It is madness that Konami still hasn't made a new Castlevania - Reader's Feature
There's a lot of rumours about a new Nintendo Direct at the moment, which is probably going to have quite a bit about Metroid Prime 4, since it's their big Christmas game this year. If the game is a hit then the whole series will be in a very good place since Metroid Dread was the biggest entry ever, despite being a pretty difficult 2D game.
Dread is definitely one of the best Metroidvanias I've ever played but of course that name has two parts to it. Even though Metroid came up with most things first, the other half of the name is Castlevania, which hasn't had a new game in over a decade.
Why is a mystery to me because the Netflix show was very popular a few years ago and I'm sure many people never even realised it was based on game. What really makes the situation weird is that Konami has brought back series like Metal Gear, Contra, and Survival Kids recently and is planning to make a dozen new Silent Hill games, and yet still there's no word on Castlevania.
There's been some retro collections for Castlevania but the last new game was Lords Of Shadow 2 which was, admittedly, awful. It was also barely a Metroidvania, so it's very easy to imagine a bunch of ways to do a new game better, whether it's 3D or 2D.
For a long time people have been saying that Konami should get FromSoftware to make one, because Bloodborne was basically halfway there already. I get this and agree but they're way to successful now to be working on someone else's game, so that's not really an option, I don't think.
The problem for Konami, and I assume this is part of the problem, is that there are so few 3D Metroidvanias around that there's nobody that's really an expert that they can go to. Ironically, the ones with any real experience are MercurySteam, who made Metroid Dread and… Lords Of Shadow. So I can imagine there's some bad blood there.
Sign up to the GameCentral newsletter for a unique take on the week in gaming, alongside the latest reviews and more. Delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning.
But surely someone out there can make it. Maybe the people that did indie game Revenge Of The Savage Planet, since that's a 3D Metroidvania. Or just do the other obvious thing and make a 2D game instead. There's a bazillion indie developers that could help out there and it'd be cheaper too, if Konami is worried it's spent all its money on Silent Hill.
There are so many people that love Castlevania that even though there hasn't been a new game in so long there's a bunch of crossovers. Basically everything with vampires in it, from V Rising to Vampire Survivors. There's so much love for the franchise, from everyone but the company that can do something about it.
So yeah, I don't really know what else can be done. Konami know the interest is out there, they're busy reboot lots of other franchises, but for some reason it's never Castlevania. A part of me hopes for an annoucement at the Nintendo Direct but I've been thinking that sort of thing for years now and it never happens. Plus, I've seen no rumours or leaks that says anything is on the way. More Trending
I just don't get it. If you're rebooting something as obscure as Survival Kids, how does that come before Castlevania?! Oh well, if it's not in the Direct maybe they'll do something for the 40th anniversary next year. Although why do I get the feeling they won't?
By reader Grackle
The reader's features do not necessarily represent the views of GameCentral or Metro.
You can submit your own 500 to 600-word reader feature at any time, which if used will be published in the next appropriate weekend slot. Just contact us at gamecentral@metro.co.uk or use our Submit Stuff page and you won't need to send an email.
MORE: I had a Commodore Amiga as a kid and this is not the gaming future I imagined - Reader's Feature
MORE: The biggest problem with the Nintendo Switch 2 is that it's too big – Reader's Feature
MORE: Donkey Kong Bananza is Nintendo and gaming at its best - Reader's Feature
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
How Happy Gilmore 2 has been received by fans and critics
Happy Gilmore 2, the highly anticipated sequel to the 1996 cult comedy, was released last week on Netflix. The film received middling reviews from critics, scoring 65 per cent on Rotten Tomatoes, but was better received by viewers with a 72 per cent score. Adam Sandler reprises his role as Happy Gilmore, with Christopher McDonald, Julie Bowen, Ben Stiller, and Dennis Dugan also returning, alongside new cameos from Travis Kelce, Bad Bunny, and Eminem. The plot sees Happy return to golf to fund his daughter's attendance at a Parisian ballet school. The film's opening scene, which kills off Julie Bowen's character Virginia Venit, has proven divisive among fans, though the director defended the decision as a key driving force for the plot.
Daily Mirror
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Netflix now streaming ‘truly entertaining' British thriller with a ‘mind-blowing' twist ending
An iconic actor teams up with a Peaky Blinders star in this gripping British thriller that's just been added to Netflix Netflix is now streaming an underrated thriller from two years ago that's guaranteed to keep you on your toes. Starring Richard E Grant and Daryl McCormack, fans and critics alike agree this psychological drama is 'mesmerising'. Unfortunately, it didn't quite light the box office on fire upon its original release, though the streaming service has now given the film a well-deserved second chance at success. Penned by Alex MacKeith and directed by Alice Troughton, in her feature film debut after working on iconic shows like EastEnders and Doctor Who, The Lesson deserves the top spot on your watchlist this week. It follows aspiring writer Liam Summers (played by McCormack) who seemingly lands the perfect job, tutoring at the estate of one of his literary heroes, JM Sinclair (Grant). However, his tenure soon takes a dark turn when his idol's family secrets start to bubble to the surface and Liam becomes trapped in a web of deceit. Awards Daily described the thriller as "meticulously crafted" and "mesmerising', while The Spectator was particularly impressed by Grant's "deliciously, marvellously, full-on monstrous" performance. A fan writing on Google reviews also had nothing but praise for Grant's co-star: 'I can't get over how incredible Daryl McCormack is in The Lesson! 'The plot twists had me on the edge of my seat, and the ending was absolutely mind-blowing - I never saw it coming!' Another five-star review gushed: 'The Lesson is a cinematic gem that is so refreshing, witty and entertaining till the very last musical note and cut to end credits. 'The stellar cast's chemistry brings layers of brilliance to the script and to the screen. The editing, score and cinematography simply yet intentionally further elevate the storytelling, creating an unexpected well crafted masterpiece.' Watch Stranger Things on Netflix for free with Sky from £15 Sky Get the deal here Product Description Someone else heaped on the praise: 'Best film I have seen in a long time and I see a lot of films. 'It completely kept me riveted from the very beginning to the end and through the epilogue. 'An elegant, intelligent, writerly and artful example of a truly entertaining masterpiece. Loved it. I wish there were more like it.' And a final fan summed up The Lesson as 'simply brilliant' in yet another five-star write-up. 'Delightfully quirky, superbly filmed visually, nicely sinister in an almost tongue in cheek manner, brilliantly acted by all the actors.' With this hidden gem of British cinema now on Netflix in the UK and Ireland, make sure The Lesson gets the attention film fans think it deserves this week. The Lesson is available to stream on Netflix.
Spectator
4 hours ago
- Spectator
What I learned from running my own Squid Game
You know how this story goes. The cameras are rolling. The audience is cruel. You're trapped in the game and the game is death and the game is going out live from the heart of the state of nature where empathy is weakness and you kill each other off until there's only one left. What will you do to survive? Who will you become if you do? This is the plot of Squid Game, Netflix's Korean mega-hit that just drew to its gory conclusion. It is also the plot of The Hunger Games, Battle Royale, The Running Man, Chain-Gang All-Stars and The Long Walk. We have spent several decades watching desperate people slaughter each other for survival to entertain the rich and stupid. Future generations will probably have thoughts about why we kept returning to this particular trope with the bloodthirsty voyeurism we associate with Ancient Rome. Obviously, these stories are meant to say something about human nature, and the depraved things desperate people can be made to do to each other; they're meant to say something about exploitation, and how easy it is to derive pleasure from someone else's pain. Squid Game says these things while shovelling its doomed characters through a lurid nightmare playground where they die in cruel and creative ways. After each deadly game, blood-spattered contestants are offered a chance to vote on whether to carry on playing. It's a simple referendum: if a majority votes to stay, they're all trapped in the death-match murder circus with only themselves to blame. If they object, a masked guard will accuse them of interrupting the free and fair elections and shoot them in the face. This is everything Squid Game has to say about representative democracy. 'I wanted to write a story that was an allegory or fable about modern capitalist society,' said director Hwang Dong-hyuk, just in case you didn't get the message. The whole thing is as subtle as a shopping-mall shooter. I'm reliably informed that the English-language translations strip away a degree of nuance, which probably helps audiences in parts of the Anglosphere where irony is an unaffordable foreign luxury and the experience of everyday economic humiliation feels a lot like being hit over the head with a huge blunt analogy. Squid Game does not want you confused about who the baddies are. There's a bored cabal of cartoon billionaires drinking scotch and throwing tantrums while they watch our heroes shove each other off cliffs. They smoke cigars and say things like 'I am a very hard man to please'. We never get to find out who they are or what their plan is, because it doesn't matter. How could it possibly matter? How could anything matter in a fake hotel lobby where all the furniture is naked ladies? This is how people who want to be rich think people who are rich ought to talk: like insurance salesmen cosplaying sexual villainy in a kink club for tourists. Nobody is supposed to be able to relate to the Squid Game villains. As it turns out, though, I can. There's an innocent explanation for how I came to run my own Reality Show of Death Game. Well, mostly innocent. I happen to have a secret other life as an immersive game designer. It's what I did instead of drugs during my divorce, after discovering that here, finally, was a hobby that would let me be a pretentious art wanker and a huge nerd at the same time. The games are intense – like escape rooms you have to solve with emotions. Many of them revolve around some species of social experiment – the kind that actual researchers can't do any more because it's inhumane. Famously, the 1971 Stanford prison experiment had to be shut down early after students who were cast as guards got far too excited about abusing their prisoners. The sort of people who pay actual money to play this kind of game are expecting to be made to feel things. They're expecting high stakes and horrible choices and wildly dramatic twists. The Death Game trope is an easy way to deliver all of that. Mine forced players to pick one of their friends to 'murder on live television'. It's a five-hour nightmare about social scapegoating with a pounding techno soundtrack. I had a lot going on at the time. I swotted up on Hobbes and Hayek. I took notes on Squid Game and its infinite derivatives. I gave the players character archetypes to choose from – the Diva, the Flirt, the Party Animal – and got them to imagine themselves in Big Brother if it were produced by actual George Orwell. I wrote and rewrote the script to make sure players wouldn't be able to opt out of picking one person to bully to death. I thought that it would be easy. Instead, I learned two surprising things. The first was that it's harder than you'd think to design a scenario where ordinary people plausibly hunt each other to death. Every time, my players tried their very hardest not to hurt each other, even when given every alibi to be evil. I created a whole rule system to punish acts of altruism, spent ages greasing the hinges on the beautiful hellbox I'd built for them, and still the ungrateful bastards kept trying to sacrifice themselves for one another. Even the ones who were explicitly cast as villains. Even when it was against the rules. It takes a lot of fiddly world-building to make violent self-interest feel reasonable. It takes a baroque notional dystopia and a guaranteed protection from social punishment. What you get is a manicured, hothouse-grown garden masquerading as a human jungle – an astroturfed Hobbesian state of nature where the cruelty is cultivated to make viewers feel comfortable in complicity. The story of these games scrapes the same nerves as the ritual reporting about shopping-mall riots on Black Friday – the ones that lasciviously describe working-class people walloping each other for a £100 discount on a dishwasher. The message is that people who have little are worse than people who have more. This is a wealthy person's nightmare of how poor people behave. The rich, of course, are rarely subject to this sort of moral voyeurism. But that story isn't true. In the real-life Lord of the Flies, the children actually worked together very successfully. In the real-life Stanford prison experiment, the guards had to be coached into cruelty. Real poverty, as sociologists like Rutger Bregman keep on telling us, is actually an inverse predictor of selfish behaviour. Not because poor people are more virtuous than anyone else, but because the rich and powerful can afford not to be. The rest of us, eventually, have to trust each other. The fantasy of these games is about freedom from social responsibility. In the Death Games, nobody has to make complex and demeaning ethical choices as an adult person in an inhumane economy. In the Death Games, it makes sense to light your integrity on fire to survive. But if we did, actually, live in a perfectly ruthless market economy where competition was the essence of survival, none of us would survive past puberty. The Death Games don't actually tell us anything about how life is. They show us how life feels. The second surprising thing I learned while running my own Squid Game is that nothing feels better than running Squid Game. If you need a rush, I highly recommend building a complicated social machine to make other people hurt each other, picking out a fun hyperpop soundtrack and then standing behind a production desk for five hours jerking their strings and cackling until they cry. People apparently like my game. It has run in multiple countries. And every time, it took me days to come down from the filthy dopamine high. It turns out that I love power. This was an ugly thing to discover, and there's an ugly feeling about watching a show like Squid Game – which is, to be clear, wildly entertaining. Voyeurism is participation, and the compulsive thrill of watching human beings hurt each other for money creates its own complicity. The audience is not innocent. Sit too close to the barrier at the beast show and you risk getting splashed with moral hazard.
