
‘White collar' jobs are down — but don't blame AI yet, economists say
Professional and business services, the industry that represents white-collar roles and middle and upper-class, educated workers, hasn't experienced much hiring activity over the past two years.
In May, job growth in professional and business services declined to -0.4%, slightly down from -0.2% in April, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. In other words, the sector has been losing job opportunities, according to Cory Stahle, an economist at job search site Indeed.
Meanwhile, industries like health care, construction and manufacturing have seen more job creation. In May, nearly half of the job growth came from health care, which added 62,000 jobs, the bureau found.
More from Personal Finance:Here's what's happening with unemployed Americans — in five chartsThe pros and cons of a $1,000 baby bonus in 'Trump Accounts'Social Security cost-of-living adjustment may be 2.5% in 2026
However, economists have said that the decline in white-collar job openings is more driven by structural issues in the economy rather than artificial intelligence technology taking people's jobs.
"We know for a fact that it's not AI," said Alí Bustamante, an economist and director at the Roosevelt Institute, a liberal think tank.
Indeed's Stahle agreed: "This is more of an economic story and less of an AI disruption story, at least so far."
There are a few reasons AI is not behind the declining job creation in white-collar sectors, according to economists.
For one, the decline in job creation has been happening for years, Bustamante said. In that timeframe, AI technology "was pretty awful," he said.
What's more, the technology is even now still in early stages, to the point where the software cannot execute key skills without human intervention, said Stahle.
A 2024 report by Indeed researchers found that of the more than 2,800 unique work skills identified, none are "very likely" to be replaced by generative artificial intelligence. GenAI creates content like text or images based on existing data.
Across five scenarios — "very unlikely," "unlikely," "possible," "likely" and "very likely" — about 68.7% of skills were either "very unlikely" or "unlikely" to be replaced by GenAI technology, the site found.
"We might get to a point where they do, but right now, that's not necessarily looking like it's a big factor," Stahle said.
While AI has yet to replace human workers, there may come a time where the technology does disrupt the labor force.
"Certainly, jobs are going to transform," Stahle said. "I'm not going to downplay the potential impacts of AI."
Stahle said that openings for consulting jobs focused on implementing generative AI have been rising. Over the past year, management consulting roles with AI language accounted for 12.4% of GenAI postings, showing signs of growing demand, per a February report by Indeed.
A separate report by the World Economic Forum in January forecasts that by 2030, the new technology will create 170 million new jobs, or 14% of the current total employment.
However, that growth could be offset by the decline in existing roles. The report cites that about 92 million jobs, or 8% of the current total employment, could be displaced by AI technology.
For knowledge-based workers whose skills may overlap with AI, consider investing in developing skills on how to use AI technology to stay ahead, Stahle said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
a few seconds ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Lula says the US has ignored Brazil's attempts to negotiate Trump's announced tariff
SAO PAULO (AP) — Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva said Thursday that his government has not been successful in trying to negotiate the 50% tariff on Brazilian imports that U.S. President Donald Trump has threatened to impose. Washington has ignored Brazil's attempts to negotiate ahead of the measure's expected implementation on Aug. 1., the Brazilian leader said. 'Brazil is used to negotiating,' Lula said. 'We had already 10 meetings with the United States. On May 16, we sent them a letter asking for clarification on the proposals we had made." 'They didn't respond. They responded through a website,' Lula added, referring to Trump's post on his social media platform Truth Social on July 9, announcing the tariff. Trump directly linked the import tax to the trial underway in Brazil of his ally, the country's former President Jair Bolsonaro, which he called a 'witch hunt.' Rather than backing down, Brazil's Supreme Court escalated the case, worsening Bolsonaro's legal troubles. Federal police has raided Bolsonaro's home and political office, ordered him to wear an ankle monitor, banned him from using social media and levelled other restrictions. Lula spoke Thursday in Vale do Jequitinhonha, one of Brazil's poorest regions in the state of Minas Gerais, repeating his mantra of needing to 'defend' Brazil's resources — a message he has adopted since the trade dispute escalated. In related developments, Brazil's Vice President Geraldo Alckmin told reporters in the capital, Brasilia, that he had a 50-minute phone call last Saturday with U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. Alckmin, who also serves as Brazil's minister of Commerce, Industry and Trade, declined to share details of the conversation, saying it was confidential. 'I reiterated Brazil's willingness to negotiate — that's our position," Alckmin, said. "Brazil never left the table. We didn't create this problem, but we want to solve it.' Separately, Brazil raised concerns on Wednesday at a World Trade Organization meeting, arguing that arbitrary tariffs violate the organization's core principles but making no mention of Trump or the United States, 'Arbitrary tariffs, chaotically announced and implemented, are disrupting global value chains and risk throwing the world economy into a spiral of high prices and stagnation,' Brazil's Ambassador Philip Fox-Drummond Gough said.

USA Today
a few seconds ago
- USA Today
TikTok will go dark in US if China doesn't agree to deal, Lutnick says
The future of TikTok in the United States remains in the hands of Chinese officials, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said. During a CNBC interview on July 24, Lutnick said if China does not approve a U.S.-drafted deal to sell the American assets of TikTok, then the app will go dark in America again, as it briefly did in January. "If that deal gets approved by the Chinese, then that deal will happen. If they don't approve it, then TikTok is going to go dark," Lutnick said. "And those decisions are coming very soon, so let's see what the Chinese do. They've got to approve it. The deal is over to them right now." When asked if the potential agreement is a part of current trade talks with China, Lutnick said it was being discussed, but "not officially." "You can't really go meet somebody and not bring up the topics that are open," Lutnick said during the interview. "It's not officially a part of it, but unofficially, of course, it's going to be discussed. Neither TikTok nor the White House immediately responded for comment when contacted by USA TODAY on July 24. TikTok: Trump signs executive order delaying ban on TikTok - again When could TikTok go dark in the US? The next deadline for TikTok to be sold from ByteDance is Sept. 17. Trump signed an executive order, the third of its kind, to extend the deadline in June. Why could TikTok get banned? TikTok's future in the United States has been up in the air for months. In January, the platform went dark for less than 24 hours under federal legislation signed into law by former President Joe Biden. For years, some government officials have been concerned that TikTok is a national security threat, believing that ByteDance, which is based in Beijing, is sharing U.S. user data with China. TikTok has repeatedly denied these claims. Three times now, Trump has signed executive orders that push back the deadline for when TikTok must be sold, promising that deals with China are on the horizon. The latest was in early July, when Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One that he was hopeful Chinese President Xi would agree to a deal to see the platform to the U.S. Greta Cross is a national trending reporter at USA TODAY. Story idea? Email her at gcross@


Fox Sports
a few seconds ago
- Fox Sports
President Trump's Executive Order Seeks to Clarify College Athletes' Employment Status
The latest plot twist in an attempt to create clearer national standards surrounding name, image and likeness in college sports surfaced on Thursday afternoon. President Donald Trump signed an executive order mandating that federal authorities clarify whether college athletes can be considered employees of the schools they play for. The move comes amid a dramatic increase in the money flowing into and around college athletics. It also follows key court victories won by current and former athletes angry that they were barred for decades, both from earning income based on their celebrity and from sharing in the billions of revenue they helped generate. Facing a growing number of state laws undercutting its authority, the NCAA cleared the way for athletes to cash in with NIL deals with brands and sponsors back in July 2021. That came mere days after a 9-0 decision from the Supreme Court that found the NCAA cannot impose caps on education-related benefits schools provide to their athletes because such limits violate antitrust law. Trump's action directs the secretary of labor and the National Labor Relations Board to clarify the status of collegiate athletes through guidance or rules "that will maximize the educational benefits and opportunities provided by higher education institutions through athletics." The NCAA's embrace of NIL deals set the stage for another massive change that took effect July 1: The ability for schools to begin paying millions of dollars to their own athletes, up to $20.5 million per school over the next year. The $2.8 billion House settlement shifts even more power to college athletes, who have also won the ability to transfer from school to school without having to sit out a year. The NCAA has been lobbying for several years for limited antitrust protection to keep some kind of control over this new landscape — and avoid more crippling lawsuits — but a handful of bills have gone nowhere in Congress. The 1,100 universities that comprise the NCAA have insisted for decades that athletes are students who cannot be considered anything like a school employee. This stance has long been a part of the amateur model at the heart of college athletics, but that model is rapidly being replaced by a more professional structure fed by money that is coming from donors, brands and now the schools themselves. Some coaches have even suggested collective bargaining is a potential solution to the chaos they see. Universities would become responsible for paying wages, benefits, and workers' compensation and schools and conferences have insisted they will fight any such move in court. While private institutions fall under the National Labor Relations Board, public universities must follow labor laws that vary from state to state, and it's worth noting that virtually every state in the South has "right to work" laws that present challenges for unions. The Associated Press contributed to this report. Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account, follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily ! FOLLOW Follow your favorites to personalize your FOX Sports experience College Football College Basketball Women's College Basketball recommended Item 1 of 3 Get more from the College Football Follow your favorites to get information about games, news and more