‘Glad US president stated a fact': Rahul Gandhi on Trump's ‘dead economy' remark on India
Gandhi claimed that everyone knew this except Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman.
'The entire world knows that the Bharatiya Janata Party has ended the Indian economy,' the Congress leader further said. 'Why? To help [industrialist Gautam] Adani.'
In a separate post on X, Gandhi accused Modi of killing the economy, citing demonetisation, a 'flawed GST', and a 'failed Assemble in India' initiative. He added that micro, small, and medium enterprises had been 'wiped out' and farmers had been 'crushed'.
VIDEO | On US President Donald Trump calling Indian economy a 'dead economy', Congress MP and Lok Sabha LoP Rahul Gandhi (@RahulGandhi) says,
"Yes, he is right. I mean, everybody knows this except PM Modi and the Finance Minister. It is a dead economy. I am glad that the US… pic.twitter.com/8r0kLdFEsV
— Press Trust of India (@PTI_News) July 31, 2025
Earlier in the day, Trump said that he does not care about 'what India does with Russia' and that 'they can take their dead economies down together, for all I care'.
'We have done very little business with India, their tariffs are too high, among the highest in the world,' Trump said on social media. 'Likewise, Russia and the USA do almost no business together.'
Trump's comment on Thursday came a day after he announced a 25% tariff on goods imported from India from August 1. He added that India will also have to pay an unspecified ' penalty ' for buying a large portion of its military equipment and fuel from Russia amid the war on Ukraine.
Even as Gandhi on Thursday said that Trump spoke the truth about the Indian economy, Congress chief Mallikarjun Kharge asked Prime Minister Narendra Modi why he was silent on Trump's 'baseless allegations'' against India.
Kharge said that the tariffs announced by Trump would hurt Indian trade, micro, small and medium enterprises and farmers.
CEASEFIRE पर ट्रंप के बयानों पर मोदी जी ने संसद में मौन व्रत धारण कर रखा था।
अब ट्रंप ने भारत पर जो बेबुनियाद आरोप लगाए हैं, क्या उसपर भी मोदी चुप रहेंगे ?
. @narendramodi जी
देश सबसे पहले है और हम देश के साथ हैं।
1️⃣ ट्रंप ने हमारे ऊपर 25% Tariff + Penalty थोपी है।
इससे…
— Mallikarjun Kharge (@kharge) July 31, 2025
Bharatiya Janata Party MP Sambit Patra said that Gandhi had 'crossed all limits' by publicly endorsing Trump's remark.
'While the world recognises India's aspiration, achievement, and wellbeing, Rahul Gandhi seems intent on running it down,' he remarked.
Patra pointed out that the International Monetary Fund has upgraded India's growth forecast for 2025, calling it the fastest among major economies, while the World Bank described India as the 'standout growth story' of the decade.
'Rahul Gandhi is attempting to chip away at India's collective spirit of its ambition & achievements but he's simply out of sync with a nation chasing its dreams with determination,' Patra said.
Rahul Gandhi has crossed all limits—publicly endorsing Donald Trump's slur that India is a 'dead economy.' Whose side is he really on?
While the world recognises India's aspiration, achievement, and wellbeing, Rahul Gandhi seems intent on running it down.
•IMF just upgraded… https://t.co/HumxN5EsIE
— Sambit Patra (@sambitswaraj) July 31, 2025
US' 'reciprocal tariffs'
The United States has said on several occasions it will impose so-called reciprocal tariffs on dozens of countries that have not negotiated separate trade agreements with it by August 1.
Trump announced higher levies in April, before pausing those tariffs at a reduced 10% rate to allow time for negotiations. Despite an extended deadline, Trump has only secured a handful of deals.
Trump had said on June 27 that New Delhi could sign a 'very big' trade deal with Washington soon. On July 2, the White House said that the deal was close to being finalised and would be announced soon.
An Indian team led by Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal had visited the US in May to negotiate the agreement. Following this, a team of negotiators from the US was in India for a week in June.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
26 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Manjunath changing surname to Fernandes': MLAs object to ‘outsiders' taking Goan names, CM vows crackdown
Goa Chief Minister Pramod Sawant on Monday said the state government will take steps to further amend the Goa Change of Name and Surname Act, 1990, and make it more stringent, if required, 'to prevent any misuse'. This came after Opposition legislators flagged complaints that people, especially those from outside the state, were fraudulently changing their surnames to traditional Goan ones to avail government schemes. Opposition MLAs Viresh Borkar of the Revolutionary Goans Party, Altone D'Costa of the Congress, and Goa Forward Party chief Vijai Sardesai moved a calling attention motion, raising concerns about people changing their surnames to Goan surnames. Drawing attention to newspaper advertisements declaring such name changes, the Opposition legislators said the 'outsiders' were exploiting legal loopholes and adopting Goan names and surnames, calling the 'trend' an 'erasure of the distinct Goan identity' and a threat to the state's demography. The Goa Change of Name and Surname Act, 1990, lays down the rules for carrying out changes in names. In 2019, the Goa Assembly passed an amendment to make it a cognisable offence, punishable with imprisonment, to carry out fraudulent name changes without following the laid-down procedures. The amendment was brought after MLAs across party lines and several communities raised concerns over changes in names and surnames advertised in newspapers by 'outsiders', alleging they had adopted Goan names and surnames to avail benefits under government schemes, to apply for a Portuguese passport, or to inherit land. The Assembly brought in more stringent provisions and passed another amendment Bill in 2022, which mandated that a person desiring to change his or her name 'should be born in Goa and his or her birth should be registered in the state of Goa' and 'that either his parents or grandparents should be born in Goa'. The amendment also vested the power to approve name change applications with a 'Civil Judge Junior Division' or a 'District Judge'. Earlier, this power was vested in the Registrar or the Chief Registrar of the state. Fatorda MLA Vijai Sardesai said, 'This is a serious concern. Identity is a carrier of our history, community and legacy.' Congress's Yuri Alemao, Leader of Opposition in the Assembly, said, 'Manjunath is applying to change to Francisco Fernandes. This is perceived as an invasion from one state to another, from one community to another.' While acknowledging that a change of one's name or surname is the right of a citizen, Alemao asked what 'specific' steps the government was considering to address the issue. Responding to the calling attention motion, Sawant told the House that the government enacted the Goa Change of Name and Surname Act, 1990, to lay down the procedure for name change of any person born in the state of Goa, and that it was subsequently amended to address complaints over loopholes. The Chief Minister said the government has been taking all necessary steps to ensure there are no cases of the change in name or surname, or both, by any ineligible persons to traditional Goan surnames. 'Similarly, penal provision under section 3A was introduced in the Act to make the Act more stringent and further the offence under the Act was made cognizable, where anyone changes his name or surname or both or publishes any notice/advertisement for such change without following the procedure as laid down in section 3, punishable with imprisonment… Further, certain conditions were subsequently laid down under the Change of Name and Surname (Amendment) Act, 2022, whereby a person should be born in Goa and his birth should be registered in the state of Goa, and further either of his parents or grandparents should be born in the state of Goa. Only such a person can apply for a change of name,' he said.
Economic Times
26 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump says he's cut drug prices by up to 1,500%. That's not possible
Synopsis Donald Trump claimed significant drug price cuts, even up to 1500%. Experts refute this, stating such cuts are impossible. They suggest it would mean people are paid to take medicine. The White House defended Trump, citing price differences with other nations. Trump also mentioned future price drops. Some drugmakers are open to cuts. AP Days after he sent letters instructing top pharmaceutical manufacturers to use a "most favored nation" pricing model for prescription drugs, President Donald Trump told reporters on Sunday that he had cut costs by up to 1,500%. But Trump's grandiose claim is mathematically impossible. Here's a closer look at the facts. TRUMP: "You know, we've cut drug prices by 1,200, 1,300, 1,400, 1,500%. I don't mean 50%, I mean 14 - 1,500%." THE FACTS: This is false. Cutting drug prices by more than 100% would theoretically mean that people are being paid to take medications. The Trump administration has taken steps to lower prescription drug prices, but experts say there's no indication costs have seen such a massive drop. Geoffrey Joyce, director of health policy at the University of Southern California's Schaeffer Center, called Trump's claim "total fiction" made up by the Republican president. He agreed that it would amount to drug companies paying customers, rather than the other way around. "I find it really difficult to translate those numbers into some actual estimates that patients would see at the pharmacy counter," said Mariana Socal, an associate professor of health policy and management at Johns Hopkins University who studies the U.S. pharmaceutical market. She added that Trump's math is "really hard to follow." Asked what Trump was using to back up his claim, White House spokesman Kush Desai said: "It's an objective fact that Americans are paying exponentially more for the same exact drugs as people in other developed countries pay, and it's an objective fact that no other Administration has done more to rectify this unfair burden for the American people." The White House provided a chart of price differentials for drugs in the U.S. and comparable countries, but did not offer any other evidence. On Sunday, Trump also described cuts to drug prices as a future development, not that already happened. "So we'll be dropping drug prices," he said. "It will start over the next two to three months by 1,200, 1,300 and even 1,400%." Prices for most prescription drugs - unbranded generics are the exception - are higher in the U.S. than they are in other high-income countries. This is in large part due to the way drug prices are negotiated in the United States. Trump made his recent appeal in letters to 17 pharmaceutical manufacturers, the White House announced last week. He asked them to reduce costs in the U.S. by matching the lowest prices of prescriptions drugs in other comparably developed countries. Some drugmakers have since indicated that they are open to cutting costs. This move follows an executive order Trump signed in May setting a 30-day deadline for drugmakers to electively lower prices in the U.S. or face new limits in the future over what the government will pay. The federal government has the most power to shape the price it pays for drugs covered by Medicare and Medicaid. It's unclear what - if any - impact the Trump administration's efforts will have on millions of Americans who have private health insurance. Socal pointed out that if drug manufacturers had cut costs to the extent Trump claims, they would be shouting it from the rooftops, especially given the heat they've taken over the years for their pricing practices. "My expectation would be that they would make announcements - public announcements - and that those announcements would come way in advance of the actual effective dates when those price cuts would come into effect," she said. Joyce agreed that there has been no indication of a substantial cut. "Not at all, not at all, none whatsoever," he said. "And let alone 1,500."
Hindustan Times
28 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
'Work weekends or stay late daily': Indian manager's shocking ultimatum to employees
A post about an Indian manager allegedly asking an employee to report to work on weekends for 8-hour shifts or add two days extra to their work hours for the coming week has sparked conversations around toxic workplaces among Reddit users. An individual posted a screenshot of a WhatsApp chat, claiming it's from the manager of one of their friends. An Indian manager's WhatsApp text on an office group has sparked anger among Reddit users. (Reddit/Awd_7, Unsplash (Representational image)/Muradi) 'This screenshot is from my friend's whatsapp group - the last msg is from her manager apparently having the audacity to normalise working on weekends,' the Reddit user wrote. In the screenshot, a part of a partially visible message reads, 'I have commitments and plans so unable to work on Saturdays and Sundays if possible I will try to complete.' It is followed by messages from other employees in the group chat who say they won't be able to work on Saturday and Sunday. In response, the manager slams one of the employees and says that the team's weekend unavailability will be addressed in the office the following week. 'This is not going to work, we need to plan something else, I will address the complete team on Monday, either we have to report to office on Saturday and Sundays for complete 8 hours or need to extend the shift on a daily basis for 2 hours for next three kindly prepare your mindset and come to work on Monday,' the message reads. The post on Reddit was published by an unverified user. has not independently verified the claims. An alleged text on WhatsApp from an Indian manager. (Reddit/@Awd_7) What did social media say? An individual suggested, 'They are literally stealing his labour. Refuse tactfully. If that doesn't work, refuse directly. Of course, he needs a new job soon.' Another added, 'They do it to reach you outside of work timings— they have no shame about it. Unless it's a genuine emergency, I simply ignore their calls/messages. I even had to block a colleague.' A third shared, 'Teams is documented. When they make requests like this, they don't want evidence. If someone goes to court, they can say it was a rogue manager. But on Teams, every message is logged; they can't do that.' A fourth wrote, 'Absolutely do not work a second on the weekend unless it's your own fault for not being able to in the week. Very slippery slope. Pretty sure none of us gets paid overtime for that.' Forced to work 20 unpaid hours: In a separate incident, a software developer claimed on Reddit about being pressured into working for 20 hours every week, on top of the standard working hours. The employee claimed that the overtime was unpaid. "That's 3 hours every weekday after work and my weekends completely gone,' the employee wrote on Reddit, adding, 'It's unpaid, non-negotiable, and they've made it clear that if I want to grow here, I have to do this.'
