logo
With next year's panchayat elections in Uttar Pradesh, parties gear up to test waters for 2027

With next year's panchayat elections in Uttar Pradesh, parties gear up to test waters for 2027

Indian Express7 days ago

ALTHOUGH PANCHAYAT elections in the state are not contested on symbols of political parties, considering the significant role played by the grassroot representatives in the Assembly elections, major political parties — both national and regional — have already begun preparations for the 2027 Assembly polls, treating the grassroots polls as a key battleground to show their strength.
In the recent past, several parties, be it NDA allies such as Apna Dal, NISHAD party, SBSP or INDIA alliance partners such as the Congress, announced that candidates they support should be fielded separately.
Although this sparked speculation over potential trouble for alliances for both the ruling BJP party and the INDIA alliance, leaders across party lines spoke to The Indian Express about the reasons for their parties to strongly pitch for supporting their own candidates in these polls while continuing with the alliances in the Assembly polls.
A mammoth affair
Panchayat elections in Uttar Pradesh are a mammoth affair, covering over 8 lakh posts, at different levels of panchayat. There are over 12 crore voters for the forthcoming polls in Uttar Pradesh. In the 2021 polls, elections were held for 7.32 lakh wards across 58,189 Gram Panchayats, 75,855 wards of 826 Kshetra Panchayats, and 3,051 members of 75 Zila Panchayats. Despite being held during the pandemic, parties like the BJP had officially declared their list of supported candidates.
However, this time, it is not just the national parties but even the regional parties who are eying the polls to strengthen their ground and 'bargaining power'. With elections expected around January-February 2026, as per sources, preparations have begun much earlier.
Why parties are keen on chipping in
Both the NDA alliance partners and the INDIA alliance have emphasised the importance of clearly announcing their intention to contest these elections separately. They believe that strengthening their parties at the grassroots level is crucial, which includes supporting their grassroots workers, some of whom will contest these polls.
To address concerns that their participation in these elections might negatively impact their alliance partners, these parties clarified that since the elections are not held under party symbols, they can still form alliances for assembly polls. They believe their ground strength will ultimately benefit their alliance partners. Additionally, some partners of the NDA expressed willingness to support BJP-backed candidates for chairman positions while allowing their own candidates to run for grassroots-level positions.
'It is a small election focused on the workers. For the BJP to return to power in 2027, it is essential that the workers stay active. If alliance partners like myself, Ashish Patel, or SBSP each have 10,000 supporters in any segment, then our combined efforts would benefit the alliance,' explained Sanjay Nishad, Chief of the NISHAD party and a minister in the state government.
He cited an example from the previous panchayat elections, noting that the BJP and the NISHAD party had contested separately. In some segments of Sultanpur, candidates backed by the NISHAD party received more support than those from the BJP. However, when it came time for the Jila Panchayat Chairman election, most voters supported candidates aligned with the BJP. 'It is difficult for our workers to reach the level of contesting MLA elections, but these are their elections, and our candidates would certainly weaken the Samajwadi Party (SP),' he added.
'All smaller parties empower themselves, and we are also preparing for the panchayat elections,' said Apna Dal leader and Union Minister Anupriya Patel. She assured they would remain allied with NDA.
Direct block pramukh elections this time?
Uttar Pradesh's Panchayati Raj Minister and Chief of the Suheldev Bharatiya Samaj Party, Om Prakash Rajbhar, recently announced that following multiple discussions with Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, an agreement has been reached to conduct Block Pramukh elections directly through public voting. At present, these elections are held indirectly, with candidates being selected by Block Development Committee members, which has led to concerns about corruption.
Rajbhar said the chief minister has agreed to send this proposal to the central government. 'After four rounds of dialogue, he has given his approval for the proposal to be forwarded to the centre. The goal is to eliminate the influence of money and muscle power,' Rajbhar explained. Although an official decision is still pending, both NDA allies and opposition parties have expressed their support for the proposal.
Sanjay Nishad affirmed their backing for direct elections, stating, 'This change would reduce the likelihood of candidates winning through financial means and provide opportunities for grassroots workers.'
Previously, Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav has also backed this proposal. 'What do we, as opposition or regional parties, have to lose? It is the BJP that has a bigger stake in this election and faces significant infighting since they are in power. By contesting these elections independently, we can strengthen our presence on the ground. We have already asked all our leaders interested in running for the 2027 Assembly polls to identify and nominate their candidates for pradhans and other posts. This would not only enhance their chances but also represent the party effectively,' said a senior Congress leader.
The ruling BJP has also begun its preparations by forming committees. These committees will aid in the ongoing delimitation process, which is being closely monitored by opposition parties.
However, party leaders claim that their allies' decision to field candidates separately will not impact them. 'Every alliance partner has the right to grow and develop independently, and we see no issue with that. We are strong at the grassroots level,' said senior BJP leader Vijay Bahadur Pathak.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Amid fresh disquiet in Karnataka BJP, rejig buzz as Vijayendra faces turbulence
Amid fresh disquiet in Karnataka BJP, rejig buzz as Vijayendra faces turbulence

Indian Express

time32 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Amid fresh disquiet in Karnataka BJP, rejig buzz as Vijayendra faces turbulence

The recent flurry of visits by senior Karnataka BJP leaders to Delhi to meet the central leadership has again set off speculations in party circles about the possibility of an impending restructuring of the state unit, which may include the appointment of its 'full-fledged chief' and changes in key posts to accommodate rival groups. The performance of current Karnataka BJP president B Y Vijayendra and Leader of Opposition (LoP) in the state Assembly R Ashoka is said to have come under the scanner of the central leadership for 'putting up a weak front' against the ruling Congress. Vijayendra, son of BJP heavyweight and ex-chief minister B S Yediyurappa, was appointed as the state party chief on an ad-hoc basis in November 2023. Ahead of the upcoming monsoon session of the state Legislature, the BJP leaders have ruffled the central leadership for their perceived 'adjustment brand of politics' with the Congress on several public issues, sources said. In recent weeks the state BJP has been perceived to have let the Siddaramaiah-led Congress government get away lightly over various rows, including the bid for a new caste survey, corruption cases, and a stampede at the Bengaluru cricket stadium involving the deaths of 11 people in the wake of alleged overenthusiasm shown by Congress leaders to felicitate the IPL winning RCB team. There has been a perception in state political circles that the Siddaramaiah government has faced more resistance from within the faction-ridden Congress rather than the principal Opposition. Some BJP leaders had even felicitated Siddaramaiah in February this year – while seeking funds for development of Bengaluru ahead of the state Budget – in a sign of camaraderie. There have also been concerns in a BJP section that the party is not geared to 'effectively counter pro-minority policies' of the Siddaramaiah dispensation, which has always been at the centre of the party's attack against the Congress. Following the BJP leadership's recent crackdown against a vocal state faction, including the expulsion of dissident leader and ex-Union minister Basanagouda Patil Yatnal, the leadership of Vijayendra and Ashoka was seen as 'unchallenged'. However, various recent developments indicate that the state BJP leadership issues have yet to be fully settled. Former state party chief and CM D V Sadananda Gowda said this week that the situation in the state unit was like a 'tinderbox' waiting to explode. 'Anything we speak is seen in the wrong light even by our own leaders. All our leaders are caught up in their own small spheres. Every day goes by in listening to the voices from these echo chambers. It creates an impression that everything is fine. I would say that everything is not okay. There is bubbling unhappiness in the party in Karnataka,' Sadananda Gowda told reporters. 'We have to come out of this factionalism and disgruntlement. Once we emerge out of this, only then will we have the strength to counter the Congress government,' he said. 'If there has to be a unanimous decision on a party leader for the state, then there should be widespread consultations, which should not be restricted to a few leaders. The state BJP core committee's existence currently is only notional. There are no issue-based discussions in the committee,' Gowda claimed. He also said the practice of the state president holding consultations with the core committee to firm up the party's strategies has come to a halt. 'The decision on whether a candidate identified to be the state president is good or bad has to be decided by the party cadre. This is not happening. Otherwise, appoint a full time president and we will adjust to working with the chosen candidate, but this is also not happening. We cannot understand this,' he said. On his part, Vijayendra has refuted suggestions that his recent visit to Delhi was linked to any possible leadership change. He however expressed hope that the leadership would soon pick a full-time state president and name him for the post. 'We are a national party. Everyone's opinion has been taken. I am confident that I have done a very successful work in the last one-and-a-half years. Our workers and leaders are confident. So it will be good… for you…and me too,' Vijayendra said Thursday in Bengaluru after his return from Delhi. 'Now the elections of 14 state party presidents across the country have been completed. Very soon a decision will be made on six or seven more states,' Vijayendra said. 'The appointment of the party presidents for Uttar Pradesh, Telangana and Karnataka have not been made,' he noted, claiming that he had gone to Delhi for 'personal reasons' and that other state leaders had done it too. Even LoP Ashok's multiple visits to Delhi could not be seen as a sign of imminent changes, Vijayendra said. 'Ashok is doing a very good job as the Opposition leader. The MLAs are also satisfied with him. However, there is a discussion in the media about a change of Opposition leaders. This is definitely not right,' he argued. 'Those who were expressing dissatisfaction are now out of the party. Some others have expressed small opinions. Union minister Pralhad Joshi and others are working to resolve issues. Everything will be fine,' Vijayendra said. On Sadananda Gowda's remarks, he said, 'Gowda is a senior. I will meet him and discuss with him. I do not agree that it is a tinderbox situation. It is natural to have minor differences of opinion in a party.' The BJP leadership's decision to name Vijayendra as the state ad hoc chief had come months after the party lost power to the Congress in the May 2023 Assembly polls. This was after the party tried to move away from the shadow of Yediyurappa during 2020-2023. The decision sparked resentment in the state party as senior leaders like Yatnal, Basavaraj Bommai, Shobha Karandlaje and C T Ravi were thus forced to follow Vijayendra, a first-time MLA. In January this year, senior BJP leader and Union minister Shivaraj Singh Chouhan had said that an election would be held for the post of the Karnataka BJP president as part of the organisational polls. This resulted in Vijayendra's rivals stepping up their attacks on him. In March, the party leadership expelled Vijayendra's key rival Yatnal, suggesting that it favoured a full three-year term for him. There seems to be a view in a large section of the state BJP that the leadership would not take the risk of dislodging Vijayendra from his post as it could also cost the party a backlash from its main support group — Lingayats to which Yediyurappa and his son belong. There appears to be however some uncertainty about the continuance of Ashok despite the point that he is from the Vokkaliga community, another dominant group in the state.

DMK slams BJP over resignation of Dalit legislator from Puducherry Cabinet
DMK slams BJP over resignation of Dalit legislator from Puducherry Cabinet

The Hindu

time40 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

DMK slams BJP over resignation of Dalit legislator from Puducherry Cabinet

The Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), the principal Opposition party in Puducherry, has come out strongly against the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) over the resignation of a Dalit legislator from the Puducherry Cabinet. Opposition leader and DMK convenor R. Siva, in a statement, said the party condemns the BJP for seeking the resignation of A.K. Sai J. Saravanan Kumar from the Cabinet headed by Chief Minister N. Rangasamy. Mr. Kumar's resignation from the Cabinet comes two years after the removal of another Dalit Minister S. Chandira Priyanga from the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government in the UT. It may be recalled that Ms. Priyanga, a member of the Chief Minister's All India N.R. Congress, a major constituent of the NDA in Puducherry, was dropped from the Cabinet in 2023 as she was 'deficient' in her performance as Minister. 'Two years after the removal of Ms. Priyanga, another Dalit Minister has been removed from the Cabinet without giving any reason. There is no Dalit representation in the NDA government in Puducherry now. It is highly condemnable. The vacancy in the Cabinet has to be filled only with the appointment of a Dalit member,' the Opposition leader said. He also questioned the necessity to appoint three nominated legislators. The appointments are solely made by the Ministry of Home Affairs, and the elected Assembly or the people of the UT have no role in the same, after the BJP came to power at the Centre in 2014, he said.

Assam CM Himanta says 'socialism, secularism' can be removed from Constitution
Assam CM Himanta says 'socialism, secularism' can be removed from Constitution

The Hindu

time40 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Assam CM Himanta says 'socialism, secularism' can be removed from Constitution

Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma claimed on Saturday (June 28, 2025) that 'socialism' and 'secularism' are Western concepts, and these words should be struck off of the Constitution. He said these words were included in the Preamble of the Constitution by then-Prime Minister Indira Gandhi and these have no place in Indian civilisation. "How can I be secular? I am a hardcore Hindu. A Muslim person is a hardcore Muslim person. How can he be secular?" Mr. Sarma said. He was speaking after launching in Assam a book titled 'The Emergency Diaries: Years That Forged a Leader' which is based on first person anecdotes from associates who worked with Narendra Modi, then a young RSS pracharak, and used other archival material. The book chronicles the 1975-77 Emergency era and Prime Minister Narendra Modi's role in the 'resistance movement'. Mr. Sarma maintained that the Indian concept of secularism is not about being neutral, but it is about being 'positively aligned'. The word 'secularism' was inserted by people who view it from the western angle, and it needs to be struck off from the Preamble, Sarma added. The CM also claimed that the Western concept of socialism was also imposed by Gandhi. Indian economic principle was based on 'trustee-ship' and helping the marginalised. "The BJP didn't have to even demolish this concept of socialism. PV Narasimha Rao and Manmohan Singh did it for the Congress," he added. He was referring to Prime Minister PV Narasimha Rao and Finance Minister Manmohan Singh who were credited with bringing economic liberalisation in India in the early 1990s. Mr. Sarma said that the time is ripe to discuss the 'damages' caused by the Emergency to the nation. "We must not forget the Emergency as we cannot repeat the Emergency," he added. The Emergency declared on June 25, 1975, by then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi lasted until March 21, 1977. It was marked by widespread press censorship, arrests without trial and the stifling of dissent in academia, politics and civil society.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store