European Capital of Culture 2025: Chemnitz relies on citizen participation
There is a major city in Eastern Germany that many Europeans have never heard of: Chemnitz. Now Chemnitz is a European Capital of Culture. This has surprised many people. Loss of industry, emigration, an ageing population, right-wing extremism... Chemnitz has many problems. As a Capital of Culture, the city is now looking for its strengths.
Under the GDR regime, Chemnitz was renamed Karl-Marx-Stadt. Today, the city with a long industrial history has its old name back. The Chemnitz Capital of Culture theme: 'C the unseen!'
What is a "Capital of Culture"? 40 years ago an idea originated in Greece: Each year, a "European City of Culture" is elected. The initial priority was to safeguard the common cultural heritage: The title was awarded to cities with a lot of ancient culture, such as Athens, Paris, Amsterdam and Florence.
However, that has changed since Glasgow 1990: Today, the priorities also include urban development, citizen participation and cultural diversity. More and more cities with economic and social problems are submitting bids. The title "Capital of Culture" is intended to help start a new beginning. The European Union supports the transformation process with funding. Chemnitz won the title for 2025 - together with Nova Gorica in Slovenia and Gorizia in Italy.
Sophie and Cathleen are two of over a thousand volunteers for Capital of Culture Chemnitz. "There are a lot of people who complain," remarks Sophie, "who say that nothing will change here anyway. But that's precisely where you have to step in and say: Of course you can change something, by lending a hand yourself.'
One third of Chemnitzers are over 60. Sophie helps with the 'Dancing Neighbours' project. Alexandra Takats heads "Team Generation" as project manager. The Capital of Culture organisers strive to engage all strata of the population - whether young or old, born in Chemnitz or elsewhere: "We have many socio-cultural projects where the aim is to bring neighbourhoods together, so that newcomers with a migration background can mix with people who have lived here for a long time.'
You have to look at this in the context of the 2018 riots. Chemnitz made headlines back then. After a fatal stabbing, a right-wing extremist mob beat up people that looked foreign. The ultra-right scene is still present in the region today.
Chemnitz is also a stronghold of the AfD - a Eurosceptic party with a strong following - and a critical attitude towards the Capital of Culture project. AfD city councillor Ronny Licht: "Chemnitz is a divided city: The suggestion is that 'the bad guys' on the right fringe are not part of society. Then people keep talking about a 'civil society' that must become loud. That doesn't unite, it divides.'
The organisers of the Capital of Culture see things differently. Project Manager Capacity Building, Pascal Anselmi: "If you try to get actively involved in your neighbourhood, that's culture for me. The will to move something, to change something, to create something new. Don't be passive - instead say: This is my city, I get involved, I participate. And that, of course, is democracy in the best sense of the word.'
This is also the view of sociologist Ulf Bohmann from Chemnitz University of Technology: "The Chemnitz Capital of Culture bid has a clear focus on social issues. This can really change the city in the long term - through working together. Culture can be used to try out democratic coexistence and make people more resistant to right-wing extremism.'
One of the most important Capital of Culture projects is called "Living Neighbourhood". There are festivals in garages and parks, money for community projects where people can redesign their neighbourhoods according to their own ideas... The Chemnitz cultural recipe is simple: Get close to people, join in - and discover culture in everyday life.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
a few seconds ago
- Euronews
What does France's decision to recognize Palestine mean?
Whether seen as reckless or bold, French President Emmanuel Macron's decision to recognize Palestine as a state could have some consequences in the future. The French president said in a letter to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and posted on X that he will formalize the decision at the U.N. General Assembly in September. 'France will rally in favour of the implementation of the two-state solution, Israel and Palestine, living side by side in peace and security,' Macron wrote. 'This solution is the only path forward which allows us to respond to the legitimate aspirations of Israelis as well as Palestinians,' he added. But what does recognizing Palestine mean? Why does it matter? And what is likely to happen? WHAT DOES IT MEAN? France is the most powerful country in Europe to have said it would recognize a Palestinian state, soon joining 147 states that have already done so. It will also join the 11 European countries, which officially recognize Palestinian statehood, including Spain, Ireland, Sweden, Romania, Hungary and Bulgaria. For many of these countries, the act of recognition means acknowledging the sovereignty and independence of Palestine in its pre-1967 borders (i.e. in the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem) and establishing full diplomatic relations with the country. France would then join the countries that already host a full-fledged Palestinian embassy. WHY IT (SOMEWHAT) MATTERS? France has Europe's largest Jewish population, as well as the largest Muslim population in Western Europe. As one of the founding fathers of the European Union, its voice carries a lot of weight not only in Europe but also around the world. Its decision to recognize Palestine is likely to put additional pressure on Israel at a time when the word genocide is used by a growing number of historians and legal experts to designate Tel Aviv's war in the Gaza strip. Earlier this week, more than 100 leading organizations including Doctors Without Borders, Amnesty International and Oxfam said that famine is widespread across Gaza. Yet, the humanitarian situation on the ground is unlikely to improve. US-sponsored ceasefire talks in Doha failed after Washington withdrew, saying Hamas was not acting 'in good faith.' 'France's recognition of Palestine sends a signal to Israel that it is paying a political price among its allies for its actions in Gaza,' said Martin Konecny, who runs the European Middle East Project in Brussels. 'It also counters the Israeli effort to erase the possibility of a Palestinian state.' It is also unlikely that such move would have any legal knock-on effect, including on trade relations with Palestine. But Konecny said it could be used in court procedures in the future, at the International Criminal Court or national courts 'where this argument could play a role.' Observers point that Macron is hoping to pressure his European allies, including the United Kingdom, Germany and Italy to take a stance and revive the long-defunct two state-solution, whereby a Palestinian state would be created alongside Israel in the West Bank and Gaza, with East Jerusalem as it capital. This arrangement had been the basis of Israeli-Palestinian negotiations since the 1993 Oslo peace accord. Macron's recognition makes the two-state solution 'even more urgent than before,' Konecny said, but 'additional measures on Israel' will be needed in order to end the war in Gaza as well as the settlement expansion in the West Bank. While the Palestinian authority still advocates for two states, Israel no longer supports this solution to the conflict, nor does its US ally. In fact, settlement activity on the West Bank has further expanded in the past years, rendering the creation of a contiguous Palestinian state impossible. Add to that, President Donald Trump's recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital in 2017, prompting the US embassy to move there from Tel Aviv. The two-state solution advocated by Macron seems highly symbolic and unfeasible as things stand on the ground. On Friday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio also slammed Macron's move to recognise a Palestinian state, calling it a 'reckless decision' that 'only serves Hamas propaganda and sets back peace.' By contrast, many EU governments already support a two-state solution but argue that an official recognition of Palestine should go hand in hand with a long-term solution to the conflict in the Middle East. 'We can no longer accept massacres and famine,' Italy's foreign minister Antonio Tajani told Ansa, the country's press agency on Friday. 'Italy is favourable to the solution of two people and two states but the recognition of a new state of Palestine should be done at the same time as the recognition of a state of Israel by the Palestinians.' While the Palestinian Authority does recognize Israel, Hamas does not. 'What interests us is peace, not the victory of one over the other,' Tajani said. Pressure for a recognition of Palestine has intensified in the UK, with British prime minister Keir Starmer scheduled to hold an emergency call with Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz later today. WHAT IS NEXT? But many political analysts also say Macron's move is a largely symbolic foreign policy tool that would boost the French president's profile but is unlikely to result in any changes to the situation on the ground. The once self-described, all-mighty 'Jupiter' president has focused his last possible term on foreign policy leaving his embattled prime minister dealing with France's mammoth budget deficit and controversial retirement reform. 'It is important for France's foreign policy but not for the Palestinians,' said Maria Luisa Frantappié, who heads the Mediterranean, Middle East and Africa Programme at Italy's think tank Instituto Affari Internazionali. 'It will mainly boost France's credibility,' she said, especially among the global South actors. 'The danger is that a lot of diplomatic energy will focus on something that is totally inadequate in the face of what we are seeing in the ground,' Konecny said. Both analysts agreed that a much more consequential action would be for Europe, which has been historically sidelined in attempting to mediate a political solution to the conflict, to review its trade ties with Israel through the EU-Israel association agreement. But the EU is far too divided on the issue. Earlier this month, the EU's foreign affairs ministers decided to delay agreeing on a list of 10 options to respond to Israel's action in Gaza during a meeting of the Foreign Affairs Council. They also agreed to 'keep a close watch' on Israel's compliance with a recent agreement to improve humanitarian aid access into Gaza. Last but not least, a shift in position would need to come from Germany, a country that has so far been governed by the so-called 'Staatsraison,' a sense of responsibility towards Israel which comes from the legacy of the Nazi Holocaust. So far, Germany has no plans to follow in on Macron's footsteps in the short term. On Friday, Stefan Kornelius, a government spokesman told German media that Germany continues to regard the recognition of Palestine as "one of the final steps on the path to achieving a two-state solution." At the same time, the German government is also "prepared to increase the pressure" if no progress is made in resolving the conflict, Kornelius said.
France 24
3 hours ago
- France 24
Iran meets European powers amid threats of UN sanctions snapback
The meeting in Istanbul was the first since Israel's mid-June attack on Iran, which sparked a 12-day war and targeted key nuclear and military sites. The European diplomats were seen leaving the Iranian consulate in the city, the venue for the talks, shortly before 2:00 pm (1100 GMT), after several hours inside. There was no immediate information given by either side about the meeting. Israel's offensive -- which killed top commanders, nuclear scientists and hundreds of others as residential areas were struck as well -- also derailed US-Iran nuclear talks that began in April. Since then, the European powers, known as the E3, have threatened to trigger the "snapback mechanism", which would reinstate UN sanctions on Iran by the end of August, under the moribund 2015 nuclear deal. The option to trigger the snapback expires in October, and Tehran has warned of consequences should the E3 opt to activate it. "Inaction by the E3 is not an option," a European source said, noting that Tehran would be reminded during the meeting that the snapback window closes within months. The source said Europeans were preparing to trigger the mechanism "in the absence of a negotiated solution" and called on Iran to make "clear gestures" regarding uranium enrichment and the resumption of cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog. Ahead of the talks on Friday, Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said the meeting would be a "test of realism for the Europeans and a valuable opportunity to correct their views on Iran's nuclear issue", in remarks to the official IRNA news agency. Sanctions Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi, who attended the talks Friday alongside senior Iranian diplomat Majid Takht-Ravanchi, warned this week that triggering sanctions "is completely illegal". He also accused European powers of "halting their commitments" to the deal after the United States unilaterally withdrew in 2018 during President Donald Trump's first term. "We have warned them of the risks, but we are still seeking common ground to manage the situation," said Gharibabadi. Iranian diplomats have previously warned that Tehran could withdraw from the global nuclear non-proliferation treaty if UN sanctions are reimposed. Restoring sanctions would deepen Iran's international isolation and place further pressure on its already strained economy. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar has urged European powers to trigger the mechanism. Israel's June 13 attack on Iran came two days before Tehran and Washington were scheduled to meet for a sixth round of nuclear negotiations. On June 22, the United States joined Israel's offensive by striking Iranian nuclear facilities at Fordo, Isfahan, and Natanz. Before the war, Washington and Tehran were divided over uranium enrichment, which Iran has described as a "non-negotiable" right, while the United States called it a "red line". The International Atomic Energy Agency says Iran is enriching uranium to 60 percent purity -- far above the 3.67 percent cap under the 2015 deal and close to weapons-grade levels. Tehran has said it is open to discussing the rate and level of enrichment, but not the right to enrich uranium. A year after the US withdrawal from the nuclear deal, Iran began rolling back its commitments, which had placed restrictions on its nuclear activities in exchange for sanctions relief. Israel and Western powers accuse Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons, a charge Tehran has repeatedly denied. 'Unshakable' Iran insists it will not abandon its nuclear programme, with Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi saying that "Iran's position remains unshakable, and that our uranium enrichment will continue". Araghchi has previously noted that enrichment was "stopped" due to "serious and severe" damage to nuclear sites caused by US and Israeli strikes. The full extent of the damage sustained in the US bombing remains unclear. Trump has claimed the sites were "completely destroyed", but US media reports based on Pentagon assessments have cast doubt over the scale of destruction. Since the 12-day war, Iran has suspended cooperation with the IAEA, accusing it of bias and failing to condemn the attacks. Inspectors have since left the country but a technical team is expected to return in the coming weeks after Iran said future cooperation would take a "new form". Israel has warned it may resume strikes if Iran rebuilds facilities or moves toward weapons capability.
Local France
3 hours ago
- Local France
French anger over toxic chemical in farmers' bill piles pressure on Macron
On July 10th, a 23-year-old master's student launched a petition urging the French government to drop legislation allowing the reintroduction of acetamiprid, a pesticide that is harmful to ecosystems but popular with many farmers in Europe. Banned in France since 2018, the chemical remains legal in the European Union, and proponents say French farmers need it to help them compete. Support for the petition spread like, with university lecturers, actors, left-wing lawmakers and star chefs backing it. It had racked up more than 1.9 million signatures by Friday morning. The controversial legislation is dubbed the Loi Duplomb, after its author, Laurent Duplomb, a senator for the right-wing Les Républicains. The bill was adopted on July 8th, but without a proper debate, to bypass gridlock in a divided parliament. Signatories of the petition have urged President Emmanuel Macron not to sign it into law. The petition calls the legislation a 'frontal attack on public health'. But supporters say their frustration goes beyond environmental concerns. Commentators speculate that it may be a sign of exasperation with deadlock in a hung parliament and a desire to have a greater say in political matters. Elodie Germain, 46, said the mobilisation represents a form of 'democratic revenge', after Macron forced a controversial pension reform through parliament in 2023 and dissolved the lower chamber last year, sparking political turmoil that resulted in a hung parliament. READ ALSO French farmers dump manure and throw eggs in petition counter-protest 'There is of course an environmental aspect behind my signature, but there is also a lot of frustration,' said Germain. Advertisement 'After the pension reform and the dissolution, here we have another example of a bill being forced through parliament.' Francois Veillerette, of environmental association Generations Futures, struck a similar note. 'People have felt for months that they are not being listened to,' he said. Such is the success of the mobilisation that representatives of France's culinary world, usually reticent about airing political views, published an open letter calling for the withdrawal of the legislation and a moratorium on pesticide use. 'We are appalled by the blindness of our politicians and their now all-too-obvious ties to the agro-industry,' said the letter, which has collected signatures from nearly 400 people, including Michelin-starred chefs and restaurateurs. 'We, restaurateurs, work hard, we keep our mouths shut and get on with it,' said Glenn Viel, a celebrated three-star Michelin chef. 'But at some point, you have to bang your fist on the table.' Jacques Marcon, another three-star Michelin chef, said he was ready to become 'a true activist for the agricultural and environmental cause'. Newspaper Le Monde said the petition had put politicians on edge. 'The unprecedentedly large grassroots movement making itself heard on environmental issues through the now-famous petition has caught everyone off guard,' it said in an editorial. The petition has drawn attention to parliament's 'shortcomings', it added. In France, if a petition submitted on the National Assembly's website reaches 500,000 signatures, parliament's lower house may choose to hold a public debate, limited to the content of the petition. While any review of the legislation is unlikely at this stage, the government is under increasing pressure to respond to the public anger. Advertisement France has a long history of mass protests, including the yellow vest protests for economic justice. The grassroots movement began in 2018 with a petition calling for lower fuel prices. Several left-wing parties and environmental associations have urged Macron to demand a 'new deliberation' of the legislation in parliament. On Wednesday, Macron said he would wait for the conclusions of the Constitutional Council, due to rule on the validity of the legislation by August 10th, according to the government spokeswoman. Experts warn that if no solution is found, the situation could breed even more frustration. Guillaume Gourgues, a lecturer in political science at the University of Lyon 2, who signed the petition, said it was 'completely abnormal' that there was no outlet in France for 'a mobilisation of this magnitude'. 'No one has the slightest idea what this will achieve,' he said, referring to the proposed parliamentary debate. Gally Vangeenberghe, a 21-year-old sales assistant from the northern city of Lille, said the fact the legislation had been adopted without debate was 'heresy'. 'I find it unacceptable.'
