Europeans hit back after Donald Trump says EU was born to 'screw' US
Trump's month back in the White House has been marked by soaring friction between Washington and its European allies, with the United States abruptly shifting gears on support for Ukraine and Germany's likely next leader urging Europe to seek take greater control of its own defense.
"Look, let's be honest, the European Union was formed in order to screw the United States," Trump told reporters as he gathered his cabinet for the first time.
"That's the purpose of it, and they've done a good job of it. But now I'm president," Trump said.
The European Commission shot back that the European Union is "the world's largest free market" and has been "a boon for the United States".
Former Swedish prime minister Carl Bildt, writing on X, said Trump had a "seriously distorted view of history" as the EU was "actually set up to prevent war on the European continent".
The United States for decades cheered on European integration, seeing the EU's formation in 1993 as a historic achievement to end conflict on a continent ravaged by two world wars.
Trump by contrast applauded Britain when it left the single European market, and has vowed an "America First" policy of pursuing self-interest above any abstract concepts of partnership.
Trump said at his cabinet meeting that the European Union has "really taken advantage of us".
The United States had a trade deficit to the 27-nation bloc of $235.6 billion last year, according to official US figures.
Asked if he had made a decision on tariff levels for the European Union, Trump added: "We'll be announcing it very soon and it'll be 25 percent, generally speaking."
He said that cars would be among the products to be hit – grim news for Germany whose export-driven economy has been in a slump.
The European Commission warned it would respond "firmly and immediately" to new tariffs.
Trump has also slapped tariffs on US neighbors Canada and Mexico as well as rival China, citing issues including illegal immigration and fentanyl smuggling.
EU meeting scrapped
Trump, who has made the deportation of undocumented immigrants a top priority, acknowledged his origins in Europe, saying wryly: "I guess I'm from there at some point a long time ago, right?"
But whatever the common heritage, tensions have risen sharply with the European Union on a series of issues starting with Ukraine.
EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas was visiting Washington on Wednesday and had earlier announced that she would meet Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
The meeting was canceled, with a European Union spokesman citing "scheduling issues." Trump, however, saw French President Emmanuel Macron on Monday and meets British Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Thursday.
On Monday, the United States sided with Russia and against nearly all European allies at the United Nations in backing a resolution that called for a swift end to the war without insisting on Ukraine's territorial integrity.
Trump insisted on Wednesday it was up to Europe, not the United States, to provide security guarantees to Ukraine, even as President Volodymyr Zelensky prepared to fly to Washington to sign an agreement giving US control of much of his country's mineral wealth.
The winner of Germany's election on Sunday, Friedrich Merz, is a longstanding supporter of the transatlantic alliance but has warned not to be under illusions about Trump.
Merz said that Europe must move quickly to "achieve independence" from the United States on defense matters.
Rubio, in an interview broadcast Wednesday with Fox News, said that the Nato alliance was "not in jeopardy" but that Europe needed to spend more on its own defense.
"We're not saying do your own thing. We're saying do more. It's their continent, right?" he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
37 minutes ago
- Int'l Business Times
Reddit Co-Founder Condemns University of Virginia President's Resignation Following Trump Pressure: 'DEI Witchhunt'
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan, right, announced he would be resigning on Friday, following pressure from the Trump administration. One of the co-founders of social media platform Reddit has expressed outrage at the resignation of the University of Virginia President, which was spurred by the Trump administration. Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian took to social media to express indignation and disappointment after University of Virginia President Jim Ryan announced that he would be resigning at a UVA Board of Visitors meeting on Friday. "Jim is a tremendous leader; this is a very sad day for @UVA. The University hasn't just been a consistently great academic program under his tenure, it's ranked NUMBER ONE in Free Speech by FIRE. ... And all because of a DEI witchhunt?" he wrote. "It's a public university and the state of Virginia is 20% Black and less than 8% of the student body is Black." Jim is a tremendous leader; this is a very sad day for @UVA. The University hasn't just been a consistently great academic program under his tenure, it's ranked NUMBER ONE in Free Speech by FIRE. ... And all because of a DEI witchhunt? It's a public university and the state of… — Alexis Ohanian 🗽 (@alexisohanian) June 27, 2025 "Counting on all those principled Republicans to speak up about this — right?" he continued. "I get it — resignation can be an act of protest — so I really hope more UVA Alums speak up on this," Ohanian wrote in a separate post, commenting directly on Ryan's resignation letter. Social media users took to online platforms to echo Ohanian's sentiments, stating that Ryan was loved by the community at UVA and expressing anger at his forced resignation. "They are silencing everyone and make it impossible for those hanging on to fight!" said one user. They are silencing everyone and make it impossible for those hanging on to fight! — Shattering Glass ☂️ (@Shatterin_glass) June 28, 2025 "A tremendous leader and a truly good man. I hope he knows how loved he was by the real UVA community and that the spirit under which the University was founded and has operated since is able to spark something in whatever/whoever comes next. Sad day for the Wahoos," wrote another. A tremendous leader and a truly good man. I hope he knows how loved he was by the real UVA community and that the spirit under which the University was founded and has operated since is able to spark something in whatever/whoever comes next. Sad day for the Wahoos. — citizensooz (@citizensooz) June 27, 2025 "Thank you for speaking out, Alexis. @wahoos4uva was formed to protect UVA from political interference like this. We need more voices like yours standing with us!" commented a third. Thank you for speaking out, Alexis. @wahoos4uva was formed to protect UVA from political interference like this. We need more voices like yours standing with us! 🧡💙 — Kimberly Acquaviva 🏳️🌈 (she/her) (@kimacquaviva) June 27, 2025 "100%. A very sad day for UVa and all of higher education," added a fourth. 100%. A very sad day for UVa and all of higher education. — Salhoo71 (@SallyHi90144928) June 27, 2025 "Thank you for speaking up. He's a remarkable leader and made UVA better in so many ways!" said another. Thank you for speaking up. He's a remarkable leader and made UVA better in so many ways! — Elizabeth McNichols (@mcnic) June 28, 2025 Ryan's resignation announcement spurred an impromptu demonstration by students and faculty who gathered at the college president's residence at Carr's Hill. "I appreciate you being here. I appreciate your support," Ryan told the crowd. "And regardless of my role, I will continue to do whatever I can to support this place and continue to make it the best place it can be. And I would ask that you all do the same." The Justice Department had repeatedly targeted the University, warning senior staff within its administration to cease race-based treatment on campus, which the department reportedly had been receiving complaints of. "Time is running short, and the department's patience is wearing thin," said a June 17 letter. Originally published on Latin Times © Latin Times. All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.
Local Germany
5 hours ago
- Local Germany
How securing rights through citizenship has become 'increasingly fragile'
The first Global State of Citizenship report, by the Global Citizenship Observatory (GLOBALCIT) at the European University Institute (EUI) in Florence, analyses citizenship laws in 191 countries in 2024. Researchers found that "with the growing number of armed conflicts and incidence of terrorism worldwide, many countries have introduced provisions for withdrawing the citizenship of a person on the basis of national security grounds.' Over a third of countries, including many European ones, 'can now strip a person of their citizenship when their actions are seen as disloyal or threatening to state security,' the report says, and the trend has been expanding. The practice is linked to an 'increasing securitisation of citizenship' since the terrorist attacks of September 11th 2001 in the USA. Between 2000 and 2020, 18 European countries put in place measures to deprive persons of citizenship because of national security or to counter terrorism. Before 2001, these measures were 'virtually absent', the report says. Recently, the Swedish government commissioned an inquiry on the revocation of citizenship from individuals threatening national security . Germany's coalition parties discussed this option for 'supporters of terrorism, antisemites, and extremists'. Hungary also amended the constitution to allow the temporary suspension of citizenship because of national security. Middle East and North Africa are other regions where these policies have expanded, the report says. Advertisement Ways to strip citizenship The report identifies four ways in which citizens can be stripped of their status on security grounds. Nearly 80 per cent of countries have rules covering at least one of these situations. In 132 countries around the world, and two thirds of European states, citizenship can be removed for disloyalty or for acts that threaten national security, such treason, espionage, trying to overthrow a government or terrorism. Such rules exist in Belgium, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Turkey and the UK. In 89 countries, however, this rule concerns only to people who naturalised, not those who acquired citizenship by birth. Another reason that can lead to the stripping of citizenship is having committee serious criminal offences, which typically involves having been sentenced to imprisonment for a certain period. These rules exist in 79 countries but only a few in Europe. In 70 countries, citizenship can be removed for serving in a foreign army and in 18 this measure concerns only people who acquired citizenship by naturalisation. In Europe, 40 per cent of countries – including France, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Estonia, Turkey, Belarus and Bosnia Herzegovina – can remove citizenship under certain conditions for having served in another army. Latvia, one of the countries that can revoke citizenship for such reasons, changed the law in 2022 to allow its citizens to work with the Ukrainian military forces. Citizenship can also be removed for providing non-military services to another state, such as being elected in a public office, working for certain agencies or just in the civil service. Such rules exist in 75 countries around the world and some in Europe too, including France, Greece and Turkey. Advertisement People naturalised more at risk Luuk van der Baaren, co-author of the report, said at the presentation of the study that 'these developments indeed raise an important question as to what extent is citizenship still a secure legal status'. The data also shows that 'a large share of the citizenship stripping provisions are discriminatory in nature, as they only apply to specific groups, particularly citizens by naturalisation'. This is to prevent that a person remains stateless, but it means that 'citizens by birth have a secure legal status, while those who acquired citizenship later in life do not,' he added. Losing citizenship may not only affect the personal security and life opportunities, but also that of dependants, the report says, as in 40 per cent of countries citizenship deprivation can extend to children. Other ways of losing citizenship There are other ways, intentional or not, to lose citizenship, according to the report. The most common, is to have withdrawn because it was acquired in a fraudulent way. Such rules exist in 157 countries. 156 states have also rules on how to voluntarily renounce citizenship, usually with provisions to ensure that a person does not end up stateless. In 56 countries, people can lose their citizenship if they acquire another nationality, and in 55 this may occur by simply residing abroad. Under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 'everyone has the right to a nationality', but four million people in the world are stateless 'because their citizenship remains denied or unrecognised,' the report continues. On the other hand, 35 countries do not allow people to renounce citizenship, or make this impossible in practice. Advertisement Unequal rights The report also looks at ways to acquire citizenship and finds 'highly unequal pathways'. The most common naturalisation requirement knowledge. Less common are economic self-sufficiency, civic or cultural integration, language or citizenship tests, and renunciation of other citizenships. On residency requirements, Americas and Western Europe have the more inclusive measures. Citizenship in European countries is also regulated via the European Convention on Nationality, under which the residence requirement cannot exceed 10 years. In 15 countries the wait is longer than 10 years: Equatorial Guinea (40 years), United Arab Emirates (30), Bahrain (25), Qatar (25), Bhutan (20), Brunei (20), Eritrea (20), Oman (20), Chad (15), Gambia (15), Nigeria (15), Rwanda (15), Sierra Leone (15), St. Kitts and Nevis (14), and India (11).
DW
10 hours ago
- DW
Big attendance expected at Budapest Pride despite police ban – DW – 06/28/2025
The annual Budapest Pride march this year is expected to go ahead in the face of a police ban and government hostility. Organizers said they expect tens of thousands of people from dozens of nations to attend the event. LGBTQ+ rights supporters from some 30 countries are expected to join the Budapest Pride march on Saturday, defying a police ban imposed under legislation introduced earlier this year that forbids the exposure of young people to non-heterosexual lifestyles. The annual event has now come to symbolize resistance to a general repression of civil society in Hungary under the nationalist government of Prime Minister Viktor Orban, which is facing a growing challenge from center-right opposition leader Peter Magyar's Tisza party ahead of elections next year. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video More than 30 embassies have voiced support for the march, which will also be attended by European Commissioner for Equality Hadja Lahbib and about 70 members of the European Parliament. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has called on Hungarian authorities to let the parade go ahead. "Our Union is one of equality and non-discrimination," von der Leyen wrote in a statement. She called these "core values" that "must be respected at all times, in all Member States." Anyone attending the march, however, risks being accused of a misdemeanor, while organizing such an event could carry the penalty of a one-year jail sentence, according to a letter sent to some foreign embassies in Budapest by Justice Minister Bence Tuzson. The so-called child-protection legislation that allowed the ban to be imposed also allows police to hand out fines and to use facial recognition technology to identify attendees. Over the past decade, Orban's government has frequently been at loggerheads with the EU over its increasing repression of civil liberties and press freedoms under the guise of protecting "Christian" values. The ban on the Pride march is being seen by opponents as part of a wider crackdown on democratic freedoms ahead of next year's elections, at which Orban's government is expected to face a stiff challenge from Magyar, whose party has been leading in opinion polls. The Tisza party, while avoiding taking a strong position on gay rights issues, nonetheless called on the government to protect anyone attending the march. "Peter Magyar has called on the Hungarian authorities and police to protect the Hungarian people this Saturday, and on other days as well, even if it means standing up against the arbitrariness of power," its press office said. Magyar himself has not planned to attend.
