logo
Embattled politician Mark Latham claims relationship with Nathalie Matthews was ‘sexed-up' but consensual

Embattled politician Mark Latham claims relationship with Nathalie Matthews was ‘sexed-up' but consensual

West Australian7 days ago
Embattled politician Mark Latham has renewed claims his relationship with former partner Nathalie Matthews was 'sexed-up' but consensual, as he denied allegations made by his former partner.
This week, widespread reports detailed Ms Matthews' allegations that Mr Latham pressured her into 'degrading' sex acts and threw dinner plates at her.
Speaking to the media at length on Saturday in south-west Sydney, an at times belligerent Mr Latham also refused to confirm or deny allegations that he had sex in his NSW parliamentary office.
He instead responded by asking reporters if they had engaged in similar behaviour at their workplaces.
'These are matters that are private . . . I'm not making any comment on things that are private,' he said
During the lengthy press conference, he said his relationship with Ms Matthews was an 'entirely consensual arrangement between two adults'.
'One thing's abundantly clear, what we had for over two years was a sexed-up, consensual, open arrangement between adults with a fair bit of other contacts, such as fun days of the races thrown in,' he said. 'I didn't make any moral judgment about her.
'I just enjoyed our time together, and it was enjoyable for 90 per cent of the time, the other per cent could be dark and disturbing, but I rationalised it by thinking at my age — an age at which my father had already dropped dead — 90 per cent beat 10 per cent but ultimately, there was an incident that ended it all I mentioned earlier; the races.'
On the night of a contentious vote on the sale of Rosehill Racecourse in Sydney, an incident between the pair allegedly unfolded.
Mr Latham, a one-time Federal Labor leader, later leader of One Nation NSW and now an independent NSW MP, claims the incident was the 'first time in my life I'd ever been physically scared of a woman'.
He claimed Ms Matthews was 'covered in mud' and confronted him. 'This was like something from World War Z,' he said.
Responding to additional reports that he had previously photographed female MPs during parliamentary sessions and sent derogatory private messages about them, Mr Latham acknowledged he had made a 'mistake'.
'I have apologised to both Susan Carter and Abigail Boyd, and they've accepted my apology, for which I thank them both sincerely,' he said.
Mr Latham maintained that he did not breach any parliamentary standing orders and has never been formally notified of any complaints regarding his behaviour.
Ms Matthews reportedly said part of the reason she applied for a domestic violence order against him was fear that intimate videos she claims to have filmed — including one recorded in NSW Parliament House — would be made public.
Mr Latham insisted he had no knowledge of such video recordings involving him.
'I have checked my devices and I can't find any material (Ms Matthews) has filmed involving me, and that includes NSW Parliament House,' Mr Latham said.
'If she has recorded these videos, it is without my knowledge and consent, and there's a question about the legality of such a practice.'
On Saturday, Ms Matthews issued a statement saying she was 'aware' of the remarks made by Mr Latham and would make no additional comments.
'I request the privacy that I deserve whilst I go through this stressful period,' she said.
'The full story will come out in due course in the proper manner.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sarah Ferguson refuses to 'accept' Barnaby Joyce's net zero claim as she dominates interview with ex Nationals leader, as the AFR gets the White Australia policy badly wrong
Sarah Ferguson refuses to 'accept' Barnaby Joyce's net zero claim as she dominates interview with ex Nationals leader, as the AFR gets the White Australia policy badly wrong

Sky News AU

time8 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

Sarah Ferguson refuses to 'accept' Barnaby Joyce's net zero claim as she dominates interview with ex Nationals leader, as the AFR gets the White Australia policy badly wrong

Read Gerard Henderson's Media Watch Dog column every Saturday morning on THE LATEST Here's how Laura Tingle, the ABC's recently-appointed Global Affairs Editor appeared on ABC TV News on Thursday 17 July. La Tingle appears to be standing in front of a photo of Gaza but there is no indication of her location. Could it be the ABC HQ in Sydney's inner-city Ultimo. You be the judge. And here's what the Global Affairs editor declared: Laura Tingle: Man made, mass starvation is considered a crime against humanity. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus: The large proportion of the population of Gaza is starving. I don't know what you would call it, other than mass starvation, and it's man made. Laura Tingle: The World Health Organisation says the man-made cause is the aid blockade imposed by Israel. Episodes of man-made mass starvation are more normally associated with war torn Africa or the actions of totalitarian regimes. In Gaza, the death toll from malnutrition so far stands at 111 according to the Hamas run health ministry, still only a tiny part of the 59,000 Palestinians that it says have been killed. Note that Laura Tingle did not distinguish between the combatants and civilians among the Hamas claim of 59,000 Palestinians that the Hamas-run health ministry says have been killed. Did anyone notice this piece in today's Financial Review Rear Window column under the heading 'Latham's Lemmings still prominent in Labor'? The Labor caucus spent the early part of its week talking about Mark Latham. Or to put it another way: after two months off work and a stonking electoral mandate, Anthony Albanese's team couldn't find anything better to do than talk about themselves. Are they being serious? They resolved to condemn the seedy revelations and allegations involving their former federal leader by adding a small plaque next to his portrait in their caucus room. 'In 2017 Mark Latham was expelled from the Australian Labor Party and banned for life,' the plaque is reported to read. 'His actions do not accord with Labor values and fail to meet the standards we expect and demand.' As an expression of triteness it is total. They could have left the portrait up, saying nothing (and upsetting some people), or simply removed it (angering others). But they came up with a special third thing for what? Their own feelings? It's the equivalent of Disney putting a sensitivity warning before Aladdin to insist the cartoon portrayals of Arabs are out-of-date with modern standards. And the architect of the racist White Australia policy, Arthur Calwell, has his mug up a few frames down from Latham. Where's his plaque? To be fair to former Labor leader Arthur Calwell [Why bother? - MWD Editor], the White Australia Policy came into effect with the passing of the Immigration Restriction Act 1901. Calwell was born in 1896. He was not the architect of White Australia. CAN YOU BEAR IT? First up, some GOOD NEWS. As anticipated in Media Watch Dog last week, Annabel ('I love reporting The Lobster Wars') Crabb has replaced Laura Tingle as ABC Radio National's Late Night Live commentator on Australian national politics. How is this good news? – MWD hears avid readers cry. Well, Comrade Crabb is likely to provide great copy for Ellie's (male) co-owner. As she did last week with her (frightfully interesting) account of The Lobster Wars. As avid readers know, Late Night Live (aka Late Night Left) is an example of the taxpayer funded public broadcaster's lack of viewpoint diversity. After all, the left-of-centre Annabel Crabb reports on Australian national politics, the left-of-centre Bruce Shapiro reports on United States politics, the left-of-centre Ian Dunt reports on British politics and the left-of-centre David Marr is LNL's presenter. Not a conservative among this lot. But MWD digresses. On Monday July 21, among other topics, the decision of the Labor Party caucus to leave Mark Latham's photo on its collection of Labor Party leaders from John Watson to Bill Shorten on the Caucus wall. Anthony Albanese's pic will go up when he is no longer Labor Party leader. Mark Latham's pic will have the following message attached to it: In 2017 Mark Latham was expelled from the Australian Labor Party and banned for life. His actions do not accord with Labor values and failed to meet the standards we expect and demand. Correct MWD if it is wrong. However, Hendo seems to recall that Mark Latham was expelled from the Labor Party in 2017 because he joined the Liberal Democratic Party – and not for bad behaviour. In which case, it is odd that the portrait of Billy Hughes is still on the Caucus wall without a message – since he was expelled from the Labor Party in 1916 for supporting conscription and joined National Labor which later became the Nationalist Party. Ever since, Billy Hughes has been regarded as a 'Labor rat'- he even features in the essay titled 'Rats' by the late John Iremonger in the edition collection by John Faulkner and Stuart Macintyre titled True Believers (Allen & Unwin, 2001). The matter was discussed on Late Night Live where the following exchange took place: Annabel Crabb: His [Latham's] photograph is up in the Caucus room. And today it was resolved that they wouldn't tear it down, they would instead – David Marr: But surely, surely a sensible decision. I mean, it should be there as a warning. Annabel Crabb: Well, I think it would have been a strange thing to turn it around or take it down. Or, you know, replace it with a hand-drawn facsimile. They've decided to add a contextualising note – David Marr: [Laughs] Oh no, saying what? Annabel Crabb: Saying that "this man was the leader of our party, and we've now established that he no longer resembles or personifies anything that we like, but we can't deny history" - it was something like that. Anyway, Mark Latham, then, I think, as is his wont, responded via the X app and said, "Oh, why don't they just go the full Stalin and then white me out with a trace around my head". It's hard to deny history, isn't it? David Marr: It is, and it's and it's hard not to applaud the Australian people who took a look at him and decided, 'no'. Annabel Crabb: Okay, well, look, it's interesting, because the 2004 election campaign, as you remember, you know, there was in the year or two preceding a real, like, a significant expectation that Mark Latham and the Labor Party would overpower John Howard at that election. And I think you know, John Howard was pretty nervous about that too… How about that? Here is Comrade Marr praising the good people of Australia for voting for the Coalition and John Howard over Mark Latham and Labor in October 2004. However, does anyone believe that Comrade Marr said 'No' to Latham and voted for a return of the Howard government in 2004? And, in case the answer is no – here's another question: Can You Bear It? Photographer Mike Bowers, who presents ABC TV Insiders' 'Talking Pictures' segment on Sundays, recently moved from the left-wing Guardian Australia online newspaper to the left-wing New Daily online newspaper. As is befitting for someone who is on the payroll of the ABC Soviet. Which, as the name suggests, is a Conservative Free Zone. On Sunday 20 July, Comrade Bowers ended his 'Talking Pictures' segment with writer Melina Wicks by discussing the Federal Court's recent decision about whether Australia owes a duty of care to Torres Strait Islanders with respect to global-warming and all that. Your man Bowers focused on three cartoons by: The Guardian Australia's Fiona Katauskas All three cartoonists – plus Comrade Bowers and Comrade Wicks – accept the view that Australia, which produces one per cent of global emissions, can determine sea levels around the Torres Strait Islands. How ignorant can cartoonists and those who comment on them get? Moreover, Can You Bear It? On 7.30 this week Sarah Ferguson interviewed Nationals backbencher Barnaby Joyce. He wanted to talk about net zero emissions by 2050. She wanted to talk about the Nationals leadership. Ferguson took up 40 per cent of the interview time and interrupted Joyce no fewer than 20 occasions. Here's how the interview ended: Barnaby Joyce: To the lady who can't afford her power, to the farmer who has been decimated with a massive intrusion, an almost socialist intrusion, with areas with helicopters and planes and security guards going to places, with the people in small businesses who say I just can't afford to do this anymore, it's idiotic. And for the fact that this will have no effect on the climate whatsoever. What is the point of that [Net Zero 2050] folly? Sarah Ferguson: Barnaby Joyce, not accepting your point about folly, but moving on. Thank you very much indeed. Barnaby Joyce: Absolute pleasure, Sarah. Sarah Ferguson: I want to change the tone very slightly here because we are used to politicians appearing to be thick skinned. The execution of power demands it and I should say this is not a reflection on Barnaby Joyce. I wanted to change the tone because tonight we'll see a slightly different side of Education Minister Jason Clare… How about that? First, who cares whether Ferguson accepts Joyce's comments that net zero is a folly. Second, Ferguson appears to blame Joyce for the fact that she interrupted him. Can You Bear It? THE MONTHLY CLAIMS THAT NOBODY LIKES RICHARD MARLES BUT THEN NAMES ONE OF HIS 'OLD MATES' The print edition of The Monthly (publisher Morry Schwartz, chief executive and editor-in-chief Erik Jensen, editor Michael Williams) arrived with a bang on Ellie's kennel on the morning of 24 July. The magazine is so very inner-city Collingwood, in a Melbourne sort of way. It is written of the inner-city left, by the inner-city left and for the inner-city left (to distort an Abraham Lincoln comment). The cover of the August 2025 issue is red print on a darkish blue background – which makes it difficult to read close up and impossible from a distance. On close analysis it declares, ' The Monthly: 20 years of Australia's best magazine'. What does this mean? – Media Watch Dog hears readers cry. Who knows? Inside there are posed photos of two occasional contributors. The following comment is attributed to Sean Kelly: 'You know every issue what you're going to get, and at the same time every issue surprises you'. Clever, eh? But what does that mean? Next page there is a pic of Sarah Krasnostein who declares, '…a space for us to look at something with fresh eyes'. But how is this consistent with Comrade Kelly's claim that you know in every issue what you're going to get since no one needs fresh eyes for such a task? Who knows? Who cares? Returning to the cover, the almost unreadable cover story heading 'Nobody likes Richard Marles (so how did he get so powerful?) by Martin McKenzie-Murray'. Inside, the cover story occupies ten pages of photos and script. The Hyphenated-Name Guy concluded his latest rant against No-Friends-Marles with a reference to his 'old mate Bill'. That is, former Labor Party leader Bill Shorten. Hang on a minute. How can a man 'nobody likes' have an 'old mate'? Over to you Comrades Jensen and Williams. Meanwhile, Can You Bear It? [Good point that you mentioned the Hyphenated Name Set (to borrow Paul Keating's term). Once upon a time they were the preserve of the wealthy Protestant Establishment who belonged to the Melbourne Club. Now, hyphenated names are replete among the inner-city left and rife within the Greens (e.g. Max Chandler-Mather) and Climate 200 financed Teals (e.g. Simon Holmes à Court). – MWD Editor.] There was enormous interest in last week's Media Watch Dog which mentioned comments linking Jillian Segal, the Special Envoy on Anti-Semitism, with the fact that her husband was a director of a company that gave $50,000 to the Advance organisation. They were made, respectively, by Olivia Ireland in the Sydney Morning Herald and Sarah Ferguson on ABC TV's 7.30. MWD commented that, in 2025, it was surprising to find left-of-centre types implying that somehow women are responsible for the actions of their husbands. How surprising to find, then, that La Trobe University Emeritus Professor Robert Manne ran the very same line in his essay 'The wrong way to respond to anti-semitism'. It was published in the 18 July 2025 issue of Inside Story . Here's what he had to say: As we have recently discovered because of the investigative journalism of the independent online media platform, the Klaxon , the man to whom Jillian Segal is married is the partner with his brother of a trust that in 2023 and 2024 donated $50,000 to 'Advance', the most significant mainstream far right movement in Australia, that led the campaign against the indigenous Voice to Parliament and that has described Prime Minister Albanese as 'weak, woke and broke'. Taking cover behind political correctness, Segal has claimed she had nothing to do with her husband's political activities or he with hers, and that it was outrageous to suggest otherwise…. How about that? The oh so intellectually fashionable Robert Manne of La Trobe University has accused Ms Segal of 'taking cover behind political correctness' to justify his attempt to discredit Ms Segal by implying that she is not independent of her husband. Can You Bear It? [No. Not really. But it is very nasty – as befits Manne's style. MWD readers should check out Gerard Henderson's review of Robert Manne's A Political Memoir which is published in the current issue of The Sydney Institute Review Online . – MWD Editor.] AN ABC UPDATE IT'S OFF TO NANCY'S COURTESY CLASSES FOR DAVID MARR FAVE IAN DUNT Here's a reminder to the ABC's new management. MWD is looking at you Kim Williams (chairman) and you Hugh Marks (managing director and editor-in-chief). The late Nancy (2002-2017) may have died [perhaps you should write 'passed' MWD Editor]. But her Courtesy Classes live on. With the help of the American psychic John Edward who can communicate with RIP types who are on the Other Side (so to speak). Media Watch Dog's proposal is that the British journalist Ian Dunt (who has a regular slot on David Marr's Late Night Live program on Radio National every second Tuesday) should get some courtesy training from Nancy via your man Edward. As avid readers know, Late Night Live (aka Late Night Left) only has left-of-centre regular commentators. Comrade Annabel Crabb on Australia, Comrade Bruce Shapiro on the United States and Comrade Ian Dunt on Britain. On Wednesday 23 July, your man Dunt ran predictable left-wing lines on Israel/Gaza, climate change and unlawful immigration. Or something like that. However, he missed the big story of the week – namely Britain's mishandling of Afghans who apparently supported British forces in Afghanistan and sought refuge in Britain. But MWD digresses, yet again. Let's go to the transcript to examine how Comrade Dunt references the Brits whom he does not like. According to The I Paper columnist, Dunt, Suella Braverman (the former Conservative Home Secretary) is a 'sort of walking psychological breakdown'. columnist, Dunt, Suella Braverman (the former Conservative Home Secretary) is a 'sort of walking psychological breakdown'. According to your man Dunt, Kemi Badenoch is 'the leader of the Conservative Party, at least for the next 24 hours'. According to Comrade Dunt, former Conservative prime minister Boris Johnson was a 'dreadful reactionary nightmare'. This is not political analysis. It's just political abuse. Ian Dunt – off to Nancy's Courtesy Classes for you. OUTSIDE INSIDERS As avid readers are well aware, a certain William (Bill) Thompson – a Melburnian who identifies as the ABC's Southbank Correspondent – set up the 'Outside Insiders ' video segment some years ago. This is a print edition of the Bill Thompson initiative to report on the ABC TV Insiders program from the outside. Insiders fled Melbourne for the (media) safety of the Canberra Bubble in 2020 and, consequently, was now loosed from the troublesome Mr Thompson. IN WHICH KATRINA CURTIS LOOKS DOWN ON FOX NEWS & DAVID SPEERS ACCUSES THOSE WITH WHOM HE DISAGREES AS DISCRIMINATING It's Media Watch Dog's melancholy duty to record that Mark ('Please call me professor') Kenny was not on ABC TV's Insiders last Sunday. Comrade Kenny is a MWD fave on account of the fact that he provides such great copy. The previous issue of MWD drew attention to the learned professor's howler about the composition of the Reserve Bank's Monetary Policy Board. And then this was his live-to-air somersault as to whether he favours a one-state solution for Israel (entailing the demise of Israel as we know it) or a two-state solution (in which Israel would exist alongside a Palestinian State). Comrade Kenny, after a 10-minute assessment, ended up with a two-state solution. Well done, professor. However, even without the Kenny contribution, there were some Insiders highlights on Sunday 20 July. Let's go to the transcripts. Katrina Curtis ( The West Australian's Canberra bureau chief) said this about Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth: 'He's not a policy guy; he's a Fox News Weekend host'. Somewhat snobbish, don't you think? After all, Hegseth is a Princeton University graduate who has served in Iraq and Afghanistan. His awards include the Bronze Star Medal. Hegseth is also the author of five books – which in MWD's count, is five more than Comrade Curtis' output. Moreover, Fox News hosts are not without talent. Then presenter David ('Please call me Speersy') Speers interviewed the Coalition's Jonno Duniam about what Speersy called 'transgender girls participating in female school sport'. This is a reference to a person born a biological male who transitions to female. This is a controversial issue since persons born male have certain physical advantages as to size and strength due to being born male. The following exchange took place: David Speers: Do you have any problem, as some of your colleagues do, with transgender girls participating in female school sport? Jonno Duniam: Well, of course, we need to have an adult debate about these things. It's not one that's been raised with me since the election. David Speers: What's your view? Jonno Duniam: But in terms of transgender girls, I honestly believe that girl sports should be for girls, boy sports for boys, and if you have a mixed grouping, then that's something you can arrange by competition or in a school arrangement. David Speers: What does that mean for transgender kids? Jonno Duniam: Well then, if transgender kids are part of a school environment where they are offering sports, then that would be up to that individual school. I know that there are certain schools, even in my own home state of Tasmania, that make provision for transgender children, and that's a matter for them. David Speers: So, each school should be able to discriminate. Jonno Duniam: Each school should be able to set up arrangements, I think, that suit their school community. So, there you have it. According to David Speers, any school or parent/grandparent or female-born girls playing sport are into discrimination if, for reasons of physical safety and competitive fairness, they believe that only female-born sports people should participate in female team sports. That's somewhat judgmental. Even for a presenter at the taxpayer-funded public broadcaster which is a Conservative Free Zone. One does not have to be into discrimination to oppose transgender girls/women participating against individuals who are born female. Even if you work at the ABC. THE ABC/AUSTRALIA INSTITUTE ENTENTE As Media Watch Dog readers know, this blog has been monitoring the ABC/Guardian Axis and the ABC/Australia Institute Entente. That is, the ready access that journalists from the left-wing The Guardian Australia and political operatives from the avowedly leftist Australia Institute (which is based in the Canberra Bubble) get on the ABC. Meanwhile, political operatives from the conservative Institute of Public Affairs in Melbourne, Robert Menzies Institute in Melbourne and the Menzies Centre in Sydney have been de-platformed by the taxpayer funded public broadcaster. [Don't you mean censored? MWD Editor.] AMY REMEIKIS' CRYSTAL BALL FAILS TO FORESEE THE OUTCOME OF THE TASMANIAN ELECTION There was enormous interest in this segment in the previous MWD . The focus was on Emma Shortis – the director of The Australia Institute's International and Security Affairs Program. Dr Shortis (for a doctor she is) is also an Adjunct Senior Fellow at RMIT University, where she is presented as 'a historian who focuses on US and global environmental politics'. In view of this, it is surprising that – as pointed out in last week's issue – a historian of the United States believes that 'the war in Vietnam…was a war that the United States started'. What a load of absolute tosh. The Vietnam War began in 1954 when communist North Vietnam commenced its aim to conquer non-communist South Vietnam. The US sent combat forces to South Vietnam in early 1965 – over a decade later. [Pardon me for a minute. Perhaps there is a typo involved here. Could Comrade Shortis hold the position of 'A Junk Professor' at RMIT University? Just a thought. – MWD Editor.] But MWD digresses. An avid reader has reminded Ellie's (male) co-owner that he had overlooked Amy Remeikis' recent appearance doing its 'Newspapers' segment on ABC TV's News Breakfast . The date was Thursday 17 July – it saw the ABC-Australia Institute entente in action once again. As readers may recall, Comrade Remeikis is a MWD fave. When she was a wage-slave at The Guardian Australia (editor Lenore Taylor), Ellie's (male) co-owner ran a campaign for her to receive a wage increase from the socialist online newspaper which is known to pay low salaries to its toilers. But, alas, without success. In the event, Ms Remeikis decamped from the socialist Guardian Australia to The Australia Institute (also socialist) where she is the leftist hang out's chief political analyst. Hendo hopes that, in this capacity, Comrade Remeikis will soon appear again on the ABC TV's Insiders' panel. Her last gig was documented in MWD on 28 March 2025. As to her News Breakfast appearance on 17 July, The Australia Institute's political analyst was asked about (i) declining birthrates in Australia, (ii) Prime Minister Albanese's visit to China, and (iii) the Tasmanian leaders' debate in the lead-up to last Saturday's Tasmanian state election. Let's go to the transcript for the final comment: Amy Remeikis: …I think also just when you've got leaders who are on the same side of things like the salmon industry and what's happening with energy and even the [proposed Australian Football League] stadium – things start to look a little bit the same. So I think that Tasmania might throw up a few surprises in its results. It seems that Comrade Remeikis' crystal ball needs cleaning. It is unclear what the final outcome of the Tasmanian election will be. But there were no real surprises. The vote in July 2025 was much the same as the last Tasmanian state election in March 2024. That's the problem with predictions – as the saying goes, it's unwise to make them about the future. LEADING MEDIA QUESTIONS OF THE WEEK – STEP FORWARD SALLY SARA Due to enormous popular demand, MWD has decided, once again, to give out the occasional award for Leading Media Question of the Week. And the winner is Sally Sara. On Radio National Breakfast on Tuesday 22 July, Sally Sara – who has returned from her holiday which journalists like to call a W.E.B. or Well Earned Break – asked this question of Finance Minister Katy Gallagher: Sally Sara: Does the government believe that genocide is now unfolding in Gaza? Katy Gallagher : Well, again, our position is that we want to see, you know, seeing innocent lives that are being lost stop. We want the conflict to end. We want aid to get through. We want the international effort to be on ending this conflict. And when I talk to Australian people, that is what they're concerned about. They're concerned about the immediate situation in the Middle East, and they want that to change. Soon after, Ms Sara asked much the same question to Professor Michael Lynk, former UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights in the Palestinian Territories, and Associate Professor in Law at Western University in London, Ontario. Sally Sara: Does the government believe that genocide is now unfolding in Gaza? Michael Lynk: I do Enough said. A HUGH WHITE MOMENT (WITH A LITTLE HELP FROM ALLAN BEHM) As avid Media Watch Dog readers know, The (Boring) Saturday Paper is just, so, well, boring. But not so boring as eavesdropping on a 'conversation' between Hugh White and Allan Behm at The Australian Institute. The occasion was an event recorded by ABC Radio National's Big Ideas program which went to air for 52 minutes on 30 June 2025. [Strange that – it seemed like 252 minutes – MWD Editor] Allan Behm is senior adviser, International and Strategic, The Australia Institute and Hugh White is Emeritus Professor of Strategic Studies at the ANU. He is also the author of the recently published Quarterly Essay 'Hard New World: Our Post American Future' published by Morry Schwartz's Black Inc, editor-in-chief Eric Jensen. As MWD recalls, your man White has written as many Quarterly Essays as there are quarters – maybe more. And he essentially writes about the same topic, i.e. the rise of China and the decline of the United States. You have to admire Comrade White. He keeps banging on about the same topic – in spite of the fact that he is no Nostradamus. In that White prophesies are invariably of the false kind. As documented in MWD of 6 June 2025, your man White is consistent – as in consistently wrong. In March 2005, he said that 'we may face … a naval battle this year … between the US and Chinese navies'. Then he predicted a US/Japan v China war in 2013. Then he predicted war in our region in late 2014/early 2015. And so on. But even as a False Prophet, your man White can still draw a crowd at the leftist Australia Institute in Canberra – especially when in conversation with Comrade Behm. By the way, the occasion was presented on the taxpayer funded public broadcaster by Natasha Mitchell. It all started off with Behm declaring that White's latest Quarterly Essay was 'fantastic' and a 'really wonderful book'. Soon after, White declared that it was 'absolutely astonishing that Donald Trump should have not once, but twice ascended to the presidency of the United States'. White soon referred to the United States president as 'this bloke'. Behm then declared that he had attended the Defence Minister's speech at the Australian Defence Conference but 'didn't understand it'. Then White referred to President Trump as 'this guy'. Then Behm referred to 'Morgenthau' – but did not say who he was. And then White commenced an all but incomprehensible coverage of the world. There was reference to the 'European hegemon' (whatever that might be) as well as to 'global hegemony'. Then White threw the switch to an 'etymological analogy' (whatever that might be) and declared that he was 'bullish on China'. A hold-the-front-page occasion if ever there was one. Then Behm threw the switch to flattery declaring: 'I love your poetry Hugh – the caterpillar turning into a butterfly – Europe could just as equally be called a maggot into a blowfly.' Groan. Then there was, yet, more. Your man Behm had this to say: Allan Behm: I want to, Hugh, first of all, congratulate you for mentioning Graham Allison in your book without mentioning Thucydides. That's a very difficult thing to do, and congratulations. I admire it enormously. It took me a little while, about 15 years ago, to retranslate Thucydides for Graham Allison, and he's never acknowledged my email. See there are disappointments for people who work in the Department of Defence, I can tell you that. Hugh, I want to go a little bit further to some really creative wordsmithing that is right bang in the middle of your essay. What was he on about? Or, perhaps, the better question is 'What was he on?' There was another reference to Thucydides and J F. Kennedy and Sir James Plimsoll and hegemonic challenge and the Nietzschean anaesthetic. Then White concluded by saying that Australia should 'not go to war with Taiwan'. Good advice perhaps – but some Australians might prefer a punch-up with China than listening to the verbal sludge of Comrade White. Verily a Hugh White moment (with a little help from Allan Behm). DOCUMENTATION AN UPDATE ON SARAH FERGUSON'S 'STORY OF THE CENTURY' In June 2018 Sarah Ferguson presented a three-part Four Corners report titled Trump/Russia. At the beginning of the first episode, Ferguson described the alleged Trump-Russia connection as the 'story of the century'. So important was this story that it necessitated Ms Ferguson flying around the world (at the taxpayers' expense), travelling to New York, London and even Moscow. The star of the program was one James Clapper, former President Obama's appointee as Director of National Intelligence. Clapper breathlessly informed the ABC audience that the alleged conspiracy by Russia to throw the 2016 election to President Trump made the Watergate controversy, which brought down President Nixon, pale by comparison. The Four Corners 'story of the century' has not aged well. In March 2019, special counsel Robert Mueller submitted his much-anticipated Report On The Investigation Into Russian Interference In The 2016 Presidential Election. When the report was released in April 2019 it was greeted by dismay from Trump-haters, who were shocked to learn that Mueller concluded there was no proof of conspiracy or coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia. As MWD helpfully pointed out at the time, the ABC could have saved a bunch of (taxpayer) money if they had only waited for the Mueller report. It has also since been revealed that in 2017 James Clapper told the House Intelligence Committee that he had never seen any direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia. This evidence was given under oath, unlike his later interview with Sarah Ferguson where Clapper said the opposite. The allegations of a Trump-Russia conspiracy in 2016 have returned to the news in recent days, though not in the way that Sarah Ferguson or James Clapper might have hoped. Tulsi Gabbard, who now sits in Clapper's old job as Director of National Intelligence, has alleged The White House under former President Barack Obama directed US intelligence services to manufacture evidence of Russian interference in the 2016 election. Gabbard's office has released intelligence assessments and internal emails from the final months of the Obama presidency. She claims that these documents show the Obama administration put pressure on intelligence services to reach the conclusion that President Trump's campaign had received help from Russia. Gabbard and President Trump have gone so far as to accuse former President Obama of treason, and Trump posted an AI-created video of Obama being arrested and imprisoned. Former President Obama's office dismissed the allegations as 'outrageous' and 'bizarre'. Don't hold your breath waiting for the ABC to cover this new scandal as the very latest 'story of the century'. Ferguson, who was rewarded for her flawed Four Corners reporting with the coveted job of 7.30 presenter, is unlikely to fly around the world seeking proof of Barack Obama's alleged treason. And Tulsi Gabbard is not going to receive a multi-week opportunity to push her claims on the Australian taxpayer-funded public broadcaster like her predecessor James Clapper. [For a more in-depth analysis of Four Corners' Trump/Russia story see the 'An ABC Update' section of MWD Issue 454 – MWD Editor] HISTORY CORNER A BOLT FROM THE PAST – IN WHICH AN ESTONIAN AUSTRALIAN WOMAN SAID THAT PRIME MINISTER GOUGH WHITLAM CALLED HER 'A BLOODY NAZI BITCH' Thanks to the avid Potts Point reader who drew Media Watch Dog's attention to a post on X by Yuan Zi Zhu concerning the one-time Labor prime minister Gough Whitlam. As avid MWD readers are certain to know, on 1 August 1974 the Whitlam government recognised de jure the incorporation of the Baltic States – Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania – into the Soviet Union. Sir James Plimsoll was Australia's ambassador to the Soviet Union at the time. In 1940, the Baltic States were invaded by the Soviet Union – under the leadership of communist totalitarian dictator Josef Stalin – as part of Stalin's deal with Adolf Hitler in September 1939. This is referred to as the Nazi-Soviet Pact or the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. Under the pact, Nazi Germany invaded Poland from the west and the Soviet Union invaded Poland from the east and also acquired the Baltic States. Around this time, some Balts sought refuge in Australia. On 22 November 1974, Prime Minister Whitlam addressed a Queensland State election rally at Brisbane's King George Square. This is how the Sydney Morning Herald reported the occasion: Brisbane, Friday - A woman stood before 2,000 people in King George Square yesterday and accused the Prime Minister of calling her 'a bloody Nazi bitch'. The woman, Estonian-born Mrs Tina Taemets of Brisbane had a front seat at Mr Whitlam's rally and held aloft a placard denouncing Australia's recognition of Soviet sovereignty over the Baltic States. When someone pulled it down and ripped it, she picked up the placard, mounted the platform and handed it to Whitlam saying, 'With the compliments of the Baltic nations.' Accepting the placard, Mr Whitlam said something quietly to her. Ms Taemets turned to the crowd and called: 'Do you know what he called me? He called me a bloody Nazi bitch.' A Labor Party official took her down the steps and pushed her back into the crowd. Members of Mr Whitlam's party on the platform were unable to hear what he had said. But they expressed confidence that he had not used the words quoted by Mrs Taemets. Mr Whitlam would not comment. The Age carried a story by John Jost on the same incident on 23 November 1974. He reported that Gough Whitlam had denied in Townsville that he used the words 'bloody Nazi bitch' to Mrs Tina Taemets. Jost reported Whitlam as saying, 'I never speak to ladies like that; the poor lady was a little hysterical'. Just a hysterical poor lady, you see. However, Mr Whitlam did not make the 'bloody Nazi bitch' denial immediately in Brisbane – it came several hours later in Townsville. It would seem that Gough Whitlam had a thing about anti-communist Balts. As former Whitlam cabinet member Clyde Cameron wrote in his book China, Communism and Coca-Cola, Whitlam told Foreign Minister Don Willesee in Cameron's presence in April 1975 that he was 'not having hundreds of f-cking Vietnamese Balts coming into this country with their religious and political hatreds against us!'. So, clearly circa late 1974 Whitlam did not like anti-communists like Mrs Taemets. MWD has been sent this photo of Mr Whitlam's encounter with Mrs Taemets at Brisbane's King George Square on 22 November 1974. Please advise if you – avid readers – are aware in what newspaper this photo was published. [Interesting. As I recall, Malcolm Fraser's government abandoned Australia's de jure recognition of the Soviet Union's incorporation of the Baltic States soon after becoming prime minister in late 1975. – MWD Editor.] **** Until Next Time. ****

These two men want an extra hurdle for sexual harassment claims. It will cost millions
These two men want an extra hurdle for sexual harassment claims. It will cost millions

Sydney Morning Herald

time20 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

These two men want an extra hurdle for sexual harassment claims. It will cost millions

The push by the NSW Liberals and rogue MP Mark Latham to introduce an extra test for sexual harassment claims would remove all types of bullying from workers' compensation and put more financial pressure on struggling schemes, an analysis for NSW Treasury shows. Liberal upper house leader Damien Tudehope and Latham have jointly written amendments to the government's workers' compensation bill, proposing changes to the definition of sexual harassment as well as axing claims made for excessive work demands and vicarious trauma. The move has heaped pressure on the Liberals for teaming up with Latham, who has been accused of domestic violence against his ex-partner, which he emphatically denies, as well as inappropriate workplace behaviour, including taking photos of female MPs. He has apologised to the women. Under the Tudehope-Latham amendments, a person who makes a sexual advance towards a colleague would need to have known, or should have known, that the advance was unwelcome. Treasury secretary Michael Coutts-Trotter asked the state insurer icare, on behalf of Tudehope, to prepare costings for the amendments. Analysis shows that the private sector scheme, known as the nominal insurer, would be almost $800 million worse off under the pair's proposed changes. The costings, which have been provided to Tudehope, show that the government bill would save the nominal insurer between $4.31 billion and $4.41 billion over the four years to 2029, while the amendments would lead to smaller savings of between $3.53 billion and $3.63 billion. Loading Opposition Leader Mark Speakman has insisted that changes to the definition of sexual harassment would still protect workers from 'ignorant bigots' but wouldn't necessarily allow employees to claim compensation if a colleague 'makes a pass' at them. However, the analysis from icare said the 'amendments will require intent of the perpetrator to harm to be established by an injured worker before compensation for a primary psychological injury caused by bullying, racial and sexual harassment may be paid'.

Rosehill, politics, the haters and his future: Racing NSW CEO Peter V'landys reveals all
Rosehill, politics, the haters and his future: Racing NSW CEO Peter V'landys reveals all

News.com.au

timea day ago

  • News.com.au

Rosehill, politics, the haters and his future: Racing NSW CEO Peter V'landys reveals all

It's PVL unplugged. No topic was off limits this week when senior racing writer Ben Dorries sat down with Peter V'landys in the Racing NSW boardroom. The most powerful man in Australian sport, the CEO of Racing NSW and the chairman of the Australian Rugby League Commission bared his soul and spoke out on a range of major issues. â– â– â– â– â– THE 'HATERS' Peter V'landys almost wears it as a badge of honour when detractors label him a dictator. 'I think it's a compliment, I wish I was a dictator,' V'landys says. 'The results speak for themselves, both thoroughbred racing and rugby league are in the best position they have ever been in. 'So, if I'm a dictator and I get those results and outcomes then I'm sure the participants aren't really concerned, that is the bottom line. 'The biggest thing that I often get is people saying to me 'you are not as bad as people say you are'. 'I'd say 90 per cent of the people that are haters, as you call them, have never met me. 'If they had met me and made that judgment, I would be concerned. 'But they have never met me, so they don't know what I am, they don't know my personality, they don't know any attribute of me at all.' â– â– â– â– â– PVL THE POLITICIAN? V'landys says he has been approached 'many times' to run for politics but 'that's not my forte, I will leave that to others'. However, he has opened up on his warm friendship with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. 'If you saw the real side of Anthony, you'd like him,' V'landys said. 'He is one of those guys you want to go to the pub with and have a beer with. 'Anthony is a very nice guy, he's good to deal with and he's a good person. 'I always look at people to see if they are a good person, first and foremost. 'He's got an exceptionally good personality and he's a very witty man. 'He has honoured his word in every situation I have dealt with him.' â– â– â– â– â– ROSEHILL INQUIRY HOSTILITY V'landys wore plenty of barbs during the parliamentary inquiry into the potential sale of Rosehill racecourse, which Australian Turf Club members later voted down. 'It was hostile, but I tried to stay out of it, I did not make public statements,' V'landys said. 'The future will tell you if it was a good decision or a bad decision (not to sell). 'It will tell you whether we were builders … or were we destroyers? 'I could see commercially the financial benefits to it, but the Australian Turf Club Members voted against it and history will judge whether that was a good or bad decision.' â– â– â– â– â– MARK LATHAM and GAI WATERHOUSE CRITICISM Latham went into attack dog mode against V'landys during the Rosehill inquiry, while racing's first lady Gai Waterhouse was also outspoken and critical of some of the process. Latham, who at one stage could have been Prime Minister, has encountered his own troubles in recent weeks over allegations from his former partner which Latham denies. 'I don't take much notice of all those things,' V'landys said, of Latham's recent troubles. 'I don't think personal attacks are necessary. 'I think Mark in this instance deserves due process and natural justice as to the accusations that have been made against him. 'I don't really worry too much what people say, because if you did you would be in the corner in the foetal position. 'Gai is entitled to her view and I haven't spoken to Gai about it. 'The only thing I would say is when you make an opinion, make sure you are correct in facts when you make that opinion. 'Gai had her opinion, I don't think she needed to get personal. 'If you get personal in an argument, I always think you are losing the argument. 'I never attack anyone personally, I will attack the issue.' â– â– â– â– â– The $20m slot race The Everest is V'landys' baby and he predicts the 2025 edition featuring Hong Kong superstar Ka Ying Rising will 'break all records'. He also hinted at a major surprise to shake up the spring carnival. ' Ka Ying Rising is a personality horse with a lot of charisma and the attention we will get from Hong Kong will be exceptional,' he said. 'I've spoken to Marc van Gestel, the chairman of stewards in Hong Kong who used to work in New South Wales, and I asked him if this horse was as good as they say. 'He said 'every bit'. Black Caviar ðŸ¤� Ka Ying Rising? David Hayes on what makes Ka Ying Rising so freakish ðŸ'‰ — Racenet (@RacenetTweets) July 18, 2025 'There will be something (a surprise in spring carnival) but we will be making that announcement in the next couple of weeks. 'It is certainly going to be a major change, but we have to go through all the processes and we have to consult our partner the Australian Turf Club.' • Jimmysstar confirmed in TAB slot for 2025 The Everest â– â– â– â– â– THE BEEFED UP $10m MELBOURNE CUP $10m Melbourne Cup: Why every runner is a winner @gilbertgardiner analyses key Victorian prizemoney changes - plus the 10 golden tickets that are now on offer for Australia's most famous race. ðŸ'‡ — Racenet (@RacenetTweets) July 9, 2025 V'landys has previously taken shots at the Melbourne Cup, although he admits it commands its place in the Australian racing landscape. But he doesn't think the recent prizemoney boost will make much difference to the race. 'The Melbourne Cup is the Melbourne Cup – you could get two donkeys in it and people would still pay attention to it,' he said. 'The Cup has got tradition over many years, I don't think it (the prizemoney uplift) will make any difference. 'It's great for Australian racing to have an aspirational race like the Melbourne Cup. 'The thing for me though is that New South Wales last year paid over $400m in returns to participants. 'The closest any other state got was $110m less than us. 'The good thing for me is that $60m of our prizemoney goes to maiden races. 'We look after the bottom end of the industry, but we also look after the top end.' â– â– â– â– â– RACING VICTORIA SKIRMISH V'landys has hardly been bosom buddies with Racing Victoria, but there appeared to be a thawing of the interstate cold war, at least initially, when Aaron Morrison took the helm at RV. This is what V'landys now has to say about his Victorian rivals in racing administration. 'We get along pretty well with Racing Victoria and I think the chairman Tim Eddy is a good guy,' V'landys said. 'He takes your point of view on, and he certainly prosecutes his case if he doesn't agree with you. 'We are not going to agree on everything. 'The one that is the sticking point at the moment is this racing pattern … but I am sure we will resolve that in the near future. 'I take my hat off to Racing Victoria for trying very hard in doing the best for their state, they have to appreciate that I have to do the best for New South Wales.' â– â– â– â– â– WILL HE WALK AWAY FROM RACING? Should Peter V’landys remain the NRL boss? These numbers say a lot.. Me and @webbywrites have a new podcast: Off The Record that gives you the best info and inside word from the world of sport. Off The Record with Buzz & Webby is out now on all podcast platforms — BUZZ ROTHFIELD (@BuzzRothfield) March 30, 2025 A podcast earlier this year got tongues wagging when The Daily Telegraph's Sports Editor at Large, Phil Rothfield, revealed V'landys was considering stepping down from one of his high-powered roles in rugby league or racing. Most expected it could be his racing role rather than league role that he could relinquish. But V'landys insists he has not yet made any decision – that will come in a roundtable conversation with his family later this year. 'What I have said in the last six years since I have been chairman of the ARL Commission and CEO of Racing New South Wales is that at the end of the year I sit down with my family and I look at how the year went, what my capacity is to continue doing both roles,' V'landys said. 'I will do the same process this year and I will determine at the end of the year if I will stay on at Racing NSW and if I stay on the League Commission. 'Whatever decisions I make, I will make at the end of the year. 'For the last six years I have done both roles, how long that will continue I will tell you at the end of the year. 'Racing in New South Wales is in the healthiest position it has ever been in. 'We pay the most to participants, people say how can you sustain the prizemoney? 'Well, we have $375m in provisions to ensure we can sustain both the prizemoney and capital upgrades. 'We have $375m in our balance sheet to ensure the future of the New South Wales racing industry. 'I don't think there's too many racing jurisdictions who can say they have that sort of money set aside. 'There has been a decline in (wagering) turnover, but we will still probably make a $10m profit this year.' â– â– â– â– â– GROUP 1 RACES AND THE GOLDEN EAGLE V'landys concedes there 'are probably too many' Group 1 races in Australia but says 'the hardest part is telling a race club that you are going to have to go down to a Group 2 from a Group 1.' However, he is adamant the $10m Golden Eagle for four-year-old horses deserves to join The Everest in the newly-minted Group 1 club. 'There is a pyramid and the Group 1s should be the grand finals and there should be less of them,' V'landys said. 'But at the same time you can't stop innovation and the Golden Eagle deserves to be a Group 1. 'Horses have won Group 1 races all around the world after coming out of the Golden Eagle. 'If all goes to plan, it should be a Group 1 (before it is raced in the coming spring). 'Last year was exceptional and I don't think there's a race anywhere in the world that has produced as many Group 1 winners as the Golden Eagle.' â– â– â– â– â– RACING'S FUTURE V'landys feels racing in Australia is in a better position to safeguard its future than most other countries. He insists the younger audience which has been attracted to The Everest helps racing as a whole Down Under. 'I think we have done racing in Australia a big favour by promoting The Everest,' V'landys said. 'I think even the Melbourne Cup has had a resurgence from the young audience that we have been able to generate. 'We are promoting The Everest to the young person in Victoria just as much as we are promoting it to the young person in New South Wales. 'And that has become evident when you look at Victorian race meetings, they are getting a younger crowd. 'Racing has made a blunder worldwide where it hasn't looked at that next generation. 'You look at other jurisdictions around the world like America, they have been complacent, and racing is on a massive decline in America. 'Racing will be lucky to survive in the next 10 or 20 years in America. 'In Australia, racing is now appealing to a younger audience not just for The Everest, but for the whole year.' â– â– â– â– â– JOCKEY HEROES V'landys loved Racenet's exclusive story in May about how 12 of the world's best jockeys, including James McDonald, had banded together to form a Grand Prix style franchise-based global circuit which could revolutionise horse racing. He hopes it gets off the ground next year – for a very good reason. 'I think you have to look outside the square and you've got to go with innovation,' V'landys said. 'It may succeed, it may not, but I like the fact that someone is having a go. 'We need to hero the jockeys. 'I've noticed in racing that we don't have the heroes, in rugby league all the players are heroes. James McDonald reacts to our exclusive story of world's best jockeys competing in new global franchise league: "This will be the ultimate challenge for jockeys, I can't wait to get started." Reaction from JMac + other big name jockeys involved - — Ben Dorries (@bendorries76) May 5, 2025 'The league players walk down the street and everyone wants a selfie with them. 'In racing you don't have that same effect, unless you are really in the racing industry you don't know our major players and our jockeys. 'If you have something that promotes that and makes them a personality or a household name you grab it, it's a good thing. 'I saw a lot of criticism of the (jockey) concept, but those same critics think that just because you've got a racecourse people are going to turn up. 'They live in yesterday's land, they don't live in the future.' â– â– â– â– â– THE GIL FACTOR Former AFL supremo Gillon McLachlan took over as Tabcorp chief executive last year and has embarked on a quest for a leaner but far more competitive business. 'I think he's a brilliant operator,' V'landys said. 'The thing I like the most about him is that he's out of the AFL because he was certainly a formidable opponent. 'I think he's going to be a major asset to TAB.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store