logo
India's TCS says none of its systems were compromised in M&S hack

India's TCS says none of its systems were compromised in M&S hack

Indian Express20-06-2025
Tata Consultancy Services said none of its 'systems or users were compromised' as part of the cyberattack that led to the theft of customer data at retailer Marks and Spencer, its client of more than a decade.
'As no TCS systems or users were compromised, none of our other customers are impacted' independent director Keki Mistry told its annual shareholder meeting.
'The purview of the investigation (of customer) does not include TCS,' Mistry added.
This is the first time India's No 1 IT services company has publicly commented on the cyber hack. M&S did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
TCS is one of the technology services providers for the British retailer. In early 2023, TCS reportedly won a $1 billion contract for modernising M&S' legacy technology with respect to its supply chain and omni-channel sales while increasing its online sales.
The 'highly sophisticated and targeted' cyberattack which M&S disclosed in April will cost about 300 million pounds ($403 million) in lost operating profit, and disruption to online services is likely until July.
Last month, Financial Times reported that TCS is internally investigating whether it was the gateway for a cyberattack.
Mistry presided as the chairman at the company's annual shareholder meeting as Tata Group Chairman N Chandrasekaran skipped it due to 'exigencies'.
The chairman's absence comes as the Group's airline Air India plane with 242 people on board crashed after take-off in Ahmedabad last week, killing all passengers except one.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Who is Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein's former girlfriend who is in federal spotlight again?
Who is Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein's former girlfriend who is in federal spotlight again?

Indian Express

time8 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Who is Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein's former girlfriend who is in federal spotlight again?

Ghislaine Maxwell, at the centre of national attention again despite being sentenced to 20 years in jail, represents much more than the image of a fallen socialite. Once a fixture of elite parties in New York and London, she was convicted three years ago for aiding Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of underage girls. This week, Todd Blanche, the US Deputy Attorney General, met with her for several hours over two days. What emerged from those conversations is unknown, but Blanche later wrote on social media that the Justice Department 'will share additional information about what we learned at the appropriate time.' His visit comes amid renewed political pressure over the federal government's handling of the Epstein case — a pressure intensified by President Donald Trump's refusal to answer questions about the disgraced financier. Maxwell's attorney, David Oscar Markus, said there were no discussions with the government about a presidential pardon, but added: 'The President this morning said he had the power to do so. We hope he exercises that power in the right and just way.' Maxwell, 63, was born into British privilege as the youngest daughter of Robert Maxwell, the Czech-born media tycoon whose empire included The Daily Mirror and publisher Macmillan. After her father died in 1991 under mysterious circumstances, falling from his yacht, Ghislaine relocated to New York City. In the US, Maxwell entered elite social circles and was seen at major public events. She attended Chelsea Clinton's wedding and was photographed in 2000 with Donald Trump, Melania Trump, and Epstein. According to CNN, she was also seen at the Clinton Global Initiative summit, though Chelsea Clinton's spokesperson, Bari Lurie, said Maxwell was invited because she was dating a friend of Clinton's. She was photographed at a memorial service soon after, seated beside a man who would come to define her public legacy: Jeffrey Epstein. Their relationship was at times romantic, though she later worked for him in various roles, managing his household staff and personal affairs. As investigators would later allege, her proximity to Epstein extended far beyond domestic management. According to federal prosecutors, between 1994 and 2004, Maxwell helped Epstein groom and traffic girls as young as 14. Court documents and trial testimony portrayed her as a recruiter, someone who could set victims at ease by offering the reassurance of an approving adult woman. The abuse, prosecutors said, occurred in a well-oiled system: Maxwell would invite girls on shopping trips, pay for travel, and promise educational assistance. She would undress in front of the girls, discuss sexual topics, and normalize the idea of giving Epstein massages that turned sexual. She sometimes participated. In exchange, the victims were paid in cash and, in some cases, pressured to bring in more girls. Maxwell's attorneys claimed that her accusers' memories had been shaped and distorted by lawyers pursuing civil suits. But in December 2021, a jury convicted her on multiple federal charges, including sex trafficking and conspiracy. She was sentenced in 2022. Maxwell has long insisted she had no knowledge that Epstein, who died by suicide in a Manhattan jail in 2019 while awaiting trial, was sexually abusing minors. Virginia Giuffre, one of the most vocal Epstein survivors, said she was recruited by Maxwell as a teenager while working at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort. Giuffre later sued Maxwell for defamation after Maxwell dismissed her claims as 'obvious lies.' The case was settled in Giuffre's favor. Giuffre also filed a lawsuit against Prince Andrew of Britain, alleging he had sexually abused her at Epstein's homes. He denied the charges, but settled the suit in 2022. Maxwell is currently appealing her conviction to the US Supreme Court, arguing that a 2008 non-prosecution deal Epstein struck with Florida prosecutors should have shielded her from federal charges. The Justice Department has urged the Court to reject that claim. Despite her incarceration, Maxwell remains a person of interest to federal investigators and to members of Congress. The House Oversight Committee voted this week to subpoena her for a deposition. Blanche, in a statement posted to social media, left open the possibility that Maxwell could assist in identifying others who may have committed crimes against Epstein's victims. 'If Ghislaine Maxwell has information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims,' he said, 'the FBI and the DOJ will hear what she has to say.' Her attorney, Markus, said only that Maxwell would 'always testify truthfully.' Maxwell did not take the stand during her own trial, but she has given two long depositions in previous civil cases. In them, she dismissed the idea that Epstein's homes were filled with minors. 'As far as I'm concerned, everyone who came to his house was an adult professional person,' she said at the time. The testimony of four women proved damning, and Maxwell was ultimately convicted on five of six charges. (With input from New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN, AP)

Whisky Business: Indian alcohol industry flags non-tariff barriers in UK market
Whisky Business: Indian alcohol industry flags non-tariff barriers in UK market

Economic Times

timean hour ago

  • Economic Times

Whisky Business: Indian alcohol industry flags non-tariff barriers in UK market

Scotch and British gin producers may have secured lower import duties in India, but Indian alcoholic beverage makers allege an uneven playing field when exporting to the UK, The Times of India has reported. ADVERTISEMENT Domestic liquor firms claim that non-tariff barriers in the UK and EU restrict access for Indian-Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL) products. These barriers, they say, revolve around technical norms like maturation period and ingredients, which are not aligned with Indian production conditions. 'The UK and even the European Union do not allow fair imports of most Indian-Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL) products due to non-tariff barriers related to maturation and ingredients. We only wish that the Indian govt had stood firm on the issue of non-tariff barriers,' said Anant S Iyer, director general of the Confederation of Indian Alcoholic Beverage Companies (CIABC), told TOI. UK regulations define whisky as a spirit matured for a minimum of three years—criteria applied to both domestic and imported products. But Iyer argues the rule disadvantages Indian producers due to climate differences. 'In India, the maturation is much faster. A longer maturity period, say, three years, means that around one-third of our spirit will evaporate due to the hotter climate which will not only result in losses but also impact the quality of the product,' he said. He further added that Indian companies are unable to market their products as whisky in the UK, forcing them to label it as 'Indian spirits' instead. 'We would like to label our products as Indian Whisky or Indian Rum/Brandy and sell the same in the UK/EU and allow the market and consumer to decide.' ADVERTISEMENT CIABC has urged the Indian government to raise this 'discrimination' with UK authorities and push for a level playing field. The lobby group has also proposed a minimum import price (MIP) for Bottled-in-Origin (BIO) liquor from Scotland to prevent Scotch imports from undercutting domestic brands. (With inputs from TOI) ADVERTISEMENT (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel)

Whisky Business: Indian alcohol industry flags non-tariff barriers in UK market
Whisky Business: Indian alcohol industry flags non-tariff barriers in UK market

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Whisky Business: Indian alcohol industry flags non-tariff barriers in UK market

Scotch and British gin producers may have secured lower import duties in India, but Indian alcoholic beverage makers allege an uneven playing field when exporting to the UK, The Times of India has reported. Domestic liquor firms claim that non-tariff barriers in the UK and EU restrict access for Indian-Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL) products. These barriers, they say, revolve around technical norms like maturation period and ingredients, which are not aligned with Indian production conditions. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Data Science CXO Others Data Analytics Cybersecurity Product Management Project Management Degree Data Science healthcare Artificial Intelligence Leadership Digital Marketing Public Policy MBA others PGDM MCA Management Operations Management Finance Technology Healthcare Design Thinking Skills you'll gain: Data Analysis & Interpretation Programming Proficiency Problem-Solving Skills Machine Learning & Artificial Intelligence Duration: 24 Months Vellore Institute of Technology VIT MSc in Data Science Starts on Aug 14, 2024 Get Details Skills you'll gain: Strategic Data-Analysis, including Data Mining & Preparation Predictive Modeling & Advanced Clustering Techniques Machine Learning Concepts & Regression Analysis Cutting-edge applications of AI, like NLP & Generative AI Duration: 8 Months IIM Kozhikode Professional Certificate in Data Science and Artificial Intelligence Starts on Jun 26, 2024 Get Details 'The UK and even the European Union do not allow fair imports of most Indian-Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL) products due to non-tariff barriers related to maturation and ingredients. We only wish that the Indian govt had stood firm on the issue of non-tariff barriers,' said Anant S Iyer, director general of the Confederation of Indian Alcoholic Beverage Companies ( CIABC ), told TOI . by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Turkey: New Container Houses (Prices May Surprise You) Container House | Search ads Search Now Undo UK regulations define whisky as a spirit matured for a minimum of three years—criteria applied to both domestic and imported products. But Iyer argues the rule disadvantages Indian producers due to climate differences. 'In India, the maturation is much faster. A longer maturity period, say, three years, means that around one-third of our spirit will evaporate due to the hotter climate which will not only result in losses but also impact the quality of the product,' he said. Live Events He further added that Indian companies are unable to market their products as whisky in the UK, forcing them to label it as 'Indian spirits' instead. 'We would like to label our products as Indian Whisky or Indian Rum/Brandy and sell the same in the UK/EU and allow the market and consumer to decide.' CIABC has urged the Indian government to raise this 'discrimination' with UK authorities and push for a level playing field. The lobby group has also proposed a minimum import price (MIP) for Bottled-in-Origin (BIO) liquor from Scotland to prevent Scotch imports from undercutting domestic brands.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store