Maharashtra Reclaims Raghuji Bhosale's Historic Sword in London Auction for Rs47.15 Lakh
2
3
4
5
6
Nagpur: In a proud moment for Maharashtra, the state govt successfully acquired the historic sword of Maratha warrior Raghuji Bhosale I at an international auction in London on Tuesday. The acquisition, which includes the cost of the auction, handling, transport, and insurance, amounted to Rs47.15 lakh, announced cultural affairs minister Ashish Shelar at a press conference in Mumbai.
Calling it a proud moment for the state, Shelar credited chief minister Devendra Fadnavis for leading a rapid and coordinated response to secure the prized artefact, including contacting the Indian embassy in London and securing the sword through mediated auction. "This is the first time our govt retrieved such a significant historical object from abroad," Shelar said.
TOI had reported on April 28 that the sword linked to Raghuji Bhonsle I was listed for auction at Sotheby's London as part of a high-profile collection of arms and armour. The listing described it as an 18th-century khanda, with an estimated value between £6,000 and £8,000 (roughly Rs6.3 to Rs8.4 lakh).
On Monday, Mudhoji Bhosale, currently residing in Nagpur and a descendant of Raghuji Raje, had written to the Prime Minister, home minister, chief minister, and culture minister, urging them to ensure the sword returns to Maharashtra, its rightful home. Following the letter, sources confirmed that a phone call took place between Mudhoji and chief minister Devendra Fadnavis at 1.50am on April 29 to discuss the matter. Mudhoji is also expected to address the media at a press conference on Wednesday.
Fadnavis said in a tweet, "I'm happy to share that the Maharashtra govt successfully brought back the historic sword of Raghuji Bhosale from a London auction. This priceless treasure, tied to the proud legacy of Nagpur and the Maratha Empire, will now return home. Thanks to the swift action by our cultural affairs team, this rare symbol of valour and heritage comes back where it belongs — in Maharashtra."
The sword is a rare example of the Maratha 'Firang' type — a straight, single-edged European blade with an intricately crafted Mulheri Ghat hilt, adorned in gold and wrapped in green cloth. Most notably, the sword bears a Devanagari inscription in gold: 'Srimant Raghoji Bhosale Senasahib Subha Firang', marking it as a personal weapon of Raghuji Bhosale I.
Experts believe the sword may have been taken out of the country during British looting after the Battle of Sitabuldi in 1817, when the East India Company defeated the Nagpurkar Bhosales and seized valuable artefacts from their treasury.
Raghuji Bhosale I (1695–1755) was a key military leader under Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj and the founder of the Bhosale dynasty of Nagpur. His military campaigns helped expand the Maratha Empire into Bengal, Odisha, and parts of South India. He was honoured with the title 'Senasahibsubha' for his service. "This sword is not just a weapon — it is a symbol of Maratha legacy, resilience, and pride," Shelar said.
Sotheby's which conducted the auction on Tuesday, said on its portal that the basket-hilt sword (khanda) was sold for £38,100.
Raje Mudhoji Bhonsle of the Nagpur royal family congratulated and thanked the Maharashtra government for acquiring the sword. His representatives also took part in the bidding process on his behalf and had bid up to Rs35 lakh, the member of the erstwhile royal family told the media.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
15 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Fewer foreign trips, protocol lapses upset Dhankhar; former Vice President felt he had a diminished role
Former Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar, in his 35-month-long tenure, travelled abroad only four times for bilateral visits, and his office often had complained to the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) over protocol issues, official sources told The Hindu. The differences over his MEA assignments were amongst the reasons for the discord between the former Vice-President and the government, and a source of grievance for Mr. Dhankhar, who felt his role, especially on foreign policy issues, was less than that of his predecessors. According to the MEA's website, Mr. Dhankhar's four visits included two that came shortly after he took over as Vice-President in August 2022, and subsequently the frequency of these visits tapered off. In comparison, his immediate predecessor Venkaiah Naidu had 13 foreign tours during his tenure between August 2017-2022, and Hamid Ansari represented India on 28 tours abroad during his decade-long tenure from 2007-2017. Mr. Dhankhar went to Cambodia (November 11-13, 2022), Qatar (November 20-21, 2022), U.K. (May 5-6, 2023) and Iran (May 2024). He was not scheduled for any tours this year, although sources said the MEA had proposed two visits abroad, in February and in June, which were turned down due to health reasons. According to the sources, Mr. Dhankhar had complained about what he saw as several protocol violations to several Opposition leaders over the past few months. One point of contention was that the Vice-President believed he received fewer visits from foreign dignitaries than in the past. The Vice-President's office was reportedly unhappy over his visit to Tehran, where he represented India at the funeral of President Ebrahim Raisi, who had died in a helicopter crash. The Iranian government's protocol officials were apparently overstretched as more than 40 high-level dignitaries attended the ceremonies, and the sources said Mr. Dhankhar was uneasy with the arrangements at Tehran's Parsian Azadi hotel during his day-long trip. Mr. Dhankhar's absence from the official banquet during U.S. Vice-President J.D. Vance's trip in April this year also raised several eyebrows. On April 21, when Mr. Vance landed in Delhi, Mr. Dhankhar was on board a flight to Jaipur and returned to the Capital only after Mr. Vance had left. However, officials privy to the exchanges said that the Vice-President's office had not been informed of the programme of the U.S. Vice-President in advance, nor was he included in the programme. At the time, The Hindu had reported that a meeting between the two Vice-Presidents was not scheduled, as officials said it was not mandated by protocol due to differences in the Indian and U.S. government structure. Sources in the Vice-President's office said that despite the issues and his own health problems, Mr. Dhankhar carried out his diplomatic assignments to the full extent he was required to, pointing out where he felt there were gaps. On May 19, speaking at an event in Delhi, he referred to a protocol lapse in the reception line-up for Chief Justice B.R. Gavai, and said 'I too am a sufferer'. He pointed out that his photograph had not been kept in government offices alongside those of the President and Prime Minister, as he said they should be. 'Once I demit office, I'll ensure that my successor has a photograph,' he said, adding that when such complaints were made, they were 'not personal, but for the position held'.
The Wire
15 minutes ago
- The Wire
At UNSC, India Hits Back After Pakistan Raises Kashmir, Indus Waters Treaty
New Delhi: India on Tuesday (July 22) pushed back against Pakistan at the UN Security Council after Pakistani foreign minister Ishaq Dar used a high-level debate on peaceful dispute resolution to raise the Kashmir issue and criticise the suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty, describing Pakistan as 'steeped in fanaticism and terrorism' and a 'serial borrower from the IMF'. Dar, who chaired the meeting as part of Pakistan's rotating presidency of the Security Council, alleged that India has been violating UN resolutions and international law. He also accused New Delhi of unilaterally disrupting long-standing water-sharing arrangements under the Indus Waters Treaty, and reiterated Pakistan's demand for the implementation of UN Security Council resolutions on Kashmir. Responding later in the meeting, India's permanent representative to the UN, P. Harish, dismissed Pakistan's comments. 'On the one hand, there is India which is a mature democracy, a surging economy and a pluralistic and inclusive society. At the other extreme is Pakistan, steeped in fanaticism and terrorism, and a serial borrower from the IMF,' Harish said. Without naming Pakistan initially, Harish argued that the council must take a firm position on cross-border terrorism. 'It ill-behoves a member of the council to offer homilies while indulging in practices that are unacceptable to the international community,' he said. Harish defended India's recent military action under the aegis of 'Operation Sindoor' carried out in the wake of the April 22 terrorist attack in Pahalgam. He said that India's strikes targeted terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir, and were 'focused, measured and non-escalatory'. He added that India halted operations once its objectives were met, 'at the request of Pakistan'. The Indian envoy argued that there must be 'serious cost to states who violate the spirit of good neighbourliness and international relations by fomenting cross-border terrorism'. India had put the World Bank-brokered Indus Waters Treaty 'in abeyance' a day after the Pahalgam terror attack. India has maintained that Jammu and Kashmir is an internal matter, and that bilateral issues with Pakistan must be addressed without third-party interference. However, New Delhi has grown increasingly uneasy with US President Donald Trump's repeated public statements claiming a role in brokering the ceasefire following the four-day escalation between the two countries earlier this year. India has maintained that the cessation of hostilities was the result of direct communication between military leaderships. Harish reaffirmed India's commitment to peaceful dispute resolution under the UN Charter, but insisted that 'national ownership and consent' must remain central to any peace process. He also called for urgent reforms of the UN Security Council to address growing doubts about its representativeness and effectiveness. 'The continuing UN Security Council impasse also shows the increasing challenges to its functioning,' Harish said In his broader remarks, Harish noted that the nature of conflicts has changed in recent decades, with the rise of non-state actors backed by state sponsors, and the spread of radical ideologies facilitated by digital platforms. There were new pressures on UN peacekeeping operations, he said, adding that peacebuilding has also acquired greater salience. At the start of the meeting, the 15-member body adopted the Pakistan-drafted resolution for strengthening mechanisms for the peaceful settlement of disputes. It also called on member states to make full use of diplomatic tools such as negotiation, mediation, conciliation and arbitration to resolve disputes peacefully.
India.com
15 minutes ago
- India.com
Pakistan, China, or US; who is India's biggest enemy? Report reveals 41% Indians..., answer will shock you
(File) The recent India-Pakistan conflict laid bare the reality of India's alliances with various countries, and exposed those who had earlier maintained the facade of friendly ties with our nation. During Operation Sindoor, Pakistan received explicit support from China, Turkey, and Azerbaijan, while countries like the United States, a strategic ally of New Delhi, leaned more towards the Pakistani narrative, while merely issuing a token condemnation of the Pahalgam terror attack. While India tries to maintain cordial relations with every country on the planet, the recent conflict with Pakistan was a sour experience for Indian citizens, as they realised which countries are friendly towards India, and which ones are their enemies. But who among Pakistan, China, and the US are considered India's biggest enemy by Indians? Let us find out. Who is India's biggest enemy? According to a recent survey by US-based Pew Research Center, around two percent of Indians consider the US as India's biggest enemy, while 33 percent believe China is the prime nemesis, and an overwhelming 41 percent are of the opinion that Pakistan is biggest foe India is faced with. This means that a combined 74 percent of Indian population considers Pakistan and its 'all-weather ally' China as the ultimate threat for the country. Why Indians consider China and Pakistan as enemies? The feeling of hatred and animosity for Pakistan and China among Indians stems from historical incidents of deceit, war, and terrorism, that Beijing and Islamabad have perpetrated against India since 1947. India has fought four wars with Pakistan and one with China since independence as both countries maintain claim on territories within our nation. Additionally, Pakistan supports, arms and fund cross-border terrorism that has claimed hundreds of thousands of lives in India in innumerable terror attacks over the last five decades. China, a close ally of Pakistan, often defends Pakistan's stance on global forums like the United Nations, and has repeatedly used its veto in the UN Security Council to prevent sanctions on dreaded Pakistan-based terrorist leaders who are wanted by Indian law enforcement agencies.
