MP suggests Republic of Ireland should take ‘rightful' place in Commonwealth
Andrew Rosindell said Ireland 'would do well to emulate countries such as Australia, Canada and New Zealand' and take its 'rightful' place in the Commonwealth.
The MP for Romford also called for a bank holiday to mark St Patrick's Day and the resurrection of the Order of St Patrick.
Speaking during a St Patrick's Day and Northern Irish affairs debate, Mr Rosindell said: 'The Republic of Ireland, I believe are our friends but we can be much closer, fully realising that we are one family that share a unique group of islands in all spheres of national operation.
'Indeed, Ireland could do much more work themselves, alongside her British brother and her loyal northern neighbour, in recognising that shared heritage and advancing shared values and goals on the global stage.
'Ireland would do well to emulate countries such as Australia, Canada and New Zealand. I believe that one day, perhaps soon, the people of the Republic of Ireland might choose to take their rightful place in the family of the Commonwealth of nations.
'Taking our deep neighbourly relations to the next level to the benefit of both partners, and I believe having a bounteous benefit to global politics.'
Mr Rosindell argued that St Patrick's Day, in addition to St David's Day, St Andrew's Day and St George's Day, should all be bank holidays across the UK.
He told MPs: 'I would strongly submit that St Patrick's Day should be a national bank holiday, alongside all the other feast days of our Kingdom's patron saints.'
He added: 'Not only would this be firmly in line with the position of Anglicanism, as the unchallenged state religion, but would reinforce the importance of all four corners of our nation.
'So too would the resurrection of the Order of St Patrick, which has shamefully been allowed to fall into abeyance for many decades, but I believe remains a sovereign order of the United Kingdom, and I hope the minister will take that back as a consideration for something to be restored.'
Mr Rosindell continued: 'Today, I believe we must focus more on bringing the four home nations of… Great Britain and Northern Ireland together, and reversing the constitutional backsliding that I believe has occurred with the British internal markets.'
Speaking from the Conservative frontbench, Jerome Mayhew, whose late father Patrick was Northern Ireland secretary under John Major, said the restoration of the Order of St Patrick would be 'a very sensible thing to do'.
In the Commons, Northern Ireland minister Fleur Anderson said: 'The Order of St Patrick, I will take away that mention as well.'
Responding to a written question from Conservative MP Charlie Dewhirst (Bridlington and The Wolds) on Wednesday, Cabinet Office minister Nick Thomas-Symonds said: 'The most illustrious Order of Saint Patrick is in the personal gift of the sovereign.
'The UK Government is not considering the restoration of the Order of St Patrick.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump says 50-50 odds of trade deal with EU
Published: | Updated: President Donald Trump gave even odds for reaching a trade deal with the European Union as he left Washington to begin his trip to Scotland – with a path to a solution where the Europeans 'buy down' the tariffs he is imposing. 'I would say that we have a fifty-fifty chance,' Trump said, amid reports that the two sides are narrowing in on a possible deal. 'Maybe less than that,' he hedged. 'But a fifty-fifty chance of making a deal with the EU. And It will be a deal where they have to buy down their tariffs. Because they're right now at 30 percent,' Trump said, referencing the tariff set to take effect by the new 'doomsday' August 1 deadline unless there is an agreement. 'They'll have to buy them down - maybe. Or they can leave them the way they are.' Trump, using a favorite negotiating tactic, described his counterparts as desperate. 'But they want to make a deal very badly. I would have said we have a 25 percent chance with Japan and they kept coming back and we made a deal,' Trump said. He was referencing the deal he announced days ago, which has Japan paying a 15 percent tariff, lower than the threatened 25 percent tariff, while opening markets to U.S. exporters. Trump and his top negotiators continue to gush about the Japanese investment – while describing it in terms different than what is coming out of Tokyo. 'Don't forget Japan's putting up $550 billion,' Trump said Friday. 'That's a lot of money. And also paying tariffs. The biggest part of the Japan deal and maybe we get this with EU maybe we don't is we have the right to go in and trade. They've totally opened Japan just for the U.S.' Trump made the comments as he left the White House at the start of a five-day trip that will have him visit his two Scottish golf courses – and meet with British PM Keir Starmer to try to 'refine' an existing U.S.-UK trade deal. He had earlier escalated his demands with the EU in mid-July by raising the tariff threat. In his Truth Social post announcing the deal, Trump said: 'Japan will invest, at my direction, $550 billion dollars into the United States, which will receive 90 percent of the profits.' Andy Laperriere, head of U.S. policy research at Piper Sandler, told CNBC that Japanese officials are 'describing it differently' and 'see the $550 billion figure as a cap and inclusive of government loan guarantees.' But Commerce Secretary Lutnick has been describing it as an investment kitty that Trump can personally direct to ramp up industrial production – with no mention of a legislative role. 'This is literally the Japanese government giving Donald Trump $550 billion, and says: Go fix whatever you need to fix,' he told host Laura Ingraham on Fox News. 'Donald Trump can take the Japanese money and say 'let's go build a factory. Let's get an American company to operate it, we'll lease them the factory. They don't make much money - so what. That's the beauty of this deal,' he said. As he calls for the Europeans to 'buy down' tariffs, Trump may have been emboldened by other moves besides the Japan deal. On Thursday, Columbia University reached a settlement with the Justice Department where it will pay $200 million and a civil rights investigation will be dropped.
South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Fact check: ‘Asylum hotels', employment data and ‘enhanced customs monitoring'
Is the Government 'opening up' asylum hotels? Earlier this week, amid concern about unrest outside a hotel in Epping used to house asylum seekers, shadow housing secretary Sir James Cleverly MP claimed in a broadcast interview: '[Labour] are opening up asylum hotels, they are increasing the use of asylum accommodation around the country'. It is true that under Labour the number of asylum seekers housed in hotels has increased, as our Government Tracker explains. According to the latest available data, 32,345 asylum seekers were housed in hotels at the end of March 2025, up from 29,585 at the end of June 2024, just before Labour came into office. The data also showed there were 71,339 asylum seekers living in other types of non-hotel accommodation at the end of March 2025, compared with 67,057 at the end of June 2024. The majority were in 'dispersal accommodation', which is longer-term temporary accommodation managed by providers on behalf of the Home Office, with others housed in 'initial accommodation', which is typically shared accommodation while an asylum seeker is having their claim for support assessed. The Home Office told us that 210 asylum hotels are currently in use as of July 23, and that they expected more to close. On March 3 2025, Dame Angela Eagle MP, minister for border security and asylum, said that in July 2024 there were 213 hotels in operation, suggesting the number of hotels in use is currently slightly lower than when Labour first came into office. According to the Home Office's latest accounts, 'the total number of contracted hotels reduced by 71 across 2024-25', although it did not specify the starting or end totals, and this time period also includes figures from when the Conservatives were in office. It is worth noting however that while the overall number of hotels in use appears to have come down slightly, there have been recent reports of new hotels being intended to house asylum seekers. It is possible this is what Sir James meant when he said Labour was 'opening up' hotels. We have contacted Sir James for comment. Unemployment and jobs: what has happened under Labour? In recent weeks we have seen contrasting claims being made about the labour market – in particular, on how unemployment has changed since Labour came into Government in July 2024. There are a number of different sources of statistics on the labour market. These datasets all measure slightly different things, and as a result debate on employment, unemployment and jobs can often be confusing – for example, we regularly see seemingly contradictory claims on these topics made during Prime Minister's Questions (PMQs), when in fact each side is referring to completely different data. For instance, during some recent sessions of PMQs, both the Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner have claimed that 384,000 jobs have been created under Labour. These claims have been challenged by the Conservative party and others, who have pointed out that under Labour unemployment has risen. This confusion is likely because Sir Keir and Ms Rayner are referring to workforce jobs data, which includes both employed and self-employed jobs and does indeed show a 384,000 increase in the number of jobs between June 2024 and March 2025 (the latest month for which figures are available). But these figures look at the number of jobs and are not comparable with data on actual employment (or unemployment), which looks at the number of people who are (or are not) working, as some people have more than one job. Going abroad four times a year will not flag you to HMRC for 'enhanced customs monitoring' We have seen a number of social media posts claiming that the Government is introducing a new system called 'enhanced customs monitoring' on August 4 to 'track UK residents who leave the country more than three times within a 12-month period' to check they are living within their means. But this is not true, and no such system exists. Videos circulating online claim that on someone's fourth trip abroad, an automatic alert will be sent to the 'mobility oversight unit', said to be a new branch under HMRC and the Home Office, which will check whether people's 'declared income, employment status and tax residency match [their] lifestyle'. The videos claim this new system was revealed after a leaked briefing was reported by the Guardian newspaper. They go on to say this includes both holidays and work trips, and all modes of travel. A spokesperson for HMRC confirmed the information is untrue and told Full Fact that 'this video is disinformation, designed to cause undue alarm and fear'. They added: 'Anyone wanting information on rules around taxation should go to or seek advice from a tax professional.' Full Fact could not find any results for 'enhanced customs monitoring' or a 'mobility oversight unit' on UK Government websites, or on the Guardian website.
North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Fact check: ‘Asylum hotels', employment data and ‘enhanced customs monitoring'
Is the Government 'opening up' asylum hotels? Earlier this week, amid concern about unrest outside a hotel in Epping used to house asylum seekers, shadow housing secretary Sir James Cleverly MP claimed in a broadcast interview: '[Labour] are opening up asylum hotels, they are increasing the use of asylum accommodation around the country'. It is true that under Labour the number of asylum seekers housed in hotels has increased, as our Government Tracker explains. According to the latest available data, 32,345 asylum seekers were housed in hotels at the end of March 2025, up from 29,585 at the end of June 2024, just before Labour came into office. The data also showed there were 71,339 asylum seekers living in other types of non-hotel accommodation at the end of March 2025, compared with 67,057 at the end of June 2024. The majority were in 'dispersal accommodation', which is longer-term temporary accommodation managed by providers on behalf of the Home Office, with others housed in 'initial accommodation', which is typically shared accommodation while an asylum seeker is having their claim for support assessed. The Home Office told us that 210 asylum hotels are currently in use as of July 23, and that they expected more to close. On March 3 2025, Dame Angela Eagle MP, minister for border security and asylum, said that in July 2024 there were 213 hotels in operation, suggesting the number of hotels in use is currently slightly lower than when Labour first came into office. According to the Home Office's latest accounts, 'the total number of contracted hotels reduced by 71 across 2024-25', although it did not specify the starting or end totals, and this time period also includes figures from when the Conservatives were in office. It is worth noting however that while the overall number of hotels in use appears to have come down slightly, there have been recent reports of new hotels being intended to house asylum seekers. It is possible this is what Sir James meant when he said Labour was 'opening up' hotels. We have contacted Sir James for comment. Unemployment and jobs: what has happened under Labour? In recent weeks we have seen contrasting claims being made about the labour market – in particular, on how unemployment has changed since Labour came into Government in July 2024. There are a number of different sources of statistics on the labour market. These datasets all measure slightly different things, and as a result debate on employment, unemployment and jobs can often be confusing – for example, we regularly see seemingly contradictory claims on these topics made during Prime Minister's Questions (PMQs), when in fact each side is referring to completely different data. For instance, during some recent sessions of PMQs, both the Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner have claimed that 384,000 jobs have been created under Labour. These claims have been challenged by the Conservative party and others, who have pointed out that under Labour unemployment has risen. This confusion is likely because Sir Keir and Ms Rayner are referring to workforce jobs data, which includes both employed and self-employed jobs and does indeed show a 384,000 increase in the number of jobs between June 2024 and March 2025 (the latest month for which figures are available). But these figures look at the number of jobs and are not comparable with data on actual employment (or unemployment), which looks at the number of people who are (or are not) working, as some people have more than one job. Going abroad four times a year will not flag you to HMRC for 'enhanced customs monitoring' We have seen a number of social media posts claiming that the Government is introducing a new system called 'enhanced customs monitoring' on August 4 to 'track UK residents who leave the country more than three times within a 12-month period' to check they are living within their means. But this is not true, and no such system exists. Videos circulating online claim that on someone's fourth trip abroad, an automatic alert will be sent to the 'mobility oversight unit', said to be a new branch under HMRC and the Home Office, which will check whether people's 'declared income, employment status and tax residency match [their] lifestyle'. The videos claim this new system was revealed after a leaked briefing was reported by the Guardian newspaper. They go on to say this includes both holidays and work trips, and all modes of travel. A spokesperson for HMRC confirmed the information is untrue and told Full Fact that 'this video is disinformation, designed to cause undue alarm and fear'. They added: 'Anyone wanting information on rules around taxation should go to or seek advice from a tax professional.' Full Fact could not find any results for 'enhanced customs monitoring' or a 'mobility oversight unit' on UK Government websites, or on the Guardian website.
