TUV's Timothy Gaston's questioning of witness ruled not a breach of code
In its report, published on Friday, Stormont's committee for standards and privileges said the commissioner had investigated two alleged breaches of the code of conduct.The complainant had alleged Gaston had improperly interfered with the performance of the assembly by "distracting and diverting the committee away from the matter" that the witnesses had been invited to speak about and therefore interfered with the work of the committee.Gaston had asked whether Age NI would regard it as transphobic if an elderly person in a care home requested to be assisted by someone of the same biological sex, and later made reference to previous comments on Ms Turtle's social media accounts.The commissioner, Melissa McCullough, did not uphold the complaint, explaining that whether the MLA's questions were relevant or not, Gaston's role on the committee was to ask questions of witnesses who appear before it.She also determined that Gaston had not breached another rule, which says MLAs should not subject anyone to "unreasonable and excessive personal attacks".
'Scrutiny is essential'
Ms McCullough's report stated: "It is my view that it was excessive but not unreasonable or an attack on Dr Turtle to have asked the questions."However she did find that he had "failed to observe the Respect Principle" of conduct, which says MLAs should "show respect and consideration for others at all time".Following the publication of the report, Gaston said he welcomed the findings."This ruling is a welcome affirmation of the essential role that MLAs play in scrutinising public policy—particularly on sensitive and contested matters," he said."Scrutiny is not only permitted in the assembly —it is essential. Attempting to silence MLAs for raising legitimate concerns undermines the integrity of our democracy. "All who value freedom of speech and proper scrutiny should welcome this report."The chairwoman of Stormont's standards committee, Cathy Mason, said the committee took any allegation of a breach of the code of conduct "very seriously"."It is important that members should at all times conduct themselves in a manner which will maintain and strengthen the public's trust and confidence in the integrity of the assembly and that members should show respect and consideration for others at all times."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
12 minutes ago
- The Independent
RNLI defends small boat rescues amid anti-immigration protests
The UK's largest lifeboat charity has said it will continue to rescue migrants who get into trouble while trying to cross the Channel in small boats, saying its staff work 'without judgement or preference'. The Royal National Lifeboat Institution (RNLI) has faced criticism over small boat rescues, but has insisted its job is to 'rescue anyone in trouble at sea'. Data released by the charity showed Channel crossing incidents made up just 1.2 per cent of its total launches in 2024. Recent weeks have seen a string of protests across the UK outside hotels believed to be housing asylum seekers amid a rise in tensions over immigration. Police have clashed with demonstrators and counter-protesters outside the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex, after an asylum seeker was charged with alleged sexual assault. Hundreds of protesters have gathered on five occasions across the last three weeks, wearing T-shirts and waving signs with slogans such as 'save our kids'. The protests have sparked fears of widespread unrest, as seen after the Southport stabbings last summer, and demonstrations have also taken place outside hotels in Leeds, Greater Manchester, and London. But volunteers from the charity have urged people to remember migrants who find themselves in dangerous situations at sea 'genuinely need help'. Dan Sinclair, who volunteers with Walmer RNLI, said as a father, scenes he has seen in the Channel go 'straight through my heart'. ''One thing that I would like people to understand and to realise is that when we are tasked to a small boat somewhere in the Channel, these people genuinely need our help,' he said. 'They are in distress. They're in unseaworthy boats offshore, taking on water in all states and conditions. They could be frozen, their legs could be paralysed, they can't talk, they've been in that position for ages, they could be crushed, families separated. We're doing what we can to try and help save every single person, to keep families united and to keep people alive.' He remembered one particular 'horrible, horrible' situation where a family was stuck on a boat sinking in front of their eyes. 'There was a little girl on that boat, she looked at me straight in the eye and said: 'I love you, thank you,'' he said. 'As a father, that was straight through my heart. When I got home, I knew I had to go speak to my daughter and give her a big cuddle and a big kiss. It just put lots of things into perspective that these people need our help.' The RNLI rescued 1,371 people from incidents involving small boats crossing the channel in 2024, the charity said, making up 3.7 per cent of the total number of people recorded to have crossed the Channel in small boats last year. It comes ahead of the return of Saving Lives at Sea on BBC Two this week. RNLI head of lifeboats Simon Ling said: 'Our volunteer lifeboat crews are normal people doing extraordinary things, often in the most challenging circumstances imaginable and we are extremely proud of their continued commitment to saving lives at sea. 'The crew testimony and rescue footage show the reality of what our volunteer lifeboat crews face when they launch to the aid of people crossing the Channel at the request of HM Coastguard. They are often confronted with highly challenging rescue scenarios, involving large numbers of distressed people in the water. 'We are incredibly proud of our crews who continue to respond selflessly to their pagers, day or night, simply to help others. We know that anyone can drown but no one should and each time our crews are requested to launch by HM Coastguard they do so knowing that someone's father, mother, son or daughter need our help. 'We are a voluntary lifesaving rescue service, and will rescue anyone in trouble at sea, as the RNLI has been doing for more than 200 years, without judgement or preference.' Saving Lives at Sea airs on BBC Two at 8pm on Thursday.
The Independent
12 minutes ago
- The Independent
Welfare cuts will still plunge thousands into poverty despite U-turn, MPs warn
Tens of thousands of people are still at risk of being pushed into poverty due to Labour's welfare cuts despite last-minute changes to the plans, a group of MPs has warned. Around 50,000 people who become disabled or ill will face poverty by the end of the decade because of the remaining reforms, the cross-party Work and Pensions Committee has found. A cut to the health-related element of Universal Credit (UC health) which will take effect from April next year and will see monthly payments nearly halved for most new claimants, dropping from £423.27 to £217.26. At the same time, the standard rate of Universal Credit will increase for all claimants by £17.39 a month, from £400.14 to £417.53. This marks the first time the benefit has been uprated above the inflation rate (CPI). These extra-inflationary increases will continue until at least 2029/30, by which point they will amount to an extra £725 in cash terms for a single person aged 25 or over, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) says. The committee welcomed this 'much-needed and long-overdue increase' but added that its MPs remain critical of the 'failure' to assess the impact of UC health cuts on poverty, health and employment. This is now the main measure that the bill will deliver after the government removed changes to the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) following the threat of a major backbench rebellion by over 100 Labour MPs. The health and disability-linked benefit will instead by subject to a fully-consulted review by social security Minister Sir Stephen Timms, due to be completed in autumn 2026. Committee chair Debbie Abrahams said: 'We welcome the concessions that the government made to the UC and PIP Bill (now the UC Bill); but there are still issues with these welfare reforms not least with the cut in financial support that newly sick and disabled people will receive. 'The government's own analysis published in March indicates that from next April approximately 50,000 people who develop a health condition or become disabled – and those who live with them - will enter poverty by 2030 as a result of the reduction in support of the UC health premium. 'We agree in a reformed and sustainable welfare system, but we must ensure that the wellbeing of those who come into contact with it is protected. The lesson learned from last month should be that the impact of policy changes to health-related benefits must be assessed prior to policy changes being implemented to avoid potential risks to claimants.' A government spokesperson said: 'Our welfare reforms will support those who can work into jobs and ensure there is always a safety net for those that need it. The impact assessment shows our reforms will lift 50,000 children out of poverty – and our additional employment support will lift even more families out of poverty. 'The reforms will rebalance Universal Credit rates to reduce the perverse incentives that trap people out of work, alongside genuinely helping disabled people and those with long-term health conditions into good, secure work – backed by £3.8bn in employment support over this parliament. 'We are also tackling poverty by extending free school meals to all households on Universal Credit, helping to address holiday hunger with our Crisis and Resilience Fund, supporting over a million households by introducing a Fair Repayment Rate on Universal Credit deductions, and delivering the biggest increase in social and affordable housebuilding in a generation, as part of our Plan for Change.'
The Independent
12 minutes ago
- The Independent
By likening Nigel Farage to Jimmy Savile, Peter Kyle has handed Reform a free gift
Just when Nigel Farage and his tiny parliamentary party were beginning to be exposed as shrill and clueless, Peter Kyle, one of the most promising cabinet ministers, handed them a free gift. By saying that the Reform leader is on the side of 'people like Jimmy Savile', Kyle destroys his own arguments for the Online Safety Act. The attempt to link Farage with a notorious child sex abuser is gratuitous and offensive. It makes Kyle seem desperate and allows Farage to pose as the wronged party – Farage's criticisms of the Act seem more credible after Kyle's outburst than before. It is surprising that Kyle has chosen to use this slur when Labour people were so indignant – and rightly so – when Boris Johnson used it against Keir Starmer. That was when Johnson was desperate: Sue Gray's report on lockdown parties in Downing Street had just been published and Johnson wanted some way of deflecting attention. His attack on Starmer had nothing to do with Gray's report. It was an aside referring to Starmer's time as director of public prosecutions, during which, Johnson said, 'he spent most of his time prosecuting journalists and failing to prosecute Jimmy Savile, as far as I can make out'. But it was more relevant than Kyle's attack on Farage. It is factually correct that the Crown Prosecution Service failed to prosecute Savile when Starmer was in charge, and it is unclear whether it could have done more to bring Savile to justice at the time. But Farage has nothing to do with Savile – at all. Kyle's attempt to smear the Reform leader was phrased thus on Sky News: 'If people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, he'd be perpetrating his crimes online, and Nigel Farage is saying that he's on their side.' Nothing could be better calculated to distract from the real issue, which is whether Farage's pledge to repeal the Online Safety Act is a sensible one. The Reform rhetoric about 'authoritarian' and 'dystopian' legislation is overdone, and Farage admitted yesterday that he didn't know how he would protect children online instead. But rather of exposing the weakness of Farage's arguments, Kyle allowed his opponent to protest on X that his comment was 'disgusting' and to demand an apology. Kyle responded: 'If you want to overturn the Online Safety Act you are on the side of predators. It is as simple as that.' This is a terrible way to conduct a public debate. There are well-founded concerns about the Online Safety Act, which seems to put unworkable obligations on non-profit-making websites while doing little to ensure that the big tech companies behave more responsibly. A lot of well-informed people said it was badly drafted legislation even before it was passed by the Conservative government two years ago. Kyle is now overseeing the coming into effect of provisions of the Act relating to age-verification, and instead of acting on the concerns that have been expressed, he has ploughed ahead – in effect accusing anyone who has doubts, including for example Ella Dorn of the New Statesman, of being aligned with Savile. When Johnson gratuitously dragged Savile's name into his attempt to save his disintegrating premiership, the disgust at his deliberate attempt to invoke conspiracy theories driven by fears of paedophilia was felt across the political spectrum. Munira Mirza, Johnson's adviser who was consulted in advance, begged him not to do it, and resigned when he did. Kyle should not be using the same disreputable tactic, which not only speaks volumes about this government's self-confidence but also allows Reform off the hook. Only this morning, Sarah Pochin, Reform's newest MP, was struggling to explain what her party's policy on small boats actually is. All she could propose was that Britain should 'do something drastic', by which she seemed to suggest that we should let migrants drown in the Channel. If the next election really is a fight between Labour and Reform, Labour must fight it better than this.
