Infrastructure crisis must be tackled with the same energy as Brexit
Will the
Government
be brave enough to implement a set of radical recommendations from the taskforce on infrastructure which is due to report next month? The response will be a clear signal about whether the Coalition parties are capable of implementing the kind of actions the country requires as a matter of urgency.
If they fail to act decisively to eliminate the bottlenecks that have blocked the overdue development of our water, energy and transport infrastructure, the housing crisis will only get worse and centre-ground politics could be discredited for a generation.
The fact that the infrastructure taskforce, chaired by
Jack Chambers
, contains a wealth of experience in the private and public sectors is a positive sign. One member of the taskforce, Sean O'Driscoll, former chief executive of Glen Dimplex, has publicly committed it to putting forward a range of radical options.
Tánaiste
Simon Harris
has promised to respond with 'big, brave, bold decisions'. If the Coalition lives up to that commitment there is a lot that can be achieved in a short space of time, but political courage will be essential in the face of the inevitable howls of protest.
READ MORE
One of the main blockages to progress has been abuse of court procedure by objectors to almost every major infrastructural project, and plenty of smaller ones as well. The result has been indefinite delays to critical water, energy and transport projects as well as housing development.
The inertia that has gripped decision making in the State for far too long is illustrated by the way a comprehensive set of proposals to remove legal obstacles from the planning system seem to have disappeared into a black hole.
A detailed report on the operation of civil law, chaired by the highly respected former president of the High Court, Peter Kelly, which was published in 2020, put forward a range of straightforward measures to streamline the process of judicial review and end the flood of planning hearings clogging up the courts.
The response to three big, potentially overwhelming events over the past decade and a half, the financial crisis, Brexit and the Covid pandemic, show that the system is capable of decisive action when the need arises
The key proposals were the introduction of a simple piece of legislation to ensure that trivial issues such as typographical errors in planning applications should not be grounds for a judicial review. More importantly it proposed that the courts should not hear a case unless the applicant is able to demonstrate that they have a substantial interest in a planning decision and have a reasonable chance of winning.
The current situation whereby an individual or group can object to a development hundreds of kilometres away from where they live or do business is one of the greatest absurdities of our planning system. The abandonment of
Apple
's
planned development in Athenry
was just one example of the system's weakness. The Kelly report made a range of other proposals, including tightening the rules on the awarding of costs and the length of time it takes to have cases heard.
In a letter to the then minister for justice,
Helen McEntee
, introducing his report, Kelly noted how Lytton Strachey in his celebrated short biography of Florence Nightingale quoted her concern that a report of the royal commission into the health of the army 'would like so many other royal commissions before and since, turn out to have achieved nothing but the concoction of a very fat blue book on a very high shelf'.
Kelly remarked that not much had changed since Victorian times when it came to implementing reports containing valuable recommendations for reform or innovation. 'In an effort to avoid such a result, the review group determined at its first meeting to produce recommendations which would be practical, affordable and capable of implementation with as little fuss as possible.'
Despite producing a report that lived up to that billing, the fate Kelly feared has come to pass. It is just one example of the lethargy which can beset the political and administrative system when it comes to making and implementing big decisions whose need is glaringly obvious.
The response to three big, potentially overwhelming events over the past decade and a half, the financial crisis, Brexit and the Covid pandemic, show that the system is capable of decisive action when the need arises. The same kind of focus, allied to a resolve to face down objectors, will be required when it comes to implementing the expected radical recommendations of the taskforce.
The timidity with which the political system has treated the proposed pipeline from the Shannon to Dublin, to guarantee the future water supply for the capital, illustrates the extent of the issue. The needless delay in constructing a motorway between Cork and Limerick is another example.
The building of Ardnacrusha in the 1920s is often cited as a model of what can be achieved by courageous government action but O'Driscoll has pointed out that much more recently, in the early 1980s, a gas pipeline between the Kinsale field and Dublin was constructed in 18 months. So big projects can be devised and implemented if the political will to drive them exists.
The Coalition needs to be brave and implement radical change for the common good. Failure will have dire consequences for generations to come.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Where is the value in increasing the Help-to-Buy scheme threshold?
Pre-budget submissions are all about pleadings. Every special interest group in the State makes a pitch for more resources. They all consider their proposals to be in the wider public and economic interest. Some are worthy, many more are largely self-interested. This year the whole process appears to have kicked off earlier than usual, perhaps on the understanding that the largesse of recent years is unlikely to be repeated this time around. In the first place, there is no election. Worries for the medium-term health of Europe's most open economy in a climate where tariffs, trade wars and an absence of consistency on policy are increasingly the norm also will inevitably push Ministers towards a more cautious approach. And for what money is available, the need is to prioritise investment in infrastructure. Expensive upgrades to electricity, water and sewerage networks that are increasingly being cited by foreign direct investors among factors counting against Ireland Inc are needed. READ MORE An EY survey on Friday found that more than two-thirds of Irish businesses 'are worried about securing enough energy to meet future needs', which is an extraordinary number. Put together, it means more things are going to be a tough ask to get over the line. [ First-time buyers in Dublin now locked out of Help-to-Buy scheme, warns Savills Opens in new window ] It seems a strange time then for estate agent Savills to be picking CSO house price data to press for an increase in the upper threshold for the Help-to-Buy scheme. Savills says first-time buyers in Dublin are paying an average of €515,000 for a home, putting them beyond the €500,000 ceiling for Help-to-Buy. It wants that ceiling increased to at least €621,000 to take account of inflation, it says. First, averages are notoriously prone to manipulation by singular expensive property sales. Second, the more reliable median data from the same CSO note shows that prices exceed €460,000 only in Dún Laoghaire Rathdown among the four Dublin local authority areas. [ Developers are bluffing when they say lower prices would undermine viability of house building Opens in new window ] Then there is the maximum available tax refund under Help-to-Buy, which is €30,000. Ignoring that when calling for a higher ceiling is not making property more affordable for first-time buyers in general, only for the very wealthy. It is worth remembering that while the marketing speaks about providing a helping hand for first-time buyers – with even the scheme's name selected for the same reason – Help-to-Buy was from the start a scheme put together to help developers make the numbers stack up on building starter homes. That's not happening, as supply constraints (and prices rising at their fastest rate in 10 years) attest, so for the State – and those first-time buyers – what is the value of widening the incentive?
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Fianna Fáil is in desperate need of a candidate for the presidential election. Applications are invited
No matter how much it protests that no decisions have been made, it's hard to see how Fianna Fáil can really just sit out October's presidential election . True, the party hasn't contested an election since 2007, when Mary McAleese snatched the nomination from Albert Reynolds and went on to win a bitterly contested race, subsequently serving two successful terms. But the reasons the party didn't contest in 2011 and 2018 – the first because it was in total meltdown after the financial crisis and then because there was a popular incumbent whom it quite liked seeking a second term – don't apply in 2025. Micheál Martin, having restored Fianna Fáil from a state of near-death to the largest party in the State and returned to the Taoiseach's office after last year's elections, has a credible claim to being the party's most successful leader since its founder. Running for elections is what successful parties do. Sitting on the sidelines, especially with Fine Gael running in what could turn out to be a restorative election for its leader, would be a peculiar choice and reflect both an insecurity about the future and a paucity of imagination and resources for the present. If Sinn Féin runs its own candidate – undecided, say party sources, but likely I think – it would be even harder for Fianna Fáil to enter a nolle prosequi. READ MORE Not that Martin and his allies care all that much for the presidency. They are interested in power and there is little if any power in the Áras. But symbols matter in politics. The election of Michael D Higgins in 2011 didn't save Labour , some Fianna Fáilers point out. True. But the election of Mary Robinson opened the door to thousands of voters who would give Labour unprecedented political opportunities. More than that, Robinson's election signalled and was part of opening up what would lead to a different society. It was one of the most consequential elections ever. The problem, as Martin's lieutenants have pondered for many months now, is a candidate: they don't have one. 'Is there a shortlist?' I asked one party panjandrum. 'There isn't even a long list,' he chortled. 'Have you any ideas?' Bertie Ahern spent months publicly offering himself – though less ubiquitously of late, suggesting some private messages of discouragement have been sent. This is probably wise for the party, and for the Bert. If he ran, the campaign would be a nightmare for him, he would have no chance of winning, and he would ultimately regret it. Offering herself too has been Mary Hanafin, but she has been received with coolness rather than enthusiasm. The truth is that there is an entire generation of Fianna Fáilers whose participation in the economic car-crash of 2008-11 more or less disqualifies them from the prospect of success in an election like this – with the remarkable exception of the leader himself, though he likes being leader and Taoiseach and is not ready for retirement yet. Barry Andrews has no interest in either running for president or doing the job. Photograph: Nick Bradshaw Barry Andrews , having a keener political eye than he sometimes lets on, has no interest in either running for the job or doing it and while his MEP colleague Cynthia Ní Mhurchú is being what passes in politics for coy on the question, even a barrister's self-confidence will only get you so far. 'Fianna Fáil will spend the summer going around to the summer schools looking at the various speakers,' laughs one Leinster House insider, a prospect calculated to strike terror into the hearts of those who might be tasked with the job. There remains at all levels of the party, including the leadership, the idea that a McAleese-type candidate will walk through the door some day soon. And maybe that will happen, but for now it remains wishful thinking, and as time ticks on, the chances are diminishing. The former SDLP leader Colum Eastwood is offering himself for this role, but Martin appeared to dismiss that prospect when asked about it recently, insisting that there had been no approach from Fianna Fáil to Eastwood and expressing his surprise at the suggestions that there had. 'It's open to everyone to put themselves forward,' he said. Experts on instant attraction will have noted this is not exactly, 'You had me at hello'. And so the question facing Fianna Fáil, according to several party sources who discussed the issue privately in recent days, may be this: if the party can't find a candidate that it is enthusiastic about, is it better to run a bad candidate or no candidate at all? Opinions vary within the party. One TD fears the political impact of coming third or even fourth behind Fine Gael, Sinn Féin and maybe an Independent. But would it be worse than sitting out the contest entirely? I don't think so. Another party source looks at it this way: when Fine Gael's Gay Mitchell crashed and burned in the 2011 contest – at a time when the party was by far the dominant player in government and politics – and came fourth behind Higgins, Seán Gallagher and Martin McGuinness, winning only 6 per cent of the vote, did that really have any lasting political impact on Fine Gael? Not really. 'If there isn't a political penalty for doing badly, then that makes it more likely we run someone,' the source says. But who? Applications are invited. Knowledge of the political system required; but preferably someone who can be above politics. Who people will admire at home and believe represents them well abroad. A very thorough background check will be required. Deadline for applications: August 31st. Apply: Micheál Martin, Government Buildings, Dublin 2. Canvassing will most certainly not disqualify. Is Conor McGregor really the only person who wants to be President of Ireland? Listen | 19:19
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Senator George Mitchell: The man Ian Paisley called ‘a foreigner and a pro-Irish republican'
In the months after the signing of the Belfast Agreement in April 1998, a letter arrived in the morning post at the homes of more than a few journalists in Ireland and Britain. It was an unusual one. I was one of those to receive it – a personal note of thanks from former US senator George Mitchell , the man who had chaired the years of tortuous negotiations in Stormont. In it, he said he deeply appreciated the role the press plays, particularly in a divided society. I was struck by his decision to pen letters to the same reporters who had questioned him, his motivations and his handling of the talks at every turn. This was so especially given that by then he was back home in New York with his wife and young son and could have been forgiven for never wanting to think about Northern Ireland , its people or its politicians ever again. We were used to dealing with stuffy, aloof British government ministers sent to Belfast , often as a punishment. But Mitchell was cut from a different cloth, always approachable, open, interested. READ MORE Agreement in Northern Ireland did not come overnight. It took many painful months and years. But George Mitchell stuck at it, keeping the negotiators at the table, despite the violence that continued on the streets. Photograph: Jan McCullough George Mitchell filming in his home town of Waterville, Maine. Photograph: Jan McCullough When he and his wife, Heather, returned to Belfast in April 2023 for the 25th anniversary of the Belfast Agreement, he stole the show at an event at Queen's University, even in the presence of Tony Blair, Bill Clinton and others. [ 'A handful of hopefuls can create change': George Mitchell passes on the torch to a new generation Opens in new window ] His words that day were typical of the man from Maine. He celebrated the achievement of the historic accord, but he also implored everyone to do more, to continue to build on the peace, not to take it for granted. I left Queen's that day not only determined to document what he had achieved while in Belfast, but to also understand what it was from his background that made him such a successful negotiator. When his son, Andrew, was born in October 1997 during one of the most fruitless chapters of the talks, one of his staff told him that 61 children had been born in Northern Ireland on the same day – children who deserved to grow up in peace. It was a thought that drove him often. He should never have been in Northern Ireland. The senator from the state of Maine had passed up an opportunity to be President Clinton's pick for the Supreme Court. In January 1995, he became Clinton's economic adviser on Northern Ireland. Having organised that year's Washington economic conference on Northern Ireland, he drafted the Mitchell Principles to help bring Sinn Féin and the loyalist parties into the talks, if they accepted exclusively peaceful means. George Mitchell with film-maker Trevor Birney (centre) and film crew in Waterville, Maine Few were surprised when he was Dublin and London's first choice to chair the talks, even if it provoked outrage from Ian Paisley in early 1996, who said the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) would quit if Mitchell arrived. 'This is about whether George Mitchell, a foreigner and a pro-Irish republican, should preside at talks that have the future destiny of Northern Ireland at hand,' the DUP leader charged. Many others were simply amazed that such a senior US figure would dedicate his time to finding a solution to a conflict deemed unfixable, where so many other efforts had failed before. That was his art, it was never about him. When we set out to make The Negotiator, it was with a desire to discover what had shaped him as a man, as a politician and as a skilled negotiator He quietly went about gaining the trust of those who would occupy Castle Buildings on Stormont's grounds for two years. Resolutions are not found in public. They are hidden in the cracks and crevices of differences. Mitchell's attention to granular detail and his ability to listen with intention allowed him to reach a deep understanding of the conflict that ultimately led to compromise and agreement. Film-maker, Trevor Birney I was one of the many journalists who gathered daily outside the gates of Castle Buildings on Stormont's grounds, attempting to find something new to say. Even though I was very junior, Mitchell and his team were always approachable and helpful as journalists sought to find where truth lay between the briefings and counter-briefings from the governments and the political parties. [ George Mitchell: Northern Ireland's peace must evolve. And if it is here to stay it must be shared Opens in new window ] Agreement did not come overnight. It took many painful months and years. But Mitchell stuck at it, keeping the negotiators at the table, despite the violence that continued on the streets. He could have issued ultimatums and deadlines. Instead, he let everyone air their grievances, day after day. People had to be heard, and to feel that they had been heard. An agreement would be written by them, not dictated by him. That was his art, it was never about him. When we set out to make The Negotiator, it was with a desire to discover what had shaped him as a man, as a politician and as a skilled negotiator. In large part, the answer was found in his home state of Maine, where he honed his political skills as a young lawyer. His mother, who could not read or write, was from Bkassine in southern Lebanon. His Boston-born father had been adopted by a Lebanese-American family. George and his four siblings had a humble childhood, living in a two-room shack by the side of the Kennebec river in Waterville. Early on, he learned that listening to others was the key. Later, as a US senator for Maine, he spent six years finding an agreement over Maine's Acadia National Park's boundaries – an issue that had caused bitter local division for 25 years: 'Patience is a muscle,' he said. Leaving Queen's at the end of the 25th anniversary celebrations, I felt that we had failed properly to document his life, and the road that brought him to Belfast despite all of the time that he had spent in the city. Before he left, I asked him whether he would take part in a documentary charting his life. Thankfully, he agreed. Over several days, we interviewed him at the Mitchells' family home on Mount Desert Island, and also in New York. [ George Mitchell says Belfast Agreement will always be a challenge Opens in new window ] There was a lot of life to cram into one film. In Northern Ireland, he had achieved something that was widely accepted as impossible – a political settlement that brought an apparently intractable conflict to an end. There are busts of him in Belfast. A Colin Davidson portrait celebrates him in New York. People still want to shake his head and tell him they had believed that he was doomed to fail, but were grateful that he had not. Today, for all its flaws, the Belfast our daughters have grown up in was gifted by those who took risks for peace in an agreement hammered out in Castle Buildings on days when there was often little hope. There were many peacemakers, but Mitchell was at the centre. His legacy stands as a beacon: conflicts can be solved if people learn to listen, to properly listen. Where patience is a muscle. The lesson, according to George Mitchell. Journalist Trevor Birney's projects have included producing the Kneecap film and writing a book and making a documentary about businessman Seán Quinn. His documentary The Negotiator was released this week.
