UNESCO: New World Heritage Sites to be announced
For 10 years now, King Ludwig II's Bavarian palaces have been at the top of Germany's wish list for new additions. Perched high above the edge of the Alps, Neuschwanstein Castle is one of Germany's most famous buildings. With its many towers, it looks like something out of a fairy tale. This "dream in stone" draws more than 1 million visitors from across the globe every year.
Commissioned by King Ludwig II of Bavaria (1845-1886), construction on Neuschwanstein castle began in 1869. Originally intended as a private residence for the king, it was never completed. This picturesque palace owned by the federal state of Bavaria is also famous for its pompous interior design.
Many German World Heritage Sites
From Aachen Cathedral to the Zollverein Coal Mine Industrial Complex, there have already been more than 50 German World Heritage Sites listed since the 1970s, when UNESCO passed the World Heritage Convention. The catalyst at the time was the loss of cultural artifacts during World War II.
However, the decisive factor was the construction of the Aswan High Dam by the Egyptian government in the 1960s, which would have flooded the world-famous temples of Abu Simbel. The agreement, which around 195 countries have ratified, is tasked with protecting cultural and natural sights of universal value.
Currently, there are 1,223 World Heritage Sites, of which 952 are cultural heritage and 231 are natural heritage.
The World Heritage Committee's perspective extends far beyond Germany. This year, 32 cultural landmarks from countries across the globe have been nominated, including the ancient Khuttal region in Tajikistan, the Caribbean underwater city of Port Royal in Jamaica, the modernist center of Gdynia in Poland and the memorial sites for the victims of the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia.
Indian fortresses soon to be World Heritage Sites?
India has nominated an ensemble of ancient fortresses to be World Heritage Sites. These impressive castles, located in the states of Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu, represent the military power of the Maratha Empire, which controlled large parts of the Indian subcontinent from the 17th to the 19th century.
Among other sites, the United Arab Emirates has nominated the Faya Palaeolandscape as a remarkable example of a Stone Age desert landscape. South Korea submitted the Daegokcheon Stream Petroglyphs, which are mysterious prehistoric rock engravings. Russia opted for the rock paintings in the Shulgan-Tash Cave in the southern Ural Mountains, which are more than 20,000 years old. China submitted the Western Xia Imperial Tombs, an example of cultural heritage from the Tangut civilization and one of the largest necropolises in the world.
The UNESCO World Heritage Site list currently includes 1,223 cultural and natural heritage sites in 168 countries, 56 of which are at risk of being destroyed. The worldwide ranking has been criticized widely, especially in scientific circles. As Christoph Brumann from the Max-Planck-Institute for Social Anthropology in Halle puts it, "How objective can this type of ranking ever be?'
UNESCO ranking faces criticism
Brumann has questioned the decision-making process by citing his research into the consequences of World Heritage Site designation for the affected regions. The most common effect is mass tourism.
"The local population could profit from this, but often times, the negative consequences far outweigh the positive ones," Brumann is quoted in the MaxPlanckResearch science magazine. His book "The Best We Share: Nation, Culture and World-Making in the UNESCO World Heritage Arena" was published in 2021.
The World Heritage Committee, comprised of elected representatives from the 21 member states of the World Heritage Convention, will also discuss the growing threat to existing World Heritage Sites in Paris, such as threats coming from armed conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, natural disasters, environmental pollution, poaching or uncontrolled tourism. According to a recent study by UNESCO and the World Resources Institute, water scarcity and flooding currently pose significant threats to almost three-quarters of all World Heritage Sites.
One in five landmarks is stuck in a cycle of water scarcity and flooding. This includes the Taj Mahal in India, which is at risk of sinking due to a drop in groundwater level. After massive flooding in 2022, Yellowstone National Park in the US had to be closed. According to reports, rebuilding the infrastructure would cost more than $20 million (€17 million). The most affected regions are the Middle East, North Africa, parts of South Asia, and northern China.
Meanwhile, back at Neuschwanstein Castle in Bavaria, the decisions made in Paris are eagerly awaited. If the palace is recognized as a World Heritage Site, it will probably draw even more tourists. What the Bavarian Administration of Palaces may find more important, however, is the worldwide recognition that would come with the award.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times of Oman
5 days ago
- Times of Oman
Oman participates in 47th session of World Heritage Committee
Paris: The Sultanate of Oman is taking part in the 47th session of the World Heritage Committee--a body of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)--currently being held at the UNESCO's headquarters in Paris. Oman's delegation at the meeting is led by Amina Salim Al Balushi, Permanent Delegate of the Sultanate of Oman to UNESCO. The session looks into the registration of more than 30 new sites on the World Heritage List during the session. It also reviews the status of 250 registered sites in order to assess the environmental and development challenges posed to the sites. The session includes working sessions on various issues related to UN-registered heritage sites, including the impact of climate change on those sites, ways to engage local communities in protecting the sites, developing sustainable management methods for the conservation of sites at risk and assessing the competitiveness of national and international plans aimed at preserving the exceptional values of sites included in the World Heritage List. Oman's participation in the session stems from its commitment to protecting cultural and natural heritage and passing this dedication over to future generations. It also consolidates Oman's international presence in cultural forums, supports the country's current and future heritage portfolios and affirms its commitment to the principles of the "International Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage". Omani sites registered in the World Heritage List include Bahla Fort (in 1987), the archaeological sites of Bat, Al Khatm and Al Ayn (in 1988), five aflaj--traditional irrigation systems (in 2006), sites codenamed "the Land of Frankincense" (in 2000) and the ancient city of Qalhat (in 2018).
Times of Oman
5 days ago
- Times of Oman
UNESCO: New World Heritage Sites to be announced
Paris: In just a few days, the palaces of King Ludwig II of Bavaria could be added to the UNESCO World Heritage Site list. Alongside 31 other sights around the world, Neuschwanstein Castle, Linderhof Palace, the King's House on Schachen and the Herrenchiemsee palace complex have been nominated for inclusion. Decisions will be made at the 47th session of the World Heritage Committee in Paris, which ends on July 16. For 10 years now, King Ludwig II's Bavarian palaces have been at the top of Germany's wish list for new additions. Perched high above the edge of the Alps, Neuschwanstein Castle is one of Germany's most famous buildings. With its many towers, it looks like something out of a fairy tale. This "dream in stone" draws more than 1 million visitors from across the globe every year. Commissioned by King Ludwig II of Bavaria (1845-1886), construction on Neuschwanstein castle began in 1869. Originally intended as a private residence for the king, it was never completed. This picturesque palace owned by the federal state of Bavaria is also famous for its pompous interior design. Many German World Heritage Sites From Aachen Cathedral to the Zollverein Coal Mine Industrial Complex, there have already been more than 50 German World Heritage Sites listed since the 1970s, when UNESCO passed the World Heritage Convention. The catalyst at the time was the loss of cultural artifacts during World War II. However, the decisive factor was the construction of the Aswan High Dam by the Egyptian government in the 1960s, which would have flooded the world-famous temples of Abu Simbel. The agreement, which around 195 countries have ratified, is tasked with protecting cultural and natural sights of universal value. Currently, there are 1,223 World Heritage Sites, of which 952 are cultural heritage and 231 are natural heritage. The World Heritage Committee's perspective extends far beyond Germany. This year, 32 cultural landmarks from countries across the globe have been nominated, including the ancient Khuttal region in Tajikistan, the Caribbean underwater city of Port Royal in Jamaica, the modernist center of Gdynia in Poland and the memorial sites for the victims of the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia. Indian fortresses soon to be World Heritage Sites? India has nominated an ensemble of ancient fortresses to be World Heritage Sites. These impressive castles, located in the states of Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu, represent the military power of the Maratha Empire, which controlled large parts of the Indian subcontinent from the 17th to the 19th century. Among other sites, the United Arab Emirates has nominated the Faya Palaeolandscape as a remarkable example of a Stone Age desert landscape. South Korea submitted the Daegokcheon Stream Petroglyphs, which are mysterious prehistoric rock engravings. Russia opted for the rock paintings in the Shulgan-Tash Cave in the southern Ural Mountains, which are more than 20,000 years old. China submitted the Western Xia Imperial Tombs, an example of cultural heritage from the Tangut civilization and one of the largest necropolises in the world. The UNESCO World Heritage Site list currently includes 1,223 cultural and natural heritage sites in 168 countries, 56 of which are at risk of being destroyed. The worldwide ranking has been criticized widely, especially in scientific circles. As Christoph Brumann from the Max-Planck-Institute for Social Anthropology in Halle puts it, "How objective can this type of ranking ever be?' UNESCO ranking faces criticism Brumann has questioned the decision-making process by citing his research into the consequences of World Heritage Site designation for the affected regions. The most common effect is mass tourism. "The local population could profit from this, but often times, the negative consequences far outweigh the positive ones," Brumann is quoted in the MaxPlanckResearch science magazine. His book "The Best We Share: Nation, Culture and World-Making in the UNESCO World Heritage Arena" was published in 2021. The World Heritage Committee, comprised of elected representatives from the 21 member states of the World Heritage Convention, will also discuss the growing threat to existing World Heritage Sites in Paris, such as threats coming from armed conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, natural disasters, environmental pollution, poaching or uncontrolled tourism. According to a recent study by UNESCO and the World Resources Institute, water scarcity and flooding currently pose significant threats to almost three-quarters of all World Heritage Sites. One in five landmarks is stuck in a cycle of water scarcity and flooding. This includes the Taj Mahal in India, which is at risk of sinking due to a drop in groundwater level. After massive flooding in 2022, Yellowstone National Park in the US had to be closed. According to reports, rebuilding the infrastructure would cost more than $20 million (€17 million). The most affected regions are the Middle East, North Africa, parts of South Asia, and northern China. Meanwhile, back at Neuschwanstein Castle in Bavaria, the decisions made in Paris are eagerly awaited. If the palace is recognized as a World Heritage Site, it will probably draw even more tourists. What the Bavarian Administration of Palaces may find more important, however, is the worldwide recognition that would come with the award.
Times of Oman
6 days ago
- Times of Oman
Why US chocolate tastes weird to the rest of the world
Berlin: Chocolate fans can attest to the vast range of flavours that this sweet treat has to offer, not only from brand to brand, but also from country to country. Consumer preferences are just as diverse. Cocoa arrived in the North American colonies as a drink from Latin America in the 17th century. The dense, sweet chocolate that is popular today, however, was brought to the New World by Swiss chocolatiers in the second half of the 19th century. Despite their common origins, Swiss and US chocolate taste very different. In the United States, the most successful brands prioritize a long shelf life and a flavor that many European palates take some getting used to. This is partly due to the use of butyric acid, which gives US chocolate a slightly sour note — which is often unsettling to European palates. But the high sugar content and additives such as corn syrup or vegetable fats are also typical of the flavor of American chocolate. "What is also very popular there are large, thick bars with filling," explains German chocolate sommelier Julia Moser. European chocolate makers value traditional recipes In Western Europe — especially in Switzerland, Belgium, France, and Germany — the focus is on fine taste and high quality. Chocolate recipes in the EU, for example, are more strictly regulated than in the US: Milk chocolate must contain at least 25% cocoa solids, and cocoa butter is required as the main fat. Manufacturers rely on traditional processes such as conching, which gives chocolate its fine, creamy texture. "The appreciation for good chocolate is growing here, even though milk chocolate is still the most widely consumed, because that's what most of us are used to from childhood," says Moser. "Dark chocolate only starts to become more popular in adulthood." Growing markets in India and Africa In India and other parts of Asia, chocolate is a relatively new delicacy. Industrial production only began here in the mid-20th century. However, the market is now growing rapidly and is replacing traditional sweets, especially among younger people. "Indian chocolate is considered an insider tip at the moment," says Julia Moser, "The cocoa beans there have a very distinctive fruitiness with a nutty note." Africa, especially West Africa, is the world's largest producer of cocoa. However, chocolate consumption there accounted for only around 4% of the global market in 2018. This is also due to the heat, which makes it very difficult to produce chocolate bars, explains Julia Moser: "People there typically enjoy the fresh pulp of the cocoa beans or make a paste from roasted beans, which they then use to make chocolate drinks." In countries such as Ghana, however, the world's largest cocoa producer after Cote d'Ivoire, interest in locally produced chocolate is growing. In Japan, KitKat bars which come in flavors such as matcha, soy sauce and wasabi have been cult favorites for years. The dark side of chocolate production Despite all the pleasure we derive from delicious and special types of chocolate, we should not forget the dark side of its history: Cocoa's triumphant journey from Latin America to the rest of the world is inextricably linked to colonial exploitation. It was the European colonial powers that deliberately introduced the cocoa plant to their tropical colonies in order to meet growing demand in Europe. Cultivation and harvesting were carried out with the help of the local population — usually under inhumane conditions. And even today, many cocoa farmers are still at the mercy of the power mechanisms of the global market. Despite their hard work, many live in extreme poverty because they are not adequately compensated due to the low prices paid by trading companies.
