Only Dalai Lama and conventions established by him can decide successor: Rijiju
Union Minister for Minorities, Kiren Rijiju, himself a Buddhist, said this, in what is being seen as an apparent snub of the Chinese position on it.
Also Read | Line will continue after me, no other authority can interfere: Dalai Lama makes statement as 90th birthday celebrations begin
'The Dalai Lama is the most important and defining institution for Buddhists,' he said, adding that, 'all those who follow the Dalai Lama feel that the Incarnation is to be decided by the established convention and as per the wish of the Dalai Lama himself. Nobody else has the right to decide it except him and the conventions in place.'
On Wednesday (July 2, 2025), the Dalai Lama had said that the institution of the Dalai Lama will continue and only the Gaden Phodrang Trust will have the authority to recognise his future reincarnation. The statement was made in the run up to the Dalai Lama's 90th birthday that falls on July 6th and over which succession issues, especially in the context of China announcing a successor due to its control of Tibet loomed large. The Dalai Lama's statement put to rest speculation that the institution of the Dalai Lama would end with him, or that China would have a free run to decide the next incarnation.
Explained | How will the Dalai Lama's successor be chosen
The Chinese on their fumed at the Dalai Lama's statement, with a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Mao Ning, stating that the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama, 'must be chosen by drawing lots from a golden urn, and approved by the central government (of China).'
She added that the Chinese government which otherwise 'implements a policy of freedom of religious belief,' reserved the right to impose 'regulations on religious affairs and methods for managing the reincarnation of Tibetan living Buddhas.'
Mr. Rijiju's statement is a clear snub to the Chinese position, and he will be attending the Dalai Lama's birthday celebrations along with his Cabinet colleague Rajiv Ranjan Singh 'Lallan' who is an MP from Bihar, a State which has the most important Buddhists sites in the world and is also home to Nalanda, whose Buddhist tradition is followed by the Dalai Lama.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Wire
42 minutes ago
- The Wire
CPI(M) Alleges Ties to Abhishek Banerjee, Massive Corruption in Deocha-Pachami Coal Project
Bankura: The Communist Party of India (Marxist) has demanded a judicial inquiry into the controversial Deocha-Pachami coal mining project in Birbhum district of West Bengal. At a press conference held on July 3 at the party's state headquarters on Alimuddin Street, CPI(M) state secretary Mohammed Salim alleged large-scale corruption, environmental violations, and illegal tender procedures, accusing both the Trinamool Congress (TMC)-led state government and the BJP-led Union government of complicity. Salim presented evidence alleging that the state government secured environmental clearance for the project fraudulently. He claimed the union environment ministry had granted clearance for a mere 12 acres, despite the project's actual size being over 431 hectares, which would necessitate a mandatory public hearing and full environmental scrutiny as a Category A project. 'This environmental certificate is practically fraudulent and was given under the auspices of the BJP-led Union government. Both the Centre and the state are responsible,'alleged Salim. The West Bengal Power Development Corporation Limited (WBPDCL) awarded the mining contract in March 2024 to Trancemarine & Confreight Logistics Pvt Ltd, a Mumbai-based firm with no prior mining experience, at a 71.05% revenue share. In April, 2025 Himadri Speciality Chemical Ltd, a Kolkata-based firm, acquired 60% of Trancemarine for a mere Rs 4.23 crore. Himadri also issued a Rs 150 crore loan to Sturdy Niketan, an obscure entity with no turnover, allegedly for royalty payments. According to a company release, Trancemarine's annual turnover for FY23-24 was Rs 35.69 crore, much higher than what Himadri is paying for its acquisition. 'Once someone is given a tender, it cannot be passed to someone else. This is a direct violation of WBPDCL policy. Sturdy Niketan, which has zero income, is being used as a front for illicit financial flows,' Salim claimed. Interestingly, Himadri Chemicals, now central to the project, had earlier invested in Tidings Media & Communication Pvt Ltd, which acquired the Bengali daily Ei Samay from the Times Group. One of Tidings' major stakeholders is Sanjay Basu, known to be a legal advisor and close confidante of both Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee and her nephew, the Diamond Harbour MP Abhishek Banerjee. In February 2025, CM Banerjee claimed at the Bengal Global Business Summit that coal mining had begun at Deucha-Pachami and promised over one lakh jobs. However, CPI(M) pointed out that WBPDCL has not even submitted the required geological report or mining plan to the Union coal ministry, 66 months after the coal block was allotted in overall project, including basalt mining, is expected to generate over Rs 1,500 crore in profits, raising serious questions about insider profiteering. 'Where is the coal? It was said that above 100,000 people would be employed, where is employment? The fact is that stones will be extracted from that land,' Salim said. Documents indicate that the coal mining lease process remains incomplete, and no private company applied to mine the block even after two deadline extensions in 2025. In November 2023, the state government authorised WBPDCL to mine basalt on 431.47 acres, with an estimated profit of Rs 5,600 crore. In June 2024, Pachami Basalt Mining PrivateLimited was incorporated in Kolkata. Neither Sturdy Niketan nor Pachami Basalt Mining Private Limited has an official website, and their corporate listing links to Basalt mining began in Deucha-Pachami site in February this year, but locals demanded a permanent halt, citing severe environmental and health hazards and alleging that forest land was cleared without informing the resident tribal communities.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
China to EU: Russian defeat in Ukraine may push US to target Beijing next
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi told the European Union's foreign policy chief this week that Beijing does not want to see Russia lose the war in Ukraine, according to a report by the South China Morning Post, citing several people familiar with the matter. In what was described as a 'tense' four-hour meeting with EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas, Wang suggested that a Russian defeat would prompt the United States to reorient its full strategic weight toward China—a scenario Beijing is determined to avoid. The comments were reportedly delivered in a tone considered blunt and at times 'lecturing', with Wang offering what one official called a 'dose of realpolitik' and 'lengthy history lessons'. China's messaging signals tactical neutrality on Ukraine The Chinese foreign minister's comments are among the clearest signals yet that Beijing views the war in Ukraine through a geopolitical lens. While China officially maintains that it is 'not a party' to the conflict and supports a peaceful resolution, Wang's remarks suggest a more tactical approach—one in which a protracted war may be preferable to a Russian collapse. China denies aiding Russia, rejects dual-use export claims Denying direct Chinese military or financial support for Russia, Wang claimed that if China had been actively aiding Moscow, 'the war would have ended long ago'. He also rejected EU accusations of dual-use exports and positioned China as a neutral actor—a claim met with scepticism in Brussels. The report added that EU sources said the bloc presented a united front, pushing back on China's portrayal of neutrality and reiterating the importance of upholding international law. EU-China summit clouded by tensions over sanctions, trade The Brussels meeting comes just weeks before a planned high-level EU-China summit, scheduled for 24–25 July in Beijing and Anhui province. However, insiders now say expectations for the summit have diminished, with Wang reportedly hinting that the agenda could be shortened in protest of recent EU trade actions. China warns of retaliation over EU's sanctions plan The EU has proposed blacklisting two small Chinese banks accused of facilitating sanctions evasion for Russian entities. Wang warned of retaliation if the move proceeds, as part of the EU's 18th sanctions package against Moscow. Meanwhile, the EU pressed China to clarify its rare earth export policy, amid growing supply chain disruptions that have forced some European manufacturers to halt production. Wang offered no long-term commitments, saying only that export licence processing times had been reduced. China calls ties 'stable', but gap between words and reality grows Following the meeting, China's foreign ministry released a statement describing EU-China ties as 'stable and constructive', calling for mutual respect and shared prosperity. The statement made no mention of Ukraine, sanctions, or rare earths. However, one diplomat told the South China Morning Post, 'There's a widening gap between what's said publicly and what's actually being discussed behind closed doors.' Wang's visit to Brussels included meetings with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President Antonio Costa. He will continue his European tour this week with visits to Berlin and Paris.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
The Yellow Sea is the new flashpoint for China's regional power play
Next Story Dasl Yoon , Joyu Wang , The Wall Street Journal Chinese provocations in the Yellow Sea are part of broader campaign by Beijing to assert its influence over the region. A Chinese navy ship with bow number 525 in the disputed South China Sea. China claims all of the South China Sea. Gift this article SEOUL :One day in February, a South Korean research vessel approached a set of unusual structures planted by China in the middle of the Yellow Sea, the narrow body of water that separates the two countries. One day in February, a South Korean research vessel approached a set of unusual structures planted by China in the middle of the Yellow Sea, the narrow body of water that separates the two countries. Two large Chinese Coast Guard ships and three Chinese boats quickly blocked the South Korean ship's path. The passengers on the small Chinese boats wielded knives to force the Koreans back. After two hours, the South Korean ship turned back, unable to learn more about the mysterious installation that sat about 230 miles from the country's coast: a yellow aquaculture cage placed next to a refurbished multistory oil rig, complete with lifeboats and a helipad. It was the latest of a series of Chinese provocations in the Yellow Sea, including incursions into South Korean territorial waters and airspace, and the placing of 13 buoys that some experts say could be used to gather intelligence. The Yellow Sea is emerging as the newest flashpoint in a broader campaign by Beijing as it asserts its intention to prevent its neighbors, as well as the U.S., from challenging its influence over the region. The provocations also come as China claims all of the South China Sea, a vital waterway for global trade. Chinese jet fighters have increased sorties near Taiwan and last month they tailed Japanese air patrols during exercises. Beijing also launched live-fire drills off the coast of Australia earlier this year. But friction in the Yellow Sea is especially alarming because of its strategic importance in any future U.S.-China conflict over Taiwan. Beijing would likely need free access to the waterway to deploy its naval and missile firepower during any attempt to seize control of the island. The largest overseas U.S. military base, home to 28,500 service personnel, sits 10 miles inland from the Yellow Sea in South Korea. Tens of thousands of U.S. troops are also stationed around 500 miles away in Japan. The Trump administration has signaled that U.S. troops from both countries could be deployed in a clash with China over Taiwan. A stepped-up Chinese presence in the Yellow Sea could limit the ability of the U.S. to maneuver in such a conflict. A large portion of Beijing's naval capabilities, as well as key missile launch sites, sit on China's side of the Yellow Sea, making them vulnerable to attack from U.S. forces in the Indo-Pacific region. Over the last couple of years, China has steadily escalated pressure on Asian countries with close ties to the U.S. Incursions into South Korean waters by Chinese warships have tripled since 2017, South Korea's military says, while aircraft intrusions have surged. In March, Beijing issued a directive calling for more assertive behavior in South Korea's territorial waters, according to a senior Taiwan security official, citing local intelligence. Beijing is also seeking to build more maritime structures there, the official said. 'China is putting pressure on yet another U.S. ally, hoping to weigh down the allied ability to push back," said Brian Hart, deputy director of the China Power Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank. The Yellow Sea is so narrow that China and South Korea's exclusive economic zones overlap. More than 20 years ago, Beijing and Seoul created the so-called Provisional Measures Zone, which created rules for policing illegal fishing and conducting marine-conservation activities. Fast forward two decades and the PMZ is the site for near-daily provocations by China, according to the South Korean military. It says Chinese warships intruded in South Korea's territorial waters some 330 times in 2024, tripling from 2017, according to the military. Recent South Korean data shows 130 Chinese aircraft entered its airspace in 2023, more than double the number from the previous year. Many of the Chinese flights were over the Yellow Sea, prompting South Korea to scramble its jets in response. In May, Beijing jolted Seoul by declaring a no-sail zone in the PMZ. It then carried out unprecedented drills in the Yellow Sea with the Fujian, the country's most advanced aircraft carrier. In response, South Korea deployed its navy to observe and gather intelligence on the exercises. The cluster of Chinese structures dotting the sea has rattled officials in Seoul. The fishing cage and the oil rig at the center of February's incident are located on the western side of the shared PMZ, close to Chinese land. Beijing has repeatedly said they are for maritime research. The Chinese multistory oil rig in the Yellow Sea, complete with lifeboats and a helipad. Analysis by the Center for Strategic and International Studies found the rig could have military as well as scientific uses. 'Concerns that the platforms may be dual-use for purposes of advancing China's creeping jurisdictional presence aren't unfounded," it said. As for the buoys, which China asserts are for meteorological observation, South Korean lawmaker Yu Yong-weon has suggested that they are clustered close together in order for China to control the area rather than collect scientific data. China has a history of building maritime structures that are used to assert its territorial claims. It has turned reefs in the South China Sea into artificial islands, equipping them with radar systems and air strips. 'China always has a dual purpose for everything," said Derek Grossman, a former Pentagon official who worked on Indo-Pacific security issues. Chinese and South Korean officials met Tuesday for bilateral talks. South Korea's Foreign Ministry, in a brief reference, said the two sides had discussed the situation in the Yellow Sea. China made no mention of the sea and said it exchanged views with South Korea on issues of common concern. Write to Dasl Yoon at and Joyu Wang at Topics You May Be Interested In Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
