel so queer," she said whilst on Celebrity Big Brother UK. "I am switching letters: f*** the L, I am going to the Q." Queer is an umbrella term for people who are not heterosexual or cisgender. It encompasses a range of sexualities and gender identities and is often used by people who feel they don't fit neatly into a box. Shortly after the show had ended, Siwa broke up with Ebbs (who very publicly called her out on it) and announced she was dating her male Big Brother co-star. She doubled down on her comments inside the house, saying in an interview with YOU magazine that she felt "pressured" into labelling herself a lesbian. "And I think I did that because of pressure," Siwa said, adding that a lot of it came from "inside the [LGBTQIA+] community at times." "From people I know, from partners I've had," she added. RMIT University's senior public relations lecturer Dr Damien O'Meara said: "We have plenty of bi and pan people who don't feel welcome in our community." He believes Fletcher and Siwa are offering a good opportunity to start a conversation and "challenge the erasure that's taking place". Around the same time, Fletcher released her single Boy, signalling to fans she was in a relationship with a man. But her decision to archive all her previous social media posts about her music on same-sex relationships led to fans accusing her of erasing her queer identity. "When you've made your entire brand of wlw (women loving women) music and art, only to turn around and talk about how 'magical and liberating' it is to be with a man, it just feels like it was all a phase for you," one social media user said. Dr Natalie Krikowa, a senior lecturer at the School of Communications at the University of Technology in Sydney and a member of the LGBTQIA+ community, said both artists were entitled to talk about their relationships but there should be an additional level of "care, empathy and respect" given to fans who have come to expect something different. "I think it is important that these conversations are had without it escalating into biphobia and bi erasure, because there is a fine line that we should not be crossing." Fletcher talked about the backlash she received in a TikTok video and has now unarchived all her posts. "My queerness is not a phase, I have always identified as a queer woman," she said in the video. Dr O'Meara pointed out that the 31-year-old's brand is through her music which is "very personal". "It explores her feelings and what she's going through, and a lot of her music has always said, 'well, this is what I'm dealing with right now.' And so, if we think of that as Fletcher's brand, what we have is her using her music to explore this," Dr O'Meara said. Bi erasure and biphobia are terms for the questioning or dismissal of bisexuality. But Dr O'Meara said Siwa and Fletcher had actually opened up an important conversation about bisexuality. Author and editor of Nonsense Newsletter Patrick Lenton, who is bisexual, agrees. "Invalidating that relationship and being angry about it stems from believing that bisexuality or queerness as a sort of broader thing isn't as valid as something say like lesbianism," he said. He added that Siwa, as a 22-year-old, is discovering what her sexuality is "in a very public platform, in real time." "In that particular case, I would've hated for anyone to be viewing and commenting on my sexuality journey when I was that young, because it was a mess." Mr Lenton said there is a lot of online gatekeeping " over who is valid in their queerness and who is allowed to be queer," pointing to bisexual actor Kit Connor (from Netflix's Heartstopper). "He was basically bullied into coming out before he was ready, because people were saying 'oh he's not queer enough to play a queer role' and it's really weird and backwards idea of looking at things." Sarah Scales, a PhD candidate at Swinburne University who is researching parasocial relationships and celebrity scandal, said part of the problem here is the "parasocial interaction" many people have with celebrities, which is a one-sided relationship that is usually between a fan and a celebrity that has no mutual development. She said people can feel upset, disappointed and betrayed if they feel their trust has been broken with someone they look up to, or someone they see within themselves. She said JoJo Siwa's fans may have reacted more favourably if she addressed her relationship breakdown with Kath Ebbs earlier and was more open about her attraction to Hughes. "If they heard it from her first in a more active way, it might have been different."