logo
Letters: Calling Donald Trump ‘inhumane' over detention facility ignores reality

Letters: Calling Donald Trump ‘inhumane' over detention facility ignores reality

Chicago Tribune10-07-2025
After reading Bob Kustra's op-ed on Sunday ('Trump's ethnic cleansing is proof of man's inhumanity to man'), I felt that the only thing I could agree with was that Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents should follow a more judicious approach in the way they apprehend immigrants. Nobody likes to be falsely accused.
The detention facility in Florida nicknamed Alligator Alcatraz is providing air conditioning for the detainees. Calling President Donald Trump an 'inhumane' person hardly applies when it is the president's responsibility to deal with people who are grossly disrespectful of our borders and sovereignty.
Aren't Americans who are indifferent to the suffering of their fellow Americans inhumane? Such as those living on the street or, worse yet, homeless veterans? (Those two words should never come together.) And yet, Kustra never references them. I don't know if I understand his implied disdain for his fellow citizens.
Years ago, immigrants were brought in to pick seasonal crops; afterward, they returned to their homelands peacefully. Now, some of them think that they are entitled. Really?
Last month, a letter writer suggested that immigrants should demonstrate in the cities south of the border where the problem originates ('March in home countries,' June 12). Great idea,Op-ed writer Bob Kustra speaks thoughtfully and forcefully to the Donald Trump administration's cruel response to the immigration 'crisis.' This crisis, he reminds us, would have been eased by the U.S. Citizenship Act of 2021, had it not been deliberately shot down by Republican leadership so Trump could then run on the immigration issue and produce the Immigration and Customs Enforcement horror show we're now witnessing. With the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' signed into law July 4, the atrocities will only multiply, and we will all feel the pain.
I am so grateful to Kustra. Republican voices like his (Kustra served two terms as lieutenant governor of Illinois) need to be amplified. Other Republicans — who serve or have served in office, hold leadership in finance, business, law or their community, Trump voters who hoped he was all bluster when it came to some of his wilder proclamations and whose values are not being represented by this administration — you have an important perspective and one that we all need to hear. Please talk with your neighbors, your friends and your family. Write letters to the editor. Post on social media. Speak at a town hall. Attend a rally. Join an organization that's working to protect our democracy and whose values you share. You are not alone.I was pleasantly surprised to read Bob Kustra's op-ed.
I worked for Lt. Gov. Kustra in the early 1990s. Although I was a Democrat, I squared voting for him and Gov. Jim Edgar for reelection in 1994 to save my job (obviously) but also because of the programs we ran out of his office: Serve Illinois and AmeriCorps (youth and young adult volunteer programs now on the Donald Trump administration's chopping block), circuit breaker (that helped seniors pay utility bills), Keep Illinois Beautiful (promoting conservation and pollution cleanup) and many others that made a positive difference in people's lives.
I was sad when Kustra resigned to become a radio host, but I'm so happy that he found his voice in the world of media after all at Boise State Public Radio. I'm delighted that he is using that platform to amplify the barbarous acts perpetrated on people in America by the Trump administration.
As to his last paragraph, ever since a below-zero cold protest on Feb. 17, I have been in the streets with fierce objections to the Trump administration. I'm glad Kustra has joined our ranks!A gunman, Ryan Louis Mosqueda, was killed at the border after he fired dozens of rounds at federal agents at a Border Patrol facility in McAllen, Texas. Why was this story buried in Section 2, Page 6, of the July 8 Tribune? And has there been one word of outrage from House Democratic leadership and Democratic representatives from Texas or elsewhere in the U.S.?
The efforts to stop Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents from doing their jobs has finally led to a death. And I pray there won't be more. But I doubt it.
I'm very disappointed in the Tribune for the biased way it has handled this subject and many more conservative issues. The bias shows in the number of left-leaning letters published each day. So much for being fair and balanced.
This year, we decided to give the Tribune a try, so we subscribed. I am so shocked at the strong left slant.They travel in unmarked cars. They display no badges. They cover their faces and mostly wear sunglasses. There is no accountability to local police or courts. No one knows who they really are, what their qualifications are or what training they have had. The criteria used to choose their targets is a mystery. And the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' provides their budget with $75 billion with no oversight.
It surely seems that Immigration and Customs Enforcement is becoming Trump's secret police. The question becomes, after immigrants: What group do they go after next?In recent days, I've seen posts online celebrating the use of the ICEBlock app to submit false immigration reports for 'fun.' One person joked about reporting locations that sell frozen water. Another called it 'entertainment.'
This isn't patriotism — it's cowardice wrapped in cruelty, and it's everything the Founding Fathers warned us against.
Weaponizing misinformation to harass immigrant families isn't clever — it's dangerous. It turns fear into a game and treats people like prey, simply because they were born elsewhere. Many of these families contribute daily to our communities, our economy and our culture. They deserve safety — not to be hunted for sport by bored nationalists.
But this cruelty doesn't stop with immigrants. It endangers the very Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents these same people claim to support. Flooding the system with false reports wastes resources, clogs operations and increases the risk of mistakes in already-volatile environments. ICE agents already have a difficult job. Sabotaging their work for a laugh doesn't make you a patriot; it makes you reckless.
James Madison once said, 'Liberty may be endangered by the abuses of liberty as well as by the abuses of power.' You are abusing liberty. And while you're at it, you're betraying the very ideals this country was founded on.
This nation was built on the backs of immigrants — many welcomed, many not. What defines us is how we treat those with the least power. The shame isn't in being outraged by cruelty. The shame is in watching it happen and calling it 'fun.'
When future generations ask what we did during a time of fear and division, may our answer be this: We stood up. We spoke out. We refused to be silent while our neighbors were hunted for sport.
Justice won't be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are.
This is my outrage. And it's time others found theirs, too.I dare any reader not to see Sophie Levenson's June 30 Tribune story concerning the reunion of a Chicago couple owing to yet another Immigration and Customs Enforcement mistake as a thorough indictment of President Donald Trump and his administration's policies on immigration enforcement ('Mistake by ICE puts woman's husband in jail ICE').
Who's going to recover the $12,000 this family has had to pay to the legal system for ICE getting it wrong? How many more stories are out there like this one? How many more taxpayer dollars will be wasted to pay for these false arrests and all the costs associated with them in travel and detention? What is our nation's leadership doing?
This about providing safety. It's all about a cruel, cynical, selfish and evil grab for power and money from each and every one of us.
! Never stop speaking up and protesting. It's our only hope.An analysis by economists cited by Bloomberg News would have us believe that fewer immigrants in our country this year will mean a drop in the gross domestic product by 0.8 percentage point.
In actuality, according to the Center for Immigration Studies, illegal immigration is a $68,000 lifetime fiscal drain per immigrant.As we rush to close our southern border and deport thousands of unnamed individuals, I would like to take a moment to express gratitude to Mexico for its support during the devastating flooding in Texas. The Acuna Civil Protection and Fire Department Water Rescue Team and Fundacion 911, both based in Mexico, sent people to join in the search and rescue efforts following the overflow of the Guadalupe River.
It is important to name these groups. Honoring and showing gratitude to those who step up to help others regardless of their origins is one sign of a civilized society that recognizes the worth of all human beings. It is the right thing to do. Our leadership spends its time implying anyone with origins south of our border is less than honorable and must be deported regardless of their contributions, just to feel powerful.
Let's hope that one day, the U.S. will revert to the honorable nation it once was.There is an exceptional amount of animus toward President Donald Trump and the GOP for the One Big Beautiful Bill Act that was just passed and signed into law. There is also a lot of confusion as to what the bill provides, what it removes and what increases to our already immense debt will be the result. The double talk that is presented by both Republicans and Democrats alike is pathetic.
Can we not be addressed with straight talk? Since the analysis by the Congressional Budget Office, the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and others project that this bill, now the law of our land, will pile on much more debt over the next 10 years that is seemingly insurmountable.
Is it too much to ask our elected representatives to shoot us straight and give it to us in a direct manner so that we the people may understand and absorb the consequences that will befall us? Can we not receive a simple cash flow projection of revenue, essential spending need, interest payment and principal debt reduction for each upcoming year for a three-year period? What we get is politicians from each party putting their spin on the details to generate the reaction and acceptance they want. We're left to decipher the difference between fact and fiction.
A case in point is the concerns by Democrats over the reduction in Medicaid. The projection is that more than 11 million people will lose benefits. First is to understand exactly what existed and what the changes are. Are there ineligible people in the program? How many 'very capable' people are abusing the system by choosing not to work? Are these the 11 million people who will no longer have access to Medicaid? If so, is this appropriate in our country in this day and age?
Considering we are in debt over our eyeballs, it is incumbent upon our elected representatives to review every single dollar that has been appropriated and immediately cut every program in every department that is not .
Further, and as much as this is painful, many programs that were implemented by the federal government must now revert back to the state and local governments. The reality is that over the last 100 years, our government has become a bloated bureaucracy. It is inefficient.
It is well past time that our government becomes a lean, efficient machine.I don't recall ever being so revolted as I was by the high-fives and jubilation shown by the GOP members who just took food out of the mouths of our poorest children, health care from millions of people and Medicaid from more millions of people in addition to cutting funding for crucial medical research that saves lives.
How is that anything to celebrate and/or to be proud of?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republicans are afraid of Mamdani in New York. That's a good thing.
Republicans are afraid of Mamdani in New York. That's a good thing.

USA Today

time25 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Republicans are afraid of Mamdani in New York. That's a good thing.

Republicans think Zohran Mamdani will turn NYC into a socialist mecca because they forgot what a functioning government looks like. We're a few months out from New York City's municipal election, and Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani is still the frontrunner in the mayoral race. It's a positive sign for progressives who want to see democratic socialists transform the party. In a July poll by Zenith Research and Public Progress Solutions, Mamdani received 50% of support while the rest of the candidates trailed behind. Former Democratic governor Andrew Cuomo, who is now running as an independent, received 22% of support, followed by Republican Curtis Sliwa at 13%. Current Mayor Eric Adams, who is also running as an independent, received just 7% support. Mamdani may be polling well, but his path to victory in November is anything but smooth. There are already five anti-Mamdani PACs that have formed since the primary, backed by business moguls and real estate tycoons who warn that the Democratic nominee would be bad for the city's economy. He's also having to answer for some of his previous posts about 'defunding the police' and comments on Israel. Republicans criticizing Mamdani for 'defund police' comment are hypocritical The biggest criticism of Mamdani has come from his previous comments about the New York City Police Department. In the wake of George Floyd's murder in 2020, Mamdani posted to X that the NYPD was 'racist, anti-queer & a major threat to public safety' and called for defunding the force. Mamdani has also proposed creating a Department of Community Safety separate from the police department, which would respond to mental health calls. But the Democratic nominee is attempting to distance himself from these previous claims, calling the posts 'out of step' with his current stance on public safety. He recently met with the family of Officer Didarul Islam, one of the four people killed in a recent shooting in Midtown Manhattan. Republicans criticizing him seem more than willing to ignore the way President Donald Trump pardoned Jan. 6 rioters who attacked police officers, or his own criminal convictions. But he is the "law and order" president, for sure. And the GOP is the "law and order" party, right? Voters are increasingly agreeing with Mamdani on Gaza Another criticism from the right is that Mamdani is too critical of Israel. Fox News recently resurrected a clip of Mamdani from a 2024 panel where the mayoral candidate claimed, 'Israel is not a place, it is not a country.' Mamdani seems to be taking these attacks to heart. He recently said he would not use the phrase 'globalize the intifada,' and would also discourage others from using it. Mamdani had previously refused to condemn the phrase. On the other hand, Mamdani's criticisms of Israel proved to be popular with voters in the Democratic primary. A poll from Data for Progress and the Institute for Middle East Understanding Policy Project found that his 'support for Palestinian rights' was important for 96% of his voters, while his 'willingness to criticize the Israeli government' was important to 88% of his voters. Opinion: People are starving in Gaza. Why are we so comfortable just letting that happen? While conservatives are trying to attack Mamdani for his previous stances on Israel and his sympathy for the Palestinian people, it doesn't seem like it'll work. Democrats should listen to their voters, not conservatives, to know how to approach this issue. Only 8% of Democrats support Israel's actions in Gaza, according to a recent Gallup poll, while 71% of Republicans support it. Some Republicans are even breaking with the party to denounce mass starvation in the region, including Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Georgia, who recently called the crisis a "genocide." Republicans are afraid of what Mamdani stands for. Good. Mamdani won the primary largely thanks to his mobilization of young voters. It worked out for him: voters under 40 made up 40% of early voting turnout. Now, the question is whether they'll turn out for the general election. I'm hopeful that they will. I have personally seen the way my generation has reacted to Mamdani's campaign. There is a palpable excitement reminiscent of Barack Obama's first run for the presidency, an excitement fueled by the idea that the Democratic Party can change, in spite of itself. Opinion: Zohran Mamdani rallied Gen Z voters. We can't abandon him now. The reasons conservatives are criticizing Mamdani are the reasons people my age voted for him. We believe in moving funding from the NYPD into areas like mental health care and community building. We support Palestinian rights. We want to see that working-class New Yorkers can remain in this city. We see taxing corporations and the wealthy as a good thing. Some may call these things unrealistic, and they may have a point. There's no way New York City becomes a socialist utopia if Mamdani is elected, since he must work with the city council, state and national governments to achieve many of his campaign priorities. But his very election could signal to the Democratic Party that they should run to, not from, progressive politics. Mamdani's path to victory is not an easy one. He will continue to face criticism from the right throughout the next few months. But if polling is any indication, he's still likely to be the next mayor of the largest city in the United States. Follow USA TODAY columnist Sara Pequeño on X, formerly Twitter, @sara__pequeno

How Democrats can stop talking past each other and start winning
How Democrats can stop talking past each other and start winning

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

How Democrats can stop talking past each other and start winning

A second group of moderates, including important donors, are libertarians who endorse ' Advertisement The third group of moderate Democrats yearns to turn back the clock to the New Deal coalition. A chief spokesperson is Ruy Teixeira of the Liberal Patriot newsletter. '[T]he New Deal Democrats were moderate and even small-c conservative in their social outlook,' he Advertisement Beginning in the 1970s, college-educated progressives began to focus on issues involving race, gender, the environment, and sexual freedom. Teixeira This brings us to the only moderate position that holds promise for Democrats: defining moderate as being pragmatic, rather than doctrinaire. College-educated progressives need to recognize that their priorities and their cultural values don't match those of most Americans. In 2024, inflation and the economy were Advertisement Centering that economic message is the first pragmatic step in rebuilding Democrats' brand to appeal to both college grads and noncollege grads. The second step is to recognize that cultural preferences differ across class lines. Non-elites value self-discipline because they need to get up every day, on time, without an attitude, to work at jobs with little autonomy. Consequently, they highly value traditional institutions that anchor self-discipline: religion, the military, the family. Those same institutions offer non-elites sources of social status independent of their subordinate positions in a capitalist economy. Blue-collar values reflect blue-collar lives. That's why, on cultural issues, college-educated progressives need to stop demanding a mind-meld with the Democratic Party. If you're playing to win, politics requires not purity but an ability to build coalitions with people whose values may differ from yours in fundamental ways. Democrats need to treat voters without college degrees as respected coalition partners, making tradeoffs. Advertisement This doesn't mean that progressives need to abandon their values; it means they have to act on them. Here are two uncomfortable facts: Progressive activists as a group are much

I didn't want to need free groceries
I didn't want to need free groceries

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

I didn't want to need free groceries

So I share Kidder's lament that feeding the hungry is on track to be a growth industry in Donald Trump's America. The Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Experience first. Before 2009, as the son of a judge and the privileged middle class, I'd never been unemployed and in need of charity in three decades of working. I loved what I did, even though freelance writing is a constant scramble for income. I've always read a book before bed; as a freelancer, I chose only books for which I was earning a reviewer's paycheck. Advertisement When the recession and its double-digit unemployment hit, the 'subprime mortgages,' 'mortgage-backed securities,' and unregulated 'shadow banks' that underlay them — and that many Americans had never heard of — unleashed work-killing forces too devastating for individual initiative to counter. Even wealthy Harvard scrapped a lucrative project (by my bank account's standards) that I'd done for four straight summers. My then-wife's part-time job invaluably backstopped the family income. But after a year of little work and with no idea how long I'd be idle, I despaired of ever being employed again. Free groceries to stretch our household resources seemed the only responsible path, especially with a child to feed. Advertisement The other folks in St. Paul's basement made for an interesting cross-section of people. Some were fellow baby boomers. The age and dress of others suggested they were students, presumably not destitute but nevertheless on a budget as they contended with Greater Boston's formidable living costs. No one dressed in rags. (Neither did the recipients Kidder observed, which he attributes to their efforts 'to ward off disgrace' from having to seek charity.) My anxious heart beat fast during my first time at the pantry. Normally a chatterbox, I made little small talk with others. It took a number of weeks before the habitual visits and the saintly volunteers' freedom from judgment thawed some of my embarrassment. I also found psychic balm in the relief of free food for my household's budget. Not everyone adjusted as easily. At least one person at the pantry teared up at having to seek aid in public. I never saw her return. Advertisement The volunteers who set out and distributed food never questioned who we were or why we were there. Hard hearts will call that poor quality control. Those who know better, who relied on the kindness of these strangers, recognize it as mindfulness of recipients' dignity. Today, those who do such work can't fully backfill the Beautiful Bill's shrinkage of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly called food stamps). Kidder notes that the national food bank network Feeding America says SNAP supplied nine times as much food as its own agency's food banks do. That the bill's backers had not just food support but the broader safety net in their sights is clear from the legislation's attaching work requirements to Medicaid. Two years ago, perhaps anticipating this dark American moment, Republican Representative Steve Scalise Yet do work. Work requirements Perhaps if our leaders saw who goes to food pantries and why — perhaps if they spent a week or two living as pantry patrons — the mythic myopia would lift from their eyes. But there are none so blind as those who will not see. Advertisement

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store