Form Statewide Policy On Compensatory Afforestation: HC to MSIDC
This directive came after reports revealed violations of the Maharashtra Urban Areas Protection and Preservation of Trees Act during infrastructure projects.
A division bench comprising justices Nitin Sambre and Sachin Deshmukh granted MSIDC four weeks to submit a detailed affidavit outlining its policy, compliance measures, and monitoring mechanisms. The order emerged from the hearing of a public interest litigation filed by Preeti Patel and three others, who alleged large-scale tree felling in breach of regulations during city development works.
The petitioners were represented by advocate Mrinall Chakravarty, while Gemini Kasat appeared for Nagpur Municipal Corporation (NMC).
Earlier, the court criticised MSIDC for not fulfilling its responsibilities after a tree audit revealed that 749 of 1,861 trees planted as compensatory afforestation had died. These trees were intended to replace 36 that were cut down to construct new buildings for the district collector and divisional commissioner's offices.
In Monday's hearing, MSIDC's general manager Brijesh Dixit appeared in person as previously directed and submitted an affidavit. He stated that a total of 1,779 saplings were planted to replace the felled trees and that watchmen would now be deployed to monitor the plantations at both the original and newly identified sites.
However, the court deemed the response unsatisfactory and instructed Dixit to provide a more detailed and clear affidavit within two weeks, explaining all aspects of the plantation, survival rate, and long-term maintenance.
The NMC Tree Authority had earlier ordered MSIDC to plant 1,735 trees to compensate for the 36 trees removed. The high number of tree deaths led to strict scrutiny and Dixit being summoned to court.
In October 2024, MSIDC sought permission to fell or transplant 40 trees for constructing new buildings for the collectorate and divisional commissioner's offices. After site inspections in February 2025, the Tree Authority found 15 heritage trees and 21 non-heritage trees at risk.
In a March 2025 meeting, permission was granted to cut 35 of these and transplant one tree, with the strict condition that 1,735 new trees be planted in compensation.
Initially, MSIDC proposed to carry out the plantation at Gorewada. However, the court directed that all trees be planted within city limits. The agency later reported planting 1,861 trees at Vayusena Nagar, Dattawadi, Dabha, Wathoda, and near Futala Lake. Inspections conducted by the Tree Authority on June 21 and 23 revealed that 749 trees had died, over 400 were under six feet in height, and many sites lacked basic care such as water supply and fencing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Petitioners fined Rs50,000 for own encroachment on Ring Road
Nagpur: The Bombay high court's Nagpur bench dismissed a public interest litigation on Wednesday that sought action against encroachments along the city's Ring Road after discovering that the petitioners had illegally constructed commercial buildings on the targeted land. Justices Nitin Sambre and Sachin Deshmukh ruled the PIL 'devoid of bonafides' and motivated by personal gain. The court fined petitioners Mangala Wakode and Rajashri Gajbhiye Rs50,000, directing the amount to be donated to the Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences University (MAFSU) for animal welfare and veterinary services. The petitioners complied with this order. Filed by counsel Tushar Mandlekar, the PIL aimed to remove encroachments on govt land from Omkar Nagar to Shatabdi Chowk in Mouza Babulkheda. However, Sangeeta Jachak, counsel for the Nagpur Improvement Trust (NIT), disclosed that the petitioners had made unauthorized constructions on neighbouring residential plots. "Their shops would directly open onto Ring Road if other structures are removed — this PIL is not public-spirited, but self-serving," Jachak stated. She added that NIT Chairman Sanjay Meena suggested the penalty be utilised effectively, leading to the donation to MAFSU. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like China is wooing Malaysia and Indonesia with mega investments. Is the plan working? CNA Read More Undo The court agreed, stating, "They encroached too — you are no different," and added, "We'll hear you, but the penalty is inevitable." Earlier, the court summoned senior NIT officials due to insufficient responses from the authorities. Their detailed submissions revealed the petitioners' own encroachments, weakening their case. The Nagpur Municipal Corporation was represented by counsel Sudhir Puranik, while additional govt pleader Deepak Thakare appeared for the state.
Time of India
4 days ago
- Time of India
Form Statewide Policy On Compensatory Afforestation: HC to MSIDC
Nagpur: The Nagpur bench of Bombay high court on Monday directed the Maharashtra State Infrastructure Development Corporation (MSIDC) to develop a comprehensive statewide policy for tree cutting and compensatory afforestation. This directive came after reports revealed violations of the Maharashtra Urban Areas Protection and Preservation of Trees Act during infrastructure projects. A division bench comprising justices Nitin Sambre and Sachin Deshmukh granted MSIDC four weeks to submit a detailed affidavit outlining its policy, compliance measures, and monitoring mechanisms. The order emerged from the hearing of a public interest litigation filed by Preeti Patel and three others, who alleged large-scale tree felling in breach of regulations during city development works. The petitioners were represented by advocate Mrinall Chakravarty, while Gemini Kasat appeared for Nagpur Municipal Corporation (NMC). Earlier, the court criticised MSIDC for not fulfilling its responsibilities after a tree audit revealed that 749 of 1,861 trees planted as compensatory afforestation had died. These trees were intended to replace 36 that were cut down to construct new buildings for the district collector and divisional commissioner's offices. In Monday's hearing, MSIDC's general manager Brijesh Dixit appeared in person as previously directed and submitted an affidavit. He stated that a total of 1,779 saplings were planted to replace the felled trees and that watchmen would now be deployed to monitor the plantations at both the original and newly identified sites. However, the court deemed the response unsatisfactory and instructed Dixit to provide a more detailed and clear affidavit within two weeks, explaining all aspects of the plantation, survival rate, and long-term maintenance. The NMC Tree Authority had earlier ordered MSIDC to plant 1,735 trees to compensate for the 36 trees removed. The high number of tree deaths led to strict scrutiny and Dixit being summoned to court. In October 2024, MSIDC sought permission to fell or transplant 40 trees for constructing new buildings for the collectorate and divisional commissioner's offices. After site inspections in February 2025, the Tree Authority found 15 heritage trees and 21 non-heritage trees at risk. In a March 2025 meeting, permission was granted to cut 35 of these and transplant one tree, with the strict condition that 1,735 new trees be planted in compensation. Initially, MSIDC proposed to carry out the plantation at Gorewada. However, the court directed that all trees be planted within city limits. The agency later reported planting 1,861 trees at Vayusena Nagar, Dattawadi, Dabha, Wathoda, and near Futala Lake. Inspections conducted by the Tree Authority on June 21 and 23 revealed that 749 trees had died, over 400 were under six feet in height, and many sites lacked basic care such as water supply and fencing.
The Print
24-06-2025
- The Print
50 years of Emergency: UP leaders recall torture, arrests
But each year on June 25, these leaders, and many others, seem to be on the same page as they all slam the Congress for having imposed the 21-month long Emergency in 1975. While Dixit is a BJP veteran, Pandey is a Samajwadi Party loyalist. Same is true for UP minister Surya Pratap Shahi and SP veteran and former minister Ravi Das Mehrotra. Lucknow, Jun 24 (PTI) Hriday Narain Dixit and Mata Prasad Pandey – both former Uttar Pradesh Assembly speakers – share little in common politically. June 25 marks the 50 years of the imposition of Emergency. 'This is one time when all political parties speak in one voice against the Congress party for the horrifying Emergency. Back then, all the parties and their leaders had a common resolve, to oust the Congress and end the Emergency. So you are right in assuming that on June 25 political ideologies take a back seat as all unite in slamming the Congress,' Dixit told PTI. 'In fact, even many leaders in the SP wonder how could their party now be in an alliance with the Congress that was responsible for the Emergency days,' Dixit said referring to the alliance between the SP and the Congress. Dixit, who was arrested during the Emergency, recalled an interesting anecdote in Unnao jail. 'I had managed to arrange a transistor and was hearing the news about results of the 1977 Lok Sabha elections, in which the Congress suffered a humiliating defeat. 'The jailor saw me playing the transistor in loud voice and used abusive language. He also warned that I would be shifted to another jail. But within two hours, as it became clear that the Congress had lost the polls, the jailor suddenly became polite,' the BJP leader said. Dixit also said that even his father couldn't recognise him when he visited home after a year in jail. 'I don't know how but unlike many others, my health inside jail had improved,' he recalled with a smile. UP's Agriculture Minister Shahi, while recalling the Emergency days, said that the then prime minister Indira Gandhi imposed the Emergency to save her chair. 'My father and uncle were lodged in the jail and MISA was imposed on them. I too was booked and cases under 22 different sections of the IPC were registered against me. In Varanasi, false cases of uprooting the railway tracks, and looting shops in front of the BHU were registered against me. I was rusticated from the university,' he told PTI. 'Emergency was indeed a 'Black Day' in India's history,' he added. Former UP Assembly speaker Pandey, currently the SP MLA from Itwa in Siddharthnagar, said he was also arrested during the Emergency period. 'I was not at home when Emergency was imposed. I came to know about police raid at my house. Later, I was arrested and lodged in Basti district jail. I escaped torture but it is true that many were subjected to cruel treatment both inside and outside the jail. 'People in my village would climb trees and remain hidden there or in dense sugarcane fields to escape themselves from forced sterilisation. It was all quite terrifying,' he recalled. SP MLA from Lucknow Central, Ravidas Mehrotra, said, 'Emergency was virtually akin to murdering democracy. The country was transformed into a prison. I was just 18 years old when I was lodged in Lucknow district jail and then transferred to Bareilly Central Jail.' 'At that time, the 'Sampoorn Kranti' movement had taken place under Loknayak Jai Prakash jee,' the former UP minister said. Some Congress leaders also told PTI that they weren't happy with the imposition of Emergency. Veteran UP Congress leader Amir Haidar said that before joining the Congress, he was with the Communist Party of India. 'I joined the Congress in 1967. I did not like the imposition of Emergency. Since I was in the Congress, I did not react to it publicly. I felt suffocated during the Emergency days,' he told PTI. However, former UP Congress chief Nirmal Khatri tried to justify the imposition of Emergency in the country. 'I was the district president of the Youth Congress in Faizabad during the Emergency period. I thought given the circumstances then, it was an appropriate step. For during the period, trains would reach destinations on time and work efficiency improved. I think the bureaucrats were responsible for the most of the trouble during the period,' he told PTI. 'Our leader had given the slogan of plantation and sterilisation but some bureaucrats, pushed by locally influential leaders, unleashed forced sterilisation, triggering panic and anger which was quite visible in the subsequent elections,' Khatri said. PTI NAV MAN KVK KVK This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
