logo
Coalition demands answers after Albanese government lifts biosecurity restrictions on US beef imports

Coalition demands answers after Albanese government lifts biosecurity restrictions on US beef imports

Sky News AU4 days ago
The Albanese government is being urged to explain its backflip on a US beef ban after the Prime Minister previously insisted Labor would not 'compromise' on biosecurity.
The Australian Financial Review revealed on Thursday that Australian officials had notified their US counterparts that restrictions on the importation of US beef will be lifted following a scientific review of the biosecurity risks.
Responding to the reports on Thursday, Nationals Senate Leader Bridget McKenzie said the decision could pose a risk to our beef industry.
'We need to make sure our $11 billion beef export industry is protected. Our concerns would be any watering down of those science-based protocols would lead the risk of disease, entering this country, and our farmers, being subjected to unnecessary risk,' Ms McKenzie said.
Shadow finance minister James Paterson said the government needed to explain its backflip.
'The prime minister himself has said that we couldn't relax the restrictions on the importation of US beef because of serious biosecurity concerns," Mr Paterson told Sky News.
"So if the government has found some way of dealing with that issue, protecting our domestic agricultural industry from the introduction of foreign diseases and pests, then they should say so they should stand up and explain that, not anonymously leak it to a newspaper.
'Full credit to the AFR for getting the story, but a major story like this affecting a major export industry of about $11 billion a year and about an $82 billion domestic industry, when you include red meat more broadly, deserves more answers than this.'
The restrictions had been cited by President Donald Trump as a justification for his decision to impose a 10 per cent across the board tariff on Australian imports – as well as much larger tariffs on steel and aluminium – in violation of the existing Australia-US free trade agreement.
'Australia bans – and they're wonderful people, and wonderful everything – but they ban American beef,' President Trump said in April
In response to the comments, Prime Minister Albanese emphatically declared his government 'will not change or compromise any of the issues regarding biosecurity, full stop, exclamation mark, it's simply not worth it. So it's that simple.'
A blanket ban on US beef imports - imposed following a mad cow disease in 2003 - was repealed in 2019. However biosecurity rules have remained in place due to the risk of beef from countries such as Mexico and Canada being imported through the US, and no American beef has been imported under the new scheme.
But a government source told the AFR on Thursday that the US Beef Imports Review had undertaken a 'rigorous science and risk-based assessment over the past decade' and the bans would be lifted.
Agriculture Minister Julie Collins confirmed the report, saying in a statement that her department was "satisfied the strengthened control measures put in place by the US effectively manage biosecurity risks.'
However Cattle Australia CEO Will Evans said he was sure the decision would not have been made unless scientific experts had the 'utmost confidence' it would not impose a risk to Australia's cattle industry.
'Context is important here. We export more than $4 billion of beef a year to the US, and this has been a multi-year assessment process undertaken by the Department of Agriculture - they're the competent authority in this, and they're required to assess this under a rules based trading system.
'What they've done is they've completed a technical scientific assessment, and they've said, look, there are the right processes in place in these countries to be able to manage these risks, and they've determined that they're going to grant access after making this assessment over many years.
'Now, the cattle industry is a $75 billion industry in Australia. I'm sure they wouldn't have made this decision unless they had the utmost confidence that the science was correct.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The opera lover, the aromatherapist and the $1m inheritance fight
The opera lover, the aromatherapist and the $1m inheritance fight

Sydney Morning Herald

time27 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

The opera lover, the aromatherapist and the $1m inheritance fight

It was a costly court fight over the million-dollar estate of an elderly opera aficionado. An aromatherapist who struck up a friendship with the woman stood to inherit everything if she won. Eva Marie Easton died in September 2021, aged 89. The German migrant made a will in November 2020 naming the Sydney Opera House Trust as sole beneficiary. It was her wish that the funds be used for the promotion of performances of German classical music. The 2020 will superseded a will from 2019, leaving everything to her friend Isabelle Agnes Peacock, an aromatherapist she met in 2004 when she started having monthly massages. Easton's Australian ex-husband had died years earlier, and she was unaware of any other living relatives. By about 2009, Easton and Peacock 'had developed a good friendship', Supreme Court Justice James Hmelnitsky said in a decision last year. 'Mrs Peacock would drive Mrs Easton to places she needed to be, such as dental and medical appointments.' Loading Easton was diagnosed with cancer and moved to a NSW aged care facility in 2017. Peacock continued to visit. The elderly woman made a will in December 2017 leaving her estate to a couple with whom she was friends. If they predeceased Easton, everything would go to Peacock. The court heard Easton became upset when the couple moved to Queensland. She executed a new will in May 2019, leaving her estate to Peacock.

The opera lover, the aromatherapist and the $1m inheritance fight
The opera lover, the aromatherapist and the $1m inheritance fight

The Age

time27 minutes ago

  • The Age

The opera lover, the aromatherapist and the $1m inheritance fight

It was a costly court fight over the million-dollar estate of an elderly opera aficionado. An aromatherapist who struck up a friendship with the woman stood to inherit everything if she won. Eva Marie Easton died in September 2021, aged 89. The German migrant made a will in November 2020 naming the Sydney Opera House Trust as sole beneficiary. It was her wish that the funds be used for the promotion of performances of German classical music. The 2020 will superseded a will from 2019, leaving everything to her friend Isabelle Agnes Peacock, an aromatherapist she met in 2004 when she started having monthly massages. Easton's Australian ex-husband had died years earlier, and she was unaware of any other living relatives. By about 2009, Easton and Peacock 'had developed a good friendship', Supreme Court Justice James Hmelnitsky said in a decision last year. 'Mrs Peacock would drive Mrs Easton to places she needed to be, such as dental and medical appointments.' Loading Easton was diagnosed with cancer and moved to a NSW aged care facility in 2017. Peacock continued to visit. The elderly woman made a will in December 2017 leaving her estate to a couple with whom she was friends. If they predeceased Easton, everything would go to Peacock. The court heard Easton became upset when the couple moved to Queensland. She executed a new will in May 2019, leaving her estate to Peacock.

Double Bay waterfront sale falls over, then sells for $2m less
Double Bay waterfront sale falls over, then sells for $2m less

Daily Telegraph

time42 minutes ago

  • Daily Telegraph

Double Bay waterfront sale falls over, then sells for $2m less

A historic sandstone waterfront mansion in Double Bay exchanged at $22m more than a year ago but the sale fell through … now, a new deal has just been done at $20m to a different buyer. The five-bedroom estate on a 978sqm block at 21 Gladswood Gardens, which was the coach house of the Gladswood Estate, has been owned by the MacMahon family since it was bought for $782,000 in 1983. The sold sticker went up last May, and sources say the expat purchaser back then couldn't sell their Hong Kong property so couldn't proceed. Enter Cohen Handler buyer's agent, Tom Penfold, who's scooped it up for his eastern suburbs lady client at $2m less than the original agreed price. MORE: Redfern house doubles in value after reno 'A waterfront in Double Bay for $20m — it's a beautiful old sandstone building,' Penfold said. 'My client fell in love with it straight away and we secured it very quickly. 'She love the rawness and the potential.' He says she will do a sympathetic reno — 'she's not going to go crazy' — and move in. The Double Bay case mirrors another in Vaucluse involving one of multi-millionaire William Wu's properties investment properties. The 32-year-old investor and his property developer mother Jing Wang amassed a $100m portfolio of houses from Bellevue Hill to Vaucluse in 2021, including a six-bedroom, seven-bathroom mansion with eight-car garage at 31 Vaucluse Rd, Vaucluse bought for $13.32m. The home, on an 879sqm block and with sweeping iconic views, went up for sale with a $23.8m guide in 2023 and later exchanged for about $24m. But local sources say that deal, too, fell through. That's just exchanged again via Bradfield BadgerFox Double Bay agents Alexander George and Peter Leipnik for about $21m to a local buyer. MORE: Big price for Nicole Kidman house

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store