South Africa can't go back to apartheid ways
Quite correctly, legal and constitutional experts, as well as civil society activists in the US, are voicing their concern that President Donald Trump is moving towards an authoritarian state, following his deployment of soldiers from the National Guard to help quell protests in Los Angeles.
The Angelenos took to the street in reaction to heavy-handed raids on immigrants by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency.
Today, on our pages, Claudia Pizzocri – a local immigration and citizenship lawyer – warns the same thing is already happening in South Africa under the 'Operation New Broom' campaign by the Department of Home Affairs.
She says that, barely two days after the campaign launched late last month, more than 50 individuals, including children, pregnant women and asylum seekers, were rounded up during an early-morning raid at the Plastic View informal settlement in Tshwane.
The people were treated in a dehumanising manner, reminiscent of the apartheid-era crackdowns on dissent.
ALSO READ: Home Affairs launches Operation New Broom to tackle illegal immigration
At the same time, lawyers suing the anti-immigrant movement, Operation Dudula, claim their actions against alleged illegal immigrants are not only unlawful, but they get tacit support from the police and authorities.
Immigration is one of the hottest global topics at the moment as hordes of people seek to move across the world – either avoiding persecution or merely looking for a better life.
Included in this group are South African whites who are being offered asylum in the US because they are allegedly facing a genocide.
In this country – and many others – the newcomers are regarded as 'The Other' and as subhuman, which makes them all that easier to abuse and deprive of their basic human rights.
In a country whose democracy rose out of the ashes of oppression, we cannot allow a similar culture of brutality to take root again.
NOW READ: NGOs say foreigners in SA told to return to their countries when opening cases against Operation Dudula
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
Malema's large rock makes ripples in SA politics pool
Julius Malema says he will vote with the DA if it proposed a no-confidence motion against President Cyril Ramaphosa. Julius Malema is known for shouting his mouth off and for changing political course faster than you can say 'Breitling watch' – and maybe he was grandstanding yesterday – but perhaps he has also chucked a large rock into the stagnant pool of South African politics. The EFF leader said that, as things currently stand, his party would vote with the DA if it proposed a no-confidence motion in the National Assembly against President Cyril Ramaphosa. He went even further, saying: 'I want to warn you that this country will have a white president, this country will have Steenhuisen as a president if the ANC is behaving the way it is behaving.' Allowing for the fact the words may be political hot air, the intriguing possibilities which arise from his comments must be depressing for Ramaphosa's ANC. If, as ANC secretary-general Fikile Mbalula proposes, the DA would be kicked out of the government of national unity (GNU) for tabling the motion then, if the vote goes ahead, Ramaphosa might well not be in a position to say anything any longer as head of state. That is, of course, if Jacob Zuma's party joins the EFF and the DA in voting against Ramaphosa… because, as we all know, the ANC long since ceased having a majority in parliament. ALSO READ: No, Malema, the UK is not a bully What is certain in the ANC-EFF-MK relationship is that they hate each other equally. If Malema carries out his threat, then it would be MK which would be the decisive factor. And the delicious irony of that would not escape that party's leader, Jacob Zuma. He would be holding Ramaphosa's future in the palm of his hand. He could end it… or he could save him with a gesture which would be the ultimate in humiliation. Yet – let's not get ahead of ourselves. You cannot bet on anything Malema says. NOW READ: Malema promises urgent aid for Mthatha flood victims, calls on the wealthy to help
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Bring back the cane? Groenewald sparks debate with corporal punishment call
Correctional Services Minister Pieter Groenewald stresses protecting vulnerable communities, especially women and children, by tightening parole approvals and urges honest dialogue on crime solutions, including revisiting corporal punishment despite its ban since 1996. Correctional Services Minister Pieter Groenewald has put forward the suggestion of corporal punishment to be reintroduced as part of the national debate on crime and justice reform in South Africa. Speaking during his budget vote debate in Parliament on Tuesday, Groenewald laid bare the depth of the crisis facing the Department of Correctional Services (DCS), pointing to overcrowded prisons, deteriorating infrastructure, and a strained parole system. Groenewald turned to a controversial but deliberate proposal: the reinstatement of corporal punishment. 'We must start a debate to say, shouldn't we bring back corporal punishment?' he said. Groenewald's proposal comes despite corporal punishment having been outlawed in South African schools since 1996, with subsequent legal rulings extending the ban to the home. Groenewald tied this call to broader concerns about the effectiveness of the criminal justice system, especially about violent crime and gender-based violence. He highlighted the need for honest conversation around crime deterrence, particularly given the limitations of the current correctional model. Groenewald described a prison system under intense strain, housing over 104,000 sentenced offenders with facilities designed for 108,000 inmates, and an additional 60,000 remand detainees, many of whom are in jail simply because they cannot afford bail.
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
AI mishap in court: Judge criticises lawyers for citation errors
AI is definitely not to be trusted to be a legal eagle, a judge found after he was confronted by two non-existent citations in a matter before him. Image: AI RON Faced with non-existent legal citations in a matter before the Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg, an acting judge posed a pointed question to the counsel responsible: did these citations represent artificial intelligence (AI) "hallucinations"? The advocate, visibly embarrassed, conceded, 'it appears to be so." Acting Judge DJ Smit made this discovery when he was about to write his judgment in a matter of Northbound Processing, which wanted to compel the South African Diamond and Precious Metals Regulator to release a refining licence to it. Judge Smit remarked that while drafting this judgment, it came to his attention that two cases cited in Northbound's heads of argument do not exist. He invited Northbound's counsel to clarify the position. Time pressure was given as an excuse, as the matter came before court as an urgent application. The lawyer explained that he used an online subscription tool called 'Legal Genius,' which claimed that it was "exclusively trained on South African legal judgments and legislation". The court was, however, told that while some non-existent citations (of previous applicable case law) did appear on the heads of argument, the senior advocate who argued the matter did not rely on the non-existent cases during oral argument. The lawyer who explained the situation to the court accepted full responsibility for the mistakes but emphasised that there was no intent to mislead the court. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading The senior advocate (who was not responsible for the non-existent citations) apologised profusely on behalf of Northbound's legal team. He also explained that he relied upon an experienced legal team (which included two competent junior counsel) upon whom he believed he could (and indeed did) rely. The senior counsel said he only did a 'sense-check' on Northbound's heads before they were filed and did not have sufficient opportunity to check the accuracy of the citations. In his judgment on this topic, Judge Smit referred to a recent King's Bench Division judgment in which the English judge warned against the risks of using AI, especially in legal research, as it could be entirely incorrect and might cite sources which do not exist. The judge said there are serious implications for the administration of justice and public confidence in the justice system if artificial intelligence is misused. Judge Smit acknowledged the apologies of counsel in this matter, but he said even negligence in this context may have grave repercussions. He referred the conduct of the legal practitioners to the Legal Practice Council for investigation. Meanwhile, in January, the sharp eye of a judge landed a law firm in a difficult situation when it was discovered that of the nine cases cited in their application as case law, only two could be found, leaving the strong suspicion that they had used AI to source their citations. Judge Elsje-Marie Bezuidenhout, sitting in the Pietermaritzburg High Court, not only ordered the law firm to pay the legal costs of the application from their own pockets, but she also referred the matter to the Legal Practice Council for possible investigation into the matter.
