Gold hits three-week high as Trump widens trade war
Spot gold was up 0.5 per cent to US$3,371.34 per ounce, as at 0045 GMT, its highest since Jun 23. US gold futures climbed 0.7 per cent at US$3,386.20.
Trump on Saturday threatened to impose a 30 per cent tariff on imports from Mexico and the European Union starting on Aug 1, after weeks of negotiations with the major US trading partners failed to reach a comprehensive trade deal.
Both the European Union and Mexico described the tariffs as unfair and disruptive, while the EU said it would extend its suspension of countermeasures to US tariffs until early August and continue to press for a negotiated settlement.
Investors now await the US inflation data for June, due on Tuesday for more cues on the Federal Reserve's interest rate path. Markets are currently pricing in just over 50 basis points worth of Fed easing by December.
Chicago Fed Bank president Austan Goolsbee said the new tariffs unveiled by Trump could spark fresh concerns about inflation, which might force the Fed to maintain its wait-and-see posture, The Wall Street Journal reported on Friday.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Gold, often considered a safe-haven asset during economic uncertainties, tends to do well in a low-interest-rate environment.
SPDR Gold Trust, the world's largest gold-backed exchange-traded fund, said its holdings fell 0.12 per cent to 947.64 tonnes on Friday from 948.80 tonnes on Thursday.
Meanwhile, gold speculators cut net long positions by 1,855 contracts to 134,842 in the week to Jul 8.
Spot silver gained 0.4 per cent at US$38.49 per ounce, platinum fell 1.1 per cent to US$1,384 and palladium slipped 1.7 per cent to US$1,194.40. REUTERS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
16 minutes ago
- Business Times
Trump raises pressure on Powell while calling firing ‘unlikely'
[WASHINGTON] US President Donald Trump said he's not planning to fire Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell, and still managed to make it sound like a threat. Trump's comments capped a hectic few hours that took his pressure campaign against the Fed chief to a new level – and sent markets into a shortlived nosedive. He ran the idea of sacking Powell by a receptive group of Republican lawmakers late on Tuesday (Jul 15). An aide said Wednesday morning he was likely to follow through. Then the president publicly backpedalled – with a major caveat. 'I don't rule out anything, but I think it's highly unlikely, unless he has to leave for fraud,' Trump said on Wednesday when asked about axing the Fed chair. It was a nod to the latest front that Trump has opened against Powell: Intensifying scrutiny of the Fed's renovation of its two main buildings in Washington. The president and his allies say the project is unnecessarily lavish and way over-budget, and they've hinted at financial wrongdoing, too. All of this is rooted in Trump's view that the Fed is keeping interest rates too high – and it is increasingly disturbing for investors, who tend to think central bankers should be left alone by politicians, not besieged by them. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Markets have gotten used to Trump's verbal attacks on Powell, a staple of his rhetoric for years. They were briefly confronted on Wednesday with the possibility that words might translate into action – and soon. Reaction was sharp: The US dollar slumped more than 1 per cent, and long-term Treasury yields spiked. The moves were largely reversed after the president signalled a reprieve. The question now is how long that will last. Powell's term as chair ends next May anyway, and Trump has begun the search for a successor. But he's also making it clear that he won't let up on the renovation issue anytime soon. Powell has called reports about the project inaccurate, and asked the bank's inspector-general to review it. 'There are many people who say he should be removed because of the fraud of what he's doing,' Trump said in an interview with Real America's Voice broadcast on Wednesday. 'He's spending two and a half billion US dollars to, I guess it's a renovation.' 'Up to him' 'If he wants to resign, that would be up to him. They say it would disrupt the market if I did,' Trump said when asked about firing Powell. It's not clear if the president even has the power to remove a Fed chair. Still, Trump says that when he met Tuesday night with about a dozen House Republicans and polled them on the subject, almost all were in favour. With Trump, conversations like that are often a precursor. He tends to publicly toy with ideas, and poll aides and even crowds at rallies, before moving forward with them. Trump was said to have brandished a draft dismissal letter in the meeting, though he later denied that. Next up for the beleaguered central bank is the prospect that a trio of Trump aides might visit the renovation site, casting a fresh spotlight on the project. Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought, Deputy Chief of Staff James Blair and Federal Housing Finance Agency Director bill Pulte – one of Powell's most vociferous critics – are pushing to carry out an ad-hoc investigation of their own. and the president has made clear that he doesn't want him here,' Pulte told Bloomberg Television on Wednesday, demurring on whether he personally drafted the dismissal letter Trump was said to have waved in front of lawmakers. The pressure campaign is a lopsided fight, because Powell is constrained in how far he can push back publicly against Trump's barrage. Still, the Fed chief isn't without defenders. The list effectively includes global financial markets. One view is that the president was floating a trial balloon on Wednesday, and was deterred by what he saw. 'We think Trump is testing the markets to see whether he can fire Powell,' wrote Anna Wong, chief US economist at Bloomberg Economics. 'The sharp reaction appears to have convinced him to pull back on the firing rhetoric for now.' But she predicts more escalation, and warns that firing Powell would slow growth and raise unemployment and inflation. Also stepping up to the Fed chief's defence on Wednesday was Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, the top Democrat on the Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee, and a longtime Powell critic. She poured scorn on the administration's scrutiny of Fed renovation. 'Give me a break,' Warren said. 'Nobody is fooled by this pretext to fire Chair Powell. And markets will tank if he does.' 'New leadership' Congressional Republicans were split on the move. 'My understanding is he doesn't have any intention of doing that,' said Senate Majority Leader John Thune. House Speaker Mike Johnson said he wasn't sure Trump had the power to do so, though referred to the frustration in party ranks by saying 'new leadership would be helpful at the Fed.' Internal GOP tensions may help explain the timing of Trump's latest salvo against Powell. The president is looking to shift attention away from the saga over the release of documents in the Jeffrey Epstein case – which has sharply divided his base. Trump said Wednesday he had 'total' confidence in Attorney General Pam Bondi over the matter, and he's angrily urged supporters to shift their attention elsewhere. That is not much consolation to Powell, who faces consequences even if the threatened firing does not materialise. The political storm could complicate the central bank's path to lowering interest rates, which it's been reluctant to do because of uncertainty over how much impact Trump's tariffs will have on consumer prices. Another gray area concerns Powell's future at the central bank after his tenure as chair ends in May – assuming he makes it that far. His seat on the Fed board extends for about a year-and-a-half longer. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Bloomberg Television this week that it would be better if Powell bowed out entirely when he departs as chair. Powell hasn't made his intent known publicly. Bessent is among the key aides advising the president on who to pick as Powell's successor – and might be a candidate himself. The other top contenders are Kevin Hassett, the director of Trump's National Economic Council – who is said by some to have the inside track – and Kevin Warsh, a former Fed governor. The president reiterated on Wednesday that whoever gets the job will be expected to deliver lower rates – another potential hammer blow to the central bank's autonomy, even if Powell escapes firing. 'Fortunately, we get to make a change in the next, what, eight months or so,' Trump said. 'I'm only interested in low-interest people.' BLOOMBERG
AsiaOne
an hour ago
- AsiaOne
US Senate passes aid, public broadcasting cuts in victory for Trump, Money News
WASHINGTON — The US Senate early on Thursday (July 17) approved President Donald Trump's plan for billions of dollars in cuts to funding for foreign aid and public broadcasting, handing the Republican president another victory as he exerts control over Congress with little opposition. The Senate voted 51 to 48 in favour of Trump's request to cut US$9 billion (S$12 billion) in spending already approved by Congress. Most of the cuts are to programs to assist foreign countries suffering from disease, war and natural disasters, but the plan also eliminates all $1.1 billion the Corporation for Public Broadcasting was due to receive over the next two years. Trump and many of his fellow Republicans argue that spending on public broadcasting is an unnecessary expense and reject its news coverage as suffering from anti-right bias. Standalone rescissions packages have not passed in decades, with lawmakers reluctant to cede their constitutionally mandated control of spending. But Trump's Republicans, who hold narrow majorities in the Senate and House, have shown little appetite for resisting his policies since he began his second term in January. The US$9 billion at stake is extremely small in the context of the US$6.8 trillion federal budget, and represents only a tiny portion of all the funds approved by Congress that the Trump administration has held up while it has pursued sweeping cuts, many ordered by billionaire Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, or Doge. As of mid-June, Trump was blocking US$425 billion in funding that had already been appropriated and previously approved by Congress, according to Democratic lawmakers tracking frozen funding. However, Trump and his supporters have promised more of the "rescission" requests to eliminate previously approved spending in what they say is an effort to pare back the federal government. The House of Representatives passed the rescissions legislation without altering Trump's request by 214 to 212 last month. Four Republicans joined 208 Democrats in voting no. But after a handful of Republican senators balked at the extent of the cuts to global health programs, Russell Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget, said on Tuesday that PEPFAR, a global programme to fight HIV/AIDS launched in 2003 by then-President George W. Bush, was being exempted. The change brought the size of the package of cuts to US$9 billion from US$9.4 billion, requiring another House vote before the measure can be sent to the White House for Trump to sign into law. The rescissions must pass by Friday. Otherwise, the request would expire and the White House will be required to adhere to spending plans passed by Congress. Republican 'no' votes Two of the Senate's 53 Republicans — Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine — joined Democrats in voting against the legislation. "You don't need to gut the entire Corporation for Public Broadcasting," Murkowski said in a Senate speech. She said the Trump administration also had not provided assurances that battles against diseases such as malaria and polio worldwide would be maintained. Most of all, Murkowski said, Congress must assert its role in deciding how federal funds were spent. Republican Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota called Trump's request a "small, but important step toward fiscal sanity". Democrats scoffed at that, noting that congressional Republicans earlier this month passed a massive package of tax and spending cuts that nonpartisan analysts estimated would add more than US$3 trillion to the nation's US$36.2 trillion debt. Democrats charged Republicans with giving up Congress' Constitutionally-mandated control of federal spending. "Today, Senate Republicans turn this chamber into a subservient rubber stamp for the executive, at the behest of Donald Trump," Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said. "Republicans embrace the credo of cut, cut, cut now, and ask questions later," Schumer said. The cuts would overturn bipartisan spending agreements most recently passed in a full-year stopgap funding bill in March. Democrats warn a partisan cut now could make it more difficult to negotiate government funding bills that must pass with bipartisan agreement by Sept 30 to avoid a shutdown. Appropriations bills require 60 votes to move ahead in the Senate, but the rescissions package needs just 51, meaning Republicans can pass it without Democratic support. [[nid:719915]]
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
US senators approve US$9 billion of Elon Musk's federal cuts
WASHINGTON: The US Senate approved early on Thursday (Jul 17) a package of spending cuts proposed by President Donald Trump that would cancel more than US$9 billion in funding for foreign aid programs and public broadcasting. The upper chamber of Congress green-lit the measure in what was seen as the first test of how easily lawmakers could usher into law savings sought by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) - in the aftermath of the tech mogul's acrimonious exit from the government. Despite the cutbacks' unpopularity in some sections of both parties, the Republican-led Senate passed the measure with 51 votes for and 48 against in a session that went more than two hours past midnight. The version of the text passed in June by the House of Representatives sought to eliminate US$400 million in funding allocated to health programs, including the PEPFAR global AIDS relief fund created by then-president George W. Bush. But defunding PEPFAR - which has saved an estimated 26 million lives - was seen as a nonstarter among a handful of moderate Republican senators, and the proposal was dropped. South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham told AFP the bill was consistent with Trump's promises to cut spending. "I've been a big fan of the foreign aid accounts ... I'm a big hawkish guy, but you need foreign aid. You need soft power," he said. "But when you start spending money on a bunch of junk, and liberal programs disconnected from the purpose of the aid package, it makes it difficult on a guy like me." The bill now goes back to the House for final approval, with lawmakers up against the clock. Congress, which had already allocated the money, has to approve the cuts by Friday or the White House must spend the cash as originally intended. Legislation to claw back money already approved by Congress - known as a "rescissions package" - is extremely rare, and no such measure has passed in decades. "SURRENDERING POWERS" Around a dozen Republicans had voiced concerns about allowing the White House to dictate spending cuts, placing them in the crosshairs of Trump, who last week threatened to withhold his endorsements from any rebels. The vote was the first in what Republicans have touted as a potential series of packages codifying the spending cuts made by DOGE. Musk was tapped by Trump to lead the task force after the tech billionaire spent US$290 million helping him get elected. The SpaceX and Tesla boss boasted that he would be able to save US$2 trillion in federal spending - but left the White House under a cloud in late May as he feuded with Trump over deficits and spending. DOGE acknowledges that it has saved taxpayers just US$190 billion - and fact checkers even see that claim as dubious, given previous inaccuracies in its accounting. The rescissions package slashes around US$8 billion in foreign aid, with much of that approved for humanitarian organization USAID, one of DOGE's first targets. Around US$1 billion is to be taken back from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which helps fund National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), as well as more than 1,500 local radio and television stations. Conservatives often accuse PBS and NPR of bias, and Trump signed an executive order in May to cease federal funding for both networks. Democrats say cutting the funding will not meaningfully reduce the deficit, but instead dismantle a trusted source of information for millions of Americans. "It is yet another example of the spirit and ideals of our Constitution being undermined in a terrible way. We are a nation that believes that (Congress) has a real role," New Jersey Senator Cory Booker told AFP.
