
PTI not a political party but a fascist group: Azma Bokhari
Punjab Information Minister Azma Bokhari on Monday said Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) was not a political party but a fascist group that seeks to destabilise the country.
Addressing a press conference in Lahore, she accused PTI of promoting unrest and undermining national interests.
She claimed that PTI had fled from the Sambrial and Muridke by-elections out of fear of public rejection. 'This group caused the May 9 incidents—an event that must not be forgiven, or it will keep repeating,' she said.
Bokhari stressed that only the Supreme Court holds the authority to impose bans but insisted that 'to move the country forward, it is essential to rid ourselves of this chaos-spreading party'.
Bokhari questioned the political legitimacy of PTI, referring to its alleged role in guerrilla-style conspiracies. 'Is a group waging guerrilla war and conspiring against Pakistan a political party?' she asked, adding, 'The terrorist group will not be allowed to destroy Pakistan's law and order.'
Read: PTI alliance mobilises for August 5 'power show'
Referring to PTI's protest planned for August 5, she said no one is ready to accept responsibility for the day. She criticised PTI for calling for processions while remaining silent on national causes.
Responding to reports of a potential deal for PTI's founder to leave the country, Bokhari said, 'I've heard about the deal, but I don't know for sure'.
Turning to foreign affairs, she accused PTI chief Imran of advancing American interests, stating, 'The Jewish lobby has relaunched its product; Khan promoted American interests'.
She ridiculed Imran's previous stance on independence, saying, 'Are we slaves? Is real freedom being promoted through ads? Previously, he asked for freedom from America; now, even his son is demanding freedom'.
'Instead of threatening America, now write on vehicles: 'Trump, only you are our hope',' she added mockingly.
Bokhari stated that even PTI leader Ali Amin Gandapur had acknowledged Punjab's development during a visit to Lahore.
She said, 'They talk of 'final calls', but their protest movements never materialise—protest calls on November 26 and April 9 were both cancelled'.
She reaffirmed the government's commitment to national interest, highlighting Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz's zero-tolerance policy on sugar hoarding. 'Many arrests have been made, and the government will take custody of stockpiled sugar from mills,' she said.
She concluded by asserting that the current government was committed to protecting Pakistan's welfare, saying, 'This is a government that safeguards the interests of the people.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
PTI on streets!
PTI is kick-starting a new political agitation from today, marking the two years of incarceration of former PM Imran Khan. That the opposition party is on a weak pitch - as it stands divided due to its internal differences and is pushed to the wall by the government - is for all to see. It will thus be a horrendous task for the party to mobilise a sizeable crowd and make its presence felt on the streets. Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa is understood to lead the movement and there isn't much certainty as to how Punjab and the federal capital's populace will respond, as they have been a victim of lethal crackdown in the past. This dizziness has apparently compelled PTI to chalk out a smart strategy wherein workers and supporters plan to "block roads, share their political heart and disperse peacefully". To what extent it succeeds in building a momentum of change through this 'guerilla campaign' is anybody's guess, but taking into account the vibrancy of the party on social media, it is set to create ripples and give a tough time to the coalition dispensation that is out to exterminate the opposition. The PTI has already launched a mass campaign as far as its overseas strength is concerned, and its media blitz in the Western capitals is making a qualified anti-government impact. The whirlpool tour of Khan's sons to the US, seeking their father's release, has galvanised the necessary sparks and their proposed visit to Pakistan is in need of being watched. Little is known about the role of the six-party opposition alliance, TTAP, in the protest. But what is certain is that the pestering instability is pushing the country to the cliff, and this new phase of revulsion will have its toll. The outcome rests in talking it out, and it's high time for the authorities to engage with the PTI. Many of its demands are worth accepting, like release of all prisoners, including Imran Khan, and provision of due political space. Will someone stand up and be counted from the corridors of power to usher in a thaw?


Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Revisiting August 5, 2019
Six years after the revocation of article 370 of the Indian constitution on August 5, 2019 which had given special status to Jammu & Kashmir, it is time to analyse to what extent New Delhi managed to get support of local Kashmiris, and how after the Pahalgam terrorist attack and Operation Sindoor, the Modi regime failed to seek international backing on its flawed narrative about Pakistan's involvement in acts of terror in the occupied territory. The recently concluded debate in the Indian parliament on Operation Sindoor featured opposition leader Rahul Gandhi lambasting Prime Minister Narendra Modi for lying over President Donald Trump's claim of brokering a ceasefire in the May 7-10 Indo-Pak war and India losing five war planes in the armed conflict. The Kashmir conflict which, according to the Modi regime, had lost its momentum and New Delhi had fully absorbed it in Indian union after August 5 is again a high-profile international issue. How did India lose its perceived edge over its absorption of J&K on August 5, 2019? Why did the Modi regime fail to provide evidence of Pakistan's alleged involvement in the Pahalgam attack on April 22, 2025 in which 26 civilians were killed? How did the failure of Operation Sindoor reverse Modi's Kashmir policy, providing Pakistan a unique opportunity to forcefully raise the Kashmir issue at the international level? Certainly, frustration and anger within the Modi regime over failing to take Operation Sindoor to its desired conclusion means that for the first time since August 5, 2019, New Delhi's confidence to firmly establish its control over occupied Kashmir has been dented. A major setback after the August 5, 2019 actions was caused when following the ceasefire between India and Pakistan, President Trump stated that he was ready to help resolve the Kashmir conflict in order to establish peace in South Asia. Since signing the Shimla Pact with Pakistan in July 1972, India has maintained a consistent position that the Kashmir issue is a bilateral matter and can only be resolved through negotiations between Islamabad and Delhi. Trump's offer of mediation on Kashmir not only antagonised India but also challenged its position that Kashmir was no more an outstanding issue in the wake of its merger with India union. The Modi regime, however, miscalculated Operation Sindoor which proved counter-productive and brought the Kashmir dispute back in the limelight. The Indian Supreme Court had, in December 2023, dismissed petitions against the revocation of article 370 and legitimised the J&K merger with the Indian union, ordering that the statehood of the disputed territory be restored by September 24, 2024. Following the Supreme Court verdict, the election to the J&K Legislative Assembly, held in September-October 2024, saw the National Conference (NC) forming a coalition government along with Congress, and Omer Abdullah became the Chief Minister. Even after the election in the occupied region, the real power rested with the Governor and New Delhi continued to undermine the authority of Chief Minister. In order to further legitimise its position on J&K after August 5, the Modi regime publicised the holding of tourism conference under G-20 in Srinagar in May 2023 and launched infrastructure road, dam and power projects. But all its efforts to strengthen its hold over J&K after August 5, 2019 suffered a setback when Operation Sindoor failed and Kashmir regained its status as a dispute between Pakistan and India. Revisiting the August 5, 2019 actions, particularly the Jammu & Kashmir Reorganization Act passed by the Indian parliament and later upheld by the Supreme Court, needs to be analysed from three angles. First is the debacle of Operation Sindoor which led to the questioning of the Indian position whereby after August 5, 2019, the target was to wrest Azad Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan from Pakistan. Indian Defense Minister Raj Nath Singh had been threatening Pakistan that after absorbing J&K, India's next target would be Azad Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan. However, after the May 7-10 Indo-Pak war, the Modi regime is pursuing a defensive position. The recent furor in the Indian parliament in which the Modi regime was blamed by Congress and other opposition parties for mismanaging the Pahalgam episode as well as Operation Sindoor means the very stance of New Delhi after August 5 is losing credibility. On July 30, Indian opposition parties in the parliament had to stage a walkout when Prime Minister Narendra Modi avoided speaking on the floor of the assembly to respond to the allegations about the shooting down of five Indian war planes by the Pakistan Air Force and failure to provide security to tourists who were killed by terrorists in Pahalgam. Second, Pakistan lost a valuable opportunity to counter New Delhi's August 5 actions. As a result, not only India strengthened its position, particularly in the Valley, but also augmented its programme for settlement of Indian nationals. Indian authorities, following the model of the Israeli annexation of Palestinian lands in the occupied West Bank, launched the policy of grabbing Kashmiris' lands under the cover of security and development. By abrogating articles 370 and 35-A, India not only ended the so-called autonomous status of the occupied region, but also got a free hand to settle non-locals in the Muslim-majority state and allowing them to vote in elections. Even then, in the September-October 2024 elections in the disputed state, the BJP failed to get a majority. Pakistan should have exerted pressure on the Modi regime for merging J&K with India as union territories in sheer violation of UNSC resolutions. Finally, Pakistan can still compel India to amend its policy on occupied Kashmir and resolve the conflict through negotiations if it is able to put its own house in order. Simply to argue that President Trump has offered to mediate is not enough. What is required of Pakistan is to better its economy, seek political stability, ensure good governance, guarantee rule of law, and eradicate extremism, corruption and nepotism. Despite revoking article 370 and absorbing J&K, India lacks legitimacy to justify its hold over the occupied Muslim-majority state. A strong Pakistan can certainly gain support of international community for Kashmiris.


Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Netherlands uses new NATO channel to pay for US arms for Ukraine
AMSTERDAM: The Netherlands said on Monday it will contribute 500 million euros ($578 million) to purchase U.S. military equipment for Ukraine, becoming the first NATO country to contribute to a new mechanism to supply Kyiv with American weapons. President Donald Trump said last month the U.S. would provide weapons to Ukraine, paid for by European allies, but he did not provide details on how this would work. 'As the first NATO ally, the Netherlands will deliver a €500 million package of US weapon systems (including Patriot parts and missiles),' Dutch Defence Minister Ruben Brekelmans said in a post on X. NATO chief Mark Rutte, a former Dutch prime minister, welcomed the announcement and said he has encouraged other alliance members to participate in the new mechanism, called the NATO Prioritised Ukraine Requirements List (PURL) initiative. 'This is about getting Ukraine the equipment it urgently needs now to defend itself against Russian aggression,' Rutte said in a statement. US approves $322mn in arms sales to Ukraine 'I have written to all NATO Allies, urging them to contribute towards this burden sharing initiative, and I expect further significant announcements from other Allies soon,' he added. The U.S. ambassador to NATO, Matthew Whitaker, told Reuters on Monday that he expected many more countries to announce over the coming weeks that they will participate. 'We're moving as fast as possible,' Whitaker said in an interview at NATO headquarters in Brussels. Asked about a timeline for getting U.S. deliveries to Ukraine under the new mechanism, he said, 'I think we'll see it moving very quickly, certainly in the coming weeks, but some even sooner than that. 'The Dutch are just the first of many. You're going to see a series of announcements in the coming weeks,' he added. NATO said it would coordinate the new initiative, which is funded by European members of the alliance and Canada and will be divided into packages worth approximately $500 million. In a statement, the alliance said, 'Working closely with Ukraine and the United States, the Supreme Allied Commander Europe Alexus Grynkewich will validate packages that correspond to Ukraine's needs, such as air defence, ammunition and other critical equipment for rapid delivery from U.S. stockpiles'. Kyiv welcomed the Dutch decision. 'Ukraine, and thus the whole of Europe, will be better protected from Russian terror,' Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy wrote on X. 'I am sincerely grateful to the Netherlands for their substantial contribution to strengthening Ukraine's air shield,' he added.