Europe's energy bills unplugged: Who pays the most to use the grid?
The share of electricity and gas bills that goes to distribution, essentially what you pay to use the grid, also differs from country to country.
So, how much of your energy bill goes to distribution companies in Europe? And which countries pay the most for distribution? Also known as network charges, this portion of the bill mostly includes both transmission and distribution costs.
The Household Energy Price Index (HEPI), compiled by Energie-Control Austria, MEKH, and VaasaETT, provides a detailed breakdown of residential end-user electricity and gas prices. The breakdown includes four components: energy, distribution, energy taxes, and VAT.
As of April 2024, the share of distribution in household electricity prices ranged from 11% in Nicosia to 65% in Budapest, closely followed by Amsterdam (60%). However, in Amsterdam, the distribution share would drop to 39% if the tax refund were not considered.
The capital cities of Hungary and the Netherlands stand out as clear outliers, with more than half of the electricity bill going to distribution.
The EU-27 average was 28%. Other high-share cities include Luxembourg City (46%), Podgorica (43%), and Bucharest (42%).
Many Central and Eastern European cities such as Kyiv, Vilnius, Riga, Zagreb, Belgrade, and Warsaw have distribution shares well above the EU average. Western cities like Paris (35%) and Lisbon (34%) also fall into the higher group.
The Nordic capitals (Helsinki, Oslo, Stockholm, Copenhagen) tend to have lower shares (between 17%–23%).
Southern Europe shows some of the lowest distribution shares, including Athens (15%) and Rome (15%).
Cities like Berlin (29%), Vienna (30%), Tallinn (29%), Dublin (30%), and Prague (31%) are close to the EU average, showing moderate distribution cost impact.
Among the capitals of Europe's top five economies, London and Madrid had the lowest distribution share at 18%.
On average across the EU capital cities, the distribution share is slightly lower in gas prices (23%) than in electricity prices (28%).
The distribution share in residential end-user gas prices ranged from 10% in Kyiv to 43% in Bern.
In addition to Bern, the distribution share exceeded one-third of gas bills in Sofia (37%) and Bratislava (34%). In Dublin, it came close to that level at 32%.
Among the EU capitals, Amsterdam had the lowest distribution share at 13%, followed by Zagreb and Tallinn, both at 15%.
The variation in gas distribution shares among Europe's top five economies is smaller compared to electricity. London and Madrid had the highest shares at 22%, slightly below the EU average, followed by Rome at 21%. In Paris and Berlin, the shares were even lower—17% and 16%, respectively.
Rafaila Grigoriou, HEPI project manager & head of VaasaETT's Greek office, and Ioannis Korras, senior energy market analyst at VaasaETT explained that network costs are determined based on local requirements and national strategies for the development and upgrading of distribution and transmission networks. A significant portion of national network investment costs is passed on to end-user bills through network charges.
'Disparities among markets are primarily driven by their investment plans and are related to electrification demand, level of RES penetration, distributed generation, the age of the network infrastructure etc.' Grigoriou and Korras told Euronews.
VaasaETT experts also noted that the comparison of network cost shares in total bills between countries may not always accurately reflect the true significance of network costs in some cases. This is especially true in cases where regulations or support schemes affect the energy component of the bill.
Cities like Budapest and Bucharest clearly illustrate this effect. In Budapest, the electricity distribution share is 65%, equal to 5.94 c€/kWh. In contrast, Bucharest has a lower distribution share of 42%, but the actual cost is higher at 6.75 c€/kWh. This is due to differences in end-user electricity prices: 9.1 c€/kWh in Budapest versus 16.1 c€/kWh in Bucharest.
The same pattern applies to gas distribution in these cities as well.
The breakdown of energy bills can vary over time or during extraordinary situations, depending on the country. The Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022 is a clear example of such a disruption, which led to sharp changes in energy prices.
'Since the beginning of the energy crisis, there has been a significant number of temporary support measures that involved the reduction or abolishment of network charges or taxes in European countries,' Rafaila Grigoriou told.
'Those have affected both electricity and gas bills and a small number of those are in fact still active in some markets. Slovenia is an example of this for residential electricity customers.' she added.
While this article does not aim to analyse or compare final consumer energy prices across Europe in depth, providing these figures still offers valuable context.
As of April 2025, household end-user electricity prices ranged from 9.1 € cents per kWh in Budapest to 40.4 c€/kWh in Berlin according to the HEPI. The EU-27 average was 24.7 c€/kWh.
Among EU capital cities, gas prices in the same period ranged from 2.5 c€/kWh in Budapest to 34.1 c€/kWh in Stockholm, with an EU average of 11.1 c€/kWh.
Euronews compared and analysed residential end-user electricity and gas prices across Europe as of January 2025, examining both nominal prices and those adjusted for purchasing power.
The article entitled 'Electricity and Gas Prices Across Europe' also explores the factors driving the differences in energy prices across European countries.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fashion Network
23 minutes ago
- Fashion Network
India accuses EU, US of double standard over Russian trade
India has sharply criticised the US and the European Union, saying it is being unfairly singled out by them over its Russian oil purchases when they both trade extensively with Moscow despite the war in Ukraine. India's criticism followed a renewed threat by US President Donald Trump on Monday to raise tariffs on goods from India over its Russian oil purchases, deepening the trade rift between the two countries. In a rare show of unity, Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the main opposition Congress on Tuesday condemned Trump's repeated criticism of New Delhi. India's Foreign Ministry said in a statement issued late on Monday that "it is revealing that the very nations criticising India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia". The US embassy and the EU's delegation in New Delhi did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Both the US and EU have sharply scaled back their trade ties with Russia since it launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. In 2021, Russia was the EU's fifth-largest trading partner, with goods exchange worth 258 billion euros, according to the EU executive European Commission. The sudden rift between India and the US has been deepening since July 31, when Trump announced a 25% tariff on Indian goods being shipped to the US and for the first time threatened unspecified penalties for buying Russian oil. India is one of the biggest buyers of crude from Russia, importing about 1.75 million barrels per day from January to June this year, up 1% from a year ago. India has said it does not support "unilateral sanctions" by the EU. Trade experts say Trump's tariff could badly hurt India's economy. Ajay Srivastava of the New Delhi-based Global Trade Research Initiative said he expected Indian goods exports to the US to fall 30% in the current fiscal year ending March 31, to 60.6 billion dollars from 86.5 billion dollars in the 2025 fiscal year. India's equity benchmarks fell after Trump's renewed threat of harsh tariffs on goods from India. Manish Tewari, a member of parliament and Congress leader, said Trump's "disparaging remarks hurt the dignity and self-respect of Indians". "The time has come to call out this constant bullying and hectoring," he added. BJP Vice President Baijayant Jay Panda quoted Henry Kissinger - the most powerful US diplomat of the Cold War era - in a post on X: "To be an enemy of America can be dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal."
Euronews
23 minutes ago
- Euronews
EU Commission 'surprised' by German minister's jibe on trade deal
The European Commission said on Tuesday it was surprised by comments German Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil in which he highlighted the EU's weakness in the ongoing tariff talks, despite Germany having been fully briefed ahead of the agreement reached on July 27 by Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and US President Donald Trump. 'It is most surprising to us,' Commission spokesperson Olof Gill said, adding: 'Nothing has happened here in terms of the Commission's approach, negotiation or outcome achieved without the clear signal received from our member states.' Klingbeil said on Monday, ahead of his meeting with US Treasury Secretary Scott Besant in Washington DC, that EU representatives 'have shown weakness' during trade negotiations with the US. 'Overall, as Europeans, we must become stronger," Klingbeil insisted, "then we can also stand up to the US with more self-confidence. Not against the US, but in dialogue with the US.' Germany 'had been fully briefed on the details of the agreement at a political level', Commission Deputy Spokesperson Arianna Podestà added on Tuesday. Since the announcement of the EU-US tariff agreement on July 27, the Commission has maintained that the deal represents the least bad option, allowing the EU to avoid a further escalation in the transatlantic trade dispute. However, the details of the agreement are still under negotiation, just days after a US Executive Order set tariffs at 15%. Germany, in particular, continues to see its automotive industry heavily impacted by 25% US tariffs — contrary to the political deal, which aimed to reduce them to 15%. Negotiations also continue on which products may be eligible for exemptions. 'We fight for every product and every industry,' a senior EU official said, adding: 'We're really trying to get as many products into the list of exemptions.' A joint EU-US statement is expected to be released soon, aiming to reinforce the political commitments made on both sides of the Atlantic. Under the current framework, the US has agreed to apply a 15% tariff on EU goods, while the EU has committed to purchasing US energy and investing in the United States.
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Change blows over the Baltic Sea as Poland bets on offshore wind
The energy transition is one of the most important challenges the European Union is facing. While the goal is clear – to achieve climate neutrality by 2050 – the road to get there is sometimes bumpy. The struggles of the energy transition are particularly evident in the wind energy sector, which, despite its dynamic development, still faces numerous barriers. Poland, being one of the largest CO₂ emitters in the EU, is an example of both the opportunities and the difficulties of this transition. For the first time in history, renewable energy sources (RES) in Poland trumped coal in the national energy mix. This is not a one-off incident, experts say, but a sign of a lasting shift in the country's energy landscape. "Every day, during daylight hours, we have much more energy from RES than from coal," comments Piotr Czopek, vice president at the Polish Wind Energy Association, emphasising that the country is just entering a new chapter in its energy transition. Renewable energy, as the cheapest source available today, can become the foundation for the future competitiveness of Polish industry in the European and global arena. Offshore wind energy plays a special role as a sector that is just coming to life. Poland has significant wind energy potential, especially in Pomerania and the central part of the country. According to the Polish Wind Energy Association (PWEA), the installed capacity of wind farms in Poland exceeded 9 GW at the beginning of 2025. However, the development of onshore wind turbines has been blocked for years by the '10H rule' - a regulation requiring wind turbines to be built no closer than ten times their height from the nearest buildings. Although a 2023 amendment softened these restrictions and gave the sector a much-needed investment boost, experts warn that further reforms are still necessary to unlock the full potential of wind energy. "Offshore wind energy? From the point of view of these renewables, it's the most stable source," says Czopek. "Anyone who has been to the Baltic Sea knows that it always blows properly there." "This makes this power industry very stable, it produces a lot of energy, on top of that, it is far away from human settlements, so no one is bothered by it. Secondly, the Baltic Sea is a relatively shallow sea, which facilitates investment," he adds. Although no offshore wind farm in Poland is yet fully operational, the first turbines are already standing in the Baltic Sea. Construction by the Baltic Power consortium (Orlen and Canada's Northland Power) aims to create a 1200 MW farm. Further projects will start next year, and by 2030, Poland plans to reach 6,000 MW of energy from offshore wind farms. As experts emphasise, this is not only an energy investment – it is also an opportunity for the industry. "We are at the initial, ascending stage. Already today, many large factories are being built in Poland – in Szczecin, in Gdansk and in other cities," Czopek says. Baltic Towers in Gdansk is just one example of a growing manufacturing base. Importantly, Poland is attracting not only domestic companies but also global players who are opening production facilities here. "No one will invest hundreds of millions of euros in Poland if they don't see that they can make money from this business," he emphasises. Offshore wind energy is also an export opportunity, as turbine components, infrastructure, or design services can go to markets all over the world. At the European level, wind energy is also growing in strength. According to WindEurope, EU countries installed a total of 18 GW of new wind capacity in 2024, mainly in Germany, Spain and the Netherlands. However, the EU faces rising component costs, inflation and global competition, above all from China, which dominates turbine production. Brussels plans to counter these trends through the European Act on Carbon Neutral Industries and strategic raw material partnerships. The aim is to increase Europe's technological and energy independence, especially given the ongoing geopolitical crisis. Social challenges are also not insignificant. In many regions – both in Poland and Western Europe – residents are protesting against the construction of wind farms, concerned about noise, landscape aesthetics or the impact on local ecosystems. Social acceptance is playing an increasingly important role, which, as research shows, can be increased through the participation of local communities in investments and a fair distribution of profits. Wind turbines have become a symbol of a green future and the fight against CO₂ emissions. However, questions are increasingly being asked about how much it really costs to build wind farms and whether their carbon footprint contradicts the idea of 'green energy'? The construction of a wind farm – whether onshore or offshore – is a financially intensive undertaking. According to WindEurope, the cost of installing one wind turbine on land ranges from €1.2 to €1.6 million for each megawatt of energy-producing capacity. For offshore or marine farms, the costs are even higher, as much as €3 to €5 million per megawatt. The total cost includes manufacturing and transporting the turbines, the construction of the foundations, network connections (often tens of kilometres of cables), engineering and maintenance work. Experts point out that, although wind energy is 'free', the infrastructure needed to generate it involves huge investment and technical costs. A typical wind turbine requires around 200-300 litres of specialised oil every 1.5-2 years. For offshore farms, the logistics and labour costs can far exceed the price of the lubricant itself. The industry is now looking for ways to reduce oil consumption or change lubrication technology altogether. Ideas are also emerging for the use of greener bio-liquids. On 18-19 November, the largest offshore wind energy conference in Poland, and also the largest in Central and Eastern Europe, will be held in Warsaw. As the organisers, the Polish Wind Energy Association, point out, the event is intended to bring together investors and supply chain companies. "It's a space to discuss investments and to do business – because that's what it's all about, to be able to meet and talk about what we can do together," it says. Poland is at a turning point today. Although only a few years ago coal dominated the domestic energy sector indivisibly, today it is wind, both literally and figuratively, that is blowing in the sails of the transformation. Renewable energy is not only changing the way we produce electricity. It is also changing the way we think about the future – greener, more competitive and more independent.
