Small island states should lead, not just participate in ocean-related scientific research: Vivian
NICE, France – Small island developing states have been the subjects of ocean research for too long, and should start to lead – not just participate in scientific research that would help them better understand the marine environments they depend on.
Though they are the custodian s of 30 per cent of the ocean under national jurisdictions , s mall island states lead just 0.3 per cent of UN-endorsed decade of action projects on ocean health , said Singapore's Minister for Foreign Affairs, Dr Vivian Balakrishnan on June 9. Ocean decade actions are science-based programmes, projects or activities endorsed by the UN to improve ocean health.
'Small island developing states have been the subjects of ocean research for too long, the observation points in data sets, the case studies in reports and the vulnerable communities in impact assessments,' Dr Balakrishnan said at the first day of the UN Ocean Conference in Nice, France.
'Small island states are rarely the lead researchers, rarely the owners of our own ocean data. We believe that it is time to change that narrative,' he added.
A large part of the summit, which ends on June 13, is focusing on boosting support for the conservation and sustainable use of oceans, seas and marine resources. Representatives from 193 countries are expected to attend.
Dr Balakrishnan, who is leading a Singapore delegation, was speaking on behalf of the Alliance of Small Island States (Aosis) regarding the need for scientific cooperation for ocean health. Aosis is a grouping of 39 small island and low-lying coastal developing states including Singapore, Palau, the Maldives and Belize.
Ocean-related scientific research tends to be dominated by Western scientific institutions and organisations, who have access to large oceanographic research vessels and instruments that can withstand the inhospitable conditions of the deep sea. Tropical marine habitats such as coral reefs are also well-studied by scientists from other parts of the world.
However, the High Seas Treaty adopted in 2023 made it clear that such research would benefit from being more collaborative, calling on countries to provide 'opportunities for scientists of all states, in particular scientists from developing states, to be involved in or associated with the project'.
The treaty is a historic agreement that lays the groundwork for international collaboration to protect oceanic areas outside national jurisdictions.
Dr Balakrishnan said: 'Ocean science is not an academic luxury. Instead, it is an existential necessity for all of us small island states. The well-being of our communities, cultures, ecosystems, food security and livelihoods are dependent on a healthy and thriving ocean.'
The ocean is also a treasure trove of information yet unknown, with unique organisms offering scientists the chance to obtain valuable scientific data that can improve life on land. A glow-in-the-dark jellyfish, for instance, inspired the development of a fluorescent dye that enabled doctors to track the movement of cancer cells.
Dr Balakrishnan said that Aosis member states are calling for more capacity-building initiatives based on their needs, and the need to include traditional and indigenous knowledge into global frameworks from the outset.
Aosis is also calling for a 'fundamental rebalancing of ocean science leadership', he said. 'We need dedicated funding mechanisms and institutional support to ensure small island developing states' research institutions can lead initiatives that address our specific challenges.'
Singapore has a thriving marine research community, with a national facility – the St John's Island National Marine Laboratory – and a research institute focusing on marine science, the Tropical Marine Science Institute at the National University of Singapore .
Researchers from these institutions, as well as the National Parks Board (NParks) and Nanyang Technological University's Asian School of the Environment and Earth Observatory of Singapore, are active in initiating and conducting a range of studies of the marine environment.
These include research into marine creatures such as reef fish and giant clams, as well as in coral reefs, seagrass meadows and other marine ecosystems. Underwater robotics, maritime research, and studies looking into oceanographic parameters like waves are also conducted in Singapore.
The focus on the need for a strong scientific basis in ocean policy was further underpinned by an event held ahead of the UN Ocean Conference which served as the scientific foundation of the summit.
The One Ocean Science Congress, held in Nice from June 3 to 6, was attended by Dr Karenne Tun, the group director of the National Biodiversity Centre at NParks.
She told The Straits Times that the congress offered NParks, Singapore's lead agency for marine conservation, the opportunity to both learn and contribute to the global scientific community.
'As a small island city-state, Singapore is surrounded by coastal and marine areas that are vital not only to our own environment, but also integral to the broader South-east Asian region,' she said.
Singapore's waters are home to about 250 hard coral species and about 700 marine fish species. Studies have shown that hawksbill turtles migrate between Singapore and Malaysia.
'Our investment in multi- and transdisciplinary research, for example in the areas of taxonomy (the science of classification), environmental monitoring, habitat restoration, nature-based solutions and climate change impact science, can contribute to finding solutions beyond our shores.'
Dr Tun said Singapore adopts a science-based approach to marine conservation and management, pointing to the Marine Conservation Action Plan, which sets out strategies to protect, restore, and enhance Singapore's coastal and marine habitats.
NParks regularly reviews this plan to incorporate new knowledge and emerging technologies.
She added: 'Through multilateral platforms such as the One Ocean Science Congress, Singapore can leverage scientific research outcomes generated by the global research community to complement local research efforts to guide the conservation and management of our blue spaces, while sharing our knowledge with others at the same time.'
Audrey Tan is an assistant news editor overseeing sustainability coverage. She has reported on the environment for more than a decade and hosts the Green Pulse podcast series.
Find out more about climate change and how it could affect you on the ST microsite here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
2 days ago
- Straits Times
‘Writing is thinking': Do students who use ChatGPT learn less?
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox A recent study suggests students who use ChatGPT to write essays engage in less critical thinking. PARIS - When Professor Jocelyn Leitzinger had her university students write about times in their lives they had witnessed discrimination, she noticed that a woman named Sally was the victim in many of the stories. 'It was very clear that ChatGPT had decided this is a common woman's name,' said Prof Leitzinger, who teaches an undergraduate class on business and society at the University of Illinois in Chicago. 'They weren't even coming up with their own anecdotal stories about their own lives,' she told AFP. Prof Leitzinger estimated that around half of her 180 students used ChatGPT inappropriately at some point last semester – including when writing about the ethics of artificial intelligence (AI), which she called both 'ironic' and 'mind-boggling'. So she was not surprised by recent research which suggested that students who use ChatGPT to write essays engage in less critical thinking. The preprint study, which has not been peer-reviewed, was shared widely online and clearly struck a chord with some frustrated educators. The team of MIT researchers behind the paper have received more than 3,000 emails from teachers of all stripes since it was published online in June, lead author Nataliya Kosmyna told AFP. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore 3 out of 4 in Singapore cannot identify deepfake content: Cyber Security Agency survey Singapore GrabCab, Singapore's newest taxi operator, hits the roads with over 40 cabs to be rolled out in July Life Star Awards 2025: Xiang Yun and Chen Hanwei are the most decorated actors in show's 30-year history Business Cathay Cineplexes gets demand for $3.4 million in arrears from Jem landlord Asia Dalai Lama says he will have successor after his death Sport FAS introduces 'enhancements' to SPL, with increase in prize money and foreign player quota Singapore 3,800 private candidates in Singapore to take O- and A-level exams in 2025 Singapore Teen admits assaulting cop, fracturing officer's nose 'Soulless' AI essays For the small study, 54 adult students from the greater Boston area were split into three groups. One group used ChatGPT to write 20-minute essays, one used a search engine, and the final group had to make do with only their brains. The researchers used EEG devices to measure the brain activity of the students, and two teachers marked the essays. The ChatGPT users scored significantly worse than the brain-only group on all levels. The EEG showed that different areas of their brains connected to each other less often. And more than 80 per cent of the ChatGPT group could not quote anything from the essay they had just written, compared to around 10 per cent of the other two groups. By the third session, the ChatGPT group appeared to be mostly focused on copying and pasting. The teachers said they could easily spot the 'soulless' ChatGPT essays because they had good grammar and structure but lacked creativity, personality and insight. However Dr Kosmyna pushed back against media reports claiming the paper showed that using ChatGPT made people lazier or more stupid. She pointed to the fourth session, when the brain-only group used ChatGPT to write their essay and displayed even higher levels of neural connectivity. Dr Kosmyna emphasised it was too early to draw conclusions from the study's small sample size but called for more research into how AI tools could be used more carefully to help learning. Dr Ashley Juavinett, a neuroscientist at the University of California San Diego who was not involved in the research, criticised some 'offbase' headlines that wrongly extrapolated from the preprint. 'This paper does not contain enough evidence nor the methodological rigour to make any claims about the neural impact of using LLMs (large language models such as ChatGPT) on our brains,' she told AFP. Thinking outside the bot Prof Leitzinger said the research reflected how she had seen student essays change since ChatGPT was released in 2022, as both spelling errors and authentic insight became less common. Sometimes students do not even change the font when they copy and paste from ChatGPT, she said. But Prof Leitzinger called for empathy for students, saying they can get confused when the use of AI is being encouraged by universities in some classes but is banned in others. The usefulness of new AI tools is sometimes compared to the introduction of calculators, which required educators to change their ways. But Prof Leitzinger worried that students do not need to know anything about a subject before pasting their essay question into ChatGPT, skipping several important steps in the process of learning. A student at a British university in his early 20s who wanted to remain anonymous told AFP he found ChatGPT was a useful tool for compiling lecture notes, searching the internet and generating ideas. 'I think that using ChatGPT to write your work for you is not right because it's not what you're supposed to be at university for,' he said. The problem goes beyond high school and university students. Academic journals are struggling to cope with a massive influx of AI-generated scientific papers. Book publishing is also not immune, with one startup planning to pump out 8,000 AI-written books a year. 'Writing is thinking, thinking is writing, and when we eliminate that process, what does that mean for thinking?' Prof Leitzinger asked. AFP


CNA
7 days ago
- CNA
WHO says all Covid-19 origin theories still open, after inconclusive study
GENEVA: All hypotheses on how the Covid-19 pandemic began remain open, the World Health Organization said on Friday (Jun 27), following an inconclusive four-year investigation that was hamstrung by crucial information being withheld. The global catastrophe killed an estimated 20 million people, according to the WHO, while shredding economies, crippling health systems and turning people's lives upside-down. The first cases were detected in Wuhan in China in late 2019, and understanding where the SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes Covid came from is key to preventing future pandemics. However, a lengthy investigation launched by the UN's health agency said that pending further data, the origin of Covid and how it first spread remains elusive. "As things stand, all hypotheses must remain on the table, including zoonotic spillover and lab leak," WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told a press conference, referring to the two main hypotheses as to how the pandemic began. EXPERT INVESTIGATION An initial WHO-Chinese joint report in March 2021 concluded that the virus most likely jumped from bats to humans via an intermediate animal. It deemed a leak from Wuhan's virology laboratories, known for their research on coronaviruses, to be "extremely unlikely". However, that investigation faced harsh criticism for lacking transparency and access, and for not seriously evaluating the lab-leak theory. Tedros launched another investigation, setting up the Scientific Advisory Group for the Origins of Novel Pathogens (SAGO), comprising 27 international experts, in July 2021. Their 78-page report was published on Friday. It said the weight of available evidence suggests a spillover from animals, either directly from bats, or through an intermediate host. However, it could not conclude with certainty where and when this happened, nor whether the Wuhan wet market was where the virus first spilled over into humans. That said, the market "appears to be the location for amplification of infection in humans", leading to widespread transmission. "Evidence for widespread infections or cases in any other countries prior to December 2019 is lacking," it added. While spillover was the best supported theory on the evidence currently available, "until further requests for information are met, or more scientific data becomes available, the origins of SARS-CoV-2 and how it entered the human population will remain inconclusive," SAGO chair Marietjie Venter said at the press conference. Lab leak theories "could not be investigated or excluded", she said, because much of the needed information had not been made available. The experts requested unpublished information from other countries, notably Germany and the United States, but without success, she said. Earlier this week, one SAGO member resigned and three others asked for their names to be removed from the report. CRUCIAL QUESTION "Over the past five years, we have learned a lot about Covid-19 but there is one crucial question about the pandemic that we have not yet answered, how it started," Tedros said. "Despite our repeated requests, China has not provided hundreds of viral sequences from individuals with Covid-19 early in the pandemic, more detailed information on animals sold at markets in Wuhan, and information on work done and biosafety conditions at laboratories in Wuhan," he said. He said WHO has requested access to intelligence reports by governments around the world on the origins of Covid-19. US President Donald Trump's administration has officially embraced the lab leak theory. MORAL IMPERATIVE Tedros said finding out how Covid-19 started was a moral imperative for those who lost their lives in the pandemic and to prevent further outbreaks. He said the virus was continuing to evolve, take lives and leave people suffering with post-Covid conditions, or so-called long Covid. Tedros said the WHO is appealing to countries with information about the origins of Covid-19 to share information.

Straits Times
7 days ago
- Straits Times
‘Science refugees': French university welcomes first US researchers
US historian Brian Sandberg (centre) - a beneficiary of the "Safe Place for Science" programme - takes part in a press conference in Marseille, southeastern France. PHOTO: AFP MARSEILLE, France - Eight American researchers have arrived at a university in southern France, as the country pushes to offer 'science asylum' to US academics hit by federal research spending cuts under US President Donald Trump. The University of Aix-Marseille (AMU) welcomed the scholars on June 27, following the March launch of its 'Safe Place for Science' initiative, the first among 20 set to relocate there in coming months. The programme has already drawn nearly 300 applicants from top institutions such as Stanford, Nasa, and Berkeley. The development comes as US universities have been threatened since Mr Trump's return to the White House with massive federal funding cuts, causing research programmes to face closures. Some staff also fear possible detention and deportation for their political views. AMU – one of France's largest universities, with some 12,000 international students alone – is eager to provide a home for these scholars, with research funding for up to three years. Historian Brian Sandberg said he decided to apply to the university in the southern Provence region on a return trip to the United States from France, when he feared he might face arrest at the border of his own country. Though he was not detained, 'it makes you think about what is your status as a researcher', said the academic from Illinois, whose work focuses on religion, gender and violence. Academic freedom 'under attack' Professor Sandberg is now one of 20 scholars specialising in subjects ranging from health, climate science, astrophysics and the humanities set to relocate to France in September. There, they hope to pursue their research in what they see as a more open academic environment. 'The principle of academic freedom, as well as the entire system of research and higher education in the United States is really under attack,' said Prof Sandberg. 'If I stay in the United States, I can continue to teach, but as a researcher, for the next four years, we're stuck,' he said, referring to Mr Trump's term in office. AMU vice-president Denis Bertin takes part in a press conference to introduce American scientists who are beneficiaries of the 'Safe Place for Science' programme. PHOTO: AFP One academic who requested anonymity said Mr Trump's policies directly threatened her work on gender and human-caused global warming. 'Apparently, one of the banned words... is 'female',' she said. 'I don't know how you can get around speaking about females without using the word,' she said. In February, the Washington Post reported that the National Science Foundation was flagging research using terms such as 'female' and 'women' that could violate Mr Trump's orders rolling back diversity initiatives. But she said her decision to move to France went beyond her professional freedom. 'I've got kids, I don't want them to grow up in a very hostile area,' she said. A 'science asylum programme' AMU's programme is part of a broader push to cash in on Mr Trump's massive cuts in funding for education. In May, France and the EU announced plans to attract US researchers in hopes of benefitting from the potential brain drain by supporting the costs of hosting foreign researchers. French President Emmanuel Macron, who called the growing pressure on academia by Mr Trump's administration 'an error', has encouraged US scientists to 'choose France'. He announced that his government would earmark €100 million (S$150 million) to help attract foreign talent. French lawmakers have introduced a Bill to create a special status for 'science refugees'. AMU president Eric Berton described 'Safe Place for Science' as a 'science asylum' programme. PHOTO: AFP European Commission head Ursula Von der Leyen has said the European Union will launch an incentives package worth €500 million to make the 27-nation bloc 'a magnet for researchers'. For its part, AMU expects to welcome the other 12 American researchers in the coming months, with its budget of €15 million. 'Saving our American colleagues and welcoming them is also a way of welcoming and promoting global research,' said the university's president, Dr Eric Berton. 'This is a science welcome programme, a science asylum programme. And above all, we want to enshrine the concept of science refugees in law,' he added. In recent years, France has already welcomed scholars forced into exile from Ukraine, Yemen, Afghanistan and the Palestinian territories. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.