
As Bangladesh Army Chief, BNP Resist 'Rohingya Corridor', Yunus Silent But Flags Fund Cuts
Last Updated:
Sources in Bangladesh suggest the Rakhine Corridor idea has not been completely abandoned, and discussions concerning the Rohingya crisis continue
Amid strong opposition from political parties, including the BNP, and the military top brass, Bangladesh's interim government, led by chief adviser Muhammad Yunus, has fallen silent on the proposed Rakhine Corridor talks. However, sources in Bangladesh suggest the idea has not been completely abandoned, and discussions concerning the Rohingya crisis continue.
The army chief, during a private meeting with senior commanders, reportedly expressed serious reservations about the project's strategic and security implications. Political parties, including senior figures of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party, also rejected the idea, citing national security concerns.
'Silent treatment'?
However, the Yunus administration appears to be quietly pursuing the plan, seeking international support through global platforms, emphasising humanitarian grounds. A source familiar with the developments stated that a humanitarian passage, not a corridor, is now the subject of consensus among multiple stakeholders, including Myanmar, Bangladesh, and other involved parties.
The proposed passage, intended to facilitate aid delivery between Rohingya settlements and camps in Cox's Bazar and designated zones along the Bangladesh-Myanmar border, has faced sharp domestic criticism. Security analysts and several political parties, including senior BNP leaders, have warned that such a passage could create a semi-autonomous zone and further destabilise the region.
A senior BNP leader, speaking to News18 from Dhaka, said, 'We cannot allow the Rakhine Corridor cutting across Bangladesh. We want a stable and peaceful country. We have presented our views to the interim government in this regard, and we will oppose any such decision that may put Bangladesh's security and stability at stake."
Addressing the media in Dhaka last week, national security adviser Khalilur Rahman said, 'The UN only asked if Bangladesh could assist in sending humanitarian aid near the border, to be delivered to the Rakhine state by UN partners. We said we can consider," as reported by The Daily Star, a widely circulated Bangladeshi newspaper.
A meeting between chief adviser Yunus and UN resident coordinator Gwyn Lewis this week has fuelled further speculation. According to an official statement from the Bangladesh government, the discussion focused significantly on the Rohingya crisis and future cooperation frameworks, with Yunus appealing for international cooperation and funds.
'In their meeting, the resident coordinator and the chief adviser addressed the pressing issues surrounding the Rohingya crisis and the ongoing financing challenges," the statement said. They expressed serious concern about significant funding reductions, which are severely impacting essential programmes within the camps.
Yunus stated the 'urgent need for sustained solidarity and increased support from the international community to mitigate the funding cuts and reinforce Bangladesh's efforts to aid the vulnerable Rohingya population".
While the Yunus administration has avoided public discussion of the proposed corridor following strong opposition, diplomatic sources suggest the concept of a passage has not been dismissed. For now, the Rakhine corridor remains an undeclared and inactive element of Bangladesh's evolving foreign and domestic policy.
First Published:
June 07, 2025, 07:30 IST

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
40 minutes ago
- First Post
'Exhausted, hungry, scared': Over 1.2 million Afghans forced to return from Iran and Pakistan this year, says UN
Pakistani authorities have set a June 30 deadline for some 1.3 million Afghans to leave. Pakistan aims to expel a total of 3 million Afghans this year. read more More than 1.2 million Afghans have been forced to return from Iran and Pakistan so far this year, the United Nations refugee agency (UNHCR) said on Saturday, warning that mass expulsions risk destabilising Afghanistan's already fragile humanitarian situation. Many of those returning have never lived under Taliban rule and now arrive to uncertain futures, often with little more than the clothes on their backs. The wave of repatriations follows separate campaigns by Tehran and Islamabad to crack down on undocumented migrants, which have primarily impacted Afghan nationals. While both governments insist they are targeting all foreigners residing illegally in their territories, the scale and speed of Afghan deportations has raised concerns among rights groups and the UN. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to UNHCR, over half of the returnees came from Iran after its government imposed a March 20 deadline for undocumented Afghans to leave voluntarily or face forced removal. Iran alone has expelled more than 366,000 Afghans this year, including recognised refugees and those in refugee-like conditions. Tensions linked to Iran's brief war with Israel have also contributed to the uptick in returns, with the single highest number recorded on June 26, when over 36,000 Afghans crossed the border back into their homeland in one day. 'Afghan families are being uprooted once again, arriving with scant belongings, exhausted, hungry, scared about what awaits them in a country many of them have never even set foot in,' said Arafat Jamal, the UNHCR representative in the Afghan capital, Kabul. He said women and girls are particularly worried, as they fear the restrictions on freedom of movement and basic rights such as education and employment. More than half of Afghanistan relies on humanitarian assistance. But opposition to Taliban policies and widespread funding cuts are worsening the situation, with aid agencies and nongovernmental organizations cutting back on basic services like education and health care. Iran's attorney general, Mohammad Movahedi Azad, said Saturday that foreigners in the country illegally should leave as soon as possible or face prosecution, state media reported. 'Foreign nationals, especially brothers and sisters from Afghanistan whom we have hosted for years, help us (so) that illegal individuals leave Iran in the shortest period,' the official IRNA news agency quoted Azad as saying. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Iranian authorities said in April that out of more than 6 million Afghans, up to 2.5 million were in the country illegally. Iran's top diplomat in Kabul, Ali Reza Bikdeli, visited the Dogharoun border crossing with Afghanistan and promised to facilitate the repatriation of Afghans, state TV reported. Iranians have complained about the increasing presence of Afghans in recent months, with some accusing them of spying for Israel since the outbreak of the war. Earlier this month, on the religious festival of Eid Al-Adha, the Taliban prime minister said all Afghans who fled the country after the collapse of the former Western-backed government were free to return, promising they would be safe. 'Afghans who have left the country should return to their homeland,' Mohammad Hassan Akhund said in a message on X. 'Nobody will harm them. Come back to your ancestral land and live in an atmosphere of peace.' On Saturday, the Taliban said a high-ranking ministerial delegation traveled to western Herat province to meet some of the Afghans returning from Iran. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The officials pledged 'swift action to address the urgent needs of the returnees and ensure that essential services and support are provided to ease their reintegration,' according to a statement from the Taliban deputy spokesman Hamdullah Fitrat on X. With inputs from agencies


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Jiski lathi, uski foreign policy! Five lessons from Iran-Israel conflict
Jiski lathi, uski foreign policy! Five lessons from Iran-Israel conflict Chetan Bhagat TNN Updated: Jun 28, 2025, 20:26 IST IST The recent Israel-Iran-(US) conflict highlights the raw realities of global power, where military and economic might often overshadow international norms. The US backing of Israel demonstrates strategic alliances driven by mutual benefit, while the UN's influence remains limited against powerful nations. Ultimately, technological advancement and economic strength are crucial for global influence, rendering soft power ineffective in protecting a nation At the time of writing this column, a ceasefire declared in the Israel-Iran-(US) conflict is holding. But given the volatile and fast-moving nature of such geopolitical events, it's hard to say what will happen next. We've all studied geography and history in school. Some of us have gone on to pursue advanced degrees in international relations . Veteran diplomats and think tanks devote all their time to the topic. But none of this quite prepares you for the messy, raw reality of how geopolitics works, especially when powerful nations are involved.


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Unfair trade practices by Bangla suppliers forced India to restrict import of jute: Officials
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel India imposed restrictions on the import of jute and allied fibre products from Bangladesh in view of its "unfair trade" practices including circumvention of anti-dumping duty that harmed Indian farmers, people familiar with the matter said on new restrictions will apply to imports into India of Bangladesh's jute and allied fibre products across all land and seaports, with the exception of the Nhava Sheva seaport in punitive measures were announced on Friday and they came into effect has been a sharp downturn in India-Bangladesh relations after deposed prime minister Sheikh Hasina fled Dhaka and took shelter in India in August last year in the face of a massive anti-government must not be allowed to persist with "unfair trade" practices that harm the livelihood of Indian farmers and mill workers in a sector that forms the economic backbone of rural regions, said an official on condition of market access extended by India in good faith cannot be undermined to the detriment of India's economic interests, said another decision on Bangladeshi jute and fibre products came weeks after it put restrictions on ready-made garments and several other consumer goods through land the provisions of SAFTA (South Asian Free Trade Area), jute from Bangladesh enjoys a duty free access to the Indian jute industry has, for long, suffered due to the adverse impact of dumped and subsidised imports of jute products, particularly yarn, fibre and bags' from the neighbouring country, the people cited above is credible evidence that Bangladeshi jute exports continue to benefit from state subsidies extended by the government of Bangladesh, they response to these concerns, the Directorate General of Anti-Dumping and Allied Duties (DGAD) conducted detailed investigations and imposed anti-dumping duty (ADD) on jute and goods originating from Bangladesh, the people the imposition of ADD has not yielded a substantial reduction in imports, they from various subsidies, common malpractices by Bangladeshi exporters include circumvention of anti-dumping duty through technical exemptions, mislabelling, exports through ADD exempted firms and "misdeclaration" to secure higher subsidies, the people restrictions are aimed to counter unfair trade practices , promote ' Atmanirbhar Bharat ' (self-reliance), and protect rural livelihoods tied to India's domestic jute economy, the people cited above said."To safeguard the interests of the domestic jute industry and to counter the unfair trade practices employed by the Bangladesh exporters acting in collusion with Bangladeshi establishment, it has been decided to restrict Bangladesh imports of jute and jute products to India through only from Nhava Sheva port," said one of the people."The imposition is expected to streamline the quality checking, prevent misdeclaration and fraudulent labelling, thereby neutralising the malpractices that have plagued the industry for long," the person said."The government is also taking steps to ensure that exporters in Bangladesh do not circumvent the aforesaid restrictions by routing their jute exports through third countries," he added.