logo
These diabetes drugs are finding new life as an antiaging hack

These diabetes drugs are finding new life as an antiaging hack

Mint12-06-2025

Some health-obsessed Americans believe the next antiaging therapeutic already exists—in the medicine cabinets of millions of diabetes patients.
The widely used class of drugs, called SGLT2 inhibitors and sold under brand names such as Jardiance and Farxiga, have been on the market for over a decade as Type 2 diabetes medications. They have also gained regulatory approval to treat conditions like heart failure and kidney disease.
Recently, though, the drugs have emerged as a hot topic on popular health podcasts and Reddit forums for longevity enthusiasts, many of whom don't suffer from any of those conditions. Instead, they are adding SGLT2 inhibitors to a roster of hacks they hope will help them live healthier for longer—or in other words, increase their healthspan.
The drugs work by helping the kidneys release extra glucose from the body through urine, improving blood-sugar levels. While there are no studies of whether they can extend the lives of healthy humans, a growing body of evidence shows they help protect against multiple age-related diseases and reduce mortality rates for patients with certain chronic conditions. Some researchers believe they may also affect the fundamental biology of aging.
'This is probably the drug class of our era," says Dr. Timothy Gong, section physician leader for heart failure and transplant cardiology at Baylor University Medical Center, who has researched SGLT2 inhibitors. 'You see cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, even general internists as well, just getting so excited."
Gong says he wouldn't be surprised to take an SGLT2 inhibitor one day, once they are studied more, though he's free from heart issues and diabetes. Yet it's too early to prescribe it for longevity benefits in otherwise healthy patients.
'I don't think that the evidence is strong enough yet for us to be able to say that," he says.
Right now, use of SGLT2 inhibitors for potential antiaging benefits is limited mostly to a growing community of so-called biohackers, who seek to optimize their health through experimentation with gadgets, behaviors and various medicines and supplements. Because most take it off-label—meaning, for a nonapproved use—the drugs typically aren't covered by insurance and can cost hundreds of dollars a month out of pocket.
Dave Aiello, a Boston chiropractor who doesn't have diabetes, began experimenting with the drugs after learning about a promising study in mice. The 38-year-old wanted to get ahead of health problems but was disenchanted by what he saw as a reactive approach to disease in conventional medicine.
'I'm trying to see if I can just stay as healthy as possible for as long as possible," says Aiello, who has been taking an SGLT2 inhibitor called empagliflozin since 2022.
He also takes the kidney-transplant drug rapamycin off-label and has previously taken the diabetes pill metformin—both of which have gained traction as potential longevity boosters, too. He was particularly impressed by research showing SGLT2 inhibitors can help the body manage blood sugar more efficiently, which in turn supports cardiometabolic health.
He says he's encouraged by the results so far: Between 2022 and 2024, Aiello's hemoglobin A1C, a measure of average blood sugar, fell to 4.6% from 5.1%, his laboratory test results show.
The drugs aren't free of potential side effects, including increased risk of urinary-tract infections, dehydration, and in rare cases, severe genital infections and a life-threatening condition called diabetic ketoacidosis.
When Aiello first started taking empagliflozin, he felt dehydrated and experienced fatigue and brain fog. Those side effects have subsided since he decreased his dose and has made sure to take in more electrolytes.
'I'm a little more willing to take some risks that could potentially affect me in the short term if I do think that there might be a benefit," Aiello says.
It isn't clear precisely how SGLT2 inhibitors might protect against the ravages of aging, but the research in mice offers clues. In 2020, a National Institute on Aging-funded study found that one SGLT2 inhibitor called canagliflozin extended the lives of male—but not female—mice by 14%.
One theory is that the drugs help slow the aging process partly by blunting blood-sugar spikes. Scientists say that by driving insulin levels down, these drugs promote fat burning and create an anti-inflammatory effect that mimics calorie restriction, which studies suggest can slow the pace of aging.
Still, many drugs that work in mice don't work in humans, says Richard A. Miller, who led the study and is director of the Glenn Center for Biology of Aging Research at the University of Michigan.
His lab is now studying how the small molecules inside slow-aging mice change over time. If a drug in humans produces these same metabolomic shifts seen in slow-aging mice, he says, it would provide more confidence that it could slow aging in people.
'We still have a lot of work to do to prove that the drugs do the same thing in people," says Miller. 'The hint here is that it's actually slowing the aging rate."
Alan Vuong, who works in sales in Austin, Texas, started taking the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin this year after hearing a podcast interview with Miller. The 34-year-old has a family history of Type 2 diabetes and wanted to lower his fasting insulin level, a measure of metabolic health, from normal to optimal.
He spends about $150 a month on his longevity protocol, which includes a dozen drugs and supplements, and has seen his insulin levels drop since starting the medication. Other than having to use the bathroom in the middle of the night more often, a known side effect of the drugs, Vuong hasn't noticed other physical side effects.
'My end goal is to extend lifespan, but more importantly, healthspan," he says. 'I'm willing to take that gamble."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Indian CEO's ‘Your Heart Isn't A Machine' Post From Hospital Bed Backfires
Indian CEO's ‘Your Heart Isn't A Machine' Post From Hospital Bed Backfires

News18

time6 hours ago

  • News18

Indian CEO's ‘Your Heart Isn't A Machine' Post From Hospital Bed Backfires

Harsh Macwan took to Instagram and shared a picture of himself from the hospital bed, which left the internet divided. Recent years have witnessed a significant rise in heart attack cases, particularly among younger adults. Several factors have contributed to this increase, including lifestyle changes, stress, a poor diet, and a lack of exercise. An Indian CEO recently shed light on such health scares, sharing the near-cardiac incident that left him highly concerned. Harsh Macwan, an IIM Ahmedabad alumnus, recently took to Instagram and shared how he recently 'came dangerously close to something" that led him to the hospital in just a few minutes. In what appears to be an attempt to caution fellow users about the health scare associated with today's fast-paced life, it eventually didn't sit well with everyone. Macwan shared his post, which featured a picture of himself in the hospital bed, now going viral for all the wrong reasons. 'It started with a sharp, crushing pressure in my chest. My left arm went numb. I was breathless, sweating, and disoriented. Within minutes, I was rushed to the hospital. What followed were ECGs and constant monitoring. I've always been the type to push through deadlines, fatigue, and stress. But this time, my body said enough," the CEO wrote in the caption. Further in the post, he urged young founders and leaders to prioritise their health over any startup, client, or ambition. 'Your heart isn't a machine. Take that day off. Sleep. Walk. Switch off your phone. Because when your body gives you a final warning, you won't get to reschedule it," he continued. While Macwan expressed that he is currently recovering, his post received warm reactions on the handle. Many of his followers expressed concern, asking him to take care and get proper rest. One wrote, 'Sending good vibes. Take care," while another added, 'Rightly said… Take care and proper rest." 'Feel better soon," another comment read. On the contrary, the post also grabbed the attention of a Reddit user who reshared the picture and took a jibe with, 'Take a pic, I'm going to post about this to help other founders – Heart Attack LinkedIn Survivor." Further in his post, the user described it as a 'haul of fame of craziest posts," asking people to save themselves. Many others also resonated with the remark, as they too joined in to call out the sharing of the picture. One wrote, 'No, no, take another picture—I don't look pathetic enough yet!!" while another added, 'Cannot wait to have a heart attack to post it on LinkedIn! So exciting!!!" 'The weird thing here is a posed hospital selfie. He's not the only guilty one – but unless it's a posed 'I just gave birth and this is our first family photo" then it's odd. Hope the dude is on the mend now," a user continued. Nonetheless, amid the criticism and well-wishes, the CEO's post does draw attention to the need for working professionals to focus on their lifestyle and health concerns.

Trump Officials Met with Walmart on Direct-to-Patient Drug Sales
Trump Officials Met with Walmart on Direct-to-Patient Drug Sales

Mint

time15 hours ago

  • Mint

Trump Officials Met with Walmart on Direct-to-Patient Drug Sales

US health officials met with with Walmart Inc. and other retailers this week as part of an effort to help Americans get their medicines more directly from companies that make them, according to people familiar with the talks. The conversations between the Trump administration and experts from the nascent straight-to-consumer drug industry are intended to explore streamlining the way Americans get their medicines, said the people, who weren't authorized to speak publicly on the matter. Officials at the US Department of Health and Human Services conducted the meeting to discuss options, the people said. It was unclear what the department's approach and timeline would be in pursuing such a venture. Walmart and HHS declined to comment. Reducing America's drug prices, currently the highest in the world, is one of President Donald Trump's top health policy goals. In May, he signed an executive order calling on the pharmaceutical industry to cut costs to the lowest level paid by similar countries. Part of that proposal instructed HHS to help Americans directly buy their medicine at those lower prices. One reason drugs are so expensive in the US is because they go through so many bureaucratic steps before they reach a patient. Most Americans get their drugs from pharmacies, which are paid primarily by insurance companies. The insurers work with other companies, called pharmacy benefit managers, to negotiate the prices with manufacturers. That process involves rebates, a fee that critics say inflates costs and the industry says is essential to prevent drugmakers from charging exorbitant prices. Trump has been talking about cracking down on PBMs since his first administration. Walmart started offering prescription delivery in October, making it a competitor to Inc. in the space. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

US Supreme Court preserves key element of Obamacare preventive care
US Supreme Court preserves key element of Obamacare preventive care

Time of India

time19 hours ago

  • Time of India

US Supreme Court preserves key element of Obamacare preventive care

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday preserved a key element of the Obamacare law that helps guarantee that health insurers cover preventive care such as cancer screenings and HIV prevention medication at no cost to patients. The 6-3 decision written by conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh reversed a lower court's ruling that the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, which under the 2010 law formally called the Affordable Care Act has a major role in choosing what services will be covered, was not validly appointed. The ruling means that certain life-saving tests and treatments must continue to be provided cost-free under most insurance plans. That allays concerns raised by public health advocates that the court might open the door to insurers subjecting these services to co-pays and deductibles, deterring many Americans from obtaining them. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Join new Free to Play WWII MMO War Thunder War Thunder Play Now Undo The task force's 16 members are selected by the U.S. secretary of health and human services without Senate confirmation. The New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had found that this arrangement violated the U.S. Constitution's provision on the appointment of governmental officers. The case arose when several individual Christian plaintiffs and two small businesses sued in federal court in Texas in 2020 to challenge the task force's structure. It was the latest in a years-long series of challenges to Democratic former President Barack Obama's signature legislative achievement to reach the Supreme Court. Live Events A key question in the case was whether the task force wields power to such an extent that its members, under the Constitution's "appointments clause," are "principal officers" who must be appointed by the president and confirmed by the U.S. Senate or "inferior officers" not subject to these requirements. Kavanaugh wrote that because task force members are adequately supervised by the U.S. secretary of health and human services, members are "inferior officers" and do not need to be appointed by the president and confirmed by the U.S. Senate. "The Task Force members are removable at will by the Secretary of HHS, and their recommendations are reviewable by the Secretary before they take effect," Kavanaugh wrote. "So Task Force members are supervised and directed by the Secretary, who in turn answers to the President, preserving the chain of command," wrote Kavanaugh, who was joined by fellow conservative Justices John Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett, as well as the court's three liberal members. Three conservative justices - Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch - dissented. Before the case was narrowed to the appointments issue, the plaintiffs had included a religious objection to being required to cover pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV. They claimed that such drugs "facilitate and encourage homosexual behavior, prostitution, sexual promiscuity and intravenous drug use." The U.S. government's appeal of the decision by the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals initially was filed by Democratic former President Joe Biden's administration before being taken up by Republican President Donald Trump's administration. The task force is made up of medical experts who serve four-year terms on a volunteer basis. It reviews medical evidence and public feedback and issues recommendations about which preventive services would be most effective for detecting illnesses earlier or addressing ailments before a patient's condition worsens. The task force has identified dozens of preventive services as having a high or moderate net benefit to patients including screenings to detect diabetes and various types of cancer, statin medications to lower the risk of heart disease and stroke, and interventions to help patients quit smoking or unhealthy alcohol use. The 5th Circuit ruled in 2024 that the task force's structure violates the Constitution, as the plaintiffs claimed. The justices during April 21 arguments in the case posed questions over whether the law gives the HHS secretary the appropriate level of supervision over the task force, including the power to influence its recommendations and fire members at will, or if it operates as a largely independent governmental body whose recommendations effectively have the force of law. The Justice Department urged the justices to view the task force's members as "inferior officers." Hashim Mooppan, a Justice Department lawyer, told the justices that the HHS secretary can remove task force members at will, review their recommendations and prevent them from taking effect, and can require the task force to obtain his approval before it issues any recommendations. The plaintiffs contended that the task force's lack of supervision and insulation from removal makes its members "principal officers."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store