Tice announces ‘renewables war' with new campaign opposing ‘eyesores'
The pressure group, which will oppose renewable energy projects, will initially launch in Lincolnshire, with the support of Greater Lincolnshire mayor Dame Andrea Jenkyns and Lincolnshire County Council leader Sean Matthews, but Mr Tice said he hopes he can drive the campaign nationwide.
Mr Tice, who is MP for Boston and Skegness, told the press conference: 'We are basically going on a renewables war against Mr Miliband and his merry band of fellows, the eco-zealots.
'Lincolnshire opposes renewable eyesores because it's an absolute outrage, what the madness of net stupid zero is doing to our county, as well as doing to our country.
'We have to stop this madness, and that's what we at Reform are doing.
'We are going to battle it. We are going to fight, we're going to campaign.
'We can win this eyesore war.
'It's also a war against the energy crisis, and it's a war against the blight of our countryside, our beloved countryside, here in Lincolnshire and beyond.
'We know that the reason we have the most expensive electricity in this country, almost in the first world, is because of the cost of renewables, and yet we keep being told by Miliband that the bills are going to come down, and yet he never tells us when.'
The campaign, which is also planned to launch in Suffolk and Norfolk, is a response to the number of proposed pylons, solar farms, and wind farms.
The campaign group's website will map proposals of renewable energy projects.
Mr Tice wrote to energy companies urging them not to invest in the latest round of green energy contracts, known as Allocation Round 7 (AR7), a move which was criticised by energy minister Michael Shanks.
The Reform deputy leader said: 'We plan to win the next general election, and we will do everything within our power to seek to stop AR7 rounds being developed, or if they do develop them, then they should take nothing for granted. We will look at all options to stop this madness.'
He said: 'This is the beginning. We're leading the way here in Lincolnshire. We will help drive it. If you want change, if you want to stop this stuff, then put us in positions of leadership and power.'
The Department for Energy Security & Net Zero (DESNZ) said all projects are subject to rigorous planning processes and the views of the local community must be taken into account.
A DESNZ spokesperson said: 'Families have seen their energy bills go through the roof due to our reliance on volatile gas markets controlled by dictators like Putin.
'Solar and an upgraded grid is central to our mission to become a clean energy superpower, delivering energy security so we can get bills down for good.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Scottish Tories eye Reform electoral pact
Senior Scottish Conservatives have discussed striking an electoral pact with Reform UK for the Holyrood elections next spring. One figure backing a deal told The Telegraph it could help avoid splitting the vote on the Right and kick the SNP out of power in Scotland. The deal, which would not need to be made public, would see the Tories either not stand candidates or go easy in areas where Reform is better placed to win and vice versa. It comes as Nigel Farage 's party sits above the Conservatives in third place in opinion polls for the Scottish Parliament elections next May. A pact does not have the backing of Russell Findlay, the Scottish Tory leader, whose team released a statement ruling out the possibility when approached by The Telegraph. But the fact a deal is being considered at senior levels in the party underscores the scale of Reform's popularity surge north of the border and the concerns it has triggered among Tories. In Scotland, Reform now has 15 councillors, 14 of whom used to be Conservatives. It is in marked contrast to other political parties previously run by Mr Farage, such as the UK Independence Party (Ukip), which struggled to get a foothold north of border. One Tory MSP has privately spoken of a defection 'watch list' in Holyrood of those suspected of switching to Reform. Mr Farage also waved away the idea he would agree to any such pact, telling The Telegraph: 'No chance. The Tories are dying in Scotland and I've got no desire to do a deal with them whatsoever.' The idea of some form of agreement, public or private, between the Conservatives and Reform has become a common discussion point in Westminster. Average UK-wide voting polls have Reform in first place on 30 per cent of the vote, with the Tories in a distant third on 17 per cent. Labour is in second place on 22 per cent. Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, has ruled out a pre-vote deal with Mr Farage, but speculation continues with the next general election not due until 2029. The recent by-election result for the Scottish Parliament seat of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse underscored the challenges of Right-wing parties splitting the vote. Labour won the seat with 32 per cent of the vote, followed by the SNP on 29 per cent. Reform came third on 26 per cent. Had the Tories, who got 6 per cent, not stood a candidate, it is possible Reform would have beaten Labour and taken the seat, though pollsters often caution against hard conclusions when predicting voter behaviour. Mr Farage has agreed to election pacts before. The Brexit Party, the precursor to Reform which Mr Farage led, had criticism of the Tory handling of the issue of Europe as its heart. Yet he still agreed not to stand candidates against sitting Conservatives at the 2019 general election to help Boris Johnson win and get a Brexit deal through the Commons, securing the UK's departure from the European Union. Despite interest in some quarters of the Scottish Conservative Party, other figures strongly played down the possibility of a pact. One Scottish Tory politician who has spent years in influential positions said: 'Churchill's phrase comes to mind, 'You don't negotiate with a tiger when your head's in its mouth'. We're in competition with Reform – we're not in partnership with them.' The source said Scottish Tory supporters had brought up the prospect of a deal with Reform but that there was little chance it would be adopted by the leadership. Another senior Scottish Tory said: 'Why would Reform do a deal? I can see why we might be interested in it, but why would they?' There have long been suspicions on the Right of coordination between Labour and the Liberal Democrats at general elections to maximise the chances of Tory defeats. The Lib Dems surged from winning 11 MPs at the 2019 general election to 72 MPs at the 2024 general election with almost no increase in overall vote share. The party's strategists have talked about how they ruthlessly focused on a small number of winnable seats rather than competing hard everywhere. Labour was likely to have benefited from the decreased campaigning in non-target seats. But there are reasons why striking some form of deal would be less likely in elections for the Scottish Parliament than the UK-wide Parliament in Westminster. The electoral system for the Scottish Parliament has a proportional element, meaning as well as individual constituency races a party wins some MPs for their overall vote totals. Reform, whose strategists hope to get between 10 and 20 MSPs next spring, is expected to get their victories almost entirely via this way, known as 'the list', rather than winning constituencies. That could provide a disincentive to strike a deal with the Tories, given a lower overall vote total would likely mean fewer MSPs thanks to this proportion element of the election. In polling for next spring's Scottish Parliament elections, Reform is on around 17 per cent, above the Tories on around 12 per cent. The SNP is top, followed by Labour. A year ago, it looked likely that Labour could win power in Scotland but a support slump since Sir Keir Starmer took office last summer means the SNP is now well-placed to remain in office. A Scottish Conservative spokesman said: 'Nigel Farage has said he is content with the SNP winning another five years in power and Reform stood multiple pro-independence candidates in the general election, so no, this won't be happening. 'The Scottish Conservatives want to get the SNP out of power, while Reform will gladly help the nationalists.'
Spectator
3 hours ago
- Spectator
Why Trump wins and why Reform can win
Freddy Gray is joined by author Ann Coulter in London, to discuss why she backs the rise of Reform UK, how immigration main issue voters care about this election and why she's supports Trump in his second term. Ann Coulter's Substack can be found at:
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
UK Online Safety Act risks ‘seriously infringing' free speech, says X
Elon Musk's X platform has said the UK's Online Safety Act (OSA) is at risk of 'seriously infringing' free speech as a row deepens over measures for protecting children from harmful content. The social media company said the act's 'laudable' intentions were being overshadowed by its aggressive implementation by the communications watchdog, Ofcom. In a statement posted on the platform, X said: 'Many are now concerned that a plan ostensibly intended to keep children safe is at risk of seriously infringing on the public's right to free expression.' It added that the risk was not a surprise to the UK government because by passing the OSA, lawmakers had made a 'conscientious decision' to increase censorship in the name of 'online safety'. 'It is fair to ask if UK citizens were equally aware of the trade-off being made,' said the statement. The act, a bugbear of the political right on both sides of the Atlantic, has come under renewed scrutiny after new restrictions on under-18s accessing pornography and viewing content harmful to children came into force on 25 July. Musk, X's owner, said days after the rules came into force that the act's purpose was 'suppression of the people'. He also retweeted a petition calling for repeal of the act that has garnered more than 450,000 signatures. X has been forced to age-restrict some content as a consequence, with the Reform UK party adding to the furore by pledging to repeal the act. Reform's commitment prompted the UK technology secretary, Peter Kyle, to accuse Nigel Farage of siding with paedophile Jimmy Savile, a comment Farage described as 'so below the belt' and deserving of an apology. Referring to Ofcom, X said regulators had taken a 'heavy-handed approach' to enforcing the act by 'rapidly increasing enforcement resources' and 'adding layers of bureaucratic oversight'. The statement said: 'The act's laudable intentions are at risk of being overshadowed by the breadth of its regulatory reach. Without a more balanced, collaborative approach, free speech will suffer.' X said it was compliant with the act but the threat of enforcement and fines – which in the case of social media platforms such as X could be as high as 10% of global turnover – could encourage censorship of legitimate content in order to avoid punishment. The statement also mentioned plans to create a national internet intelligence investigations team to monitor social media for signs of anti-migrant disorder. X said the proposal may be positioned as a safety measures but 'it clearly goes far beyond that intent'. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion It said: 'This move has set off alarm bells for free speech advocates who characterise it as excessive and potentially restrictive. A balanced approach is the only way to protect individual liberties, encourage innovation and safeguard children.' A spokesperson for Ofcom said the OSA contained provisions protecting freedom of speech. They said: 'The new rules require tech firms to tackle criminal content and prevent children from seeing defined types of material that's harmful to them. There is no requirement on them to restrict legal content for adult users. In fact, they must carefully consider how they protect users' rights to freedom of expression while keeping their users safe.' The UK's Department for Science, Innovation and Technology has been approached for comment.
